nate wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> It was dumping large amounts of data into his home directory... which
>> was
>> NFS mounted from the server I needed to reboot.
>
> That's why I like HA clusters, our NFS cluster runs on top of
> CentOS, and if we needed to reboot a node it would have minima
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> It was dumping large amounts of data into his home directory... which was
> NFS mounted from the server I needed to reboot.
That's why I like HA clusters, our NFS cluster runs on top of
CentOS, and if we needed to reboot a node it would have minimal
impact, the other syst
Timo wrote:
>> From:
>> Sent: 18.2.'10, 18:55
>> Timo wrote:
>>> --- Original message ---
From:
Sent: 18.2.'10, 18:21
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Henry Ritzlmayr
> wrote:
>> nate wrote:
> >
>> a) I'm talking about
>> work;
>
> ..my systems at work.
--- Original message ---
> From:
> To: centos@centos.org
> Sent: 18.2.'10, 18:55
>
> Timo wrote:
>> --- Original message ---
>>> From:
>>> Sent: 18.2.'10, 18:21
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Henry Ritzlmayr
wrote:
> nate wrote:
>
> >I don't both
Timo wrote:
> --- Original message ---
>> From:
>> Sent: 18.2.'10, 18:21
>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Henry Ritzlmayr
>>> wrote:
nate wrote:
>>> >
>I don't bother changing the setting for local disks as it is
>usually pretty quick to scan them. You must h
--- Original message ---
> From:
> Sent: 18.2.'10, 18:21
>
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Henry Ritzlmayr
>> wrote:
>>> nate wrote:
>> >
>>> > I don't bother changing the setting for local disks as it is
>>> > usually pretty quick to scan them. You must have a pret
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Henry Ritzlmayr
> wrote:
>> nate wrote:
> >
>> > I don't bother changing the setting for local disks as it is
>> > usually pretty quick to scan them. You must have a pretty big
>> > and/or slow file system for fsck to take 2+ hours.
>> >
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Rudi Ahlers wrote on Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:54:11 +0200:
>
>> The server booted up, ran fsck, then each VM, as it booted up ran fsck as
>> well - which just slowed down the whole process since there's a 5 minute
>> delay in starting each VM.
>
> Why would yo
At Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:07:27 +0100 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On 02/18/2010 09:54 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> ...
> > But, how does one get past this? I know we need to reboot from time to time,
> > but more than often it's (preferably) not sooner than 6 - 10 months, so fsck
> > will run.
>
>
Rudi Ahlers wrote on Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:54:11 +0200:
> The server booted up, ran fsck, then each VM, as it booted up ran fsck as
> well - which just slowed down the whole process since there's a 5 minute
> delay in starting each VM.
Why would you autostart a VM only every 5 minutes? Or did you m
On 02/18/2010 09:54 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
...
> But, how does one get past this? I know we need to reboot from time to time,
> but more than often it's (preferably) not sooner than 6 - 10 months, so fsck
> will run.
Turn off automatic fsck with "tune2fs -i 0 -c 0" and instead
do a manual fsck (re
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Henry Ritzlmayr wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I don't bother changing the setting for local disks as it is
> > usually
> > pretty quick to scan them. You must have a pretty big and/or
> > slow
> > file system for fsck to take 2+ hour
>
>
> I don't bother changing the setting for local disks as it is
> usually
> pretty quick to scan them. You must have a pretty big and/or
> slow
> file system for fsck to take 2+ hours.
>
> nate
>
>
>
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:13 AM, nate wrote:
> Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
> > Is it "absolutely" necessary to run this on servers? Especially since
> they
> > don't reboot often, but when they do it takes ages for fsck to finish -
> > which on web servers causes extra unwanted downtime.
> >
> > Or is t
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Is it "absolutely" necessary to run this on servers? Especially since they
> don't reboot often, but when they do it takes ages for fsck to finish -
> which on web servers causes extra unwanted downtime.
>
> Or is there a way to run fsck with the server running? I know it's a
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>
>
> There are two metrics used: number of times a FS is mounted and number
> of days since last fsck/mount. For machines that don't get rebooted
> often (eg servers) the 'number of times a FS is mounted' almost never
> kicks in and the 'num
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 1/6/2010 1:17 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
>
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:34 PM, nate wrote:
> No out of band management?
>>
My thoughts exactly. All servers should have this these days, be it
an integrated card or an IP-base
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 02:11:10PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 1/6/2010 1:17 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> > All hardware sucks, all software sucks.
> >
> > Your machine _will_ go wrong and you _will_ need remote console access and
> > remote power ability. Especially if you have thousands of th
On 1/6/2010 1:17 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:34 PM, nate wrote:
No out of band management?
>
>>> My thoughts exactly. All servers should have this these days, be it
>>> an integrated card or an IP-based KVM.
>
>> But, on the other hand they should never need it,
2010/1/6 Les Mikesell :
> But, on the other hand they should never need it, except perhaps when
> installing the OS if you don't use a full-auto method or clone disks.
Reminds me of the quote, "In theory there is no difference between
theory and practice. In practise, there is".
Call me paranoid
On 1/6/2010 2:36 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Brian Mathis wrote:
>>> No out of band management?
>
>> My thoughts exactly. All servers should have this these days, be it
>> an integrated card or an IP-based KVM.
>
> Oh believe me, I want to get there. It's high on my
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Brian Mathis wrote:
>> No out of band management?
> My thoughts exactly. All servers should have this these days, be it
> an integrated card or an IP-based KVM.
Oh believe me, I want to get there. It's high on my list this year
... I'm still relatively new here
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 12:30:15PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 1/6/2010 12:05 PM, Brian Mathis wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:34 PM, nate wrote:
> >> No out of band management?
> > My thoughts exactly. All servers should have this these days, be it
> > an integrated card or an IP-based
At Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:45:46 -0600 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On 1/6/2010 11:19 AM, Alan McKay wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > I searched the list archives and found this :
> >
> > echo "AUTOFSCK_TIMEOUT=5"> /etc/sysconfig/autofsck
> > echo "AUTOFSCK_DEF_CHECK=yes">> /etc/sysconfig/autofsck
On 1/6/2010 12:05 PM, Brian Mathis wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:34 PM, nate wrote:
>> Alan McKay wrote:
>>
>>> I want to do a reboot of a couple of systems during our maintenance
>>> window and fsck them, but would rather try it from home first and not
>>> go to the data center. Then of cou
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:34 PM, nate wrote:
> Alan McKay wrote:
>
>> I want to do a reboot of a couple of systems during our maintenance
>> window and fsck them, but would rather try it from home first and not
>> go to the data center. Then of course rush there like a madman if
>> they don't com
> Hey folks,
>
> I searched the list archives and found this :
>
> echo "AUTOFSCK_TIMEOUT=5" > /etc/sysconfig/autofsck
> echo "AUTOFSCK_DEF_CHECK=yes" >> /etc/sysconfig/autofsck
>
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2006-November/029837.html
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-Se
On 1/6/2010 11:19 AM, Alan McKay wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I searched the list archives and found this :
>
> echo "AUTOFSCK_TIMEOUT=5"> /etc/sysconfig/autofsck
> echo "AUTOFSCK_DEF_CHECK=yes">> /etc/sysconfig/autofsck
>
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2006-November/029837.html
> http://l
Alan McKay wrote:
> I want to do a reboot of a couple of systems during our maintenance
> window and fsck them, but would rather try it from home first and not
> go to the data center. Then of course rush there like a madman if
> they don't come back up :-)
No out of band management?
nate
___
Hey folks,
I searched the list archives and found this :
echo "AUTOFSCK_TIMEOUT=5" > /etc/sysconfig/autofsck
echo "AUTOFSCK_DEF_CHECK=yes" >> /etc/sysconfig/autofsck
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2006-November/029837.html
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-September/thread.
30 matches
Mail list logo
