On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 05:22:53 AM Lars Hecking wrote:
But making it the default on an *Enterprise* distribution makes little
sense.
*Enterprise* != *server*
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
wireless sure needs it to work decently, without it, its a kludge of a
kludge.
Sure, it's an excellent choice for mobile devices.
But making it the default on an *Enterprise* distribution makes little
sense.
(Just checking, this is still the CentOS mailing list, not Ubuntu? Yes.)
On 03/27/2012 04:22 AM, Lars Hecking wrote:
wireless sure needs it to work decently, without it, its a kludge of a
kludge.
Sure, it's an excellent choice for mobile devices.
But making it the default on an *Enterprise* distribution makes little
sense.
(Just checking, this is still
On 03/27/12 2:33 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I don't think that Network Manager should be used outside of gnome (or
KDE) personally, but upstream makes those kind of decisions ... we just
clone the experience as closely as possible.
I think it just needs a little more refinement and better
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu writes:
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 13:08 -0700, Nataraj wrote:
Furthermore RedHat has decided that they don't like
Upstart and they are going to yet another replacement for upstart in
future releases (sorry, I don't remember the name of it).
They should also realise that
On 03/26/12 9:01 AM, Lars Hecking wrote:
They should also realise that they don't like NetworkManager and get rid
of it.
and replace it with what?
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
John R Pierce writes:
On 03/26/12 9:01 AM, Lars Hecking wrote:
They should also realise that they don't like NetworkManager and get rid
of it.
and replace it with what?
No replacement needed. Or at least go back to the pre-6 situation and not
stuff it down our throats as a
On 03/26/12 10:00 AM, Lars Hecking wrote:
No replacement needed. Or at least go back to the pre-6 situation and not
stuff it down our throats as a mandatory requirement.
wireless sure needs it to work decently, without it, its a kludge of a
kludge.
--
john r pierce
John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/26/12 10:00 AM, Lars Hecking wrote:
No replacement needed. Or at least go back to the pre-6 situation and
not stuff it down our throats as a mandatory requirement.
wireless sure needs it to work decently, without it, its a kludge of a
kludge.
That's fine... but
Lars Hecking wrote on 03/26/2012 01:00 PM:
No replacement needed. Or at least go back to the pre-6 situation and not
stuff it down our throats as a mandatory requirement.
Just because NetworkManager is the default does not mean it is
mandatory. You are free to yum remove NetworkManager
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 13:08 -0700, Nataraj wrote:
Furthermore RedHat has decided that they don't like
Upstart and they are going to yet another replacement for upstart in
future releases (sorry, I don't remember the name of it).
You're thinking about systemd.
I believe Fedora 15 was the first
Adam,
Please don't top post. Reformatted
On 03/21/12 19:50, Adam Wead wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:40 PM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I just updated one of our servers to 5.8, and rebooted. In the logs, I saw
a bunch of
Mar 21 16:29:02server rpc.statd[9783]: recv_rply: can't decode
mark wrote:
On 03/21/12 19:50, Adam Wead wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:40 PM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I just updated one of our servers to 5.8, and rebooted. In the logs, I
saw
a bunch of
Mar 21 16:29:02server rpc.statd[9783]: recv_rply: can't decode RPC
message!
Mar 21 16:29:33server
On 03/22/2012 08:24 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
mark wrote:
On 03/21/12 19:50, Adam Wead wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:40 PM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I just updated one of our servers to 5.8, and rebooted. In the logs, I
saw
a bunch of
Mar 21 16:29:02server rpc.statd[9783]: recv_rply:
Nataraj wrote:
On 03/22/2012 08:24 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
mark wrote:
On 03/21/12 19:50, Adam Wead wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:40 PM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I just updated one of our servers to 5.8, and rebooted. In the logs,
I saw a bunch of
Mar 21 16:29:02server
On 03/22/12 11:50 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
In this case, a more elegant solution would be one that the authors of the
initscript should have thought of: they're already checking to see if
something's running, why not loop with a sleep until portmap's running?
they'd have to spawn a detached
On 03/22/2012 11:54 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/22/12 11:50 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
In this case, a more elegant solution would be one that the authors of the
initscript should have thought of: they're already checking to see if
something's running, why not loop with a sleep until
I just updated one of our servers to 5.8, and rebooted. In the logs, I saw
a bunch of
Mar 21 16:29:02 server rpc.statd[9783]: recv_rply: can't decode RPC
message!
Mar 21 16:29:33 server last message repeated 442 times
Mar 21 16:30:34 server last message repeated 835 times
Mar 21 16:31:36 server
Mark,
There's a NFS bug with the latest kernel:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798809
Reboot into your previous kernel and that should fix it.
...adam
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:40 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I just updated one of our servers to 5.8, and rebooted. In the logs,
19 matches
Mail list logo
