Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf time constraints

Am 15.11.21 um 22:08 schrieb Phil Perry: On 15/11/2021 11:49, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: Am 14.11.21 um 14:59 schrieb Phil Perry: On 14/11/2021 13:08, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: Hey, i wonder if its possible to use dnf and dictate it to not install packages that are younger then

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf time constraints

On 15/11/2021 11:49, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: Am 14.11.21 um 14:59 schrieb Phil Perry: On 14/11/2021 13:08, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: Hey, i wonder if its possible to use dnf and dictate it to not install packages that are younger then $((today - 7 )) for example. If not directly

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf time constraints

Am 14.11.21 um 14:59 schrieb Phil Perry: On 14/11/2021 13:08, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: Hey, i wonder if its possible to use dnf and dictate it to not install packages that are younger then $((today - 7 )) for example. If not directly possible, any other ways to accomplishing it? Sure,

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf time constraints

On 14/11/2021 13:08, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: Hey, i wonder if its possible to use dnf and dictate it to not install packages that are younger then $((today - 7 )) for example. If not directly possible, any other ways to accomplishing it? Sure, building repos with snapshots would work

[CentOS] yum/dnf time constraints

Hey, i wonder if its possible to use dnf and dictate it to not install packages that are younger then $((today - 7 )) for example. If not directly possible, any other ways to accomplishing it? Sure, building repos with snapshots would work here but I am looking for additional ways ... --

Re: [CentOS] yum quiet not really quiet anymore?

Il 2021-07-24 20:12 Simon Matter ha scritto: Maybe redirecting only stderr to /dev/null is enough? No, it really goes to stdout. Anyway, masking all error redirecting them to /dev/null would be too heavy-handed. Regards. -- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it

Re: [CentOS] yum quiet not really quiet anymore?

> Hi all, > I noticed that "yum -q" (or "dnf" -q) on CentOS 8 is not really quiet > anymore. For example (notiche the "upgraded" line): > > [root@localhost cron.d]# yum upgrade -y -q > > Upgraded: >python3-perf-4.18.0-305.10.2.el8_4.x86_64 > > While yum historically had issue with the quiet

[CentOS] yum quiet not really quiet anymore?

Hi all, I noticed that "yum -q" (or "dnf" -q) on CentOS 8 is not really quiet anymore. For example (notiche the "upgraded" line): [root@localhost cron.d]# yum upgrade -y -q Upgraded: python3-perf-4.18.0-305.10.2.el8_4.x86_64 While yum historically had issue with the quiet option [1], this

[CentOS] yum versionlock vs priority

hi all, i could use some guidance in debugging an issue on centos 7.9 where "suddenly" yum refuses to install a package. the package has multiple version in 2 repos: highest version is in a repo with prio=5, the other lower versions are in a repo without any priorities set. we however require a

Re: [CentOS] YUM problem

system-config-lvm appears to be deprecated: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=centos+%22system-config-lvm%22=ffab=web ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] YUM problem

Hi, I'm trying to find a YUM package. My system runs a CentOS-7.2.1511 (yes, it's a old version, but some software is "stable" with this CentOS version). Now, I'm looking for a package with YUM. When a run "yum provides */system-config-lvm", I get this error: [root@mysystem ~]# yum provides

Re: [CentOS] yum update security updates only

We utilize Spacewalk and the errata from https://cefs.steve-meier.de/ to provide this function for CentOS. Andrea -Original Message- From: CentOS On Behalf Of Jon Pruente Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 7:08 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: {EXTERNAL} Re: [CentOS] yum update

Re: [CentOS] yum update security updates only

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 6:02 PM Eric Chennells wrote: > Frank, > > Interesting thank you I didn't realize that. It used to be supported I > believe, and there is a lot of out of date 3rd party documentation floating > around google that suggests it does. > > Well it's just that many enterprises

Re: [CentOS] yum update security updates only

On Nov 13, 2020, at 19:01, Eric Chennells wrote: > > Frank, > > Interesting thank you I didn't realize that. It used to be supported I > believe, and there is a lot of out of date 3rd party documentation floating > around google that suggests it does. > > Well it's just that many enterprises

Re: [CentOS] yum update security updates only

Frank, Interesting thank you I didn't realize that. It used to be supported I believe, and there is a lot of out of date 3rd party documentation floating around google that suggests it does. Well it's just that many enterprises have policies which state that only security updates should be

Re: [CentOS] yum update security updates only

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:52:08 -0800 Eric Chennells wrote: > Does anyone know what's going on here? That is unsupported by Centos. So the short answer is, you can't do that. Any particular reason you can't just update your system fully? -- Can we uninstall 2020 and install it again? This one

[CentOS] yum update security updates only

Hello, I'm trying to do a yum update and only apply the security patches. I'm aware of yum update --security , however when I do that it fails to install any updates. I've tried this on a fresh 7.8.2003 (core) system, as well as the Centos 7 AMI on AWS, specifically ami-04a25c39dc7a8aebb and I

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf diff

On 6/06/20 7:34 am, Kenneth Porter wrote: That's quite handy! But not what I'm looking for. I'm trying to figure out what edits I made to my config files. Just mv those files that you changed (as shown by rpm -V packagename) and yum reinstall the package, then you can diff the original files

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf diff

--On Monday, June 08, 2020 5:00 PM +0100 Paddy Doyle wrote: It won't track /var/named/* though. I love etckeeper enough that I started keeping /var/named under git, as well. I do disable etckeeper's nightly commit as I don't want it combining unrelated changes into a single commit if I

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf diff

On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 04:00:31PM +0100, Paddy Doyle wrote: > Just to mention that 'etckeeper' from EPEL is a great way of tracking Ah, I see you mentioned you were using that already in the original post. Sorry for the noise. Paddy ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf diff

On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 12:34:07PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: > I'm trying to figure out > what edits I made to my config files. > > My most recent case was trying to figure out what I'd done to my BIND files > (/etc/named.*, /etc/logrotate.d/named, /var/named/*). I ended up just > tarring

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf diff

On 6/5/20 4:31 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: > --On Friday, June 05, 2020 1:39 PM -0700 John Pierce > wrote: > >> don't most packages create a .rpmnew file if you've modified the previous >> package file ? > > That file is created AFTER you've made edits, and reflects only the > state of the file

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf diff

> --On Friday, June 05, 2020 1:39 PM -0700 John Pierce > > wrote: > >> don't most packages create a .rpmnew file if you've modified the >> previous >> package file ? > > That file is created AFTER you've made edits, and reflects only the state > of the file in the latest package. So it's not

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf diff

Am 05.06.20 um 23:31 schrieb Kenneth Porter: --On Friday, June 05, 2020 1:39 PM -0700 John Pierce wrote: don't most packages create a .rpmnew file if you've modified the previous package file ? That file is created AFTER you've made edits, and reflects only the state of the file in the

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf diff

--On Friday, June 05, 2020 1:39 PM -0700 John Pierce wrote: don't most packages create a .rpmnew file if you've modified the previous package file ? That file is created AFTER you've made edits, and reflects only the state of the file in the latest package. So it's not clear what changed

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf diff

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 12:35 PM Kenneth Porter wrote: > On 6/5/2020 12:21 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > if you click on the six digit number, for example, e52775 for the > > current latest "import 389-ds-base-1.3.10.1-9.el7_8". The result is > > every diff of every change for the rpm. > > That's

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf diff

On 6/5/2020 12:21 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: if you click on the six digit number, for example, e52775 for the current latest "import 389-ds-base-1.3.10.1-9.el7_8". The result is every diff of every change for the rpm. That's quite handy! But not what I'm looking for. I'm trying to figure out

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf diff

On 6/5/20 2:21 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 6/5/20 11:55 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote: >> --On Friday, June 05, 2020 9:10 AM -0500 Johnny Hughes >> wrote: >> >>> These are two totally separate programs and projects. >> >> I'm not talking about diff'ing the yum and dnf programs. I'm talking >> about

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf diff

On 6/5/20 11:55 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote: > --On Friday, June 05, 2020 9:10 AM -0500 Johnny Hughes > wrote: > >> These are two totally separate programs and projects. > > I'm not talking about diff'ing the yum and dnf programs. I'm talking > about diffing the RPM packages that "rpm -V" reveals

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf diff

--On Friday, June 05, 2020 9:10 AM -0500 Johnny Hughes wrote: These are two totally separate programs and projects. I'm not talking about diff'ing the yum and dnf programs. I'm talking about diffing the RPM packages that "rpm -V" reveals as changed. Such a utility would download the

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf diff

On 6/1/20 7:25 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: > I'm used to using "git diff" and "svn diff" to view changes in my > development system. Is there a similar thing that works with changes > between a repository package and the installed RPM? Ie. something that > shows the changes in /etc hinted at by "rpm

[CentOS] yum/dnf diff

I'm used to using "git diff" and "svn diff" to view changes in my development system. Is there a similar thing that works with changes between a repository package and the installed RPM? Ie. something that shows the changes in /etc hinted at by "rpm -V". I'm already using etckeeper+git but

Re: [CentOS] yum update / kernal update failed - remove or repair

On 25/1/20 11:56 am, Anthony K wrote: [0]: https://anindya.me/2011/09/17/grub-fallback-after-kernel-panic/ I've just discovered that the article I posted is a rather old post so went hunting. If you have a RHEL subscription (I'm using the free developer subscription) you can see the

Re: [CentOS] yum update / kernal update failed - remove or repair

On 23/1/20 12:44 am, Gary Stainburn wrote: ... As I will probably only have one chance to fix this (without having to get the ISP's help again) I was wondering if there are any clear instructions on how to remove a failed kernel RPM update, returning the server to the state it was in prior to

Re: [CentOS] yum update / kernal update failed - remove or repair

On Thursday 23 January 2020 15:22:32 Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: > > > > Before you try the update again, you'll have to fix the reason for the > > failure - add memory, or at least add a swap file. > > > > You could check with > > rpm -qa --last | head -20 > > which the latest packages are

Re: [CentOS] YUM (DNF) Possible Confusion Centos 8

On 1/23/20 2:29 PM, Nataraj wrote: > > I would agree.  I have the same behavior in a Redhat 8 development > system, so it's not a problem with the Centos build.  I have not added > any repositories other then the Redhat > codeready-builder-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms. I original installed 8.0 and >

Re: [CentOS] YUM (DNF) Possible Confusion Centos 8

> > Simon and others > Here's a very simple and hopefully reproducible test-case > > Select as your boot ISO: >  CentOS-8.1.1911-x86_64-dvd1.iso > Choose to reclaim all space on the disk > Choose 'Minimal Install' as the software selection > Connect yourself to the network (I use a wired

Re: [CentOS] yum update / kernal update failed - remove or repair

> On 1/22/20 3:57 PM, Gary Stainburn wrote: >> I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns >> out it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the >> middle and things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover >> from this would be greatly

Re: [CentOS] yum update / kernal update failed - remove or repair

On 1/22/20 3:57 PM, Gary Stainburn wrote: > I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns out > it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the middle and > things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover from this would be > greatly

Re: [CentOS] yum update / kernal update failed - remove or repair

> I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns > out it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the > middle and things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover from > this would be greatly appreciated I may sound old school but my

Re: [CentOS] YUM (DNF) Possible Confusion Centos 8

On 1/22/20 11:04 AM, david wrote: At 08:05 PM 1/21/2020, you wrote: > On 1/21/20 10:10 AM, david wrote: >> At 08:52 AM 1/21/2020, David G. Miller wrote: >> >> >>> On 1/21/20 9:35 AM, david wrote: Folks In a test Centos 8 installation as a guest of VirtualBox on Windows 10, I

Re: [CentOS] YUM (DNF) Possible Confusion Centos 8

On Jan 22, 2020, at 11:04 AM, david wrote: > > After the reboot, issue as root: > yum -y install perl chrony perl-libwww-perl perl-App-cpanminus gcc Thank you for boiling that down. We’ve been seeing the symptom here, too, but the trigger was somewhere inside a thousand-like shell script.

Re: [CentOS] YUM (DNF) Possible Confusion Centos 8

At 08:05 PM 1/21/2020, you wrote: > On 1/21/20 10:10 AM, david wrote: >> At 08:52 AM 1/21/2020, David G. Miller wrote: >> >> >>> On 1/21/20 9:35 AM, david wrote: Folks In a test Centos 8 installation as a guest of VirtualBox on Windows 10, I want to install ffmpeg, and

Re: [CentOS] YUM (DNF) Possible Confusion Centos 8

At 08:10 AM 1/22/2020, you wrote: On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 08:35:14AM -0800, david wrote: > yum list installed > > and the following diagnostics occur: > --- > Modular dependency problems: > > Problem 1: conflicting requests > - nothing provides module(perl:5.26)

Re: [CentOS] YUM (DNF) Possible Confusion Centos 8

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 08:35:14AM -0800, david wrote: > yum list installed > > and the following diagnostics occur: > --- > Modular dependency problems: > > Problem 1: conflicting requests > - nothing provides module(perl:5.26) needed by module >

Re: [CentOS] yum update / kernal update failed - remove or repair

I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns out it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the middle and things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover from this would be greatly appreciated The log below shows: [root@vps2 ~]# yum

[CentOS] yum update / kernal update failed - remove or repair

I have a VPS running C7. I ran a 'yum update' which included a kernel update. The yum update wasn't a total success because mariadb updates failed. However everything else appeared to work. However, when I rebooted the server it did not restart. I have managed to get the ISP's support desk to

Re: [CentOS] YUM (DNF) Possible Confusion Centos 8

> On 1/21/20 10:10 AM, david wrote: >> At 08:52 AM 1/21/2020, David G. Miller wrote: >> >> >>> On 1/21/20 9:35 AM, david wrote: Folks In a test Centos 8 installation as a guest of VirtualBox on Windows 10, I want to install ffmpeg, and support for exfat. They're not in the

Re: [CentOS] YUM (DNF) Possible Confusion Centos 8

On 1/21/20 10:10 AM, david wrote: At 08:52 AM 1/21/2020, David G. Miller wrote: On 1/21/20 9:35 AM, david wrote: Folks In a test Centos 8 installation as a guest of VirtualBox on Windows 10, I want to install ffmpeg, and support for exfat. They're not in the standard distribution (as far

Re: [CentOS] YUM (DNF) Possible Confusion Centos 8

At 08:52 AM 1/21/2020, David G. Miller wrote: On 1/21/20 9:35 AM, david wrote: Folks In a test Centos 8 installation as a guest of VirtualBox on Windows 10, I want to install ffmpeg, and support for exfat. They're not in the standard distribution (as far as I know), so I issue as root:

Re: [CentOS] YUM (DNF) Possible Confusion Centos 8

On 1/21/20 9:35 AM, david wrote: Folks In a test Centos 8 installation as a guest of VirtualBox on Windows 10, I want to install ffmpeg, and support for exfat. They're not in the standard distribution (as far as I know), so I issue as root:   yum -y --enablerepo rpmfusion-free-updates

[CentOS] YUM (DNF) Possible Confusion Centos 8

Folks In a test Centos 8 installation as a guest of VirtualBox on Windows 10, I want to install ffmpeg, and support for exfat. They're not in the standard distribution (as far as I know), so I issue as root: yum -y --enablerepo rpmfusion-free-updates install ffmpeg fuse-exfat exfat-utils

Re: [CentOS] Yum on CentOS 8: Failed to set locale, defaulting to C

Le 16/12/2019 à 14:25, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit : > I logged out and logged back in and tried the 'yum check-update' command, > which > normally doesn't require root privileges. And here's what I get: > > $ yum check-update > Failed to set locale, defaulting to C > Last metadata expiration

[CentOS] Yum on CentOS 8: Failed to set locale, defaulting to C

Hi, I'm currently fiddling with CentOS 8.0 on a sandbox server in order to get acquainted with its various quirks and idiosyncrasies. Here's the first curious detail I noticed. I used the CentOS installer in french (since I live in France), but I like my server systems to default to english.

Re: [CentOS] yum install fails - itertoolsmodule.so

In article <201911071633.27771.gary.stainb...@ringways.co.uk>, Gary Stainburn wrote: > Hi Paddy, > > I was suspecting the same, and from the output below I think you're right. > However, I was hoping I could just repair > this problem for now, and worry about replacing the HDD later. I need to

Re: [CentOS] yum install fails - itertoolsmodule.so

Hi Paddy, I was suspecting the same, and from the output below I think you're right. However, I was hoping I could just repair this problem for now, and worry about replacing the HDD later. I need to resume some services that also seem to generate this same error. Gary [root@zeppo

Re: [CentOS] yum install fails - itertoolsmodule.so

Hi Gary, That "Input/output error" suggests a disk problem to me. Does that file /usr/lib64/python2.7/lib-dynload/itertoolsmodule.so actually exist and is it readable? Also look the the output of 'rpm -V python-libs' to see if rpm considers the installed files to be corrupt. If it's not that,

[CentOS] yum install fails - itertoolsmodule.so

I've just tried a yum update on one of my C7 boxes and got the following output. I'm guessing to fix this I need to re-install the RPM, but I can't remove it because of dependancies, so how can I fix the problem? I've managed to download a later version of the RPM, but haven't managed to find

Re: [CentOS] yum remove iptables problem

On Tue, 2019-05-07 at 12:07 +1000, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: > Hi > > Just got a new server replacing another server. > I had to use iptables to protect it until I could move a hardware > firewall from the old server to the new server. > > Now I am trying to delete iptables but it wants to

Re: [CentOS] yum remove iptables problem

> Hi > > Just got a new server replacing another server. > I had to use iptables to protect it until I could move a hardware firewall > from the old server to the new server. > > Now I am trying to delete iptables but it wants to delete lots of other > dependency packages, e.g. sendmail,

[CentOS] yum remove iptables problem

Hi Just got a new server replacing another server. I had to use iptables to protect it until I could move a hardware firewall from the old server to the new server. Now I am trying to delete iptables but it wants to delete lots of other dependency packages, e.g. sendmail, cyrus-sasl and even

Re: [CentOS] yum groupinstall 'GNOME Desktop' fails

On Apr 17, 2019, at 11:45 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > yum groupinstall "GNOME Desktop" "X Window System" > > That should work I did that plus the other two groups referenced above, each group added separately. I’ve just tried a “groupremove” on everything I added and then added just the

Re: [CentOS] yum groupinstall 'GNOME Desktop' fails

On 4/17/19 12:00 PM, mark wrote: > Warren Young wrote: >> I’ve got a CentOS 7 VM here that was installed with one of the CLI-only >> presets. To answer a question in another thread here, I wanted to >> install a GNOME desktop environment in it, so I went searching and found >> the standard

Re: [CentOS] yum groupinstall 'GNOME Desktop' fails

Warren Young wrote: > I’ve got a CentOS 7 VM here that was installed with one of the CLI-only > presets. To answer a question in another thread here, I wanted to > install a GNOME desktop environment in it, so I went searching and found > the standard instructions for doing that. > > The problem

[CentOS] yum groupinstall "GNOME Desktop" fails

I’ve got a CentOS 7 VM here that was installed with one of the CLI-only presets. To answer a question in another thread here, I wanted to install a GNOME desktop environment in it, so I went searching and found the standard instructions for doing that. The problem is that rebooting the VM

Re: [CentOS] Yum refuses to install kmod-8188eu from elrepo

On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 09:41:09 -0800 Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 8:01 AM Akemi Yagi wrote: > > > > That output indicates that that kmod package is built for the EL 7.5 > > kernel and is not compatible with the current kernel. I suggest you > > file a request to have the kmod-8188eu

Re: [CentOS] Yum refuses to install kmod-8188eu from elrepo

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:49 AM Jonathan Billings wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:03:22PM -0500, Mike Burger wrote: > > Another alternative may be to pull down the SRPM and run it through rpmbuild > > to locally create a binary package compatible with the system as it's > > currently

Re: [CentOS] Yum refuses to install kmod-8188eu from elrepo

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:03:22PM -0500, Mike Burger wrote: > Another alternative may be to pull down the SRPM and run it through rpmbuild > to locally create a binary package compatible with the system as it's > currently installed/running. I encourage this behavior, however, elrepo kmod

Re: [CentOS] Yum refuses to install kmod-8188eu from elrepo

On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:03:22 -0500 Mike Burger wrote: > On 2019-01-22 11:01, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:54 AM Marko Vojinovic > > wrote: > >> I am having trouble using the realtek wifi chip in my new tp-link > >> usb wifi dongle. [snip] > >> However, yum install

Re: [CentOS] Yum refuses to install kmod-8188eu from elrepo

On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 08:01:55 -0800 Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:54 AM Marko Vojinovic > wrote: > > > > I am having trouble using the realtek wifi chip in my new tp-link > > usb wifi dongle. [snip] > > However, yum install kmod-8188eu refuses to install it (full yum > > output is

Re: [CentOS] Yum refuses to install kmod-8188eu from elrepo

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 8:01 AM Akemi Yagi wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:54 AM Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > What is the best way to resolve this? Is there some kernel package > > somewhere that matches these properties, or is there some other package > > that provides these features to an

Re: [CentOS] Yum refuses to install kmod-8188eu from elrepo

On 2019-01-22 11:01, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:54 AM Marko Vojinovic wrote: I am having trouble using the realtek wifi chip in my new tp-link usb wifi dongle. Upon plugging it, the device gets registered by the kernel (in /var/log/messages), but that's about it, no network

Re: [CentOS] Yum refuses to install kmod-8188eu from elrepo

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:54 AM Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > > I am having trouble using the realtek wifi chip in my new tp-link > usb wifi dongle. Upon plugging it, the device gets registered by the > kernel (in /var/log/messages), but that's about it, no network device > is being created

[CentOS] Yum refuses to install kmod-8188eu from elrepo

I am having trouble using the realtek wifi chip in my new tp-link usb wifi dongle. Upon plugging it, the device gets registered by the kernel (in /var/log/messages), but that's about it, no network device is being created (iwconfig does not see it, nothing else works). A few google searches

Re: [CentOS] Yum excluding packages I need

On Jan 11, 2019, at 16:01, mark wrote: > > Ok, final resolution: reinstalled the 390... and there's no driver for the > current kernel. I did an rpm -ql, and it's for an 862 kernel. > > Time to remove, and go to the proprietary (this server has two Tesla > cards, and uses CUDA). You actually

Re: [CentOS] Yum excluding packages I need

On 11/01/2019 19:11, mark wrote: Stephen Berg (Code 7309) wrote: On 1/11/19 10:41 AM, mark wrote: C7, and I did a yum update --disableexcludes=all, and yet it's telling me [nvidia]: excluding kmod-nvidia-410.66-1.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64 [nvidia]: excluding kmod-nvidia-410.73-1.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64

Re: [CentOS] Yum excluding packages I need

Pete Biggs wrote: >> >> Ok, final resolution: reinstalled the 390... and there's no driver for >> the current kernel. I did an rpm -ql, and it's for an 862 kernel. >> >> Time to remove, and go to the proprietary (this server has two Tesla >> cards, and uses CUDA). > > Definitely. If you are using

Re: [CentOS] Yum excluding packages I need

> > Ok, final resolution: reinstalled the 390... and there's no driver for the > current kernel. I did an rpm -ql, and it's for an 862 kernel. > > Time to remove, and go to the proprietary (this server has two Tesla > cards, and uses CUDA). > Definitely. If you are using CUDA with Tesla

Re: [CentOS] Yum excluding packages I need

mark wrote: > Stephen Berg (Code 7309) wrote: > >> On 1/11/19 10:41 AM, mark wrote: >> >> >>> C7, and I did a yum update --disableexcludes=all, and yet it's >>> telling me [nvidia]: excluding >>> kmod-nvidia-410.66-1.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64 [nvidia]: excluding >>>

Re: [CentOS] Yum excluding packages I need

Stephen Berg (Code 7309) wrote: > On 1/11/19 10:41 AM, mark wrote: > >> C7, and I did a yum update --disableexcludes=all, and yet it's telling >> me [nvidia]: excluding kmod-nvidia-410.66-1.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64 >> [nvidia]: excluding kmod-nvidia-410.73-1.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64 >> [nvidia]: excluding

Re: [CentOS] Yum excluding packages I need

On Fri, 2019-01-11 at 11:41 -0500, mark wrote: > C7, and I did a yum update --disableexcludes=all, and yet it's telling me > [nvidia]: excluding kmod-nvidia-410.66-1.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64 > [nvidia]: excluding kmod-nvidia-410.73-1.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64 > [nvidia]: excluding

[CentOS] Yum excluding packages I need

C7, and I did a yum update --disableexcludes=all, and yet it's telling me [nvidia]: excluding kmod-nvidia-410.66-1.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64 [nvidia]: excluding kmod-nvidia-410.73-1.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64 [nvidia]: excluding kmod-nvidia-410.73-2.el7_6.elrepo.x86_64 [nvidia]: excluding

Re: [CentOS] Yum through a proxy

On 09/11/2018 15:10, Vic Chester wrote: Good to know I am not the only one. I imagine since many environments use proxies these days, this is encountered more frequently. Would be great to hear from the devs on this. You should ask upstream,

Re: [CentOS] Yum through a proxy

Good to know I am not the only one. I imagine since many environments use proxies these days, this is encountered more frequently. Would be great to hear from the devs on this. On Fri, Nov 9, 2018, 9:41 AM Simon Matter > I have configured yum to use a proxy via the yum.conf file by adding: > >

Re: [CentOS] Yum through a proxy

> I have configured yum to use a proxy via the yum.conf file by adding: > > proxy=http://myproxy.com:8080/ > > What I noticed when running yum check-up date is that some requests are > going through the proxy while the system seems to be trying to resolve the > domains of other hosts in the repo

[CentOS] Yum through a proxy

I have configured yum to use a proxy via the yum.conf file by adding: proxy=http://myproxy.com:8080/ What I noticed when running yum check-up date is that some requests are going through the proxy while the system seems to be trying to resolve the domains of other hosts in the repo and trying to

[CentOS] Yum and proxy settings

I have configured yum to use a proxy via the yum.conf file by adding: proxy=http://myproxy.com:8080/ What I noticed when running yum check-up date is that some requests are going through the proxy while the system seems to be trying to resolve the domains of other hosts in the repo and trying to

Re: [CentOS] Yum dependency failure installing latest LibreOffice

On Tue, 29 May 2018 07:56:45 -0400 Fred Smith wrote: > Yes, I did do "rpm -ivh *.rpm" and it installed without issue. I suspect that if you installed just the dependency first (from your local directory) and then the rest of the program it would have worked. Again, because yum looks for

Re: [CentOS] Yum dependency failure installing latest LibreOffice

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 08:21:14PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > On Mon, 28 May 2018 21:08:26 -0400 > Fred Smith wrote: > > > Trying to install the latest LibreOffice downloaded from Libreoffice.org. > > I had 6.0.1.1 and downloaded 6.4.0.2, and kept getting dependency errors: > > I expect that yum

Re: [CentOS] yum hangs and results in problems

On Friday 25 May 2018 07:57:16 John Hodrien wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2018, Gary Stainburn wrote: > > Questions > > > > 1) Any ideas why my yum runs keep hanging, and what I can do to fix it? > > It's likely it's hanging in a script, so just trace it all through. yum > will start other processes

Re: [CentOS] Yum dependency failure installing latest LibreOffice

On Mon, 28 May 2018 21:08:26 -0400 Fred Smith wrote: > Trying to install the latest LibreOffice downloaded from Libreoffice.org. > I had 6.0.1.1 and downloaded 6.4.0.2, and kept getting dependency errors: I expect that yum is looking for dependencies online, i.e. from one of your configured

[CentOS] Yum dependency failure installing latest LibreOffice

I've been bashing my head on the wall for 2 or 3 hours for something that should be (and has been, in the past) simple. Trying to install the latest LibreOffice downloaded from Libreoffice.org. I had 6.0.1.1 and downloaded 6.4.0.2, and kept getting dependency errors: --> Running transaction

Re: [CentOS] Yum list installed lies to me

On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 10:44:51AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 05/26/2018 05:32 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > >however if I do: > >yum install wxWidgets wxWidgets-devel > >it says: > >Package wxGTK3-3.0.2-15.el7.x86_64 already installed and latest version > >Package

Re: [CentOS] Yum list installed lies to me

On 05/26/2018 05:32 PM, Fred Smith wrote: however if I do: yum install wxWidgets wxWidgets-devel it says: Package wxGTK3-3.0.2-15.el7.x86_64 already installed and latest version Package wxGTK3-devel-3.0.2-15.el7.x86_64 already installed and latest version wxWidgets and wxGTK3 are the same

Re: [CentOS] Yum list installed lies to me

Review the results from $ sudo yum info wxGTK3 and $ sudo yum info wxGTK3-devel Or were you needing/looking for a newer version? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Yum list installed lies to me

when I do "yum list installed" I get a lot of stuff, including this excerpt: wqy-zenhei-fonts.noarch 0.9.46-11.el7 @anaconda wvdial.x86_64 1.61-9.el7 @anaconda wxBase.x86_64

Re: [CentOS] yum hangs and results in problems

On Thu, 24 May 2018, Gary Stainburn wrote: Questions 1) Any ideas why my yum runs keep hanging, and what I can do to fix it? It's likely it's hanging in a script, so just trace it all through. yum will start other processes up, and one of those will have hung. It'll be called

[CentOS] yum hangs and results in problems

My live mail server was due an update so I ran yum update All seemed file so I told it to proceed. HOwever it then hung for over 30 minutes. I stopped the update and tried again. It complained about problems with the update, so I tried yum --skip-broken -y update which then hung at a

Re: [CentOS] Yum-cron

On 11 May 2018 at 11:36, wrote: > Ok, I've just had issues this morning, and went and *looked*. I can see a > yum-cron running monthly, sure. Running weekly, I guess. Running daily? > Why? > > And there is *NO* reason whatever for a "yum-hourly*. None. This is > CentOS, not

Re: [CentOS] Yum-cron

John Hodrien wrote: > On Fri, 11 May 2018, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> And there is *NO* reason whatever for a "yum-hourly*. None. This is >> CentOS, not ubuntu-snapshot-of-the-moment. > > Did you have a look at what the hourly run does by default? > Ok, I just did, and I see in the configuration

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >