2009/4/16 John Thomas gmane-2006-04...@jt-socal.com
Scott Silva wrote:
And the right repositories have to be online!
Finally, a successful commercial repository.
It's not without it's problems though, especially when using yum... Blindly
playing with this repository can be bad for your
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 15:10 +0800, D Tucny wrote:
2009/4/16 John Thomas gmane-2006-04...@jt-socal.com
Scott Silva wrote:
And the right repositories have to be online!
Finally, a successful commercial repository.
It's not without it's problems
on 4-16-2009 12:10 AM D Tucny spake the following:
2009/4/16 John Thomas
gmane-2006-04...@jt-socal.com
mailto:gmane-2006-04...@jt-socal.com
Scott Silva wrote:
And the right repositories have to be online!
Finally, a successful commercial repository.
It's not without
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Erik Laxdal wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
I tried to install alsa 1.0.19 on centos 5.3 64 - did not work - compile
errors.
I need to re-install alsa-lib and alsa-util .
I dont want to do rpm -e first on those packages as dependcy is crazy.
I know they were installed (rpm
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM, David G. Miller d...@davenjudy.org wrote:
Finally ! 10 years after apt :)
I saw a t-shirt advertised recently that said apt-get girlfriend. I'm
guessing yum still can't do that ;-).
I haven't seen it work all that well in apt either. I'm guessing it
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Jim Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM, David G. Miller d...@davenjudy.org wrote:
Finally ! 10 years after apt :)
I saw a t-shirt advertised recently that said apt-get girlfriend.
I'm guessing yum still can't do that ;-).
I haven't seen it work all that
on 4-15-2009 10:55 AM Paul Heinlein spake the following:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Jim Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM, David G. Miller
d...@davenjudy.org wrote:
Finally ! 10 years after apt �:)
I saw a t-shirt advertised recently that said apt-get girlfriend.
�I'm guessing yum
on 4-15-2009 10:55 AM Paul Heinlein spake the following:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Jim Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM, David G. Miller
d...@davenjudy.org wrote:
Finally ! 10 years after apt :)
I saw a t-shirt advertised recently that said apt-get girlfriend.
I'm guessing yum
Scott Silva wrote:
And the right repositories have to be online!
Finally, a successful commercial repository.
--
Sincerely,
John Thomas
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I tried to install alsa 1.0.19 on centos 5.3 64 - did not work - compile
errors.
I need to re-install alsa-lib and alsa-util .
I dont want to do rpm -e first on those packages as dependcy is crazy.
I know they were installed (rpm -qa | grep alsa tells me so) I just want
to re-install ?
How do I
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote:
I tried to install alsa 1.0.19 on centos 5.3 64 - did not work - compile
errors.
Installing via rpm is separate from compiling. Which are you doing?
Are you having trouble building rpms, or installing them?
I need to
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Jerry Geis geisj at pagestation.com
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos wrote:
/ I tried to install alsa 1.0.19 on centos 5.3 64 - did not work - compile
// errors.
/
Installing via rpm is separate from compiling. Which are you doing?
Are you
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote:
nothing sinister here was not getting HDMI sound on my motherboard,
did some searching
seemed like I needed to update to alsa 1.0.19 so I tried it. compiling
from source. Ran into compile errors so
I wanted to
Jerry Geis wrote:
nothing sinister here was not getting HDMI sound on my motherboard,
did some searching
seemed like I needed to update to alsa 1.0.19 so I tried it. compiling
from source. Ran into compile errors so
I wanted to backout to the default alsa. the default alsa worked but
Jerry Geis wrote:
I tried to install alsa 1.0.19 on centos 5.3 64 - did not work - compile
errors.
I need to re-install alsa-lib and alsa-util .
I dont want to do rpm -e first on those packages as dependcy is crazy.
I know they were installed (rpm -qa | grep alsa tells me so) I just want
You can remove them with rpm -e pkgnames --nodeps and then reinstall
them with yum. I had to do this recently with some strangeness that was
goign on with kpartx and device-mapper-multipath of al things.
# rpm -i --replacepkgs rpm-file is possibly safer in some scenarios.
Depending on what you
I just want to re-install ?
How do I do that?
Fetch rpm's, man rpm, you'll see options to --force,
--replacefiles, --replacepkgs etc...
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
You can remove them with rpm -e pkgnames --nodeps and then reinstall
them with yum. I had to do this recently with some strangeness that was
goign on with kpartx and device-mapper-multipath of al things.
# rpm -i --replacepkgs rpm-file is possibly safer in some
Jerry Geis wrote:
I tried to install alsa 1.0.19 on centos 5.3 64 - did not work - compile
errors.
I need to re-install alsa-lib and alsa-util .
I dont want to do rpm -e first on those packages as dependcy is crazy.
I know they were installed (rpm -qa | grep alsa tells me so) I just want
19 matches
Mail list logo