Re: [CentOS] new list proposal - meaningless

2008-10-16 Thread Spike Turner
Karanbir Singh wrote: Over a period of time, we would like to see the CentOS list become a more user help and distro specific list, with generic conversations moving to the centos-tech list. perhaps that is why core issues in CentOS like the kernel and samba are ignored by the

Re: [CentOS] new list proposal - meaningless

2008-10-16 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Spike Turner wrote: perhaps that is why core issues in CentOS like the kernel and samba are ignored by the developers? Examples :- http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/066143.html We are not going to rebase except if upstream does. And maybe nobody answered that because

Re: [CentOS] new list proposal - meaningless

2008-10-16 Thread Karanbir Singh
Spike Turner wrote: perhaps that is why core issues in CentOS like the kernel and samba are ignored by the developers? Examples :- http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/066143.html Thats a bit of a dribveby waste of space post that does not really merit a reply from anyone.

Re: [CentOS] new list proposal - meaningless

2008-10-16 Thread Spike Turner
Karanbir Singh wrote: Thats a bit of a dribveby waste of space post that does not really merit a reply from anyone. Also if that was something that concerns you so much, what have you done about it ? http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/066154.html Johnny has been

Re: [CentOS] new list proposal - meaningless

2008-10-16 Thread Karanbir Singh
Spike Turner wrote: A driveby waste of space post was one by a certain Karanbir telling someone to recklessly upgrade Gnome when this is supposed to be an enterprise distro. Last time I checked, it was still a free world ? unless you live in the US, in which case, all bets are off. And yes, I

Re: [CentOS] new list proposal - meaningless

2008-10-16 Thread Spiro Harvey
A driveby waste of space post was one by a certain Karanbir telling someone to recklessly upgrade Gnome when this is supposed to be an enterprise distro. well, if they're running Gnome, then they're probably not using the machine in an enterprise capacity. nobody in their right mind would

Re: [CentOS] new list proposal - meaningless

2008-10-16 Thread Frank Cox
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:48:31 +1300 Spiro Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well, if they're running Gnome, then they're probably not using the machine in an enterprise capacity. nobody in their right mind would install X on a server. *blink* I run a couple of Centos 5 application servers with

Re: [CentOS] new list proposal - meaningless

2008-10-16 Thread Spike Turner
Spiro Harvey wrote: well, if they're running Gnome, then they're probably not using the machine in an enterprise capacity. nobody in their right mind would install X on a server. Really? What about SLED (Suse Linux Enterprise Desktop) or Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop? Read something

Re: [CentOS] new list proposal - meaningless

2008-10-16 Thread Spiro Harvey
Really? What about SLED (Suse Linux Enterprise Desktop) or Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop? Marketing terms for IT managers and non-technical decision makers. -- Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd 021-295-1923www.knossos.net.nz signature.asc