Unless I've missed something (which is possible) there hasn't been any public
progress announcements regarding rpmfusion in the past several weeks.
Is there anything new to report? My ulterior motive is that I would love to
have the convenience of a one-stop rpm shop for Centos/RHEL and Fedora,
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 00:52 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
Unless I've missed something (which is possible) there hasn't been any public
progress announcements regarding rpmfusion in the past several weeks.
Is there anything new to report? My ulterior motive is that I would love to
have the
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 03:40:08 -0400
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RPMFusion has their own mailing lists; consider asking there.
I did exactly that, before posting my question here. Didn't see anything that
looked like a recent overall progress update. The last post to the
Frank Cox wrote:
Unless I've missed something (which is possible) there hasn't been any public
progress announcements regarding rpmfusion in the past several weeks.
Is there anything new to report? My ulterior motive is that I would love to
have the convenience of a one-stop rpm shop for
Frank Cox wrote:
Unless I've missed something (which is possible) there hasn't been any public
progress announcements regarding rpmfusion in the past several weeks.
Is there anything new to report? My ulterior motive is that I would love to
have the convenience of a one-stop rpm shop for
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Not to start a repo flame war, but for CentOS/RHEL, the repo that aims to
be a one-stop rpm shop is EPEL. Of course it needs more contributors, but
it has already ported a significant amount of FC6's old 'extras' repo
over (FC6 - EL5).
Ross, you are wrong on that front
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Not to start a repo flame war, but for CentOS/RHEL, the repo that aims to
be a one-stop rpm shop is EPEL. Of course it needs more contributors, but
it has already ported a significant amount of FC6's old 'extras' repo
over (FC6 - EL5).
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
If they manage to port all the Fedora extras over for EL then I
would say that is pretty darn close to one-stop shop for RPMs. Of
course no repo can have it all. There are always the questionable
items like closed source drivers and codecs which should be isolated.
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
If they manage to port all the Fedora extras over for EL then I
would say that is pretty darn close to one-stop shop for RPMs. Of
course no repo can have it all. There are always the questionable
items like closed source drivers and codecs
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
You need to go back and workout what a real resourceful repo should /
could / would have. If EPEL gives you all that, your' done. For a vast
majority of the rest of us, it doesnt and the way their mandate works,
it wont.
This is a CentOS users list. It is for users
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Ross S. W. Walker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If they manage to port all the Fedora extras over for EL then I
would say that is pretty darn close to one-stop shop for RPMs.
Assuming that all software ever needed by anybody exists in Fedora
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
You need to go back and workout what a real resourceful repo should /
could / would have. If EPEL gives you all that, your' done. For a vast
majority of the rest of us, it doesnt and the way their mandate works,
it wont.
This is a
Bent Terp wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If they manage to port all the Fedora extras over for EL then I
would say that is pretty darn close to one-stop shop for RPMs.
Assuming that all software ever needed by anybody exists in
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:38:49 +0100
Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rpmfusion never intended to support CentOS or any EL distro, they are
very much Fedora centric, so you should go talk to them about it
The very first line on the web page at http://rpmfusion.org says RPM Fusion is
a
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:24:40 +0100
Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And do any of those repo's listed there produce rpms for EL ?
Even if they don't do it today, perhaps they are planning to start with the
launch of rpmfusion. Or not. I'm just going on what the rpmfusion web page
says,
Frank Cox wrote:
Is there anything new to report?
(This question still hasn't been answered.)
if you go ask on the Fedora lists and their own lists at rpmfusion, I am
sure they will tell you :D Ignacio already did hint at what the
situation was though.
--
Karanbir Singh :
16 matches
Mail list logo
