Thank you,
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:32 PM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Alexander Farber alexander.far...@gmail.com
[r...@ablprx01 squid]# rpm -qa|grep -i squid
squid-2.6.STABLE6-5.el5_1.3
Sadly, CentOS squid packages are quite old.
Squid recent releases are: 2.7.STABLE5 and
Alexander Farber wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:32 PM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Alexander Farber alexander.far...@gmail.com
[r...@ablprx01 squid]# rpm -qa|grep -i squid
squid-2.6.STABLE6-5.el5_1.3
Sadly, CentOS squid packages are quite old.
Squid recent releases are:
Alexander Farber wrote:
Does anybody know of good Squid rpm's?
I have sourced our 2.6 packages from
http://people.redhat.com/mnagy/squid/ for the last few years without
problems.
Dean
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
this explains, why OpenBSD+Squid worked well for us
at the same server - I guess OpenBSD's Squid package
is better maintained.
CentOS supplied Squid is running just fine here.
Talking about squid versions: Advisory SQUID-2009:1
Due to an internal error Squid is vulnerable to a denial of
Alexander Farber wrote:
Sadly, CentOS squid packages are quite old.
Squid recent releases are: 2.7.STABLE5 and 3.0.STABLE12...
this explains, why OpenBSD+Squid worked well for us
at the same server - I guess OpenBSD's Squid package
is better maintained.
Except you cannot really say, just
Uh oh http://people.redhat.com/mnagy/squid/ doesn't have them yet...
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:06 PM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:
Talking about squid versions: Advisory SQUID-2009:1
Due to an internal error Squid is vulnerable to a denial of service attack
when processing specially crafted
CentOS supplied Squid is running just fine here.
Here too, 1300+ users, 80+ acl's and squidguard.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
John Doe wrote on Wed, 4 Feb 2009 04:06:28 -0800 (PST):
Talking about squid versions: Advisory SQUID-2009:1
Due to an internal error Squid is vulnerable to a denial of service
attack when processing specially crafted requests.
This bug is fixed by Squid versions 2.7.STABLE6, 3.0.STABLE13, and
Alexander Farber wrote on Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:20:49 +0100:
this explains, why OpenBSD+Squid worked well for us
at the same server - I guess OpenBSD's Squid package
is better maintained.
CentOS supplied Squid is running just fine here.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Ramon Nieto wrote:
CentOS supplied Squid is running just fine here.
Here too, 1300+ users, 80+ acl's and squidguard.
Likewise here, working as an internal cache for data used by a very busy
web server farm with
Alexander Farber wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Ramon Nieto wrote:
CentOS supplied Squid is running just fine here.
Here too, 1300+ users, 80+ acl's and squidguard.
Likewise here, working as an internal cache for data used by a very busy
web
From: Alexander Farber alexander.far...@gmail.com
[r...@ablprx01 squid]# rpm -qa|grep -i squid
squid-2.6.STABLE6-5.el5_1.3
Sadly, CentOS squid packages are quite old.
Squid recent releases are: 2.7.STABLE5 and 3.0.STABLE12...
Latest 2.6 is STABLE22
I've checked /var/log/messages and also
Hello,
I have a problem here with:
[r...@ablprx01 squid]# cat /etc/*release
CentOS release 5.2 (Final)
[r...@ablprx01 squid]# rpm -qa|grep -i squid
squid-2.6.STABLE6-5.el5_1.3
The web proxy process (used by 300-400 users)
seems to run ok:
[r...@ablprx01 squid]# ps uawwwx|grep squid
root
13 matches
Mail list logo
