On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 09:36:35PM +0600, Sergey Podushkin wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Also which Fedora version was the basis for this?
Version of anaconda is tightly linked to Fedora version, so it's based
on Fedora 13, because it use anaconda-13.
RHEL6 Anaconda was forked from Fedora
On 11/11/2010 01:06 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote:
Am 10.11.10 23:54, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
On 11/10/2010 04:33 PM, Connie Sieh wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/10/2010 02:43 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10,
John R. Dennison wrote:
I think it's a fair bet to say it will be at least 4-6 weeks
out.
When it comes, will I be able to upgrade by sudo yum update?
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:57:58PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
John R. Dennison wrote:
I think it's a fair bet to say it will be at least 4-6 weeks
out.
When it comes, will I be able to upgrade by sudo yum update?
You can try. :)
There is, in the RH docs, an upgrade path
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:57:58PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
When it comes, will I be able to upgrade by sudo yum update?
You can try. :)
Having done several upgrades from CentOS 4 to CentOS 5, my recommendation
would be to not even try it.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:13:16AM -0500, Steve Thompson wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:57:58PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
When it comes, will I be able to upgrade by sudo yum update?
You can try. :)
Having done several upgrades from
2010/11/11 Steve Thompson s...@vgersoft.com:
Having done several upgrades from CentOS 4 to CentOS 5, my recommendation
would be to not even try it. There is all kinds of ugliness left over that
has to be cleaned up; I did it in the end, but it took a lot longer than
doing a clean install.
On 11/11/2010 09:23 AM, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
2010/11/11 Steve Thompsons...@vgersoft.com:
Having done several upgrades from CentOS 4 to CentOS 5, my recommendation
would be to not even try it. There is all kinds of ugliness left over that
has to be cleaned up; I did it in the end,
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Also which Fedora version was the basis for this?
Version of anaconda is tightly linked to Fedora version, so it's based
on Fedora 13, because it use anaconda-13.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Thursday, November 11, 2010 09:57:58 am Timothy Murphy wrote:
John R. Dennison wrote:
I think it's a fair bet to say it will be at least 4-6 weeks
out.
When it comes, will I be able to upgrade by sudo yum update?
Given that the upstream sources from which CentOS 5 was originally
Am 11.11.10 15:53, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
On 11/11/2010 01:06 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote:
Am 10.11.10 23:54, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
On 11/10/2010 04:33 PM, Connie Sieh wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/10/2010 02:43 PM,
Is it an x86_64 install? I had a problem with Xen last year under 5.x
whereby I had to increase the VM's memory footprint to 512 MB
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote:
Am 11.11.10 15:53, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
On 11/11/2010 01:06 AM, Götz Reinicke -
On 11/11/2010 9:30 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Having done several upgrades from CentOS 4 to CentOS 5, my recommendation
would be to not even try it. There is all kinds of ugliness left over that
has to be cleaned up; I did it in the end, but it took a lot longer than
doing a clean install.
Yeah - try to bump up the memory to 512 MB... As I recall, that fixed my
issues as well...
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote:
Am 11.11.10 17:17, schrieb Scot P. Floess:
Is it an x86_64 install? I had a problem with Xen last year under 5.x
whereby I had to
On 11/11/2010 04:46 PM, Scot P. Floess wrote:
Yeah - try to bump up the memory to 512 MB... As I recall, that fixed my
issues as well...
What are the chances that you might consider not top posting, and
trimming your replies so as to not carry the whole thread with it ?
- KB
On 11/11/2010 10:10 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote:
Am 11.11.10 15:53, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
On 11/11/2010 01:06 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote:
Am 10.11.10 23:54, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
On 11/10/2010 04:33 PM, Connie Sieh wrote:
On 11/11/2010 10:21 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 11/11/2010 9:30 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Having done several upgrades from CentOS 4 to CentOS 5, my recommendation
would be to not even try it. There is all kinds of ugliness left over that
has to be cleaned up; I did it in the end,
On 11/11/2010 10:55 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I just tried to install RH EL 6 on a virtual mashine with 256 MB. Just
after the installer boots it says 'You do not have enough RAM to install
'
Given a comment that RHEL 6 is based on FC13, I am going to try
installing FC13 on one of my
What are the chances that you might consider not top posting, and
trimming your replies so as to not carry the whole thread with it ?
Good chance I guess
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 11/11/10 00:45, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:57:10PM -0600, Barry Brimer wrote:
Absolutely. Red Hat does a tremendous amount of heavy lifting to produce
RHEL, without which there would be no CentOS. Red Hat also gets paid
pretty well to do so, and unless I am mistaken
Jake Shipton wrote:
On 11/11/10 00:45, Matthew Miller wrote:
My Fedora 12 is coming to EOL soon, so I must upgrade my Fedora, but I
plan to switch to CentOS6 instead :-) Albeit EL doesn't have XFCE (Last
time I checked) I can sort that out, and a few other things I can easily
fix (make and
Yah...can't wait
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:02 PM, John Kennedy skeb...@gmail.com wrote:
When will CentOS 6 be released???
(Just kidding...Just wanted to let you all know that RHEL6 has been
released...And yes, I know that most of you all know...)
John
--
John Kennedy
on 11-10-2010 11:02 AM John Kennedy spake the following:
When will CentOS 6 be released???
(Just kidding...Just wanted to let you all know that RHEL6 has been
released...And yes, I know that most of you all know...)
John
So the usual 4 to 6 week (maybe 8 week) build and QA/QC process... Like
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:05:53AM -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
on 11-10-2010 11:02 AM John Kennedy spake the following:
When will CentOS 6 be released???
So the usual 4 to 6 week (maybe 8 week) build and QA/QC process... Like anyone
will wait to start hounding...
Well, some will wait, or
on 11-10-2010 11:13 AM Scott Robbins spake the following:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:05:53AM -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
on 11-10-2010 11:02 AM John Kennedy spake the following:
When will CentOS 6 be released???
So the usual 4 to 6 week (maybe 8 week) build and QA/QC process... Like
anyone
On 10-11-10 02:52 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
on 11-10-2010 11:13 AM Scott Robbins spake the following:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:05:53AM -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
on 11-10-2010 11:02 AM John Kennedy spake the following:
When will CentOS 6 be released???
So the usual 4 to 6 week (maybe 8 week)
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:53:50PM -0500, Digimer wrote:
I expect that 5.6 will get the first priority, if for no other reason
than it was out first, and thus probably already being worked on.
RHEL-5.6 is in beta, there is no final release.
Last time there was only one build queue, so if 5.6 and 6 come out at the
same
time, they will have to choose which one gets attention first. CentOS
doesn't
have the multi-million dollar infrastructure to support multiple
simultaneous
releases.
I expect that 5.6 will get the first
2010/11/10 Digimer li...@alteeve.com:
I expect that 5.6 will get the first priority, if for no other reason
than it was out first, and thus probably already being worked on.
RHEL 5.6 isn´t released yet. Only the beta of RHEL 5.6 was released yesterday.
Best regards,
Morten
sound intrested
ddownload link?
ons 2010-11-10 klockan 20:58 +0100 skrev Morten P.D. Stevens:
2010/11/10 Digimer li...@alteeve.com:
I expect that 5.6 will get the first priority, if for no other reason
than it was out first, and thus probably already being worked on.
RHEL 5.6 isn´t
hi Guys,
On 11/10/2010 07:52 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
Last time there was only one build queue, so if 5.6 and 6 come out at the same
time, they will have to choose which one gets attention first. CentOS doesn't
have the multi-million dollar infrastructure to support multiple simultaneous
sound intrested
download link?
ons 2010-11-10 klockan 20:58 +0100 skrev Morten P.D. Stevens:
2010/11/10 Digimer li...@alteeve.com:
I expect that 5.6 will get the first priority, if for no other reason
than it was out first, and thus probably already being worked on.
RHEL 5.6 isn´t
2010/11/10 mattias m...@mjw.se:
sound intrested
ddownload link?
The beta of RHEL 5.6 is only available via the Red Hat Network. (RHN)
Best regards,
Morten
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
hi Guys,
On 11/10/2010 07:52 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
Last time there was only one build queue, so if 5.6 and 6 come out at the
same
time, they will have to choose which one gets attention first. CentOS doesn't
have the multi-million dollar infrastructure to support multiple simultaneous
Quoting Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org:
hi Guys,
On 11/10/2010 07:52 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
Last time there was only one build queue, so if 5.6 and 6 come out at the
same
time, they will have to choose which one gets attention first. CentOS
doesn't
have the multi-million dollar
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Barry Brimer wrote:
Quoting Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org:
hi Guys,
On 11/10/2010 07:52 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
Last time there was only one build queue, so if 5.6 and 6 come out at the
same
time, they will have to choose which one gets attention first. CentOS
What does 6 bring with it? Anything new in virtualization and cloud computing?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:40:52PM -0600, Matt wrote:
What does 6 bring with it? Anything new in virtualization and cloud
computing?
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/server/details/
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org http://mattdm.org/
Quoting Connie Sieh cs...@fnal.gov:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Barry Brimer wrote:
Quoting Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org:
hi Guys,
On 11/10/2010 07:52 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
Last time there was only one build queue, so if 5.6 and 6 come out at the
same
time, they will have to
Thanks Karanbir , I actually want to pony up and start helping so I am
looking forward to hearing more about that and how I can help...Sounds Great
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.orgwrote:
hi Guys,
On 11/10/2010 07:52 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
Last time there
the big piece that i've been waiting for is ipv6 stateful firewalling.
without that, ipv6 has been a non-starter for me.
On 11/10/2010 12:43 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:40:52PM -0600, Matt wrote:
What does 6 bring with it? Anything new in virtualization and cloud
On 11/10/2010 02:43 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:40:52PM -0600, Matt wrote:
What does 6 bring with it? Anything new in virtualization and cloud
computing?
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/server/details/
I don't see here what version of BIND is included.
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/10/2010 02:43 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:40:52PM -0600, Matt wrote:
What does 6 bring with it? Anything new in virtualization and cloud
computing?
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/server/details/
I don't see here
On 11/10/2010 04:33 PM, Connie Sieh wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/10/2010 02:43 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:40:52PM -0600, Matt wrote:
What does 6 bring with it? Anything new in virtualization and cloud
computing?
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:54:19PM -0600, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
And what are the minimum system requirements? Will we still be able to
install this on a 256Mb system for example?
What is preventing you from looking at the upstream website to
determine requirements?
If
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:57:10PM -0600, Barry Brimer wrote:
Absolutely. Red Hat does a tremendous amount of heavy lifting to produce
RHEL, without which there would be no CentOS. Red Hat also gets paid
pretty well to do so, and unless I am mistaken the CentOS team does not.
In any case, I
On 11/10/2010 05:11 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:54:19PM -0600, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
And what are the minimum system requirements? Will we still be able to
install this on a 256Mb system for example?
What is preventing you from looking at the
Am 10.11.10 23:54, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
On 11/10/2010 04:33 PM, Connie Sieh wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/10/2010 02:43 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:40:52PM -0600, Matt wrote:
What does 6 bring with it? Anything
48 matches
Mail list logo
