On 02/10/2012 05:54 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
Yea, I gave up on bonding, ended up just using eth1. But every tutorial
I found had added eth0 and eth1 as interfaces to br0, thus sharing the
bridge so to speak.
Those tutorials were documenting the manner in which you can set up a
transparent Linux
In article 4f345cd3.4060...@bobhoffman.com,
Bob Hoffman b...@bobhoffman.com wrote:
so I gave up on bonding.
I found about 300 posts showing eth0 and eth1 both pointing to br0 (bridge)
as interfaces.
I followed them correctly, or so I thought.
I pointed both ethx to the bridge, restarted
On 02/10/2012 12:54 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
so I gave up on bonding.
I found about 300 posts showing eth0 and eth1 both pointing to br0 (bridge)
as interfaces.
I followed them correctly, or so I thought.
I pointed both ethx to the bridge, restarted network and bam...!!!
Bonding and bridging
On 02/10/2012 11:18 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
In article4f345cd3.4060...@bobhoffman.com,
Bob Hoffmanb...@bobhoffman.com wrote:
so I gave up on bonding.
I found about 300 posts showing eth0 and eth1 both pointing to br0 (bridge)
as interfaces.
I followed them correctly, or so I thought.
I
-
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote
/Fri Feb 10 06:47:22 EST 2012/
On 02/10/2012 12:54 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
/ so I gave up on bonding.
// I found about 300 posts showing eth0 and eth1 both pointing to br0 (bridge)
// as interfaces.
// I
i have several centos 5.x servers with bonding enabled. And none of them
have any problems.
I used this tutorial:
http://www.howtoforge.com/network_card_bonding_centos
I use mode=6.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Bob Hoffman b...@bobhoffman.com wrote:
Bob Hoffman wrote:
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote
/Fri Feb 10 06:47:22 EST 2012/
On 02/10/2012 12:54 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
/ so I gave up on bonding.
// I found about 300 posts showing eth0 and eth1 both pointing to br0
(bridge)
// as interfaces.
// I followed them correctly, or so I
On 02/10/2012 02:54 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
-
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote
/Fri Feb 10 06:47:22 EST 2012/
On 02/10/2012 12:54 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
/ so I gave up on bonding.
// I found about 300 posts showing eth0 and eth1 both
/
=
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote
// Yea, I gave up on bonding, ended up just using eth1. But every tutorial
// I found had added eth0 and eth1 as interfaces to br0, thus sharing the
// bridge so to speak.
// All the tutorials were for debian though, all the
On 02/10/2012 04:25 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
/
=
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote
// Yea, I gave up on bonding, ended up just using eth1. But every tutorial
// I found had added eth0 and eth1 as interfaces to br0, thus sharing the
// bridge so to speak.
// All
/ =
// Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote//
// Nothing at all to do with bonding. Not at all.
// eth1 to br0 , eth0 to br0that's all.
// If that is possible, I see no reason for a bond at all.
// I just want to make sure if an NIC fails, the other one is still
Bob,
I'd suggest you do some more reading on the purpose behind bonding
and bridging. It *sounds* like what you functionally need is
to have a server with a single route upstream, not acting as
a gateway, but where you want to be able to take a failure on
one of the upstream network connections
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Bob Hoffman b...@bobhoffman.com wrote:
Nothing at all to do with bonding. Not at all.
eth1 to br0 , eth0 to br0that's all.
If that is possible, I see no reason for a bond at all.
I just want to make sure if an NIC fails, the other one is still working
On Feb 9, 2012, at 6:54 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
entire ip block went out.
when I called datacenter they told me the router was under attack
and I
was like 'uh oh' and told them to just shut off my computer I would be
there to fix it. They did not believe me.
An hour later I was there and
--On Friday, February 10, 2012 01:49:05 PM -0600 Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
I suppose it is possible for a NIC to fail, but I can't recall actually
ever seeing it. I've seen lots of complicated failover schemes introduce
new problems and their own failure modes [...]
+1.
Devin Reade wrote:
snip
I do have clusters where bonding is in use but those have helped not so
much in avoiding NIC failures as they do in allowing the machines
to continue operating as the network team brings down part of the
redundant switch network for maintenance (or to replace a failed
--On Friday, February 10, 2012 04:40:59 PM -0500 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Devin Reade wrote:
snip
or when some fool decides that they can unplug a network cable
briefly so that they can move other cables around).
Now wait a minute - I would dearly love to disconnect some cables we have
in
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:40 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Devin Reade wrote:
snip
I do have clusters where bonding is in use but those have helped not so
much in avoiding NIC failures as they do in allowing the machines
to continue operating as the network team brings down part of the
Devin Reade wrote:
--On Friday, February 10, 2012 04:40:59 PM -0500 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Devin Reade wrote:
snip
or when some fool decides that they can unplug a network cable
briefly so that they can move other cables around).
Now wait a minute - I would dearly love to disconnect some
19 matches
Mail list logo
