nate wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I'm not 100% sure if there's a DRAC 4 device in. It has 2x NIC's, and I
can set the IP on the top NIC as the management IP. I haven't been able
to connect to it via a web browser though, nor can I ping it.
Install the OpenIPMI tools, start ipmi, and try
Les Mikesell wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all
I'm trying to get to grips with this one, but just can't figure it
out. I recently acquired some 2nd hand Dell Poweredge 860 servers,
and noticed that they have built in remote management interfaces. So,
I have setup one, and assigned an IP
On Friday 20 June 2008 09:45:16 Anne Wilson wrote:
On Friday 20 June 2008 06:13, Martin Garcia wrote:
Hi Anne, I have many servers running clamav, simply use the dag repos
http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/ and install it via yum yum install clamav
clamd then run freshclam, thats it. I presume your
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Cool, this worked from my Windows Laptop to the Dell server, but I see
it's only a very basic info type setup. Do you run any specific software
on your Linux server to give you more control?
I was actually hoping that I could use this as a KVM over IP type thing
to manage
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
hi
this is my named.conf
//
// named.conf for Red Hat caching-nameserver
//
options {
directory /var/named;
dump-file /var/named/data/cache_dump.db;
statistics-file /var/named/data/named_stats.txt;
/*
* If there is a firewall
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can
Sorry, I have no clue about your question. However, I have several
AMD K6 chips (pentium-equivalent) lying around should you trip over
a motherboard that'll run them. That would solve your 486 problem, I
think, so let me know if such a chip would help you out.
Fred - thanks for the offer -
nate wrote:
Some management systems have additional options which include full
VGA KVM abilities, I have a demo Dell box with DRAC 5 which has this
ability though I haven't been able to get it to work. HP systems
have this ability as well but require an additional ~$300 license
add on(iLO
I need to copy over 100TB of data from one server to another via network.
What is the best option to do this? I am planning to use rsync but is there
a better tool or better way of doing this?
For example, I plan on doing
rsync -azv /largefs /targetfs
/targetfs is a NFS mounted filesystem.
Any
Mag Gam wrote:
I need to copy over 100TB of data from one server to another via
network. What is the best option to do this? I am planning to use
rsync but is there a better tool or better way of doing this?
For example, I plan on doing
rsync -azv /largefs /targetfs
/targetfs is a NFS
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
So, how do I actually access these servers remotely? If possible, I'd
like todo it via another CentOS server at the DC using SSH.
Dell's usually come with their openmange suite, so you might google
for that. I think a java-enabled browser should connect and get an
On 6/21/08, Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I've found their web support to be excellent if you can get past the
place where they sort out the individual/small/large business users.
Try to find support/downloads and the place where you put in the model
number or their tag number
Mag Gam wrote:
I need to copy over 100TB of data from one server to another via network.
What is the best option to do this? I am planning to use rsync but is there
a better tool or better way of doing this?
For example, I plan on doing
rsync -azv /largefs /targetfs
/targetfs is a NFS mounted
I tried RHEL 3 (I believe) on a Pentium class system, and that did not work
well.
For everything but the kernel, there was a 386 version available (glibc,
ssl, etc), so we recompiled the kernel for the 586.
Unfortunately, glibc, when you compile it for anything below a 686, did not
support NTPL
MHR wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Chuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once I build a system and bring it to our defined baseline, I rarely use rpm
from that point forward...I custom roll almost everything -- especially
apache. (red hat's layout makes my skin crawl) When did CPAN become so
Hi all:
I am using Centos 5.1. But now I have a problem when unmount a removable
usb hard disk with right click and choose unmount volume command. When I did
that, system reminds me with a message like this:Cannot unmount volume
xxx, Detail: Cannot remove directory, xxx represents a temporary
Am 21.06.2008 um 15:33 schrieb Mag Gam:
I need to copy over 100TB of data from one server to another via
network. What is the best option to do this? I am planning to use
rsync but is there a better tool or better way of doing this?
For example, I plan on doing
rsync -azv /largefs
on 6-21-2008 6:17 AM Jerry Geis spake the following:
Sorry, I have no clue about your question. However, I have several
AMD K6 chips (pentium-equivalent) lying around should you trip over
a motherboard that'll run them. That would solve your 486 problem, I
think, so let me know if such a chip
Scott Silva wrote:
I still think Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, or one of the BSD's will be your best
option on that hardware. But Gentoo would take forever to compile/install on
that hardware.
I thought I read at some point that Debian etch dropped 486 support.
Another option may be CentOS 3.x or
ÀîêÍ wrote:
I googled this problem for many days and didn't find any way to solve
this problem. Maybe it is a bug. I hope someone can help me. Thank you.
You may lose data doing this but at least for NFS volumes if something
is stuck I umount the file systems with the -l -f options. I'm
nate wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
I still think Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, or one of the BSD's will be your best
option on that hardware. But Gentoo would take forever to compile/install on
that hardware.
I thought I read at some point that Debian etch dropped 486 support.
Another option may be
Network is a 10/100
1 million large files
No SAN, JBOD
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Rainer Duffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Am 21.06.2008 um 15:33 schrieb Mag Gam:
I need to copy over 100TB of data from one server to another via network.
What is the best option to do this? I am
Am 21.06.2008 um 21:51 schrieb Mag Gam:
Network is a 10/100
You're kidding?
1 million large files
No SAN, JBOD
Move the data by moving the storage itself.
It will take months to transfer 100 TB via FastEthernet.
cheers,
Rainer
--
Rainer Duffner
CISSP, LPI, MCSE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mag Gam wrote:
Network is a 10/100
1 million large files
No SAN, JBOD
assuming 100baseT wire speed of about 10Mbyte/sec, moving 100TB will
take a minimum of 100TB/10MB/s = 10,000,000 seconds or 2900 hours, or
about 4 months. even on a gigE network, this would still take about 2
weeks or
Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 6/21/08, Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I've found their web support to be excellent if you can get past the
place where they sort out the individual/small/large business users.
Try to find support/downloads and the place where you put in the model
number
Can add fiber network card to each server? fiber switch? if not try to
plugin to each server giga ethernet card put a crossover cable and
start rsync... i did that with 1tb of photos and takes a lot of
timekeep power supply working and cross the fingers
I hope this can help
2008/6/21
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 5:12 PM, nightduke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can add fiber network card to each server? fiber switch? if not try to
plugin to each server giga ethernet card put a crossover cable and
start rsync... i did that with 1tb of photos and takes a lot of
timekeep power
Am 21.06.2008 um 23:44 schrieb Matt Morgan:
O
Then if you get the network sorted out, the fastest most reliable
way I know to copy lots of files is
star --copy
You can get star with
yum install star
Now that I know the details - I don' think this is going to work. Not
with 100 TB
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ted Miller wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ted Miller wrote:
Is there a file system + configuration that will let me share a
directory, and anyone who has access to something in that directory
on the server will also have access (and lack of access) to the same
files from
Ted Miller wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Well ... you would need to Join the Samba Server to your Windows
Domain. If that domain is ADS (Active Directory Services) then it is
a different procedure than if it is a WinNT type Windows Domain.
This is getting well outside the range of
Rob Townley wrote:
dmesg dmesg.log
or
cd /var/log/
ls -lat | more
i liked the old days when dmesg, /var/log/messages and other syslog
stuff was displayed automatically on a tty console. I tried a softlink
from /var/log/messages to tty9, but didn't have any luck. Would it
require a tee
On one of our servers wtmp is growing very fast.
The binary file is about 50M but when I change it to ascii with fwtmp command,
The ascii file is only 10M.
binary file is being 5 times bigger than text file ?
Any suggestion ?
___
CentOS mailing list
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 09:33 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:
I need to copy over 100TB of data from one server to another via
network. What is the best option to do this? I am planning to use
rsync but is there a better tool or better way of doing this?
At gigabit speeds, you're looking at over a week
Thanks for the reply. I think we are making progress, see
comments/questions interspersed below.
Les Mikesell wrote:
Ted Miller wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Well ... you would need to Join the Samba Server to your Windows
Domain. If that domain is ADS (Active Directory Services) then it
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 21:48 -0400, Ted Miller wrote:
I have been using 'share' mode, but a little reading makes it sound like I
should switch to 'user' mode to make my life easier. I have been adding
various user permission lines to each share. Will they keep working if I
just comment
Thank you for your help. I will try this when I mount the hard disk next
time. Thanks again.
2008/6/22 nate [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ÀîêÍ wrote:
I googled this problem for many days and didn't find any way to solve
this problem. Maybe it is a bug. I hope someone can help me. Thank you.
Ted Miller wrote:
Is samba running there? If so, you are mostly done.
Yes, at the moment I have Samba running, but apparently not properly
configured. I am also in the process of moving this machine from Centos
4 to Centos 5, and am trying to do it better this time. At the moment
I've been having no end of issues with a 3ware 9650SE-24M8 in a server that's
coming on a year old. I've got 24 WDC WD5001ABYS drives (500GB) hooked to it,
running as a single RAID6 w/ a hot spare. These issues boil down to the card
periodically throwing errors like the following:
sd
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
I've been having no end of issues with a 3ware 9650SE-24M8 in a server
that's coming on a year old. I've got 24 WDC WD5001ABYS drives
(500GB) hooked to it, running as a single RAID6 w/ a hot spare. These
issues boil down to the card periodically throwing errors
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 at 9:12pm, John R Pierce wrote
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
I've been having no end of issues with a 3ware 9650SE-24M8 in a server
that's coming on a year old. I've got 24 WDC WD5001ABYS drives (500GB)
hooked to it, running as a single RAID6 w/ a hot spare. These issues
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 at 9:12pm, John R Pierce wrote
I have no experience with that raid card, most of our larger systems
use external SAN storage, but I will say that, IMHO, is a very large
raid-6. we usually don't make single raid sets much large than 7-8
drives,
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 at 1:01am, Ruslan Sivak wrote
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 at 9:12pm, John R Pierce wrote
I have no experience with that raid card, most of our larger systems use
external SAN storage, but I will say that, IMHO, is a very large raid-6.
we usually don't
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
periodically throwing errors like the following:
sd 1:0:0:0: WARNING: (0x06:0x002C): Command (0x8a) timed out, resetting
card.
Wondering if you have scheduled automatic media scans of all of the
disks in the array? Perhaps you have a disk that is going bad
causing
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been having no end of issues with a 3ware 9650SE-24M8 in a server
that's coming on a year old. I've got 24 WDC WD5001ABYS drives (500GB)
hooked to it, running as a single RAID6 w/ a hot spare. These issues
I wouldn't have a problem doign some CSS work for your Drupal Blog, just let
me know the details of what you would like and I'll let you know what I
think.
Brandon Cribbs
Linux- UNIX System Administretator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Dag Wieers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola a [EMAIL PROTECTED], resulta que de la noche a la mañana tengo en la cola
de correo
todos los mails con este error:
4D9BF14C0D 2566 Sat Jun 21 00:45:43 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(delivery temporarily suspended: connect to 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]: Connection
refused)
Hola:
(delivery temporarily suspended: connect to 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:
Connection
refused)
Revisa a ver si todas tus interfaces de red esten levantadas
Y por lo que veo, esa la 127.0.0.1, que cuando todas las interfaces
estan down, esa debiera estar funcionando. Revisa tambien que el
47 matches
Mail list logo
