Johnny Hughes wrote:
OR moderate all posts ... who wants to volunteer to read and release all
posts :-D
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
Besides that obvious question, moderation would mean an end to the quick
replies that we enjoy now.
Regards,
Robert
__
--- Robert - elists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > OR moderate all posts ... who wants to volunteer
> to read and release all
> > posts :-D
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Johnny Hughes
>
> I thought I saw Perrin and Wieers raise their
> keyboards!!!
>
> E ahem, I meant hands...
>
> :-)
>
> ( l
>Please, no more GOD stuff.
> illicit mails, that include SPAM :-)
>
> So Admins GOD WORK!
>
> /Mats
>
>
I believe he meant to type 'GOOD WORK'. No big deal.
~James
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis
Please, no more GOD stuff.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MatsK
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 12:18 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] What's up with the mailing list spam?
&g
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:18:08 +0100
MatsK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> >> Maybee this is why its more common to see weird pictures with text
> >> in them so its harder to script is ?
> >>
> >> /Mats
> >
> > That wouldn't help much in this case. Unless the subscription was
Bill Campbell wrote:
> We have Mailman configured to check with spamassassin, sending messages
> with sufficiently high scores to the moderator(s) for approval and
> automatically discarding anything with a score > 20. Thus anything with
> scores between our required_score of 5 and 20 is held for
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Maybee this is why its more common to see weird pictures with text in them
so its harder to script is ?
/Mats
That wouldn't help much in this case. Unless the subscription was
being automated I guess.
Your rÃght about that, but it's the automated scripts that is harde
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
While this isn't perfect, fewer than 1 spam per month has made it through
to any of the lists we host in the last year (at least one of which I
approved accidentally :-).
I think it should be noted that this is probably the first time I've
seen a spam
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Matt Shields wrote:
Just this morning I've gotten 3 or 4 pieces of spam on the CentOS mailing list.
Tell us how we should reject that in advance and we will. Yes, the
"user" was subscribed.
We have Mailma
> While this isn't perfect, fewer than 1 spam per month has made it through
> to any of the lists we host in the last year (at least one of which I
> approved accidentally :-).
I think it should be noted that this is probably the first time I've
seen a spam on the centos list that I can remember.
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>Matt Shields wrote:
>> Just this morning I've gotten 3 or 4 pieces of spam on the CentOS mailing
>> list.
>
>Tell us how we should reject that in advance and we will. Yes, the
>"user" was subscribed.
We have Mailman configured to check with spamassass
John Hinton wrote:
> I guess the big advantage to them on list is the archive now contains their
> post and if there was a URL, a link from the CentOS archive, pretty well
> positioned by Google and the likes, now points to their site possibly
> moving them up on the search engines. It's actuall
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:22:35PM +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Matt Shields wrote:
Just this morning I've gotten 3 or 4 pieces of spam on the CentOS mailing list.
Tell us how we should reject that in advance and we will. Yes, the
"user" was subscribed.
>
> OR moderate all posts ... who wants to volunteer to read and release all
> posts :-D
>
> Thanks,
> Johnny Hughes
I thought I saw Perrin and Wieers raise their keyboards!!!
E ahem, I meant hands...
:-)
( like they both do not have enough to do already ;-> )
- rh
> Maybee this is why its more common to see weird pictures with text in them
> so its harder to script is ?
>
> /Mats
That wouldn't help much in this case. Unless the subscription was
being automated I guess.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:22:35PM +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Matt Shields wrote:
Just this morning I've gotten 3 or 4 pieces of spam on the CentOS mailing list.
Tell us how we should reject that in advance and we will. Yes, the
"user" was subscri
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:22:35PM +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>> Matt Shields wrote:
>>> Just this morning I've gotten 3 or 4 pieces of spam on the CentOS mailing
>>> list.
>> Tell us how we should reject that in advance and we will. Yes, the
>> "user" was subscribed.
>>
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:22:35PM +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Matt Shields wrote:
> > Just this morning I've gotten 3 or 4 pieces of spam on the CentOS mailing
> > list.
>
> Tell us how we should reject that in advance and we will. Yes, the
> "user" was subscribed.
>
Clearly you should ass
Matt Shields wrote:
> Just this morning I've gotten 3 or 4 pieces of spam on the CentOS mailing
> list.
Tell us how we should reject that in advance and we will. Yes, the
"user" was subscribed.
Ralph
pgpHczKi3cRbi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
C
19 matches
Mail list logo
