[CentOS] rpm spec:: Requires conditions format :: lower not working

Hi! I'm trying to give a range of versions for a dependency in the form of : Requires: xrootd-server >= 4.1.0 Requires: xrootd-server < 5.0.0 with the already installed package having the versions: [rpmbuild@el7build SPECS]$ rpm -qa --queryformat '%{name} %{version}\n' | grep xrootd | sort

Re: [CentOS] rpm command option

On 5/6/20 12:49 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote: On Wed, 6 May 2020 00:00:48 + (UTC) Chris Olson via CentOS wrote: We located an application recommended by one of customers for sharing certain data.  It was available for installation using a few different methods.  Using yum was also

Re: [CentOS] rpm command option

On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 09:49:51AM +0200, Peter Kjellström wrote: > Well I wouldn't called obvious, but the rpm man page has a "see also" > for rpmkeys(8) and this man page documents the rpm key related options. > > I don't know how it came to be that rpm --import just quietly > does rpmkeys

Re: [CentOS] rpm command option

On Wed, 6 May 2020 00:00:48 + (UTC) Chris Olson via CentOS wrote: > We located an application recommended by one of customers > for sharing certain data.  It was available for installation > using a few different methods.  Using yum was also recommended > for the installation.  The install

Re: [CentOS] rpm command option

On 5/5/20 6:00 PM, Chris Olson via CentOS wrote: We located an application recommended by one of customers for sharing certain data.  It was available for installation using a few different methods.  Using yum was also recommended for the installation.  The install instructions began with what

[CentOS] rpm command option

We located an application recommended by one of customers for sharing certain data.  It was available for installation using a few different methods.  Using yum was also recommended for the installation.  The install instructions began with what appeared to be a fairly typical command as indicated

Re: [CentOS] CentOS rpm versioning

So there is no way to automatically compare RHEL and CentOS rpms. Why CentOS can't user versions like "10.3.17-1.module+el8.1.0+3974+90eded8-cento+257+48736ea"? They would be both consistent with rhel and have all needed hashes. пн, 16 мар. 2020 г. в 17:37, Stephen John Smoogen : > On Mon, 16

Re: [CentOS] CentOS rpm versioning

On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 12:17, koka miptpatriot wrote: > Hello > > Clair vulnerability scanner considers the latest version of CentOS mariadb > vulnerable, because of RHSA-2019:3708 > It states, that mariadb must be updated at least to the version > "10.3.17-1.module+el8.1.0+3974+90eded84".

[CentOS] CentOS rpm versioning

Hello Clair vulnerability scanner considers the latest version of CentOS mariadb vulnerable, because of RHSA-2019:3708 It states, that mariadb must be updated at least to the version "10.3.17-1.module+el8.1.0+3974+90eded84". CentOS' last version is "10.3.17-1.module_el8.1.0+257+48736ea6". Rpm/yum

Re: [CentOS] RPM Transaction Failure (SOLVED)

On 3/3/19 10:01 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: On Mar 3, 2019, at 1:53 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote: error: lua script failed: /usr/libexec/copy_jdk_configs.lua:272: attempt to index global 'file' (a nil value) Try following the instructions here: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/3573891

Re: [CentOS] RPM Transaction Failure

On Mar 3, 2019, at 1:53 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > error: lua script failed: /usr/libexec/copy_jdk_configs.lua:272: attempt to > index global 'file' (a nil value) Try following the instructions here: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/3573891 #

[CentOS] RPM Transaction Failure

Hey Y'all, I have a yum update failure that remains consistent and repeatable. This is what happens every time I try to update the java package. This a new computer with a fresh network install of CentOS 6.10. How can I fix this? CentOS release 6.10 (Final) Linux nicotine.patch

Re: [CentOS] rpm spec version : higher version is seen as older

On 05/23/2018 10:05 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 08:07:52PM +0300, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: >> Hi! I have a very puzzling problem : >> one rpm with version 1.2.5 and one with 1.3.1 (spec file does not have >> Epoch defined) >> >> trying to install i get this : >>

Re: [CentOS] rpm spec version : higher version is seen as older

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 08:07:52PM +0300, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: > Hi! I have a very puzzling problem : > one rpm with version 1.2.5 and one with 1.3.1 (spec file does not have > Epoch defined) > > trying to install i get this : > [root@storage02 aliprod]# rpm -Uvh >

[CentOS] rpm spec version : higher version is seen as older

Hi! I have a very puzzling problem : one rpm with version 1.2.5 and one with 1.3.1 (spec file does not have Epoch defined) trying to install i get this : [root@storage02 aliprod]# rpm -Uvh xrootd-alicetokenacc-1.3.1-1.el6.x86_64.rpm Preparing...

Re: [CentOS] rpm conflict on new install

On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 03:01:52PM +, Gary Stainburn wrote: > Yesterday I did a clean install of Centos 6 -> Workstation -> Plasma. > > I then added some recommended repo's and did a yum update. > > I'm now getting the following: > > [root@lcomp5 ~]# yum check > Loaded plugins:

Re: [CentOS] rpm conflict on new install

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Gary Stainburn wrote: Cheers John, I did find that one after sending the post, but it still doesn't give a solution. It just says that they're going to fix 'yum' but that was in November and it's still broken. I did see one post that said that ipaclient isn't needed and

Re: [CentOS] rpm conflict on new install

On Friday 03 February 2017 15:06:38 John Hodrien wrote: > On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Gary Stainburn wrote: > > Googling shows that a number of people seem to be suffering from this but > > doesn't seem to give a solution. Does anyone have any suggestion? > > It's been mentioned on this list before. > >

Re: [CentOS] rpm conflict on new install

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Gary Stainburn wrote: Googling shows that a number of people seem to be suffering from this but doesn't seem to give a solution. Does anyone have any suggestion? It's been mentioned on this list before. Google: site:lists.centos.org freeipa conflict jh

[CentOS] rpm conflict on new install

Yesterday I did a clean install of Centos 6 -> Workstation -> Plasma. I then added some recommended repo's and did a yum update. I'm now getting the following: [root@lcomp5 ~]# yum check Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks ipa-client-4.4.0-14.el7.centos.4.x86_64 has installed conflicts

Re: [CentOS] RPM help

On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 07:57:56AM -0400, TE Dukes wrote: > How can I do an uninstall/re-install without hosing more stuff up? > I have found some examples, --nodeps, --replacepkgs and -replacefiles Don't use 'rpm'. Do a 'yum reinstall packagename1 packagename2' to have yum download and

Re: [CentOS] RPM help

please check out logs and error messages. Eero 2016-08-08 14:57 GMT+03:00 TE Dukes : > Hello, > > > > My installation of clamav is hosed up. It won't start due to a malformed > database. > > > > I ran freshclam and updated the database but still have the problem. > >

[CentOS] RPM help

Hello, My installation of clamav is hosed up. It won't start due to a malformed database. I ran freshclam and updated the database but still have the problem. I was going to uninstall clamav but there are other app dependencies. Virtualmin is one. How can I do an

Re: [CentOS] RPM perl requirements woes

On May 12, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > > I'm trying to package up a perl module into an RPM for easy deployment. > I want it to be as self-contained as possible (to avoid version issues > with perl modules in base or EPEL). By the way, have you considered (as an

Re: [CentOS] RPM perl requirements woes

On May 12, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > curl -L http://cpanmin.us | perl - App::cpanminus -L cpanminus is already packaged for EL7. It just isn’t installed by default. $ sudo yum install perl-App-cpanminus > This way, cpanminus is installed first You can list

Re: [CentOS] RPM perl requirements woes

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:14 PM, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > Dear CentOS hive mind, > > I'm trying to package up a perl module into an RPM for easy deployment. > I want it to be as self-contained as possible (to avoid version issues > with perl modules in base or EPEL). So in my

[CentOS] RPM perl requirements woes

Dear CentOS hive mind, I'm trying to package up a perl module into an RPM for easy deployment. I want it to be as self-contained as possible (to avoid version issues with perl modules in base or EPEL). So in my spec file, I'm doing: curl -L http://cpanmin.us | perl - App::cpanminus -L

Re: [CentOS] rpm containing gmessage???

On 02/11/2016 01:48 PM, Frank Cox wrote: On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 13:42:39 -0500 ken wrote: Maybe I haven't run the correct yum commands or looked in the right repo, but I haven't found a utility called 'gmessage'. Anyone know where to find it? gmessage has been more-or-less superseded by

Re: [CentOS] rpm containing gmessage???

On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 18:55:16 -0500 ken wrote: > > gmessage has been more-or-less superseded by zenity. > > > > That's nutz. From docs I've seen, gmessage is way more flexible and > featured. It doesn't appear that way to me, but what do I know. I just use zenity for my own bash scripts and

[CentOS] rpm containing gmessage???

Maybe I haven't run the correct yum commands or looked in the right repo, but I haven't found a utility called 'gmessage'. Anyone know where to find it? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] rpm containing gmessage???

On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 13:42:39 -0500 ken wrote: > Maybe I haven't run the correct yum commands or looked in the right > repo, but I haven't found a utility called 'gmessage'. Anyone know > where to find it? gmessage has been more-or-less superseded by zenity. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D

[CentOS] rpm requires logic

Exists the possibility to define an RPM requires statement with a logic? Like: Requires: mysql-server OR mysql55-mysql-server MTAs like postfix have "Provides: MTA" to provide such facility. I do not see such possibility for DB packages ... Thanks -- LF

Re: [CentOS] rpm requires logic

Am 14.12.2015 um 15:16 schrieb Matthew Miller : > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:00:09PM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Exists the possibility to define an RPM requires >> statement with a logic? Like: >> Requires: mysql-server OR mysql55-mysql-server >> MTAs like postfix have

Re: [CentOS] rpm requires logic

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:00:09PM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote: > Exists the possibility to define an RPM requires > statement with a logic? Like: > Requires: mysql-server OR mysql55-mysql-server > MTAs like postfix have "Provides: MTA" to provide > such facility. I do not see such possibility for

Re: [CentOS] RPM `requires` installation order

On 10/29/2015 01:56 AM, Shyam S wrote: Hello All, I'm a bit of newbie with rpm/yum, seeking the help from rpm/yum experts. Suppose I have an RPM package A which depends on package B. RPM A's spec has 'Requires:B' tag with 'autoprov' and 'autoreq' enabled. When I install RPM A on a 'centos

Re: [CentOS] RPM `requires` installation order

On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 11:56 +1100, Shyam S wrote: > I have tried `PreReq` tag as well, which has same behaviour as far as I can > tell. > > Is there any other means to accomplish my requirement? PreReq now has the same effect as Requires. In earlier versions it did what you want and I don't

[CentOS] RPM `requires` installation order

Hello All, I'm a bit of newbie with rpm/yum, seeking the help from rpm/yum experts. Suppose I have an RPM package A which depends on package B. RPM A's spec has 'Requires:B' tag with 'autoprov' and 'autoreq' enabled. When I install RPM A on a 'centos 6.5' machine with 'RPM version 4.8.0',

Re: [CentOS] RPM install/upgrade problem

On Saturday 27 September 2014 00:20:17 Cliff Pratt wrote: It may be that you have a bad bash RPM from somewhere. I believe that the cpio command works directly on the package so you could try with cpio on the command line to see if it will open the RPM. I suspect that it won't be able to.

Re: [CentOS] RPM install/upgrade problem

It may be that you have a bad bash RPM from somewhere. I believe that the cpio command works directly on the package so you could try with cpio on the command line to see if it will open the RPM. I suspect that it won't be able to. Cheers, Cliff On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Tony Molloy

[CentOS] RPM install/upgrade problem

Hi, For the last few updates I'm having a yum problem. # yum update gives the following error for e.g. Running transaction Updating : bash-4.2.45-5.el7_0.2.x86_64 1/10 Error unpacking rpm package bash-4.2.45-5.el7_0.2.x86_64 error: unpacking of archive failed on file

Re: [CentOS] RPM Build Guidance

On 09/04/2013 12:03 AM, Dave Johansen wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Mark LaPierre marklap...@aol.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey All, Is there someone here on the list that has experience building RPM install files? I've never done it before. I'm

Re: [CentOS] RPM Build Guidance

I think you should learn how to package rpms, it's a really useful skill. That being said, you should also learn how to steal. Musescore is already packaged for Fedora under the name mscore. You can probably steal their srpm. Install the src rpm and run rpmbuild -ba on the spec. It should be a

[CentOS] RPM Build Guidance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey All, Is there someone here on the list that has experience building RPM install files? I've never done it before. I'm looking for someone who is willing to do a little hand holding. I just built Musescore from source. I hope to build an

Re: [CentOS] RPM Build Guidance

Greetings, On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Mark LaPierre marklap...@aol.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey All, Is there someone here on the list that has experience building RPM install files? I've never done it before. I'm looking for someone who is willing

Re: [CentOS] RPM Build Guidance

On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Mark LaPierre marklap...@aol.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey All, Is there someone here on the list that has experience building RPM install files? I've never done it before. I'm looking for someone who is willing to do a

Re: [CentOS] creating centos rpm from deb with alien

On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 02:50:09 +, Juan R. de Silva wrote: I'm in process of getting additional knowledge/info to follow all your suggestions. Tanks for all replied. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

[CentOS] creating centos rpm from deb with alien

I want to install GoldenDict on my fresh CentOS 6.3 installation. So far I've not found any GoldenDict rpm files created for CentOS. What about creating rpm from deb using alien? Would it be safe to attempt such install? I do not want to screw my new installation.

Re: [CentOS] creating centos rpm from deb with alien

From: Juan R. de Silva Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2013 21:50 I want to install GoldenDict on my fresh CentOS 6.3 installation. So far I've not found any GoldenDict rpm files created for CentOS. Did you Google it yet? Lets assume yes and you found the many RPMs listed for fedora.

Re: [CentOS] creating centos rpm from deb with alien

On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 22:26:50 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote: From: Juan R. de Silva Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2013 21:50 I want to install GoldenDict on my fresh CentOS 6.3 installation. So far I've not found any GoldenDict rpm files created for CentOS. Did you Google it yet? Lets assume yes

Re: [CentOS] creating centos rpm from deb with alien

On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 04:12:59 + (UTC) Juan R. de Silva wrote: So, I concluded that Fedora RPMs are not suitable. Am I mistaken here? Download the srpm and compile it on your Centos system. Then you get a native Centos RPM. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema

Re: [CentOS] creating centos rpm from deb with alien

On 1/1/2013 8:20 PM, Frank Cox wrote: On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 04:12:59 + (UTC) Juan R. de Silva wrote: So, I concluded that Fedora RPMs are not suitable. Am I mistaken here? Download the srpm and compile it on your Centos system. Then you get a native Centos RPM. ASSUMING the base

[CentOS] RPM file download

I see a package x246-0.120-5.20120303.el6 (i686) available in my Add/Remove Software tool. I can't find said package in any of the repos I've searched through. Can anyone point me to a link where I can download that package to my local repo? -- _ °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre

Re: [CentOS] RPM file download

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:00:40PM -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote: I see a package x246-0.120-5.20120303.el6 (i686) available in my Add/Remove Software tool. I can't find said package in any of the repos I've searched through. Can anyone point me to a link where I can download that package to

Re: [CentOS] RPM file download

On 29.10.2012 21:00, Mark LaPierre wrote: I see a package x246-0.120-5.20120303.el6 (i686) available in my Add/Remove Software tool. I can't find said package in any of the repos I've searched through. Can anyone point me to a link where I can download that package to my local repo? It

Re: [CentOS] RPM file download

On Monday 29 October 2012, Mark LaPierre marklap...@aol.com wrote: I see a package x246-0.120-5.20120303.el6 (i686) available in my Add/Remove Software tool. I can't find said package in any of the repos I've searched through. If Add/Remove Software sees it, that means that yum can also see

Re: [CentOS] RPM file download

On 10/29/2012 06:11 PM, Nux! wrote: On 29.10.2012 21:00, Mark LaPierre wrote: I see a package x246-0.120-5.20120303.el6 (i686) available in my Add/Remove Software tool. I can't find said package in any of the repos I've searched through. Can anyone point me to a link where I can download

Re: [CentOS] RPM file download

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 06:45:18PM -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote: Found that one a couple of days ago. I don't like the idea of mixing repos either that's why I was looking for the one that the package manager found, x264-0.120-5.20120303.el6.i686.rpm , not the one from the nux repo. yum

Re: [CentOS] RPM file download

On 10/29/2012 07:16 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 06:45:18PM -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote: Found that one a couple of days ago. I don't like the idea of mixing repos either that's why I was looking for the one that the package manager found,

Re: [CentOS] RPM file download(Solved)

On 10/29/2012 05:00 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: I see a package x246-0.120-5.20120303.el6 (i686) available in my Add/Remove Software tool. I can't find said package in any of the repos I've searched through. Can anyone point me to a link where I can download that package to my local repo? I

[CentOS] rpm archives

Hi Is there a way to retrieve old rpm binaries from archives. Regards Kaushal ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] rpm archives

On 2012-09-28, Kaushal Shriyan kaushalshri...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a way to retrieve old rpm binaries from archives. http://vault.centos.org/ -- kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] rpm user and groups

From: Markus Falb markus.f...@fasel.at For example, mysql-server is adding mysql user with uid 27 Is this something I can ask the rpm db? rpm -qa | sort | while read PKG; do echo $PKG; rpm -q --scripts $PKG | grep -- -u 27; done JD ___ CentOS

[CentOS] rpm user and groups

Hi! This is a rpm question. For example, mysql-server is adding mysql user with uid 27 Is this something I can ask the rpm db? It seems not, because something like the following seems to give me no useful information regarding users or uids $ rpm -qa --provides|grep mysql I would like to ask:

Re: [CentOS] rpm user and groups

On 05/21/12 1:51 PM, Markus Falb wrote: This is a rpm question. For example, mysql-server is adding mysql user with uid 27 Is this something I can ask the rpm db? It seems not, because something like the following seems to give me no useful information regarding users or uids $ rpm -qa

[CentOS] rpm configuring /etc/hosts file

Hello Group, I am having some problems in my /etd/hosts file, where unwanted matching appears between IP addresses and hostnames. Could someone please tell me, which is centos rpm, which configures /etc/hosts file. Thanks in advance nagrik

Re: [CentOS] rpm configuring /etc/hosts file

On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:34:53 -0700 Vinay Nagrik wrote: Could someone please tell me, which is centos rpm, which configures /etc/hosts file. rpm -q --whatprovides /etc/hosts setup-2.8.14-13.el6.noarch -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com www.creekfm.com

Re: [CentOS] rpm configuring /etc/hosts file

On 03/14/12 2:34 PM, Vinay Nagrik wrote: Could someone please tell me, which is centos rpm, which configures /etc/hosts file. vim (or any other text editor of your choice). -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast

[CentOS] centos rpm package description list?

Dear All Is there any reference link that lists the centos rpm packages by their description? As I know, we have reference sites like rpm.pbone.net and dag.wieers.com etc that we can search for an rpm package by its name. But what we have if we want to find a rpm package by its description rather

Re: [CentOS] centos rpm package description list?

On Saturday 03 Sep 2011, hadi motamedi wrote: Dear All Is there any reference link that lists the centos rpm packages by their description? As I know, we have reference sites like rpm.pbone.net and dag.wieers.com etc that we can search for an rpm package by its name. But what we have if we

Re: [CentOS] centos rpm package description list?

On 9/3/11, Colin Coles co...@wemoto.com wrote: On Saturday 03 Sep 2011, hadi motamedi wrote: Dear All Is there any reference link that lists the centos rpm packages by their description? As I know, we have reference sites like rpm.pbone.net and dag.wieers.com etc that we can search for an rpm

Re: [CentOS] centos rpm package description list?

On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 16:07 +0430, hadi motamedi wrote: Is there any reference link that lists the centos rpm packages by their description? As I know, we have reference sites like rpm.pbone.net and dag.wieers.com etc that we can search for an rpm package by its name. But what we have if we

Re: [CentOS] rpm and /etc/cron.daily/rpm

Hello Greg, On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:05:34 -0700 Greg Bailey gbai...@lxpro.com wrote: On 08/29/2011 08:54 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: The rpm package used to provide /etc/cron.daily/rpm /etc/logrotate.d/rpm I see /usr/lib/rpm/rpm.log and rpm.daily, which looks like they're intended

[CentOS] rpm and /etc/cron.daily/rpm

The rpm package used to provide /etc/cron.daily/rpm /etc/logrotate.d/rpm I see /usr/lib/rpm/rpm.log and rpm.daily, which looks like they're intended for that purpose. Anyone have any idea why they're not in cron.daily and logrotate.d? mark ___

Re: [CentOS] rpm and /etc/cron.daily/rpm

On 08/29/2011 08:54 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: The rpm package used to provide /etc/cron.daily/rpm /etc/logrotate.d/rpm I see /usr/lib/rpm/rpm.log and rpm.daily, which looks like they're intended for that purpose. Anyone have any idea why they're not in cron.daily and logrotate.d?

Re: [CentOS] rpm and /etc/cron.daily/rpm

Greg Bailey wrote: On 08/29/2011 08:54 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: The rpm package used to provide /etc/cron.daily/rpm /etc/logrotate.d/rpm I see /usr/lib/rpm/rpm.log and rpm.daily, which looks like they're intended for that purpose. Anyone have any idea why they're not in cron.daily and

Re: [CentOS] rpm and /etc/cron.daily/rpm

On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 12:49 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Greg Bailey wrote: Looks like those files are now provided by the rpm-cron package in RHEL 6 / CentOS 6. Thanks, Greg. Though it seems really dumb and pointless to make a separate package just to run something that's already in

Re: [CentOS] centos] rpm and /etc/cron.daily/rpm

On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Always Learning wrote: Brilliant job creation scheme to increase State and Federal tax yields. 'Always' -- if you are going to post cr*p, at least have the courtesy to not CROSS post to Red Hat lists and here -- Russ herrold

Re: [CentOS] rpm and /etc/cron.daily/rpm

Always Learning wrote: On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 12:49 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Greg Bailey wrote: Looks like those files are now provided by the rpm-cron package in RHEL 6 / CentOS 6. Thanks, Greg. Though it seems really dumb and pointless to make a separate package just to run

Re: [CentOS] centos] rpm and /etc/cron.daily/rpm

R P Herrold wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Always Learning wrote: Brilliant job creation scheme to increase State and Federal tax yields. 'Always' -- if you are going to post cr*p, at least have the courtesy to not CROSS post to Red Hat lists and here Russ, my fault - I'd crossposted to here

Re: [CentOS] centos] rpm and /etc/cron.daily/rpm

On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 13:09 -0400, R P Herrold wrote: -- if you are going to post cr*p, at least have the courtesy to not CROSS post to Red Hat lists and here I cancelled it from the Red Hat moderation queue, because, as intelligent people know, one can not post to lists one is not

[CentOS] centos] rpm and /etc/cron.daily/rpm

On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Russ, my fault - I'd crossposted to here and the general RH list. Dunno if I should consider filing this as a bug or not with upstream. yes but, no ... your content was not wild-ass OT political - R ___

Re: [CentOS] rpm and /etc/cron.daily/rpm

On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 10:28 -0700, Greg Bailey wrote: On 08/29/2011 09:49 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I see /usr/lib/rpm/rpm.log and rpm.daily, which looks like they're intended for that purpose. Anyone have any idea why they're not in cron.daily and logrotate.d? Looks like:

Re: [CentOS] centos] rpm and /etc/cron.daily/rpm

On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 13:30 -0400, R P Herrold wrote: yes but, no ... your content was not wild-ass OT political I'm apolitical with an occasional sense of humour. Which USA party do you want me to favour? I'll find it difficult to endorse the former governor of Alaska or the Tea Drinkers.

Re: [CentOS] rpm and /etc/cron.daily/rpm

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Always Learning cen...@u61.u22.net wrote: I see /usr/lib/rpm/rpm.log and rpm.daily, which looks like they're intended for that purpose. Anyone have any idea why they're not in cron.daily and logrotate.d? Looks like:

Re: [CentOS] rpm libuser-devel is not signed

'yum update' runs into the following error message. Package libuser-devel-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.i386.rpm is not signed I got this too, there's two ways around it: 1) Wait until the package is signed and then update. 2) Run: yum update --nogpgcheck Other workarounds for this particular issue

Re: [CentOS] rpm libuser-devel is not signed

On 04/21/2011 01:04 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote: 'yum update' runs into the following error message. Package libuser-devel-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.i386.rpm is not signed I got this too, there's two ways around it: 1) Wait until the package is signed and then update. 2) Run: yum update

Re: [CentOS] rpm libuser-devel is not signed

On 04/21/2011 09:26 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: Other workarounds for this particular issue have just been suggested here: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-April/110547.html http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-April/110551.html I find it strange that people are making such

Re: [CentOS] rpm libuser-devel is not signed

On 04/21/2011 12:49 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote: 2) Run: yum update --nogpgcheck please dont do that :( - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] rpm libuser-devel is not signed

On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Karanbir Singh wrote: On 04/21/2011 09:26 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: Other workarounds for this particular issue have just been suggested here: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-April/110547.html http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-April/110551.html

Re: [CentOS] rpm libuser-devel is not signed

Other workarounds for this particular issue have just been suggested here: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-April/110547.html http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-April/110551.html I find it strange that people are making such recommendations. A non verifyable signature

Re: [CentOS] rpm libuser-devel is not signed

On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Mathieu Baudier wrote: Sorry, but not everybody is on production machines. Since the OP could not analyze himself the error message, one could safely assume he is not dealing with critical production environments. Maybe he was just told: install quickly this CentOS in

Re: [CentOS] rpm libuser-devel is not signed

On 04/21/2011 12:26 PM, Mathieu Baudier wrote: Sorry, but not everybody is on production machines. Security and integrity of an install is not optional, wherever you might be. Imho anyway. Maybe he was just told: install quickly this CentOS in VirtualBox, just to make sure our app is

Re: [CentOS] rpm libuser-devel is not signed

On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Karanbir Singh wrote: yes, a package was released, unsigned, and has been fixed. ( and 4 more tests added to the release process to make sure that this does not happen again; or atleast reduce the chance of this going out ). And if people stick with the sane practice of

Re: [CentOS] rpm libuser-devel is not signed

Not updating is entirely sensible and sounds like the best default position. Installing a package you'd expect to be signed when it isn't signed should ring alarm bells. I agree that my first answer was probably wrong, even with all disclaimers and warnings. I thought of a technical way

Re: [CentOS] rpm libuser-devel is not signed

On 04/21/2011 08:34 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote: Not updating is entirely sensible and sounds like the best default position. Installing a package you'd expect to be signed when it isn't signed should ring alarm bells. I agree that my first answer was probably wrong, even with all disclaimers

Re: [CentOS] rpm libuser-devel is not signed

Johnny Hughes wrote: On 04/21/2011 08:34 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote: Not updating is entirely sensible and sounds like the best default position. Installing a package you'd expect to be signed when it isn't signed should ring alarm bells. I agree that my first answer was probably wrong, even

Re: [CentOS] rpm libuser-devel is not signed

On Thursday, April 21, 2011 07:56:27 AM John Hodrien wrote: If people think that disabling gpg checking is a good idea, you risk this finding its way into their yum.conf. That's exactly what you've seen amongst some spacewalk users. FWIW, there are some out there who don't even think unsigned

[CentOS] rpm libuser-devel is not signed

Hello, 'yum update' runs into the following error message. Package libuser-devel-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.i386.rpm is not signed regards Olaf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] rpm libuser-devel is not signed

On 21/04/11 5:26 AM, Olaf Mueller wrote: Hello, 'yum update' runs into the following error message. Package libuser-devel-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.i386.rpm is not signed I got this too, there's two ways around it: 1) Wait until the package is signed and then update. 2) Run: yum update

[CentOS] rpm split

Hi, I have a custom rpm for our application. The problem is that it grew old and fat. It's about 30 MB. So i would like to split it into two parts. One big part that almost never changes and one smaller part that is changed more frequently. But i don't know how to write the spec file so a simple

  1   2   3   >