RE: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy

2008-07-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Why don't you try it and see what happens. I did, which is what lead me to believe it only checks the db:) jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy

2008-07-06 Thread Tony Molloy
On Sunday 06 July 2008 07:20:33 Joseph L. Casale wrote: Why don't you try it and see what happens. I did, which is what lead me to believe it only checks the db:) jlc Sorry, Tony Then you have a problem ;-) ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy

2008-07-06 Thread William L. Maltby
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 06:52 +0100, Tony Molloy wrote: snip The problem would be if yum checks it's db to see if it has previously installed /usr/bin/false and find that it hasn't. In that case it won't wok. If it won't wok, you'l have to cook up something. :-) YUK, YUK! snip -- Bill

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy

2008-07-06 Thread Tony Molloy
On Sunday 06 July 2008 11:39:50 William L. Maltby wrote: On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 06:52 +0100, Tony Molloy wrote: snip The problem would be if yum checks it's db to see if it has previously installed /usr/bin/false and find that it hasn't. In that case it won't wok. If it won't wok,

[CentOS] How to Auto Add forward slash / when accessing a link/url through ProxyPass

2008-07-06 Thread ankush grover
Hi Friends, I am using Centos 5.2 and using ProxyPass to access applications running on other servers. Everything is working fine except for one of the applications I need to auto add forward slash when any user tries to access that application. For ex ProxyPass /testdiary

Re: [CentOS] Three Identical systems - short cut to setting up the drives?

2008-07-06 Thread William L. Maltby
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 06:36 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: snip Still in the top level working directory (the created initrd dir/..) find initdirname | cpio -oac | gzip --best new initrd name Just checked. find * is what you want. Also, there are a couple ignorelocking failures and

Re: [CentOS] Three Identical systems - short cut to setting up the drives?

2008-07-06 Thread William L. Maltby
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 23:58 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: William L. Maltby wrote: On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 17:38 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: snip Now actually, I would have perfered renaming the LVM partition and its internal ext3 partitions. I even had a naming

Re: [CentOS] i386 version of Perl getting installed on x64 system?

2008-07-06 Thread Johnny Hughes
Joseph L. Casale wrote: Can you identify which one of these packages individually is requiring the 32-bit perl? In other words, can you install perl-LDAP without it wanting to pull in the 32-bit perl? Same for all of them... You can also do an rpm -q -R -p rpm on the .rpm file to see what it

[CentOS] configuration file for tunneling device

2008-07-06 Thread Nabin Limbu
Hi, For Ethernet and others, we have a configuration file inside /etc/sysconfig/newtork-script/ like ifcfg-ethx where we specify ip address, mask, type etc... For GRE tunneling, how can I specify the parameters for tunneling device, so that I ifup-tunnel will automatically read and start the

Re: [CentOS] Can't run a bash script from USB drive

2008-07-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
William L. Maltby wrote: Your blindness is caused by a broken (IMO) search. I also had recently searched for this and another thread. AFAICT, the search button on the mailing lists intro page only checks archived stuff. I've seen mails archived there before they hit my INBOX. But yes, google

[CentOS] how to generate modprobe.conf

2008-07-06 Thread David Hláčik
Hello, i have moved hard disk from one pc to another (some architecture). I have booted, everything working. To my surprise some modules in modprobes.conf are still there even if this PC does not have such hardware. I have tried remove modprobe.conf, but after reboot, system by it self does not

Re: [CentOS] how to generate modprobe.conf

2008-07-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
David Hláčik wrote: Hello, i have moved hard disk from one pc to another (some architecture). I have booted, everything working. To my surprise some modules in modprobes.conf are still there even if this PC does not have such hardware. I have tried remove modprobe.conf, but after reboot,

Re: [CentOS] RHEL vs. CentOS

2008-07-06 Thread Johnny Hughes
drew einhorn wrote: In looking at the possibility of using yum-priorities on a RHEL5 system, I noticed on thing that is different from my recollection, I see that the default priority it 99, but I seem to recall that it used to be 1. Is my memory faulty, or did it change? Actually 99 seems to

Re: [CentOS] How to Auto Add forward slash / when accessing a link/url through ProxyPass

2008-07-06 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, It's been long since I don't write Proxy rules, but IIRC you have to match /s on the left side and on the right side. On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:24 AM, ankush grover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ProxyPass /testdiaryhttp://testdiary.example.com/ ProxyPassReverse /testdiary

Re: [CentOS] How to Auto Add forward slash / when accessing a link/url through ProxyPass

2008-07-06 Thread nate
ankush grover wrote: I have the below lines added in httpd.conf file RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} /testdiary RewriteRule /testdiary(.)$ /testdiary/ ProxyPass /testdiary http://testdiary.example.com/ ProxyPassReverse /testdiary http://testdiary.example.com/ This is what I

Re: [CentOS] configuration file for tunneling device

2008-07-06 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Nabin Limbu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For GRE tunneling, how can I specify the parameters for tunneling device, so that I ifup-tunnel will automatically read and start the interface and I don't have to write the below scripts in my start-up file. Apparently

Re: [CentOS] Three Identical systems - short cut to setting up the drives?

2008-07-06 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:36 AM, William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If it's a boot drive, remember to rebuild your initrd and modify the init file to ignore lvm lock failures with the new VG name. Otherwise you'll be fighting some more battles. Yes, I remember getting burned by

Re: [CentOS] Back to my Xwindows kernel panic

2008-07-06 Thread Johnny Hughes
Robert Moskowitz wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: I have a newly built drive with 5.2 fresh install (that I will be cloning shortly) in my DECtop and it is failing with X the same way the upgrade from 5.1 drive did (not too supprising there). In 5.1 X worked. I could

RE: [CentOS] i386 version of Perl getting installed on x64 system?

2008-07-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
There is a known issue with the new version of yum on RHEL/CentOS 5.2 ... You need to specify the packages like this: yum install package_name.x86_64 not yum install package_name If you do not specify, then yum can install both (or either) of i386 or x86_64 packages to meet that requirement.

[CentOS] nspluginwrapper failure on x86_64 in 5.2

2008-07-06 Thread Mark Hull-Richter
This was working in 5.1 - I am now getting errors when I try to run a flash video in seamonkey under CetnOS 5.2. Here is the error: For application/x-shockwave-flash found plugin /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so sh: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer: No such

Re: [CentOS] i386 version of Perl getting installed on x64 system?

2008-07-06 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 09:55:03AM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote: There is a known issue with the new version of yum on RHEL/CentOS 5.2 ... You need to specify the packages like this: yum install package_name.x86_64 not yum install package_name If you do not specify, then yum can

Re: [CentOS] nspluginwrapper failure on x86_64 in 5.2

2008-07-06 Thread Johnny Hughes
Mark Hull-Richter wrote: This was working in 5.1 - I am now getting errors when I try to run a flash video in seamonkey under CetnOS 5.2. Here is the error: For application/x-shockwave-flash found plugin /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so sh:

RE: [CentOS] i386 version of Perl getting installed on x64 system?

2008-07-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Just to muddy the waters on this a bit more... for me, the rpmforge perl-Time-HiRes package won't install as it conflicts with my base installation of perl. Yea, I just figured that out. This is on a RHEL5.2 x86_64 system however. So I assume an x86 install doesn't have this issue? # rpm -qf

[CentOS] Re: Message size rejected

2008-07-06 Thread Scott Silva
on 7-3-2008 11:43 PM Anne Wilson spake the following: On Thursday 03 July 2008 22:29:55 Jim Perrin wrote: On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Anne Wilson cannewilson-gM/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My daughter needs to send me a large file. It appears that it is getting through my ISP, but being

Re: [CentOS] i386 version of Perl getting installed on x64 system?

2008-07-06 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Ray Van Dolson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 09:55:03AM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote: This is on a RHEL5.2 x86_64 system however. # rpm -qf --queryformat '%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}\n'

Re: [CentOS] i386 version of Perl getting installed on x64 system?

2008-07-06 Thread Johnny Hughes
Joseph L. Casale wrote: Just to muddy the waters on this a bit more... for me, the rpmforge perl-Time-HiRes package won't install as it conflicts with my base installation of perl. Yea, I just figured that out. This is on a RHEL5.2 x86_64 system however. So I assume an x86 install doesn't

RE: [CentOS] i386 version of Perl getting installed on x64 system?

2008-07-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I would say it is the Best one ... it seems there is a problem in this instance. Its just not my day :P I used my gmail to sign up to rpmforge, and received the sub confirmation instantly, replied to it and received my membership confirmation. Sent an email regarding both packages I am having

Re: [CentOS] i386 version of Perl getting installed on x64 system?

2008-07-06 Thread Johnny Hughes
Akemi Yagi wrote: On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Ray Van Dolson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 09:55:03AM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote: This is on a RHEL5.2 x86_64 system however. # rpm -qf --queryformat '%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}\n'

[CentOS] Re: Three Identical systems - short cut to setting up the drives?

2008-07-06 Thread Scott Silva
on 7-4-2008 2:38 PM Robert Moskowitz spake the following: William L. Maltby wrote: On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 11:41 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: snip Yes, dd is actually pretty slow in wall clock time. Where it wins is in human time since you just type a short command line and go away,

Re: [CentOS] i386 version of Perl getting installed on x64 system?

2008-07-06 Thread Johnny Hughes
Joseph L. Casale wrote: I would say it is the Best one ... it seems there is a problem in this instance. Its just not my day :P I used my gmail to sign up to rpmforge, and received the sub confirmation instantly, replied to it and received my membership confirmation. Sent an email regarding

Re: [CentOS] nspluginwrapper failure on x86_64 in 5.2

2008-07-06 Thread B.J. McClure
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 11:10 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: Mark Hull-Richter wrote: This was working in 5.1 - I am now getting errors when I try to run a flash video in seamonkey under CetnOS 5.2. Here is the error: For application/x-shockwave-flash found plugin

[CentOS] Centos 5.2 and 2.6.18-92 Kernel backported SATA fixes?

2008-07-06 Thread Michael Rock
Last year to get motherboards with the G33 chipset with SATA working with Centos I had to either use David Harbic fixes or use Fedora 8 since it had the later 2.6.25 kernel. I no longer see David's fixes available and also see in the 5.2 release notes update SATA driver and infrastructure.

Re: [CentOS] Re: Message size rejected

2008-07-06 Thread Anne Wilson
On Sunday 06 July 2008 17:26:05 Scott Silva wrote: That is one of the biggest of my beefs about windows. It allows any computer noob to shoot themselves in the foot very easily. That can be a plus or a negative. The biggest negative is that there are now millions of computers on the internet

Re: [CentOS] Re: Message size rejected

2008-07-06 Thread Jacques B.
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 06 July 2008 17:26:05 Scott Silva wrote: That is one of the biggest of my beefs about windows. It allows any computer noob to shoot themselves in the foot very easily. That can be a plus or a negative. The biggest

Re: [CentOS] Re: Message size rejected

2008-07-06 Thread Anne Wilson
On Sunday 06 July 2008 19:38:16 Jacques B. wrote: Have you considered a file transfer service such as yousendit.com? File size might still be an issue I guess as they limit it to 100 MB for their free account.  There's another thought.  Why not create yourself a gmail account or other such

Re: [CentOS] Re: Message size rejected

2008-07-06 Thread Jacques B.
Have you considered a file transfer service such as yousendit.com? File size might still be an issue I guess as they limit it to 100 MB for their free account. There's another thought. Why not create yourself a gmail account or other such online account that is as forgiving as possible on

Re: [CentOS] Three Identical systems - short cut to setting up the drives?

2008-07-06 Thread William L. Maltby
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 11:04 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:36 AM, William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If it's a boot drive, remember to rebuild your initrd and modify the init file to ignore lvm lock failures with the new VG name. Otherwise

Re: [CentOS] nspluginwrapper failure on x86_64 in 5.2

2008-07-06 Thread MHR
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:48 AM, B.J. McClure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a similar issue with only one version of nspluginwrapper installed. # rpm -qa | grep nspluginwrapper nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.5-21.el5 I do appear to have two identical firefox packages installed. #

[CentOS] PPPoE and IPv6

2008-07-06 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I am not getting my IPv6 address and prefix delegation for my ppp interface on my new gateway. ppp is working right. It is getting authenticated and getting the its IPv4 address. Shorewall is doing the forwarding and the static routes on the internal interface for IPv4 are working. But no

[CentOS] Re: i386 version of Perl getting installed on x64 system?

2008-07-06 Thread Scott Silva
on 7-6-2008 9:10 AM Ray Van Dolson spake the following: On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 09:55:03AM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote: There is a known issue with the new version of yum on RHEL/CentOS 5.2 ... You need to specify the packages like this: yum install package_name.x86_64 not yum install

Re: [CentOS] Back to my Xwindows kernel panic

2008-07-06 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Nope... Johnny Hughes wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: I have a newly built drive with 5.2 fresh install (that I will be cloning shortly) in my DECtop and it is failing with X the same way the upgrade from 5.1 drive did (not too supprising there).

Re: [CentOS] nspluginwrapper failure on x86_64 in 5.2

2008-07-06 Thread MHR
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: do you have both versions of firefox installed, and do you use both versions of firefox .. Yes and no - I almost never use firefox at all. if not, remove the i386 plugin and see if that fixes the issue. Did that. Also

Re: [CentOS] Re: Message size rejected

2008-07-06 Thread Anne Wilson
On Sunday 06 July 2008 22:27:42 Scott Silva wrote: It wasn't a personal attack, just a general state of the average windows user vs an average user of some of the linux/unix derivatives. Sorry - just on edge at that moment. I realise it wasn't personal. My comment on just increasing the

Re: [CentOS] Three Identical systems - short cut to setting up the drives?

2008-07-06 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 3:28 PM, William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: He is trying to copy an existing install, transport the drive and boot. Until he gets a boot that allows the new root to be detected *as* the new root, I don't know if that would work. You can actually do that by using

[CentOS] Getting something into centosplus for 5.2?

2008-07-06 Thread Ian Forde
I've got a USB to serial adapter that I picked up from Radio Shack earlier this year. The updated pl2303 driver is already in the mainstream kernel as per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429652 but I'm not getting much traction from Red Hat as far as them updating the kernel. So

[CentOS] Couple of CentOS 5.2 dhcp notes

2008-07-06 Thread Ian Forde
1. Apparently, since I updated from 5.1 to 5.2, dhcpd no longer wants to stay running. The config is sound, and I can start it from the command-line with the -d flag and it serves up leases. But without the -d flag, it just silently dies... 2. Syslog contains this little snippet:

Re: [CentOS] Getting something into centosplus for 5.2?

2008-07-06 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 03:45:39PM -0700, Ian Forde wrote: I've got a USB to serial adapter that I picked up from Radio Shack earlier this year. The updated pl2303 driver is already in the mainstream kernel as per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429652 but I'm not getting much

Re: [CentOS] Couple of CentOS 5.2 dhcp notes

2008-07-06 Thread Marko A. Jennings
On Sun, July 6, 2008 6:57 pm, Ian Forde wrote: 1. Apparently, since I updated from 5.1 to 5.2, dhcpd no longer wants to stay running. The config is sound, and I can start it from the command-line with the -d flag and it serves up leases. But without the -d flag, it just silently dies...

Re: [CentOS] Getting something into centosplus for 5.2?

2008-07-06 Thread Ian Forde
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 15:57 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: I won't speak on the -plus topic, but as far as upstream is concerned, you definitely need to open an RFE SR if you're a paying customer... probably won't be super speedy, but better than your bug sitting around forever ignored. :) Heh

Re: [CentOS] Three Identical systems - short cut to setting up the drives?

2008-07-06 Thread William L. Maltby
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 18:41 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: snip You can actually do that by using chroot from a rescue CD. I usually want to do that on my systems, when I clone from a machine with hardware RAID to a machine on which I will use software RAID. After copying the image

Re: [CentOS] Couple of CentOS 5.2 dhcp notes

2008-07-06 Thread Ian Forde
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 19:12 -0400, Marko A. Jennings wrote: On Sun, July 6, 2008 6:57 pm, Ian Forde wrote: 1. Apparently, since I updated from 5.1 to 5.2, dhcpd no longer wants to stay running. The config is sound, and I can start it from the command-line with the -d flag and it serves up

Re: [CentOS] Couple of CentOS 5.2 dhcp notes

2008-07-06 Thread Marko A. Jennings
On Sun, July 6, 2008 6:57 pm, Ian Forde wrote: 1. Apparently, since I updated from 5.1 to 5.2, dhcpd no longer wants to stay running. The config is sound, and I can start it from the command-line with the -d flag and it serves up leases. But without the -d flag, it just silently dies...

Re: [CentOS] Couple of CentOS 5.2 dhcp notes

2008-07-06 Thread Ian Forde
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 19:34 -0400, Marko A. Jennings wrote: On Sun, July 6, 2008 6:57 pm, Ian Forde wrote: 1. Apparently, since I updated from 5.1 to 5.2, dhcpd no longer wants to stay running. The config is sound, and I can start it from the command-line with the -d flag and it serves up

Re: [CentOS] Getting something into centosplus for 5.2?

2008-07-06 Thread S.Tindall
On Sunday, July 06, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Ian Forde wrote: I've got a USB to serial adapter that I picked up from Radio Shack earlier this year. The updated pl2303 driver is already in the mainstream kernel as per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429652 but I'm not getting much

Re: [CentOS] Getting something into centosplus for 5.2?

2008-07-06 Thread Karanbir Singh
S.Tindall wrote: Tripp-Lite U209-000-R: http://www.tripplite.com/products/product.cfm?productID=2430 Cables-To-Go 26886: http://www.cablestogo.com/product.asp?cat%5fid=101sku=26886 Think they cost about US$15 each at provantage.com. I've been using these with zero issues ( 14 of them

Re: [CentOS] Getting something into centosplus for 5.2?

2008-07-06 Thread Ian Forde
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 00:54 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: Ian Forde wrote: I figure that this is the kind of situation that -plus is meant to solve... open a request at http://bugs.centos.org/ - thats the *only* way to get stuff into centos_plus, and if there is a patch or a proposed

Re: [CentOS] Getting something into centosplus for 5.2?

2008-07-06 Thread Ian Forde
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 19:39 -0400, S.Tindall wrote: Seems like it would be simpler to get an adapter that work with the current/native pl2303 driver. Yeah... but mine works - with some extra work... didn't want to buy this type of device twice but... For the purpose of serial consoles, these

Re: [CentOS] Desktop: Evolution Bug Buddy issues (GNOME)

2008-07-06 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 4:31 PM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark: A follow on: I searched in the CentOS Bugzilla and also in the Upstream Bugzilla, for Evolution. There are about 25 things in CentOS and 119 in

[CentOS] ANSWER: Couple of CentOS 5.2 dhcp notes

2008-07-06 Thread Ian Forde
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 15:57 -0700, Ian Forde wrote: 1. Apparently, since I updated from 5.1 to 5.2, dhcpd no longer wants to stay running. The config is sound, and I can start it from the command-line with the -d flag and it serves up leases. But without the -d flag, it just silently dies...

[CentOS] SIGPIPE in assorted apps after yum update

2008-07-06 Thread John Hanks
Hello, I have several systems which I recently updated with yum -y update to all the latest packages. These systems use yum-priorities and use the CentOS (priority 1) EPEL (priority 5) and rpmforge (priority 10) repositories. After the updates, dhcpd stopped working with a SIGPIPE error which

Re: [CentOS] Acer 5920 audio chip does not work in CentOS 5.2?

2008-07-06 Thread hce
On 7/4/08, William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 12:41 +1000, hce wrote: On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 12:18 AM, William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 07:57 -0500, Alex White wrote: snip snip /proc delivers the

[CentOS] gentee

2008-07-06 Thread ann kok
Hi what is the different between the gentee and centos? thank you ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] gentee

2008-07-06 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 06:52:51PM -0700, ann kok wrote: Hi what is the different between the gentee and centos? Gentee is a programming language, CentOS is a Linux Distribution. Ray ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] gentee

2008-07-06 Thread Ian Blackwell
Ray Van Dolson wrote: Gentee is a programming language, CentOS is a Linux Distribution. You would hope the question was really about Gentoo, but I have a suspicion that perhaps it wasn't :-D Ian smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[CentOS] Re: SIGPIPE in assorted apps after yum update

2008-07-06 Thread John Hanks
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 7:44 PM, John Hanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I have several systems which I recently updated with yum -y update to all the latest packages. These systems use yum-priorities and use the CentOS (priority 1) EPEL (priority 5) and rpmforge (priority 10)

[CentOS] Re: Problem with Bonding Driver

2008-07-06 Thread Dirk H. Schulz
Hi, --On 5. Juli 2008 09:45:16 -0700 Art Age Software [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, could you describe in more detail? What exactly is ignored? The options do not look much different. As I said, I am trying to set a different primary interface for each bond: eth0 for bond0, and eth2 for

[CentOS] MySQL in CentOS 5.2

2008-07-06 Thread hce
Hi, I've just installed MySQL (mysql.i386 5.0.45-7.el5) and lighty (lighttpd.i386 1.4.19-1.el5.rf) to the CentOS 5.2, but could not find mysql and lighttpd scripts in /etc/init.d. Also there is no /usr/bin/mysql_install_db. Where can I find mysql and lighttpd scripts for starting the processes in

Re: [CentOS] MySQL in CentOS 5.2

2008-07-06 Thread Clint Dilks
hce wrote: Hi, I've just installed MySQL (mysql.i386 5.0.45-7.el5) and lighty (lighttpd.i386 1.4.19-1.el5.rf) to the CentOS 5.2, but could not find mysql and lighttpd scripts in /etc/init.d. Also there is no /usr/bin/mysql_install_db. Where can I find mysql and lighttpd scripts for starting the

RE: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy

2008-07-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
If it won't wok, you'l have to cook up something. :-) YUK, YUK! Now that's ironic (you'l):P ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS-docs] article for consideration, Atheros 5007EG wireless card

2008-07-06 Thread Scott Robbins
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 03:16:40PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: Scott Robbins wrote: My thought is that it could go somewhere under http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless Seeing the quality of the stuff you already added to the wiki, I just gave you access to everything under

Re: [CentOS-docs] article for consideration, Atheros 5007EG wireless card

2008-07-06 Thread Scott Robbins
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 03:16:40PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: Scott Robbins wrote: My thought is that it could go somewhere under http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless Seeing the quality of the stuff you already added to the wiki, I just gave you access to everything under

Re: [CentOS-docs] article for consideration, Atheros 5007EG wireless card

2008-07-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Scott Robbins wrote: I was able to create a new empty page, but not able to create a page under Laptops/Wireless. (I tried adding AR5007EG to http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless/ which took me to the expected empty page but got the message that I wasn't allowed to edit the

Re: [CentOS-docs] article for consideration, Atheros 5007EG wireless card

2008-07-06 Thread Scott Robbins
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 08:55:48PM +0100, Alan Bartlett wrote: On 06/07/2008, Scott Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The article is now up at http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/WirelessAR5007EG I also added a link to it from the Wireless page at

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2008:0557 CentOS 5 i386 nss Update

2008-07-06 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0557 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0557.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: c5ab539f1d014246b0548cda7e2e6897

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2008:0557 CentOS 5 x86_64 nss Update

2008-07-06 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0557 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0557.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 4c607a16cefc3247905fc95361ca7409

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2008:0557 CentOS 5 i386 nspr Update

2008-07-06 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0557 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0557.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: ddf29c14ea7685f7cce5b92fe0c45df2 nspr-4.7.1-1.el5.i386.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0569 Critical CentOS 5 i386 firefox Update

2008-07-06 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0569 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0569.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: bb6c75eed0cef5655f28f1789dff5777

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0569 Critical CentOS 5 x86_64 firefox Update

2008-07-06 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0569 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0569.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: c454a5cff8530f036e1f33f26c5f801a

[CentOS-es] Re: Disponible Implementación de Servidores con GNU/Linux, versión julio 2008 (kiko)

2008-07-06 Thread kiko Marti
Felicidades Joel por este gran manual, muchas gracias. Gente como tu hace grande la comunidad GNU/Linux. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

Re: [CentOS-es] Dilema sobre sustitución del ADS por FDS y estaciones Linux

2008-07-06 Thread BlackHand
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 12:48 -0400, Hardy Beltran Monasterios wrote: Yo nunca he ocupado FDS/RHDS7 pero ese userPassword es un atributo del directorio LDAP que mantiene la información de las cuentas de usuario. Deberías revisar la definición del esquema que estás usando en tu LDAP.

Re: [CentOS-es] Saludos a todos

2008-07-06 Thread Daniel Listas de Linux
wellcome 2008/7/4 Victor Padro [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bienvenido. :) -- It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion. Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente servidas ___ CentOS-es mailing

Re: [CentOS-es] Squid Parent

2008-07-06 Thread Fequay
Buenas esta es la version. squid-2.5.STABLE11-3.FC1 tambien puede ser que el logrotate no este haciendo su pega y no me rote los logs. On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 07:33:44 -0500, Aland Laines wrote que yo sepa, el squid comprime y renombra el esos archivos log automaticamente, que version de squid

Re: [CentOS-es] Instalacion de IMSS en CentOS

2008-07-06 Thread Hardy Beltran Monasterios
El dom, 06-07-2008 a las 14:33 -0400, Sebastián Veloso Varas escribió: Estimados, Desde ya les envio mi cordial saludos a todos ustedes puesto que soy nuevo en esta lista. Tengo la siguiente inquietud ... ¿Alguien ha instalado alguna vez en su CentOS la herramienta IMSS (Interscan

Re: [CentOS-es] auda con sendmail

2008-07-06 Thread Daniel Listas de Linux
Necesitas configurar postfix para virtual host. Te paso instrucciones para debian, sólo para que te hagas a la idea. Busca las de CentOS o apañate con esto http://www.debuntu.org/2006/05/05/45-how-to-postfix-and-virtual-hosts 2008/7/3 Hector Cuadros Prosopio [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Buen dia a todo