On 07/18/2012 04:45 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:16 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
mark and I wouldn't support Larry Ellison if I have any options
Yeah, sticking it to the company that's developing and supporting open
source GPL Java sounds sensible...
*sarcasm*
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Johnny Hughes wrote:
No, java is not open source. Didn't you know that the APIs are
patented. You did see that Oracle sued Google for making a Derivative
work of java, right? Open source is open source ... this suing people
for using open source to create derivative
On 07/19/2012 09:53 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Johnny Hughes wrote:
No, java is not open source. Didn't you know that the APIs are
patented. You did see that Oracle sued Google for making a Derivative
work of java, right? Open source is open source ... this suing people
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/19/2012 09:53 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Johnny Hughes wrote:
No, java is not open source. Didn't you know that the APIs are
patented. You did see that Oracle sued Google for making a Derivative
work of java, right? Open source is open source
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
You did see the majority of the developers for OpenOffice jumped ship
and went to LibreOffice as soon as Sun was bought by Oracle, right? Why
do you think that is?
Like in all events in History, there's two versions of
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
If Android was not wildly popular, Oracle would not have done anything
about it. Since it is, they want $$.
Money is so evil! how they dare license a technology... even if it's
open source...
*sarcasm*
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
It fits in fine until Oracle decides that it wants to sue because they
think there is some money to be made. Then APIs are patentable, GPL does
not give patent permissions, etc. The lawsuits will then fly.
You could
On 07/19/2012 10:17 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
If Android was not wildly popular, Oracle would not have done anything
about it. Since it is, they want $$.
Money is so evil! how they dare license a technology... even if
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
Just because Sun didn't have patent suits in our genetic code doesn't
mean we didn't feel wronged. While I have differences with Oracle, in
this case they are in the right. Google totally slimed Sun. We were
all really
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
No, java is not open source.
Yes it is.
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
They made Java GPL
Yes, you finally understood. Thanks :)
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7/
Chris wrote:
Hello CentOS Guys,
What do you think about the Oracle Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel?
Since Release 2 of the UEK Kernel, all updates are available free of
charge http://public-yum.oracle.com/
My questions:
Does the Oracle UEK kernel really perform better than the default
No
Clive
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:16 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
mark and I wouldn't support Larry Ellison if I have any options
Yeah, sticking it to the company that's developing and supporting open
source GPL Java sounds sensible...
*sarcasm*
FC
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Chris xchris...@googlemail.com wrote:
Does the Oracle UEK kernel really perform better than the default centos
kernel?
Technical advantages and disadvantages?
This answers some of your questions
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 06:45:35PM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:16 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
mark and I wouldn't support Larry Ellison if I have any options
Yeah, sticking it to the company that's developing and supporting open
source GPL Java sounds
2012/7/18 m.r...@5-cent.us:
Do you understand what OUL is, a modified version of RHEL? And no, I have
grave doubts you could use that kernel with the standard repositories for
CentOS: I'd give you a 95% confidence that trying to update most things
would give you tons of unsatisfied
2012/7/18 John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 06:45:35PM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:16 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
mark and I wouldn't support Larry Ellison if I have any options
Yeah, sticking it to the company that's
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:03:47AM +0200, Chris wrote:
I think they did a great job with btrfs and Oracle Linux for free.
Uh-huh.
OEL for free is a calculated move to poach yet more users from Redhat,
and in this specific instance, also _directly_ targeted at CentOS users.
btrfs on its own
2012/7/18 Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com:
Why come here and speak about mixing CentOS with Oracle kernel?. The
answers will surely be mostly negative (like going to a Fedora mailing
list and asking about using an Ubuntu kernel, or vice-versa). Do you
expect the answers to be otherwise?.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:09 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
Perhaps if they were actually putting out their _own_ distribution
instead of leeching off Redhat's work and then _making money off of it_
it perchance might be a different story.
It's called free market competition.
On 19-07-12 00:34, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:09 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
Perhaps if they were actually putting out their _own_ distribution
instead of leeching off Redhat's work and then _making money off of it_
it perchance might be a different
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Patrick Lists
centos-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl wrote:
Larry is that you?
ROFL... I use Fedora on desktops. Used Sun JDS before, and SuSE before
that. Caldera Openlinux 12 years ago. IBM OS/2 before that.
Today, one of my servers run CentOS. But when I plan to
22 matches
Mail list logo
