On 14/12/10 02:15, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Gé Weijers g...@weijers.org wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
RHEL is much better about that, although by now the production RHEL
5 is 4 years out of date, the leading edge RHEL 6 is now one
And also take into consideration that RHEL6 is shipped with approx.
2.000 packages. And there are over 10.000 packages available for
Fedora. Such a limited package scope is needed to be able to provide
stability. And this stability is why so many loves to run
RHEL/CentOS/ScientificLinux
On 13/12/2010 19:03, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/12/13 Gé Weijersg...@weijers.org:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
RHEL is much better about that, although by now the production RHEL
5 is 4 years out of date, the leading edge RHEL 6 is now one year
out of date after the lengthy
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:40 AM, David Sommerseth
d...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On 14/12/10 02:15, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Well, yes. But the edge on RHEL 5 is 4 years old,a nd RHEL 6 (end
eventually CentOS 6) will have been blunted for a year by the time
it's published. It's a problem
They are OK with the roll-your-own style of Gentoo?
Especially with it's cutting edge versions, bugs, security holes and the only
way to overcome them is to upgrade to an even newer version that may break
compatibility, introduce new bugs, zero-day vulnerabilities, the list goes on
and
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:02 AM, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
They are OK with the roll-your-own style of Gentoo?
Especially with it's cutting edge versions, bugs, security holes and the
only way to overcome them is to upgrade to an even newer version that may
break
On Dec 13, 2010, at 5:02 AM, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
They are OK with the roll-your-own style of Gentoo?
Especially with it's cutting edge versions, bugs, security holes and the
only way to overcome them is to upgrade to an even newer version that may
break compatibility,
On Dec 13, 2010, at 5:02 AM, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
They are OK with the roll-your-own style of Gentoo?
Especially with it's cutting edge versions, bugs, security holes and the
only way to overcome them is to upgrade to an even newer version that may
break compatibility,
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Zdenek zdene...@o2.pl wrote:
Hello all.
Does anybody have experience with pushing CentOS in enterprise?
I have the following situation. I tried to promote CentOS to local bank. They
have now a couple of Gentoo-based systems and I tried to explain them that
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:22:28PM -0500, Brian Mathis wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Zdenek zdene...@o2.pl wrote:
Hello all.
Does anybody have experience with pushing CentOS in enterprise?
I have the following situation. I tried to promote CentOS to local
bank. They have
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 05:47:53PM +, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Anyone who advocates maintaining from source has simply never
administered more than a handful of machines at a time.
Great way to learn, but impractical for hundreds to thousands of
machines.
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Zdenek zdene...@o2.pl wrote:
Hello all.
Does anybody have experience with pushing CentOS in enterprise?
What does 'enterprise' mean to you?
-Kristopher Kane
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:55:12PM -0500, Kristopher Kane wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Zdenek zdene...@o2.pl wrote:
Hello all.
Does anybody have experience with pushing CentOS in enterprise?
What does 'enterprise' mean to you?
Space. The final frontier...
lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Anyone who advocates maintaining from source has simply never
administered more than a handful of machines at a time.
Great way to learn, but impractical for hundreds to thousands of
machines.
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:55:12PM -0500, Kristopher Kane wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Zdenek zdene...@o2.pl wrote:
Hello all.
Does anybody have experience with pushing CentOS in enterprise?
What does 'enterprise' mean to you?
Space. The final
On Monday, December 13, 2010 01:03:03 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
What does 'enterprise' mean to you?
Space. The final frontier...
Hey, that's the question, when you're trying to get new, bigger disks!
What we need is a working warp drive. These magnetic impulse drives are still
too
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Monday, December 13, 2010 01:03:03 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
What does 'enterprise' mean to you?
Space. The final frontier...
Hey, that's the question, when you're trying to get new, bigger disks!
What we need is a working warp drive. These magnetic impulse
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
RHEL is much better about that, although by now the production RHEL
5 is 4 years out of date, the leading edge RHEL 6 is now one year
out of date after the lengthy release testing, and CentOS will always
lag that.
I believe out of date is the
2010/12/13 Gé Weijers g...@weijers.org:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
RHEL is much better about that, although by now the production RHEL
5 is 4 years out of date, the leading edge RHEL 6 is now one year
out of date after the lengthy release testing, and CentOS will always
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Gé Weijers g...@weijers.org wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
RHEL is much better about that, although by now the production RHEL
5 is 4 years out of date, the leading edge RHEL 6 is now one year
out of date after the lengthy release
On Tuesday, December 14, 2010 02:28 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Oog... I just looked that up
http://www.thinkgeek.com/homeoffice/kitchen/dea2/?source=google_home_officecpg=ogho1gclid=CLiQtsPt6aUCFRVx5QodJHRAYQ
mark not sure I want to know where no man has cut before
There,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zdenek said the following on 12/12/10 17:45:
Are there any public resources that can be used as proofs of CentOS stability?
Are there about Windows stability?
Ciao,
luigi
- --
/
+--[Luigi Rosa]--
\
To iterate is human, to recourse, divine.
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Zdenek zdene...@o2.pl wrote:
Does anybody have experience with pushing CentOS in enterprise?
I have the following situation. I tried to promote CentOS to local bank. They
have now a couple of Gentoo-based systems and I tried to explain them that
CentOS is
At Sun, 12 Dec 2010 17:45:23 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Hello all.
Does anybody have experience with pushing CentOS in enterprise?
I have the following situation. I tried to promote CentOS to local bank. They
have now a couple of Gentoo-based systems and I
2010/12/12 Zdenek zdene...@o2.pl:
Hello all.
Does anybody have experience with pushing CentOS in enterprise?
Yes and no. Maybe you should select RHEL for enterprises?
--
Eero
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
At Sun, 12 Dec 2010 17:45:23 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Hello all.
Does anybody have experience with pushing CentOS in enterprise?
I have the following situation. I tried to promote
I have the following situation. I tried to promote CentOS to local bank. They
have now a couple of Gentoo-based systems and I tried to explain them that
CentOS is much better option for enterprises.
We deployed a CentOS based virtualized appliance for a (non-critical)
application developed
On Dec 12, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Zdenek zdene...@o2.pl wrote:
Hello all.
Does anybody have experience with pushing CentOS in enterprise?
I do, but I have it easy because I am the IT management.
I have the following situation. I tried to promote CentOS to local bank. They
have now a couple
Is the the system for a bank need critical?
then pay for RHEL
else install CENTOS
Its the mentality of people and lack of exposure to technology that
hinders people from moving forward. Recently the MyGOSSCON 2010
(http://mygosscon.oscc.org.my) saw more
29 matches
Mail list logo
