m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Is there some way to make dkms NOT try to install/load a driver?
mark, with an old NVidia card that is *NOT* supported
by anything newer than 174, and *certainly* not
by the generic xorg x11 nvidia driver
why dkms?
use
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Is there some way to make dkms NOT try to install/load a driver?
mark, with an old NVidia card that is *NOT* supported
by anything newer than 174, and *certainly* not
by the generic xorg x11 nvidia driver
why dkms?
use
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
why dkms?
use nvidia-x11-drv-173xx and kmod-nvidia-173xx from elrepo, the kmod is
kabi-tracking.
That's the one I think I'm using. Somehow, when I did my most recent
update, to kernel 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5, or whenever it did an X
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
why dkms?
use nvidia-x11-drv-173xx and kmod-nvidia-173xx from elrepo, the kmod is
kabi-tracking.
That's the one I think I'm using. Somehow, when I did my most recent
update, to kernel 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5, or whenever it did an X
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:37 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
If you do not have any other dkms-dependent packages, you should
remove all dkms-xxx.
Mmmm... I was afraid to do that, not being sure what else it loads.
However, if I rpm -qa | grep dkms, I only see dkms itself.
In that case, you
Akemi wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:37 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
If you do not have any other dkms-dependent packages, you should
remove all dkms-xxx.
Mmmm... I was afraid to do that, not being sure what else it loads.
However, if I rpm -qa | grep dkms, I only see dkms itself.
In
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:56 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
ls -l `find /lib/modules -name nvidia.ko`
How 'bout find /lib/modules -name nvidia.ko -ls?
30965907 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 48 Mar 18 09:48
/lib/modules/2.6.18-164.2.1.el5/weak-updates/nvidia.ko -
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:56 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
ls -l `find /lib/modules -name nvidia.ko`
How 'bout find /lib/modules -name nvidia.ko -ls?
30965907 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 48 Mar 18 09:48
/lib/modules/2.6.18-164.2.1.el5/weak-updates/nvidia.ko -
snip
It's a
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:56 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
ls -l `find /lib/modules -name nvidia.ko`
How 'bout find /lib/modules -name nvidia.ko -ls?
309659070 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 48 Mar 18 09:48
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of MHR
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 11:18 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers
I've never seen this problem at all - running AMD 64x2 7750, 4Gb
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of JohnS
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:52 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers
No none of that is hardware issues. It is issues with the Nvidia
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
Diagonal thin black lines originating from upper left corner for starters.
Then if I open a gui, whatever sort, that window gets those lines too. Menus
are unreadable because of this, but slightly more readable if I
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Michael A. Peters
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 5:57 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers
Strangely enough, only the systems running an Amd cpu
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Alfred von Campe
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 7:51 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers
FWIW, I don't use DKMS but this homegrown script instead
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 10:08 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Michael A. Peters
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 5:57 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Scott Silva
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 8:19 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers
on 4-6-2009 5:55 AM Sorin Srbu spake the following:
I got
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Akemi Yagi
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 8:44 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers
My question is who updates those drivers, as the v173.08
Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Scott Silva
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 8:19 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers
on 4-6-2009 5:55 AM Sorin Srbu spake
FWIW, I don't use DKMS but this homegrown script instead. I put
whatever version of the driver I want to deploy (currently NVIDIA-
Linux-x86-180.44-pkg1.run) in a network accessible location and
create a link named NVIDIA-Linux-x86-latest to it. The script then
handles the rest.
Alfred
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
on 4-6-2009 5:55 AM Sorin Srbu spake the following:
My question is who updates those drivers, as the v173.08 Nvidia drivers are
now almost a year old? Would there be any other good repo with more current
drivers suitable
John wrote on Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:52:03 -0400:
But 75% don't know how to. All they know is they downloaded the cds.
Took them a week to figure out how to make a bootable install disk. Then
finally 24 hours to install the OS. Six hours to get on the Internet.
Another 5 hours to setup email.
Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CentOS is *not* for users new to Linux or Unix-like operatings
systems. It isn't. Full stop.
Hopefully what you mean is that it isn't designed specifically for users that
are new to Linux. It is a perfectly fine distribution for those wanting to
learn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Robert Becker Cope
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 8:51 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: RE: [CentOS] DKMS
Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CentOS is *not* for users new to Linux or Unix-like
Robert Becker Cope wrote:
Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CentOS is *not* for users new to Linux or Unix-like operatings
systems. It isn't. Full stop.
Hopefully what you mean is that it isn't designed specifically for users that
are new to Linux. It is a perfectly fine distribution for
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's easy
to forget there is now a whole generation of computer users who have known
nothing but the GUI and completely missed out on DOS or CP/M, and never
owned a Spectrum/Commodore/BBC Micro etc.
Wow, Ned, I never
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's easy
to forget there is now a whole generation of computer users who have known
nothing but the GUI and completely missed out on DOS or CP/M, and never
owned a Spectrum/Commodore/BBC Micro etc.
Wow,
It was a Bounced message.
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kai Schaetzl
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 2:31 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:31:14 +0200:
John wrote
On Saturday 05 April 2008 22:13, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 05 April 2008 20:02:08 Alan Bartlett wrote:
(3) The CentOS-docs list. Anne, the last item I received was dated April
3rd.
In the morning I'll go to the member prefs page and see if I can see what's
wrong. Thanks
Nothing to
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 16:49 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
John wrote:
Alan,
I knew of the Dell article, as I have all of those saved for reference.
[1] I was just wondering if you knew of any that were for someone knew
to Linux. You know the Microsoft type tutorials that have screenshot
On Saturday 05 April 2008 18:18:47 John wrote:
Ned, do I hear someone volunteering to write a new Wiki section? (I
don't think a *separate* Wiki for the new users, be they M$ Windoze
departees or not, is a good idea.) Perhaps this discussion should be
continued on the CentOS-docs list?
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 19:17 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 05 April 2008 18:18:47 John wrote:
Ned, do I hear someone volunteering to write a new Wiki section? (I
don't think a *separate* Wiki for the new users, be they M$ Windoze
departees or not, is a good idea.) Perhaps this
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 20:02 +0100, Alan Bartlett wrote:
On 05/04/2008, Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the command line, if you saved the commands - or got them
from an instructional listing in the first place, you just
paste the same set of commands into a
Alan Bartlett wrote:
(2) We must not loose sight of what CentOS basically is. CentOS == RHEL less
RH. A stable, server orientated OS. On the fora, we often see evidence that
CentOS is believed to be similar to *other* distros (that are more suitable
for laptops home use) and that it, CentOS,
John wrote:
One things GUIs can do is present a bunch of pre-set defaults or pick up
the current settings so you only have to change a few particular items,
and they can check the ranges and syntax of the entries before trying to
apply them. Webmin does a fair job on this considering the
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 14:54 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Alan Bartlett wrote:
(2) We must not loose sight of what CentOS basically is. CentOS == RHEL less
RH. A stable, server orientated OS. On the fora, we often see evidence that
CentOS is believed to be similar to *other* distros (that
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 14:54 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Alan Bartlett wrote:
(2) We must not loose sight of what CentOS basically is. CentOS == RHEL less
RH. A stable, server orientated OS. On the fora, we often see evidence that
CentOS is believed to be similar to *other* distros (that
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 15:12 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
John wrote:
One things GUIs can do is present a bunch of pre-set defaults or pick up
the current settings so you only have to change a few particular items,
and they can check the ranges and syntax of the entries before trying to
37 matches
Mail list logo
