On 6/9/2015 11:26 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
I've been informed that rpmforge and epel do
not play well together and that if I use both,
epel should have the higher (lower numbered) priority.
Alas I had it the other way around.
rpmforge messed up my effort to get audacity.
I no longer need
I've been informed that rpmforge and epel do
not play well together and that if I use both,
epel should have the higher (lower numbered) priority.
Alas I had it the other way around.
rpmforge messed up my effort to get audacity.
I no longer need audacity,
but would like to fix the situation
Michael Hennebry wrote:
I've been informed that rpmforge and epel do
not play well together and that if I use both,
epel should have the higher (lower numbered) priority.
Alas I had it the other way around.
rpmforge messed up my effort to get audacity.
I no longer need audacity,
but would
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 13:26 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
I've been informed that rpmforge and epel do
not play well together and that if I use both,
epel should have the higher (lower numbered) priority.
Alas I had it the other way around.
rpmforge messed up my effort to get audacity.
I
On Jun 9, 2015, at 4:19 PM, Robert Nichols rnicholsnos...@comcast.net wrote:
On 06/09/2015 03:42 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
What do you
need in rpmforge that isn't available from base, rpmfusion, or epel?
Do you happen to know of somewhere other than rpmforge where I can find
hexedit and
On 06/09/2015 03:42 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us
wrote:
What do you
need in rpmforge that isn't available from base, rpmfusion, or epel?
Do you happen to know of somewhere other than rpmforge where I can find
hexedit and gqview for el6 ? Epel has them for el5, but not el6.
Fortunately, installing
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
some rpmforge packages may even conflict with the base distro. What do you
need in rpmforge that isn't available from base, rpmfusion, or epel? The
only thing I know of are some kmod packages from elrepo, and I have the
elrepo.repo configuration so
snip
I didn't mean to stir up a ruckus
Thanks for the help
Ruckus stirs itself on most mailing lists!
Overworked sysadmins just need to go get a cup of coffee and count to 10
before they hit reply, or at least before they hit send.
I know that dealing with dwindling IT budgets and angry
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:50:37AM -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
I didn't mean to stir up a ruckus
Ruckus stirs itself on most mailing lists!
Overworked sysadmins just need to go get a cup of coffee and count to 10
before they hit reply, or at least before they hit send.
cen...@centos -- now
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 19:22 -0500, Mail List wrote:
On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:26:28 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 15:46 -0600, rra...@comcast.net wrote:
I have not been able to connect to rpmforge for a couple of days
You'll probably get a better response, as well
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 17:39 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
William L. Maltby wrote:
You'll probably get a better response, as well as a fix if there is a
problem, by posting to that list rather than here.
you mean the list you can't find since the rpmforge website is
apparently down?
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 08:00 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 17:39 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
William L. Maltby wrote:
You'll probably get a better response, as well as a fix if there is a
problem, by posting to that list rather than here.
you mean the
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, William L. Maltby wrote:
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 08:00 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 17:39 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
William L. Maltby wrote:
You'll probably get a better response, as well as a fix if there is a
problem, by posting to that list
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 08:43 -0600, rra...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, William L. Maltby wrote:
snip
I didn't mean to stir up a ruckus
Not your fault at all. I know that Dag often monitors this list and on
occasions when he can't/doesn't get stuff resolved at the rpmforge
rra...@comcast.net wrote:
I have not been able to connect to rpmforge for a couple of days
Is it me or is there a problem with the repository
fyi, its back online per a email reply to my query on the
users/at/lists.rpmforge.net list...
___
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, John R Pierce wrote:
rra...@comcast.net wrote:
I have not been able to connect to rpmforge for a couple of days
Is it me or is there a problem with the repository
fyi, its back online per a email reply to my query on the
users/at/lists.rpmforge.net list...
confirmed
I have not been able to connect to rpmforge for a couple of days
Is it me or is there a problem with the repository
Richard
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 15:46 -0600, rra...@comcast.net wrote:
I have not been able to connect to rpmforge for a couple of days
Is it me or is there a problem with the repository
You'll probably get a better response, as well as a fix if there is a
problem, by posting to that list rather than
On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:26:28 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 15:46 -0600, rra...@comcast.net wrote:
I have not been able to connect to rpmforge for a couple of days
You'll probably get a better response, as well as a fix if there is a
problem, by posting to that list
William L. Maltby wrote:
You'll probably get a better response, as well as a fix if there is a
problem, by posting to that list rather than here.
you mean the list you can't find since the rpmforge website is
apparently down?
luckily, google had a cached entry for it. i signed up for
Hi
Is it possible to have rpmforge for both architectures? Currently is
only for 64bit, but I need some libraries 32bit (rrdtool) to install
ganglia.
But if I try to install rpmforge i386, I got the message:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mgarcia]# rpm -ivh rpmforge-release-0.3.6-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to have rpmforge for both architectures? Currently is
only for 64bit, but I need some libraries 32bit (rrdtool) to install
ganglia.
A problem is that the /etc/yum.repos.d/mirrors-rpmforge file has
$ARCH in it, which would still
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to have rpmforge for both architectures? Currently is
only for 64bit, but I need some libraries 32bit (rrdtool) to install
ganglia.
A problem is that the /etc/yum.repos.d/mirrors-rpmforge file has
$ARCH in it, which would still be x86_64 even if
Anything like this would probably have to be an upstream thing. But it
would probably be a good idea for people to put this into their
kickstart configs...
i think that the yum setup diverges from upstream already, so i don't see
this as a big change from that.
also, i'd like to suggest that the priorities plugin be made added to the
base install and that the centos-base repos be configured with priority 1.
it looks like c4 has the priority setting, but c5 doesn't and neither have
the plugin installed. it seems like this would create a little more
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 10:40 -0700, Joe Pruett wrote:
rpmforge has just released a new perl-DBD-mysql for el4 that has an
obsoletes against perl-DBD-MySQL and the protectbase yum plugin doesn't
grok obsoletes. the priorities plugin does. so if you are having issues
with this, install the
Joe Pruett wrote on Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:48:48 -0700 (PDT):
i forgot to add to my suggestion: make the check_obsoletes option in
yum-priorities be enabled by default for c5 as it is in c4.
There's also an obsoletes option in yum.conf. That option you are talking
about is for priorities.conf
Jim Perrin wrote on Thu, 3 Jul 2008 15:47:03 -0400:
This is a known issue with rpm's http code. It doesn't do cookies. It
can't really follow redirects (302 or otherwise) well, and generally
it's a hack.
Ah, well, now I understand. Yes, there occurs a redirect. It once used to
work, with
I wanted to install the rpmforge-release package on a new install and get
the following. Do others have the same problem?
b51:~ rpm -ivvvh http://packages.sw.be/rpmforge-release/rpmforge-
release-0.3.6-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm
Retrieving
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
I wanted to install the rpmforge-release package on a new install and get
the following. Do others have the same problem?
b51:~ rpm -ivvvh http://packages.sw.be/rpmforge-release/rpmforge-
release-0.3.6-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm
Retrieving
Karanbir Singh wrote on Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:22:21 +0100:
go look at the http code in rpm :D
do you get the same result?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
go look at the http code in rpm :D
do you get the same result?
This is a known issue with rpm's http code. It doesn't do cookies. It
can't really follow redirects (302 or otherwise) well, and generally
it's a hack. That's
For several days now I've been trying to update clamav from rpmforge without
success. Does anyone know what's likely to be the problem?
Anne
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 02:33:33PM +0100, Anne Wilson enlightened us:
For several days now I've been trying to update clamav from rpmforge without
success. Does anyone know what's likely to be the problem?
As has been covered before, this isn't the correct list for this question.
There is a
On Monday 21 April 2008 14:38, John wrote:
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 14:33 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
For several days now I've been trying to update clamav from rpmforge
without success. Does anyone know what's likely to be the problem?
Anne
Did you try to manually download it? Several
John wrote:
rpm -qa | grep clam
clamav-db-0.91.2-1.el5.rf
clamd-0.91.2-1.el5.rf
clamav-0.91.2-1.el5.rf
Those are stone old and have security issues. DO NOT USE THEM.
Ralph
pgpQrKh5f8JeZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 14:33 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
For several days now I've been trying to update clamav from rpmforge without
success. Does anyone know what's likely to be the problem?
Anne
Did you try to manually download it? Several peeps seem to be having a
problem with.
Don't
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 14:47 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 21 April 2008 14:38, John wrote:
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 14:33 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
For several days now I've been trying to update clamav from rpmforge
without success. Does anyone know what's likely to be the problem?
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 15:56 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
John wrote:
rpm -qa | grep clam
clamav-db-0.91.2-1.el5.rf
clamd-0.91.2-1.el5.rf
clamav-0.91.2-1.el5.rf
Those are stone old and have security issues. DO NOT USE THEM.
Ralph
Now your forcing me to yum update clamav! I know
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 14:47 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 21 April 2008 14:38, John wrote:
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 14:33 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
For several days now I've been trying to update clamav from rpmforge
without success. Does anyone know what's likely to be the problem?
Hello, I have suffered the same problem you describe with clam updates.
Finally it worked the upgrade from 0.92.XXX to 0.93.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa|grep -i clam
clamav-db-0.93-2.el4.rf.i386
clamd-0.93-2.el4.rf.i386
clamav-0.93-2.el4.rf.i386
The problem I had was that at starting the
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 19:41 +0200, Lorenzo Martínez Rodríguez wrote:
snip
P.S.: Yes, I do love top-posting if it helps (before some taliban says
something to me, the list is to help people. I hope not to be
unpolite)
snip
I'm not taliban, nor intolerant. But Have you thought about what you
Dag Wieers wrote on Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:35:42 +0200 (CEST):
Yesterday evening I added a TIMESTAMP to the root of my tree in order to
follow up on the correctness of mirrors. And after 12 hours more than 50%
of the mirrors do not have that TIMESTAMP file.
It is possible that it is filtered
Hi,
Yesterday evening I added a TIMESTAMP to the root of my tree in order to
follow up on the correctness of mirrors. And after 12 hours more than 50%
of the mirrors do not have that TIMESTAMP file.
It is possible that it is filtered out, so the test is not at all valid.
I am going to reduce the
Peter Kjellstrom napsal(a):
We see it too. My assumption is that it has to do with slow mirror sync
somehow. It seems a bunch of mirrors typically sit on a old or new version
that does not work with the local data (previously pulled from another
mirror). My typical fix is to ignore it
Dag Wieers wrote on Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:21:38 +0200 (CEST):
I wonder if this could be related to the fact that the metadata and data
are synchronized independently and not with the rsync --delay-updates
options.
The error refers to the metadata only it seems. What exactly does this
check
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Phil Schaffner wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 08:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
As already said the problem exists with an unspecified number of
mirrors. I
don't use a mirror. I installed your rpmforge repo rpm package.
That
retrieves the list of mirrors and tries one
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 15:21 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
I wonder if this could be related to the fact that the metadata and
data
are synchronized independently and not with the rsync --delay-updates
options.
Seems like a reasonable hypothesis. How hard would it be to test it by
synchronizing
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 08:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
As already said the problem exists with an unspecified number of
mirrors. I
don't use a mirror. I installed your rpmforge repo rpm package.
That
retrieves the list of mirrors and tries one (at random it seems). The
checksum fails, it
On Tuesday 28 August 2007, Phil Schaffner wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 08:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
As already said the problem exists with an unspecified number of
mirrors. I
don't use a mirror. I installed your rpmforge repo rpm package.
That
retrieves the list of mirrors and
I've only seen this on networks where I (or my providers) use
proxies, however you may have better luck asking on the rpmforge
user's list.
M... I sufer this issue frequently. And I establish the connection
from several sites (home, work). Maybe I'm behind a proxy network in my
hme
Dag Wieers wrote on Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:33:21 +0200 (CEST):
If you do have problems related to network issues, setting up a local
mirror is a good way to control the environment _and_ save ond bandwidth.
It's sure not a network issue. Don't experience it at the moment as yum is
still using
52 matches
Mail list logo
