On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Gary Greene
wrote:
> On Tuesday, Cliff Pratt wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:26 AM, wrote:
>>> Has anyone had problems accessing random websites since going up to 6.4?
>>>
>>> Since about the day after I got partly upgraded, if I try to access
>>> nytimes.co
On 03/25/2013 04:06 PM, Gary Greene wrote:
> NSCD is also necessary if you're running an LDAP or NIS environment,
> so don't just turn it off if you're using external authentication
> services. In a Winbind environment, NSCD is unnecessary however.
I would advise all users to migrate to sssd from
On 03/25/2013 10:26 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Just now, over lunch, it failed... until I restarted nscd. My manager
> tells me it's caching... but it seems to be caching momentary failures.
That could be coincidence. As far as I know, Firefox will not use nscd
for hostname lookups. I confir
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:06:31PM +, Gary Greene wrote:
> NSCD is also necessary if you're running an LDAP or NIS environment,
Not necessary in a NIS environment on a LAN 'cos NIS is UDP based and
very very fast to respond. LDAP, however, pretty much needs nscd (or
sssd) in order to be halfw
On Tuesday, Cliff Pratt wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:26 AM, wrote:
>> Has anyone had problems accessing random websites since going up to 6.4?
>>
>> Since about the day after I got partly upgraded, if I try to access
>> nytimes.com, or orbitz.com, I get server not found.
>>
>> With a lot of
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:26 AM, wrote:
> Has anyone had problems accessing random websites since going up to 6.4?
>
> Since about the day after I got partly upgraded, if I try to access
> nytimes.com, or orbitz.com, I get server not found.
>
> With a lot of work, I, my manager, and the other adm
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Has anyone had problems accessing random websites since going up to 6.4?
>
> Since about the day after I got partly upgraded, if I try to access
> nytimes.com, or orbitz.com, I get server not found.
>
> With a lot of work, I, my manager, and the other admin, found that set
Has anyone had problems accessing random websites since going up to 6.4?
Since about the day after I got partly upgraded, if I try to access
nytimes.com, or orbitz.com, I get server not found.
With a lot of work, I, my manager, and the other admin, found that setting
options edns0 in /etc/resolv.
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 09:49 +0200, Marcus Moeller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have set up nscd on my CentOS 5 box with nss_ldap. getent shows all
> LDAP groups correctly but 'id' only shows the users primary group.
>
---
"id -G" ?? Show All?
John
___
Ce
Hi all,
I have set up nscd on my CentOS 5 box with nss_ldap. getent shows all
LDAP groups correctly but 'id' only shows the users primary group.
Best Regards
Marcus
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cento
Steve Rigler wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 16:40 -0700, James A. Peltier wrote:
James A. Peltier wrote:
Hi All,
I just enabled nscd to see if I can speed up some operations on our
large NFS/NIS environment, however, now that I've enabled nscd I am no
longer able to sudo. Can someone please p
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 16:40 -0700, James A. Peltier wrote:
> James A. Peltier wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I just enabled nscd to see if I can speed up some operations on our
> > large NFS/NIS environment, however, now that I've enabled nscd I am no
> > longer able to sudo. Can someone please poi
James A. Peltier wrote:
Hi All,
I just enabled nscd to see if I can speed up some operations on our
large NFS/NIS environment, however, now that I've enabled nscd I am no
longer able to sudo. Can someone please point me in the right
direction? Everything was working fine prior to enabling i
Hi All,
I just enabled nscd to see if I can speed up some operations on our
large NFS/NIS environment, however, now that I've enabled nscd I am no
longer able to sudo. Can someone please point me in the right
direction? Everything was working fine prior to enabling it.
--
James A. Peltier
Andy Harrison wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/10/07, Craig White wrote:
As for 'critical apps that require' nscd...I don't personally know of
any and if we are talking about CentOS-5 which has 2.3.27 version of
openldap...the 2.3.x versions are very fast and I'm n
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 14:54 -0400, Andy Harrison wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On 10/10/07, Craig White wrote:
> >
> > user accounts in ldap
> >
> > accounts < 500 in /etc/passwd
>
> Could you provide some more detail? Until I rig up nscd, when I look
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/10/07, Craig White wrote:
>
> user accounts in ldap
>
> accounts < 500 in /etc/passwd
Could you provide some more detail? Until I rig up nscd, when I look
at an nfs volume, I see nothing but uid's and gid's for the file
ownership. Asid
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 14:28 -0400, Andy Harrison wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On 10/10/07, Craig White wrote:
> > obviously, I don't understand the question because I have users mounting
> > both their home directories and the common files via NFS and I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/10/07, Craig White wrote:
> obviously, I don't understand the question because I have users mounting
> both their home directories and the common files via NFS and I don't use
> nscd...
>
But do the user accounts exist in the local passwd fi
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 14:20 -0400, Andy Harrison wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 10/10/07, Craig White wrote:
> > As for 'critical apps that require' nscd...I don't personally know of
> > any and if we are talking about CentOS-5 which has 2.3.27 version of
> > o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/10/07, Craig White wrote:
> As for 'critical apps that require' nscd...I don't personally know of
> any and if we are talking about CentOS-5 which has 2.3.27 version of
> openldap...the 2.3.x versions are very fast and I'm not certain that
> ns
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 10:19 -0500, jlee wrote:
>
> Craig White wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 08:16 -0400, Andy Harrison wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10/9/07, jlee wrote:
> >>> output from /var/log/messages
> >>> Oct 9 12:56:38 lyra kern
Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 08:16 -0400, Andy Harrison wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/9/07, jlee wrote:
output from /var/log/messages
Oct 9 12:56:38 lyra kernel: nscd[11660]: segfault at 002b401fee8b rip
00552aab7966 rsp 408029e0
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 08:16 -0400, Andy Harrison wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On 10/9/07, jlee wrote:
> > output from /var/log/messages
> > Oct 9 12:56:38 lyra kernel: nscd[11660]: segfault at 002b401fee8b rip
> > 00552aab7966 rsp 408029e0 e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/9/07, jlee wrote:
> output from /var/log/messages
> Oct 9 12:56:38 lyra kernel: nscd[11660]: segfault at 002b401fee8b rip
> 00552aab7966 rsp 408029e0 error 4
> Oct 9 13:16:38 lyra kernel: nscd[12540]: segfault at 002b401
Does anyone know if there is a fix for nscd segfaulting after a short period of
time.
Googling for it came up with one result that suggested deleting the files in
/var/db/nscd , but that didn't help. Another result was about run away
processes which
is not the problem I'm having.
They are x86_6
26 matches
Mail list logo
