On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 02:59:48PM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
There are any number of 3rd party repos that maintain many newer
packages, so
On 02/10/2011 12:37 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 10/02/11 02:05, Larry Vaden wrote:
In order to avoid a cross post, the following background quote is from
scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov:
quote
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Ewan Mac Mahone...@macmahon.me.uk wrote:
I'm a little bit hazy on
Larry, could you please stop spamming this list with problems you see on
the SL list? Thanks. This package isn't even part of CentOS.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:42:48PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Larry, could you please stop spamming this list with problems you see on
the SL list? Thanks. This package isn't even part of CentOS.
Personally, I have no problem with it. Cross-community communication
over potentially shared
On Thursday, February 10, 2011 06:42:48 am Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Larry, could you please stop spamming this list with problems you see on
the SL list? Thanks. This package isn't even part of CentOS.
While google perftools is not a part of either SL or CentOS, it *is* in EPEL,
and CentOS users
While google perftools is not a part of either SL or CentOS, it *is*
in EPEL, and CentOS users can be users of EPEL
Then it's on-topic on the EPEL list, not here. e.g. ask there for an
updated version of the package.
This wasn't the first instance. This guy has recently started a habit of
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote:
While google perftools is not a part of either SL or CentOS, it *is*
in EPEL, and CentOS users can be users of EPEL
Then it's on-topic on the EPEL list, not here. e.g. ask there for an
updated version of the
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:53:52AM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com
wrote:
While google perftools is not a part of either SL or CentOS, it *is*
in EPEL, and CentOS users can be users of EPEL
Then it's on-topic on the EPEL
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:53:09AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
This is correct, CentOS would add an updated package somewhere (our
people.centos.org site or the centos-testing repository would be the
likely places).
We want our release to be the same source code where ever possible ...
On 02/10/2011 01:33 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:53:09AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
This is correct, CentOS would add an updated package somewhere (our
people.centos.org site or the centos-testing repository would be the
likely places).
We want our release to be the
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
There are any number of 3rd party repos that maintain many newer
packages, so getting things into CentOSPlus is not the only option.
I would very much appreciate your referral to a repo that has a current BIND.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 02:59:48PM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
There are any number of 3rd party repos that maintain many newer
packages, so getting things into CentOSPlus is not the only option.
I would very much
In order to avoid a cross post, the following background quote is from
scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov:
quote
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Ewan Mac Mahon e...@macmahon.me.uk wrote:
I'm a little bit hazy on the details, but there are some slides from the
meeting here[1]:
On 10/02/11 02:05, Larry Vaden wrote:
In order to avoid a cross post, the following background quote is from
scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov:
quote
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Ewan Mac Mahone...@macmahon.me.uk wrote:
I'm a little bit hazy on the details, but there are some slides from
14 matches
Mail list logo
