stest 4.6 -> 5.1 upgrade path
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Sorin Srbu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did the upgrade dance with yum once when going from Fedora 5 to 7. It
> worked, but took a lot of time and left a helluva' lot of obscure
lib-failures
> and stuff. I eve
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Sorin Srbu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did the upgrade dance with yum once when going from Fedora 5 to 7. It
> worked, but took a lot of time and left a helluva' lot of obscure lib-failures
> and stuff. I eventually got it working but I never felt sure it wouldn'
ur data first though.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Johnny Hughes
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 5:07 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Fastest 4.6 -> 5.1 upgrade path
Yum upgrades are the hardest to do, and are NOT recommend
Adrian Marsh wrote:
Hi All,
I've a question on upgrading Centos with the least downtime...
The best way to accomoplish this is to backup all data and not upgrade
the install at all. That is how Red Hat recommends that you do it for
RHEL and how CentOS recommends it be done as well.
Found a thread here that seems to suggest it's the only way:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=11128&forum=3
7
Oh Well..
Thanks anyway..
Adrian
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinf
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 07:51:24AM -0700, Adrian Marsh wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I’ve a question on upgrading Centos with the least downtime…
>
> I’ve a centos 4.6 machine, hosting my local Centos respository. I’d
> like to upgrade the OS to 5.1
>
> I’ve practised in a VMware machine upgrading it by
6 matches
Mail list logo