On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 08:52 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Saturday, April 09, 2011 05:32:34 AM Karanbir Singh wrote:
> > I just wanted to make sure that people realise that while the process on
> > that page will get you to where one needs to be, the scripts etc are not
> > what we use in the cen
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 05:32:34 AM Karanbir Singh wrote:
> I just wanted to make sure that people realise that while the process on
> that page will get you to where one needs to be, the scripts etc are not
> what we use in the centos buildsystem.
And that's a more useful statement than the
Hi
On 04/08/2011 07:47 PM, Brian Mathis wrote:
> Yes, and not to mention the giant warning on the top of that page:
> Comment from Karanbir Singh:
> "Just want to point out that CentOS does not use anything from that page
> - and details / scripts on that page have nothing to do wit
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 14:47 -0400, Brian Mathis wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Dvorkin, Asya wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks Keith, good question, that should have been on my list of
> >>> "Questions to ask about CentOS building process", and thanks to Akemi
> >>> for a quick answer :)
> >>
>
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Dvorkin, Asya wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks Keith, good question, that should have been on my list of
>>> "Questions to ask about CentOS building process", and thanks to Akemi
>>> for a quick answer :)
>>
>> Given that its answered in a FAQ one could argue that it was not
>>
>>
>> Thanks Keith, good question, that should have been on my list of
>> "Questions to ask about CentOS building process", and thanks to Akemi
>> for a quick answer :)
>
> Given that its answered in a FAQ one could argue that it was not a good
> question.
You know, there is a famous saying.
On 8.4.2011 18:03, Mister IT Guru wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 08:58 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Keith Keller
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all!
>>>
>>> We've seen quite a few references on the list to "100% binary
>>> compatibility with upstream". What I am curious about is,
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 08:58 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Keith Keller
> wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > We've seen quite a few references on the list to "100% binary
> > compatibility with upstream". What I am curious about is, how precisely
> > is this determined? All t
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Keith Keller
wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> We've seen quite a few references on the list to "100% binary
> compatibility with upstream". What I am curious about is, how precisely
> is this determined? All the ways I can think of for comparing how two
> systems might work s
Hi all!
We've seen quite a few references on the list to "100% binary
compatibility with upstream". What I am curious about is, how precisely
is this determined? All the ways I can think of for comparing how two
systems might work seem flawed in some way (e.g., using some sort of
checksum; unit
10 matches
Mail list logo
