- Dell Equalogic - Very good experience, absolutly reliable
- EMC CX Series - Wont´t buy them again, many Problems with the iSCSI
- HP MSA - No Problems at all
Am 12.12.10 23:12, schrieb Ross Walker:
On Dec 12, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010
In one instance we need to host virtual machines, so we don't need
anything fancy. I'm happy with running iSCSI / NFS and even AOE.
Currently we have a few 2U SuperMicro servers with 24bays, running
OpenFiler. But, OpenFiler is outdated and limited when it comes to
scalability. Ideally, I
John R Pierce wrote:
On 12/11/10 8:15 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
If you use any NAS (or a SAN) devices, what do you use? And I'm
referring more to larger scale network storage than your home PC or
home theater system.
We've had very good experiences with our NetGear ReadyNAS devices but
I'm
On 12/13/10 12:44 AM, RedShift wrote:
I'd stay away from AoE for high availability, I've tried it at home but
performance can fluctuate and the AoE driver present in CentOS 5 is way too
old. I wasn't able to build a HA setup without corrupting data when failover
occured.
Any HA block
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de
wrote:
The other question is if it actually works.
Too many of the low-cost devices eat the data on the drives, when the
motherboard or the
On 12/12/10 08:56, John R Pierce wrote:
IBM sells some nice one rack units as well.
speaking of.anyone have any experience with the IBM DS3500 storage?
I've been considering the DS3500 for my dev lab storage. These come
24x2.5 (or 12x3.5) SAS 2U boxes with redundant storage
On 12/11/2010 11:15 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
If you use any NAS (or a SAN) devices, what do you use? And I'm
referring more to larger scale network storage than your home PC or
home theater system.
We've had very good experiences with our NetGear ReadyNAS devices but
I'm in the market for
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:07 PM, William Warren
hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote:
On 12/11/2010 11:15 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
If you use any NAS (or a SAN) devices, what do you use? And I'm
referring more to larger scale network storage than your home PC or
home theater system.
On Dec 12, 2010, at 5:17 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de
wrote:
The other question is if it actually works.
Too many of the low-cost
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
In one instance we need to host virtual machines, so we don't need
anything fancy. I'm happy with running iSCSI / NFS and even AOE.
Currently we have a few 2U SuperMicro servers with 24bays, running
OpenFiler. But, OpenFiler
On Dec 12, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
In one instance we need to host virtual machines, so we don't need
anything fancy. I'm happy with running iSCSI / NFS and even AOE.
Currently we have
On 12/11/10 8:15 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
If you use any NAS (or a SAN) devices, what do you use? And I'm
referring more to larger scale network storage than your home PC or
home theater system.
We've had very good experiences with our NetGear ReadyNAS devices but
I'm in the market for
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 6:31 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 12/11/10 8:15 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
If you use any NAS (or a SAN) devices, what do you use? And I'm
referring more to larger scale network storage than your home PC or
home theater system.
We've had very good
Am 11.12.2010 um 17:38 schrieb Rudi Ahlers:
Yes, I know. But the problem I have with NetApp is that it's not build
for a smaller market. i.e. a client looking to start small and scale
as he needs, and can afford to.
The NetGear's allow exactly just that. One can start small and grow as
Hi :)
On Saturday 11 December 2010 17:38 Rudi Ahlers wrote
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 6:31 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 12/11/10 8:15 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
If you use any NAS (or a SAN) devices, what do you use? And I'm
referring more to larger scale network storage than
On 12/11/10 8:15 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Maybe I'm just not shopping around enough, or maybe I prefer to well
known brands, I don't know.
oh, another. NexSAN ... this is more SAN block storage than NAS file
storage, but you can put a NFS server between your NAS clients and it
for NAS
On 12/11/10 9:29 AM, Rafa Grimán wrote:
What about a DIY NAS with an off the shelf server and storage array?
and how do you avoid single-point-of-failure?if that COTS goes down,
your storage is offline, and you've lost any writes in progress.
enterprise storage has fully redundant
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
If you use any NAS (or a SAN) devices, what do you use? And I'm
referring more to larger scale network storage than your home PC or
home theater system.
We've had very good experiences with our NetGear ReadyNAS devices but
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
If you use any NAS (or a SAN) devices, what do you use? And I'm
referring more to larger scale network storage than your home PC or
home theater system.
We've had very good experiences with our NetGear ReadyNAS devices but
On Saturday 11 December 2010 18:37 John R Pierce wrote
On 12/11/10 9:29 AM, Rafa Grimán wrote:
What about a DIY NAS with an off the shelf server and storage array?
and how do you avoid single-point-of-failure?if that COTS goes down,
your storage is offline, and you've lost any writes in
If you use any NAS (or a SAN) devices, what do you use? And I'm
referring more to larger scale network storage than your home PC or
home theater system.
We're using two different products that qualify under that heading.
For NAS devices, which are our primary backup medium, we use the QNAP
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 18:15 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
If you use any NAS (or a SAN) devices, what do you use? And I'm
referring more to larger scale network storage than your home PC or
home theater system.
EMC AX4 SAN (iSCSI)
We've had very good experiences with our NetGear ReadyNAS devices
On Dec 11, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
If you use any NAS (or a SAN) devices, what do you use? And I'm
referring more to larger scale network storage than your home PC or
home theater system.
We've had very good experiences with our NetGear ReadyNAS devices but
Go EMC. Support is solid and the units are well designed.
But-But - they run Windows on the low-end stuff, don't they?
;-)))
Rainer
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Dec 11, 2010, at 5:11 PM, Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
Go EMC. Support is solid and the units are well designed.
But-But - they run Windows on the low-end stuff, don't they?
;-)))
I think they run embedded windows on some of their high-end stuff as well.
If done
On 12/11/2010 09:24 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
With 100TB, DIY is out of the question ;-)
I wouldn't say that. It would be...challenging...but not out of the
question.
But Aberdeen (note - I have no financial interest. They are simply
someone I've seen marketing Linux based SAN/NAS machines
On Saturday 11 December 2010 23:50 Jerry Franz wrote
On 12/11/2010 09:24 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
With 100TB, DIY is out of the question ;-)
I wouldn't say that. It would be...challenging...but not out of the
question.
I don't see why it's out of the question. Why should it be? Nowadays
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
The other question is if it actually works.
Too many of the low-cost devices eat the data on the drives, when the
motherboard or the controller fries...
With luck, you can read the data on one of the drives...
If
IBM sells some nice one rack units as well.
speaking of.anyone have any experience with the IBM DS3500 storage?
I've been considering the DS3500 for my dev lab storage. These come
24x2.5 (or 12x3.5) SAS 2U boxes with redundant storage controllers
that have 2x2 SAS host ports and either
29 matches
Mail list logo
