Mogens Kjaer kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika perjantai, 27. kesäkuuta
2008):
> Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> ...
>
> > Which is why yum upgrade is recommended, yum update may or may not work
> > for everyone, depending on this flag
>
> Many have expressed concern because they've used "yum update" instea
Mogens Kjaer wrote on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:55:58 +0200:
> The yum.conf file will have this line unless manually removed
And you are right, too :-) William mentioned the config file, btw, he just
didn't mention the flag.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Ser
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
...
Which is why yum upgrade is recommended, yum update may or may not work
for everyone, depending on this flag
Many have expressed concern because they've used "yum update" instead of
"yum upgrade".
My point is that it might not be a problem.
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, Carl
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
You are right, there is a difference:
upgrade
Is the same as the update command with the --obsoletes flag set.
See update for more details.
If the /etc/yum.conf file contains:
obsoletes=1
yum update will be the same as yum upgrade.
The yum.co
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
You are right, there is a difference:
upgrade
Is the same as the update command with the --obsoletes flag set.
See update for more details.
If the /etc/yum.conf file contains:
obsoletes=1
yum update will be the same as yum upgrade.
The yum.conf file will have thi
You are right, there is a difference:
upgrade
Is the same as the update command with the --obsoletes flag set.
See update for more details.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
_
Thanks guys for the various suggestions
really do apprecite
but as u guys say i shd follow ..
have a perfect backup system and then do the upgrade
really apprecite
regards
fabian
simon
> I just updated from an i386 CentOS 5 system today, using the reccommendeds
> steps on my server, and
William L. Maltby <> scribbled on Thursday, June 26, 2008 8:49 PM:
> an
> update of a live server without adequate testing and/or fallback plan is
> akin to unassisted suicide. It won't be your foot you shot yourself in
> if something goes drastically wrong.
LOL! Clear and to the point. Good one!
I just updated from an i386 CentOS 5 system today, using the reccommendeds
steps on my server, and it went fine.
So it *should* also go fine for you, but, as has been said before, Your
Mileage May Vary.
2008/6/26 William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 21:31 +0200, Kai S
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 21:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:48:48 -0400:
>
> > 2. yum upgrade # not update
>
> that's supposed to be the same.
IIRC, that's true if default config file wasn't modified with certain
parameters. Do I mis-remember? IIRC, u
William L. Maltby wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:48:48 -0400:
> 2. yum upgrade # not update
that's supposed to be the same.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 21:46 +0300, fabian dacunha wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am curently running a CENTOS server with the following setup
>
> CentOS release 5 (Final)
> Kernel 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen on an i686
Stating the obvious, you are WAY behind on updates, including many
security patches.
> bin
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 11:35 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> fabian dacunha wrote:
> > i jus wanted to know if i could SAFELY apply the updates since its a live
> > server running our companys primary DNS and mail server
In case you missed it, there was a recommended "two step" and parameter
recomme
Why don't you clone your machine, or use Vmware or something, and do an test
before you do it with your production-machine? Asking this sort of question is,
well, rather meaningless IMO. Your setup is unique considering what tweaks you
might've done to it. YMMV as they say. What works for me, do
fabian dacunha wrote:
i jus wanted to know if i could SAFELY apply the updates since its a live
server running our companys primary DNS and mail server
noone has your exact configuration, so the only way to know if it will
for sure work for you would be to test it on a staging server config
15 matches
Mail list logo