Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks

2011-02-17 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Can you please stop this? You are creating new thread after new thread from old threads I wasn't interested in and set to ignore. Now you create them as new threads, so I have to ignore these as well. This grows annoying. Put together with your habit of off-topic posting YOU get annoying.

Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks

2011-02-17 Thread Larry Vaden
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote: Can you please stop this? You are creating new thread after new thread from old threads I wasn't interested in and set to ignore. Now you create them as new threads, so I have to ignore these as well. This grows

Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks

2011-02-17 Thread Scot P. Floess
Gentleman: Can we all just get along? I love reading this list and posting my own questions as well... But really - is this helping anyone? On Thu, 17 Feb 2011, Larry Vaden wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote: Can you please stop this? You

Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks

2011-02-17 Thread m . roth
Scot P. Floess wrote: Gentleman: Can we all just get along? I love reading this list and posting my own questions as well... But really - is this helping anyone? I've done occasional OT posts, but I stop - this set of threads has been going on all week, I think, or was it since last

Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks

2011-02-17 Thread Larry Vaden
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Scot P. Floess sflo...@nc.rr.com wrote: Can we all just get along?  I love reading this list and posting my own questions as well...  But really - is this helping anyone? We were taught by our Rhodes scholar debate mentor to refute untruths and that is what I

Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks

2011-02-17 Thread Rudi Ahlers
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote: Can you please stop this? You are creating new thread after new thread from old threads I wasn't interested in and set to ignore. Now you create

Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks

2011-02-17 Thread Brunner, Brian T.
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Larry Vaden Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 10:50 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:31 AM

Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks

2011-02-17 Thread Scot P. Floess
Sure - I get it... But any prolonged debate - just address those concerns/issues with that person... I hate to say it, but I suspect either nobody cares or just doesn't want to hear it... Remember, I responded to you directly about an earlier post as I didn't feel it added any value to

Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks

2011-02-17 Thread Larry Vaden
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Scot P. Floess sflo...@nc.rr.com wrote: Sure - I get it...  But any prolonged debate - just address those concerns/issues with that person... I hate to say it, but I suspect either nobody cares or just doesn't want to hear it... Remember, I responded to you

Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks

2011-02-17 Thread Benjamin Donnachie
On 17 February 2011 16:06, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote: List infraction per http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16. This was amusing to start with, but now it's irritating. Please stop. Ben ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks

2011-02-17 Thread Scot P. Floess
List infraction per http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16. Larry, I try to conduct myself in a professional manner whenever I am visible to the world. I am doing my best to do so now. There are many things I'd like to say and am not going to do so... So, how about

Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks

2011-02-17 Thread Scot P. Floess
Ben, My apologies - I don't typically get caught up in this type of pointless tit-for-tat... I'll personally stop... -- Scot P. Floess RHCT (Certificate Number 605010084735240) Chief Architect FlossWare http://sourceforge.net/projects/flossware

Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks

2011-02-17 Thread m . roth
Larry Vaden wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Scot P. Floess sflo...@nc.rr.com wrote: Sure - I get it...  But any prolonged debate - just address those concerns/issues with that person... I hate to say it, but I suspect either nobody cares or just doesn't want to hear it...

Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks

2011-02-17 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Larry, enough is enough. Please stop your behavior. This list is not for your personal amusement. If you cannot behave like any other person on the list, please go elsewhere. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks

2011-02-16 Thread Mark
This whole discussion is off-topic and getting to be really annoying. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks

2011-02-16 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 02/17/2011 04:59 AM, Mark wrote: This whole discussion is off-topic and getting to be really annoying. yes, please take it to somewhere more appropriate. - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos