Re: [CentOS] dumpe2fs and repquota not agreeing on block size

2008-10-27 Thread MHR
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Neil Aggarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello: > > Also, if I do: > df /var > > I get this > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > /dev/md2 39674140 20401792 17224468 55% /var > > Which tells me the blocks are 1K in

RE: [CentOS] dumpe2fs and repquota not agreeing on block size

2008-10-27 Thread Neil Aggarwal
Tru: > no, the quota are expressed in kB units, not > filesystem block unit. Thanks for the information. I assumed that because the quota reports in blocks, that meant file system blocks. I read the man pages to try to find some documentation of the block size for quota but did not see anyth

Re: [CentOS] dumpe2fs and repquota not agreeing on block size

2008-10-27 Thread Tru Huynh
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 08:37:26PM -0500, Neil Aggarwal wrote: > Hello: > > I am trying to set up user quotas on my /var > partition to enforce limits on user's mailbox > sizes. The machine is running CentOS 5. > > When I do this: > /sbin/dumpe2fs /dev/md2 | grep 'Block size' > Block size:

[CentOS] dumpe2fs and repquota not agreeing on block size

2008-10-26 Thread Neil Aggarwal
Hello: I am trying to set up user quotas on my /var partition to enforce limits on user's mailbox sizes. The machine is running CentOS 5. When I do this: /sbin/dumpe2fs /dev/md2 | grep 'Block size' Block size: 4096 That tells me the block size is 4k. But, if I do: repquota /var