m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> b.j. mcclure wrote:
>>
Right, I just looked it up, and I see it's an ADSL modem. Look at your
IP address, and I'll bet you're 192.168.0.x, or 192.168.1.x. Whatever it
is, try pinging 192.168.[0 or 1].1. Whichever it is, pull up your
On 6/7/2011 1:04 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> No. I was rung one day by a lady at my ISP (Eircom), who told me I
> had been chosen as a recipient of their new "Ultimate" system, which
> would increase my speed from 5Mb/s to 14Mb/s, at no extra cost!
Could be newer DSL technology, or could simply
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> b.j. mcclure wrote:
>
>>> Right, I just looked it up, and I see it's an ADSL modem. Look at your
>>> IP address, and I'll bet you're 192.168.0.x, or 192.168.1.x. Whatever it
>>> is, try pinging 192.168.[0 or 1].1. Whichever it is, pull up your
>>> browser, and point it to th
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 01:04:11 PM Timothy Murphy wrote:
> who told me I had been chosen as a recipient of their new "Ultimate" system,
> which would increase my speed from 5Mb/s to 14Mb/s,
> at no extra cost!
The speed increase is possible, for sure, as long as you're close enough to the
DSLA
David Bunt wrote:
> Try a minimal install. That won't hit the 2nd dvd.
Actually no installation I have done
(including one with practically everything chosen)
has ever required the 2nd DVD.
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School
b.j. mcclure wrote:
>> Right, I just looked it up, and I see it's an ADSL modem. Look at your IP
>> address, and I'll bet you're 192.168.0.x, or 192.168.1.x. Whatever it is,
>> try pinging 192.168.[0 or 1].1. Whichever it is, pull up your browser,
>> and point it to that IP, and you should be at t
Les Mikesell wrote:
>> The machine is running CentOS-5.6 .
>> The modem is running fine, but my speed has not been improved threefold,
>> as promised.
>> In fact the speed is identical to the previous modem, as far as I can
>> tell.
>
> Do you know what kind of change this was supposed to be?
No
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:59:52 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 6/7/2011 10:18 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> > The modem is running fine, but my speed has not been improved threefold,
> > as promised.
> > In fact the speed is identical to the previous modem, as far as I can tell.
>
> Do you know what
On 6/7/2011 11:22 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> Right, I just looked it up, and I see it's an ADSL modem. Look at your IP
> address, and I'll bet you're 192.168.0.x, or 192.168.1.x. Whatever it is,
> try pinging 192.168.[0 or 1].1. Whichever it is, pull up your browser, an
On 6/7/2011 10:18 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> The machine is running CentOS-5.6 .
> The modem is running fine, but my speed has not been improved threefold,
> as promised.
> In fact the speed is identical to the previous modem, as far as I can tell.
Do you know what kind of change this was suppo
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 11:22 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Timothy Murphy wrote:
> > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> >>> Now I have to work out how to install Windows on the machine,
> >>> but I daren't ask about that here ...
> >>> I need it because my ISP claims to have tripled the speed
> >>> of
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Now I have to work out how to install Windows on the machine,
>>> but I daren't ask about that here ...
>>> I need it because my ISP claims to have tripled the speed
>>> of my supply, but says I have to run a Windows CD
>>> to setup the modem he
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Reading this, I'm thinking still more about the bigger picture, there. I
> didn't see the start of this thread - is this a home system? If so, using
> WinDo$e is pointless, if you're running Linux, unless you're running Linux
> in a VM under WinDoze.
The machine is runni
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> You could ask someone to bring their Windowz laptop, set it up and you
> are done.
Actually I always leave or install a small Windows partition
on my Linux machines.
I find that I occasionally need them, eg when updating firmware.
I don't have the religious objection
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I suppose there could be something relevant on the 2nd DVD,
>> although the first has been sufficient to install in 3 other ways:
>> 1) via HTTP from another machine on my home LAN;
>> 2) after copying the DVD-1of2 to a USB stick; and
>> 3) it was also sufficient on a ma
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> On 7.6.2011 1.19, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> But I'm not sure what "image #2" is? Or where it should be put?
>>
> images/stage2.img ??
I assumed that was what was meant,
and put copies of this file everywhere I could think of:
in the same place as the DVD, in an images director
> I guess that, as pointed out, this could be something on the 2nd DVD.
>
Try a minimal install. That won't hit the 2nd dvd.
--
Head Grunt
ChickenWare.com
>From concept to the internet..
866-588-7806
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lis
Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
>>> Did you check the debug consoles (alt-Fx)?
>>
>> I'm not sure what this is.
>
> There are several consoles available during install and boot.
> If you hit Alt+F1, you'll see the "regular" install/boot text.
> If you hit Alt+F2, you'll see debug outputs of portions of
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Now I have to work out how to install Windows on the machine,
>>> but I daren't ask about that here ...
>>> I need it because my ISP claims to have tripled the speed
>>> of my supply, but says I have to run a Windows CD
>>> to setup the modem
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Now I have to work out how to install Windows on the machine,
>> but I daren't ask about that here ...
>> I need it because my ISP claims to have tripled the speed
>> of my supply, but says I have to run a Windows CD
>> to setup the modem he has given me.
>
> ?? What kin
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> John Doe wrote:
>
>> From: Timothy Murphy
>>
> I tried (several times) installing CentOS-5.6 from a hard disk,
> and each time it failed after installing all the rpms,
> with the warning "The installation has tried to mount image #2,
> but cannot find it
On 7.6.2011 1.19, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> But I'm not sure what "image #2" is? Or where it should be put?
>
images/stage2.img ??
-Jussi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>> Did you check the debug consoles (alt-Fx)?
>
> I'm not sure what this is.
There are several consoles available during install and boot.
If you hit Alt+F1, you'll see the "regular" install/boot text.
If you hit Alt+F2, you'll see debug outputs of portions of the
install/boot process.
Alt+F3
John Doe wrote:
> From: Timothy Murphy
>
I tried (several times) installing CentOS-5.6 from a hard disk,
and each time it failed after installing all the rpms,
with the warning "The installation has tried to mount image #2,
but cannot find it on the hard drive."
>> md5sum
From: Timothy Murphy
>>> I tried (several times) installing CentOS-5.6 from a hard disk,
>>> and each time it failed after installing all the rpms,
>>> with the warning "The installation has tried to mount image #2,
>>> but cannot find it on the hard drive."
> md5sum -c md5sum.txt.asc
Don Krause wrote:
>> I tried (several times) installing CentOS-5.6 from a hard disk,
>> and each time it failed after installing all the rpms,
>> with the warning "The installation has tried to mount image #2,
>> but cannot find it on the hard drive."
> Strange, I install it from the DVD.iso to V
On Jun 6, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Has anybody successfully installed CentOS-
>
> I tried (several times) installing CentOS-5.6 from a hard disk,
> and each time it failed after installing all the rpms,
> with the warning "The installation has tried to mount image #2,
> but cann
Has anybody successfully installed CentOS-
I tried (several times) installing CentOS-5.6 from a hard disk,
and each time it failed after installing all the rpms,
with the warning "The installation has tried to mount image #2,
but cannot find it on the hard drive."
When I pressed the Debug button
28 matches
Mail list logo
