Re: [CentOS] mock, extras vs epel

2009-11-03 Thread David Hrbáč
Todd Denniston napsal(a): > I am looking to be a bit more standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and > so I was about to > install mock but noticed that there is one provided in the centos/5/extras > and another in epel. > > epel is obviously newer, but are there reasons/experiences in this

Re: [CentOS] mock, extras vs epel

2009-11-03 Thread Todd Denniston
Karanbir Singh wrote, On 11/03/2009 04:57 AM: > The mock in extras is what we use to build the distro against and is the > only version we work with on the buildsystems. depending on what you are > doing, that issue might or might not be relevant. > Thanks for yours and Mr. X's feedback. Off to

Re: [CentOS] mock, extras vs epel

2009-11-03 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 11/03/2009 12:09 AM, Todd Denniston wrote: > Is the extras version the version used by the upstream provider and thus the > CentOS team keeps it > around to do the matching builds? The mock in extras is what we use to build the distro against and is the only version we work with on the builds

Re: [CentOS] mock, extras vs epel

2009-11-02 Thread Mr. X
--- On Mon, 11/2/09, Todd Denniston wrote: > From: Todd Denniston > Subject: [CentOS] mock, extras vs epel > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Date: Monday, November 2, 2009, 4:09 PM > I am looking to be a bit more > standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and so

[CentOS] mock, extras vs epel

2009-11-02 Thread Todd Denniston
I am looking to be a bit more standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and so I was about to install mock but noticed that there is one provided in the centos/5/extras and another in epel. epel is obviously newer, but are there reasons/experiences in this group that would suggest sticking wi