:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of ken
> > Sent: den 22 november 2017 20:14
> > To: centos@centos.org
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update
> >
> > On 11/19/2017 12:53
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of ken
> Sent: den 22 november 2017 20:14
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update
>
> On 11/19/2017 12:53 PM, vychytraly . wr
ken wrote:
> On 11/19/2017 12:53 PM, vychytraly . wrote:
>> Maybe try flatpak version? there should be no problems with dependencies
>> there... :)
>
> Thanks, I didn't know about flatpak... even tho it's in the base repo!
> I have to admit though, after reading through the flatpak website about
>
On 11/19/2017 12:53 PM, vychytraly . wrote:
Maybe try flatpak version? there should be no problems with dependencies
there... :)
Thanks, I didn't know about flatpak... even tho it's in the base repo!
I have to admit though, after reading through the flatpak website about
it, I still don't un
Hello Peter,
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 20:39:41 +1300 Peter wrote:
> On 21/11/17 19:55, wwp wrote:
> Maybe. Unpacking the rpm works, anyway, I never encountered a single
> binary issue since I use it like that (ordinary use, I probably don't
> use that text encoding or whatever submodu
On 21/11/17 19:55, wwp wrote:
Maybe. Unpacking the rpm works, anyway, I never encountered a single
binary issue since I use it like that (ordinary use, I probably don't
use that text encoding or whatever submodule which depends on a newer
libstdc++).
Please explai
Hello,
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 19:22:19 -0600 Robert Nichols
wrote:
> On 11/20/2017 07:13 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> > On 11/20/17 03:44, wwp wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:58:21 +1300 Peter wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote:
> There's
On 11/20/2017 07:13 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 11/20/17 03:44, wwp wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:58:21 +1300 Peter wrote:
On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote:
There's the unstable version that installs and works:
https://www.skype.com/en/insider/
Thanks for pointing this out,
On 11/20/17 03:44, wwp wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:58:21 +1300 Peter wrote:
>
>> On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote:
>>> There's the unstable version that installs and works:
>>> https://www.skype.com/en/insider/
>>
>> Thanks for pointing this out, it looks like they rem
On 21/11/17 02:21, milos.blazevic wrote:
> Judging by the comments in the original announcement:
> https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/skype/forum/skype_linux-skype_startms-skype_installms/the-new-skype-for-desktop-is-here/dba5e41b-126a-4221-9e28-e1266d235689?auth=1
> I'd say yes.
>
> Sadly, no on
Quoting Peter :
On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote:
There's the unstable version that installs and works:
https://www.skype.com/en/insider/
Thanks for pointing this out, it looks like they removed the newer
GLIBCXX requirement that was added for 8.10, possibly due to popular demand?
Ju
Hello,
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:58:21 +1300 Peter wrote:
> On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote:
> > There's the unstable version that installs and works:
> > https://www.skype.com/en/insider/
>
> Thanks for pointing this out, it looks like they removed the newer
> GLIBCXX requirement that
On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote:
> There's the unstable version that installs and works:
> https://www.skype.com/en/insider/
Thanks for pointing this out, it looks like they removed the newer
GLIBCXX requirement that was added for 8.10, possibly due to popular demand?
Peter
_
Quoting ken :
For about a week now yum has tried and failed to update skypeforlinux:
Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
skypeforlinux-8.10.0.4-1.x86_64 from skype-stable
Processing Dependency: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.20)(64bit) for
package: skypeforlinux-8.10.0.4-1.x86_
Maybe try flatpak version? there should be no problems with dependencies
there... :)
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 7:02 PM, ken wrote:
> For about a week now yum has tried and failed to update skypeforlinux:
>
> Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
> skypeforlinux-8.10.0.4-1.x86_64 fro
For about a week now yum has tried and failed to update skypeforlinux:
Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
skypeforlinux-8.10.0.4-1.x86_64 from skype-stable
Processing Dependency: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.20)(64bit) for
package: skypeforlinux-8.10.0.4-1.x86_64
Is there any
16 matches
Mail list logo