On 12/19/2016 01:09 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 12/19/2016 11:47 AM, lejeczek wrote:
devtoolset-6-runtime is missing from repo(s) ?
Looks like it is being made available, but not all there yet. Wait a
few days and check again, I guess. I just happened to notice that
some devtoolset-6 packages w
On 12/19/2016 11:47 AM, lejeczek wrote:
On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote:
devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS
elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64
isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages?
regards,
devtoolset-6 is avai
On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote:
devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS
elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64
isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more
packages?
regards,
devtoolset-6 is available.
devtoolset-6-runtime is missing
On 19/12/16 16:38, lejeczek wrote:
On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote:
devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS
elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64
isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more
packages?
regards,
devtoolset-6 is avail
On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote:
devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS
elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64
isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more
packages?
regards,
devtoolset-6 is available.
somewhere (semi)officially? wh
On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote:
devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS
elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64
isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages?
regards,
devtoolset-6 is available.
___
CentOS mailing list
Cent
hi everyone
just a quickie to devel maybe. I'm looking at some bits:
devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS
elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64
isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages?
regards,
L.
___
CentOS mailing list
Hello, I just found the discussion on the devtoolset on SO:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15599714/risks-of-different-gcc-versions-at-link-run-time
confirming my guesses.
You can use any new C++11/C++14 feature and your program will link
dynamically to stock libstdc++. Any feature that is no
On May 20, 2016, at 8:17 AM, Jarosław Bober wrote:
>
> ldd gives me:
> ldd a.out
> linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fff6e5ff000)
> libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x0039d840)
In that case, I don’t see how you can be making use of any C++11/14 features
that aren’t implemented by
Are you asking if the new libstdc++ is statically linked into your app only
for the new functions but your app remains dynamically linked to the old
one for the parts of C++ that have remained unchanged, the answer is “no”.
Your app is linked to the new library, period. You can use ldd(1) to prove
On May 19, 2016, at 3:30 AM, Jarosław Bober wrote:
>
> Do I have to install devtoolset on all my machines that I want to run this
> app?
Probably, yes. That, or redistribute parts of it with your app, either by
cherrypicking files from the devtoolset RPM or statically linking to it.
> Or wou
Hello,
my name is Jarek I am new here. I need some clarifications on how to
distribute an app developed with devtoolset-4 enabled.
I am developing a distributed app in c++ I wanted to upgrade toolchain to
use new standard.
Is it true that when I compile on centos 6.x with devtoolset enabled then
Hello,
my name is Jarek I am new here. I need some clarifications on how to
distribute an app developed with devtoolset-4 enabled.
I am developing a distributed app in c++ I wanted to upgrade toolchain to
use new standard.
Is it true that when I compile on centos 6.x with devtoolset enabled then
On 28/01/16 10:54, Kay Diederichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there any way to get access to devtoolset-4 ?
>
> I see alot of stuff at
> http://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2076 . Is this not yet
> released?
>
not as yet, the SCL Sig guys are working through the initial bootstrap,
and shou
Hi,
is there any way to get access to devtoolset-4 ?
I see alot of stuff at
http://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2076 . Is this not yet
released?
thanks,
Kay
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listi
15 matches
Mail list logo