On Tuesday 08 July 2008 00:51:59 Florin Andrei wrote:
Bottom line: disable atime on all systems unless you _really_ need to do
disk forensics. You will see a performance improvement in almost every
scenario.
I'd like to try this on this laptop. How do you do it?
Anne
Jonathan Wright wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all
If I do a dig mydomain.co.za from a Linux server, how do I know
which DNS nameserver returns the queries?
I seem to have a faulty DNS server, but can't see which one, so I
want to find out which nameserver (if there's 4 - ns1.myserver,
On Monday 07 July 2008 10:50:11 William L. Maltby wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 11:48 +1000, hce wrote:
On 7/4/08, William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 12:41 +1000, hce wrote:
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 12:18 AM, William L. Maltby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gavin Carr wrote:
The current beta version of Firebug doesn't appear to install on
Firefox 3 on CentOS 5.2, apparently because it's reporting itself as
3.0b5 rather 3.0. I tweaked the minVersion requirement in the xpi to
3.0b5 and it seems to be working fine for me now.
In case anyone else
Ben wrote:
Ben wrote:
For some time now i have been running BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.1
x86_64 however after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 BackupPC will not start.
sudo /etc/init.d/backuppc start return OK but there is no BackupPC
processes.
This fails also.
# sudo -u backuppc /usr/bin/BackupPC
when the mail server receives mail to be sent to multiple users with
attachments responds with a mistake by refusing to forward the mail
Can you help?
Luigi A. Gatto
---
Luigi Antonio Gatto
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/7/7 MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Herta Van den Eynde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to install CentOS 5.2 on a Dell PE 1850 via the DRAC 4
card, with CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-1of6.iso mounted as virtual media. At
the boot prompt, I hit Enter, which should start
El 07/07/2008, a las 16:51, Johnny Hughes escribió:
Santi Saez wrote:
Dear Srs,
yum-updatesd-0.9-2.el5 appears that it's not working on freshly
installed CentOS 5.2, using:
# rpm -qa yum*
yum-metadata-parser-1.1.2-2.el5
yum-updatesd-0.9-2.el5
yum-3.2.8-9.el5.centos.2.1
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 00:51:59 Florin Andrei wrote:
Bottom line: disable atime on all systems unless you _really_ need to do
disk forensics. You will see a performance improvement in almost every
scenario.
I'd like to try this on this laptop. How do you do it?
Put noatime
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ben wrote:
Ben wrote:
For some time now i have been running BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.1
x86_64 however after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 BackupPC will not start.
sudo /etc/init.d/backuppc start return OK but there is no BackupPC
processes.
This fails also.
# sudo -u
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 11:12:53 Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 00:51:59 Florin Andrei wrote:
Bottom line: disable atime on all systems unless you _really_ need to do
disk forensics. You will see a performance improvement in almost every
scenario.
I'd
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 11:12:53 Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 00:51:59 Florin Andrei wrote:
Bottom line: disable atime on all systems unless you _really_ need to do
disk forensics. You will see a performance improvement in almost every
scenario.
I'd
Amitava Shee wrote:
Yes, building from source will work. I just want to know if there is a
package (in some yum repository) somewhere so that updates, patches etc.
gets applied with yum update. It would be nice to do something like
yum install pcre-utf8
Again - and I'm going to type this
Hi all!
Maybe I'm just being silly here, but I'm wondering if anybody has ever
used their computer for sharing files over USB. That is, the computer
pretends to be a USB mass storage device.
This could be useful for connecting to media players and such that
support you plugging a USB harddrive
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay kids, for those following along I'd like to take a moment to sum
this thread up so far
No it isn't
Yes it is
No it isn't
Yes it is
No it isn't
Yes it is.
Thank you. This has been a brief email summary. You may not
Hi,
I'm trying to mount a Windows folder from a Linux box with the command:
# mount -t smbfs (...)
but I get the error:
mount: unknown filesystem type 'smbfs'.
Does this mean that CentOS mount doesn't support smbfs type ?
If so, how can I enable it ?
I'm using 5.1
Any help would be
Any help would be appreciated.
I think you need samba-client, then you use #mount -t cifs
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Mário Gamito wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to mount a Windows folder from a Linux box with the command:
# mount -t smbfs (...)
but I get the error:
mount: unknown filesystem type 'smbfs'.
Does this mean that CentOS mount doesn't support smbfs type ?
If so, how can I enable it ?
I'm using 5.1
Any
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 08:23:59AM -0400, Jim Perrin enlightened us:
Okay kids, for those following along I'd like to take a moment to sum
this thread up so far
No it isn't
Yes it is
No it isn't
Yes it is
No it isn't
Yes it is.
Thank you. This has been a brief email summary. You may
That would be now mount -t cifs /dev/null
JohnStanley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mário Gamito
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 8:43 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] CentOS mount doesn't support smbfs type ?
Hi,
I'm trying
Hi I am using Centos 5.1 and I have a weird problem with squid logs
rotation. I have the file squid as follow in /etc/logrotate.d:
Recently I reduce size parameter.
/var/log/squid/access.log {
weekly
missingok
rotate 10
compress
create 0660 squid squid
missingok
size 200M
Ben wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ben wrote:
Ben wrote:
For some time now i have been running BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.1
x86_64 however after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 BackupPC will not start.
sudo /etc/init.d/backuppc start return OK but there is no BackupPC
processes.
This fails also.
#
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 04:20:30PM -0600, Kenneth Burgener wrote:
On 7/7/2008 2:26 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
on 7-7-2008 12:45 PM Kenneth Burgener spake the following:
The CentOS 5/RHEL 5 repository from atrpms.net is safe to use, if
you only use the stable version. Packages in
Michael Rock wrote:
To be specific it listed it as RedHat 5.0 Client.
http://www.linuxtested.com/results/asus_p5k-vm.html
They did not test sata though
Hard Drive Seagate ST320410A 20G (IDE)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bent Terp wrote:
Hi all!
Maybe I'm just being silly here, but I'm wondering if anybody has ever
used their computer for sharing files over USB. That is, the computer
pretends to be a USB mass storage device.
This could be useful for connecting to media players and such that
support you
Hi all
Is there a procedure to use an 8GIG thumbdrive to copy the centos 5.2
dvd contents
to the thumbdrive then run isolinux (or something like it) and be able
to use the thumbdrive as the install media?
Seems like it should work, however my machine only has syslinux not
isolinux.
yum
Matt Hyclak wrote on Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:59:51 -0400:
What should I do instead, if I can't return to insanity?
go forward to it!
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS
I tried to resist, but ...
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 18:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Matt Hyclak wrote on Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:59:51 -0400:
What should I do instead, if I can't return to insanity?
What convinces you that you ever left it? Insane folks don't know
they're insane.
go forward to
I'm having some trouble getting reverse zones right on 5.2. The zone files
worked fine on a CentOS 4.6 machine, and the forward zones moved to the new
server seem OK. But for some reason I can't get anything but servfail's on
remote queries to the machine. But for some reason they will answer
I was checking out Dag's ( not dagw ;- ) new blog...
I don't know how much, if at all, this has been debated...
http://dag.wieers.com/blog/using-apt-in-an-rpm-world
if he is so adamant about apt over yum, why are we using yum still?
Laziness? ;-) ...or are we just tasty food centric?
Yum yum
I'm having some trouble getting reverse zones right on 5.2. The zone files
worked fine on a CentOS 4.6 machine, and the forward zones moved to the
new
server seem OK. But for some reason I can't get anything but servfail's on
remote queries to the machine. But for some reason they will
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OK. Now that I have already upgraded, how do I migrate my bookmarks.
Should have exported them before the upgrade, I suspect
I agree with Dick Roth. You should not have had to do anything, if Firefox
was installed
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Herta Van den Eynde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/7/7 MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is normal for the graphical installation.
Is it? 5.1 starts up an X-server and asks these questions in a
graphical screen.
You might want to check that. IIRC, every time I
On 8-Jul-08, at 9:57 AM, Robert - elists wrote:
I was checking out Dag's ( not dagw ;- ) new blog...
I don't know how much, if at all, this has been debated...
http://dag.wieers.com/blog/using-apt-in-an-rpm-world
if he is so adamant about apt over yum, why are we using yum still?
Laziness?
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Santi Saez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Johnny,
Oh, no! A Dear Johnny letter! Waaah!
(SCNR :-)
mhr
BFG
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Robert - elists wrote:
I was checking out Dag's ( not dagw ;- ) new blog...
I don't know how much, if at all, this has been debated...
http://dag.wieers.com/blog/using-apt-in-an-rpm-world
if he is so adamant about apt over yum, why are we using yum still?
Laziness? ;-) ...or are we just
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 04:20:30PM -0600, Kenneth Burgener wrote:
On 7/7/2008 2:26 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
on 7-7-2008 12:45 PM Kenneth Burgener spake the following:
The CentOS 5/RHEL 5 repository
nate wrote:
Maybe apt repositories for RPMs are just as easy to setup as YUM
repositories
apt works with repomd (yum) repos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Jim Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay kids, for those following along I'd like to take a moment to sum
this thread up so far
No it isn't
Yes it is
No it isn't
Yes it is
No it isn't
Yes it is.
Thank you. This has been a brief email summary. You may not
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:44 AM, William L. Maltby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 18:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Matt Hyclak wrote on Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:59:51 -0400:
What should I do instead, if I can't return to insanity?
What convinces you that you ever left it? Insane
Craig White wrote:
don't use a journalled filesystem (ext3)
That's pretty extreme, it may not actually solve the original problem,
and in case of a crash you may have fun with repairing inconsistent
filesystems.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 12:17:58PM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 04:20:30PM -0600, Kenneth Burgener wrote:
On 7/7/2008 2:26 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
on 7-7-2008 12:45 PM
On Tue, July 8, 2008 12:48 pm, Scott Silva wrote:
I'm having some trouble getting reverse zones right on 5.2. The zone files
worked fine on a CentOS 4.6 machine, and the forward zones moved to the
new
server seem OK. But for some reason I can't get anything but servfail's on
remote queries
Anne Wilson wrote:
The reason I want to try it is that the laptop appears to be running much
hotter under KDE4 than it did under KDE3, so I want to test whether
over-frequent updates is the reason or not. For instance, if I minimise this
message then maximise it again, the fan will start.
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Client filtering is not recommended by some people ... but highly
recommended by others :-D
It's a good idea on important systems - but then you shouldn't open
those machines to outside repositories anyway.
But if you don't do client-side filtering, you're helping the
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 11:33:24AM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Client filtering is not recommended by some people ... but highly
recommended by others :-D
It's a good idea on important systems - but then you shouldn't open
those machines to outside repositories
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 11:33:24AM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Client filtering is not recommended by some people ... but highly
recommended by others :-D
It's a good idea on important systems - but
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 21:42 +0300, Axel Thimm wrote:
The true answer to this is cooperating/merged repos and we're
targeting this on rpmrepo.org. Join up and be part of the solution :)
some years ago, the rpm hell dependencies was the worst nightmare
for rpm based distros.
many people did at
Axel Thimm wrote:
Just to present an example from Fedora: clamav within Fedora was and
is considered rather cumbersome packaged and many users turn to 3rd
party repos to get clamav installed.
Actually, I stirred up a lot of muck not too long ago on a mailing list,
exactly on this topic. The
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 12:06:27PM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
Just to present an example from Fedora: clamav within Fedora was and
is considered rather cumbersome packaged and many users turn to 3rd
party repos to get clamav installed.
Actually, I stirred up a lot of muck
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 12:17:58PM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 04:20:30PM -0600, Kenneth Burgener
What CentOS (5) packages are needed to setup X11 forwarding? I don't
want to install a full desktop, just the minimal to forward some
server windows to my desktop.
Regards,
Dnk
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Title: OpSign
Has someone had problems with the mysql version of Centos 5.2?
After I upgraded, the replication broke, the relay file got corrupted,
I had to downgrade for it to work again.
[]s.
--
__
AlessandroRen
on 7-8-2008 9:58 AM Robert - elists spake the following:
I'm having some trouble getting reverse zones right on 5.2. The zone files
worked fine on a CentOS 4.6 machine, and the forward zones moved to the
new
server seem OK. But for some reason I can't get anything but servfail's on
remote
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 01:27:55PM -0700, dnk enlightened us:
What CentOS (5) packages are needed to setup X11 forwarding? I don't
want to install a full desktop, just the minimal to forward some
server windows to my desktop.
Installing xorg-x11-xauth is usually enough.
Matt
--
Matt
On 8-Jul-08, at 1:40 PM, Matt Hyclak wrote:
Installing xorg-x11-xauth is usually enough.
Matt
Yeah I added that one (xorg-x11-xauth), xfs (started), and yet when i
run an app, no go.
# ssh -Y [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# app
No fonts found; this probably means that the fontconfig
library is
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:46 PM, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8-Jul-08, at 1:40 PM, Matt Hyclak wrote:
Installing xorg-x11-xauth is usually enough.
Matt
Yeah I added that one (xorg-x11-xauth), xfs (started), and yet when i run an
app, no go.
# ssh -Y [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# app
No
On 8-Jul-08, at 1:49 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Yeah I added that one (xorg-x11-xauth), xfs (started), and yet when
i run an
app, no go.
# ssh -Y [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# app
No fonts found; this probably means that the fontconfig
library is not correctly configured. You may need to
edit the
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 03:14:18PM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
Using client side filtering is not recommended, it creates more bugs,
than it can solve. The proper thing is to take care of it on the
server side, where the package owners are supposed to know how to
structure the
The true answer to this is cooperating/merged repos and we're
targeting this on rpmrepo.org. Join up and be part of the solution :)
You might want to make some of the mailling lists public for people to
join up on :).
Argh! Was that always the case? I'll fix that.
--
Axel.Thimm at
Fyi,
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html
Any ideas of an eta?
TIA
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal
When I let yum install the latest samba updates, it ate my smb users
file and smb.conf. Once I restored those, it gave me several selinux
avc denials, one of which I can't clear up. See
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2965 for details.
Anyone else having problems like this?
Dave
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 19:29:06 Florin Andrei wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
The reason I want to try it is that the laptop appears to be running much
hotter under KDE4 than it did under KDE3, so I want to test whether
over-frequent updates is the reason or not. For instance, if I minimise
I installed Centos 5.2 on DELL 2650 server (fresh install). After installed
finish, I reboot server and get following messages and server hang:
Memory for crash kernel (0x0 to 0x0) notwithin permissible range
Redhat nash version 5.1.19.6 starting
Anyone know why?
Thanks.
on 7-8-2008 11:42 AM Axel Thimm spake the following:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 11:33:24AM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Client filtering is not recommended by some people ... but highly
recommended by others :-D
It's a good idea on important systems - but then you shouldn't
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 05:28 +0800, mcclnx mcc wrote:
I installed Centos 5.2 on DELL 2650 server (fresh install). After
installed finish, I reboot server and get following messages and
server hang:
Memory for crash kernel (0x0 to 0x0) notwithin permissible range
Redhat nash version
mcclnx mcc wrote:
I installed Centos 5.2 on DELL 2650 server (fresh install). After
installed finish, I reboot server and get following messages and
server hang:
/Memory for crash kernel (0x0 to 0x0) notwithin permissible range/
/Redhat nash version 5.1.19.6 starting/
Anyone
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Fyi,
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html
Any ideas of an eta?
About 45 min to release to the mirror masters, about 25 min from them
for it to show up on mirror.centos.org and start moving out to the
external mirrors.
--
Karanbir Singh :
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Jerry Geis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a procedure to use an 8GIG thumbdrive to copy the centos 5.2 dvd
contents to the thumbdrive then run isolinux (or something like it) and be
able to
use the thumbdrive as the install media?
Look for a file named
So, has anybody on this list gotten the bonding driver working with
more than a single bond and **different options** on the bonds in
CentOS 3/4/5 (I'm using 5.2)?
I am starting to believe that this is in fact a problem with Red Hat
kernels. But if so, I am surprised that it has persisted so long
Maybe I'm just being silly here, but I'm wondering if anybody has ever
used their computer for sharing files over USB. That is, the computer
pretends to be a USB mass storage device.
Surely, somebody must have thought of this before :-D
Yes, Apple thought of it years ago. Plug a Mac/laptop to
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:38 PM, B.J. McClure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 05:28 +0800, mcclnx mcc wrote:
I installed Centos 5.2 on DELL 2650 server (fresh install). After
installed finish, I reboot server and get following messages and
server hang:
Memory for crash kernel
Alessandro Ren wrote:
Has someone had problems with the mysql version of Centos 5.2? After
I upgraded, the replication broke, the relay file got corrupted, I had
to downgrade for it to work again.
no such problems here. You could potentially rebase your replica's once
you have done
Spiro Harvey, Knossos Networks Ltd wrote:
Yes, Apple thought of it years ago. Plug a Mac/laptop to another Mac
via Firewire (and I think USB too), boot it while holding down the T
key (I'm pretty sure it's T), and it boots as a slave drive.
Firewire aka IEEE1394 is a peer to peer interface.
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ben wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ben wrote:
Ben wrote:
For some time now i have been running BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.1
x86_64 however after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 BackupPC will not start.
sudo /etc/init.d/backuppc start return OK but there is no
BackupPC processes.
on 7-8-2008 1:34 PM Scott Silva spake the following:
on 7-8-2008 9:58 AM Robert - elists spake the following:
I'm having some trouble getting reverse zones right on 5.2. The zone
files
worked fine on a CentOS 4.6 machine, and the forward zones moved to the
new
server seem OK. But for some
I believe this is completely OT, but I want to be positive. I have a fully
up to date CentOS 5.2 box. During the past week, when surfing with Firefox
(and today, while testing with Konqueror), frequently, especially when DNS
is slow, I am seeing references to opendns.com At times, I end up on
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008, Lanny Marcus wrote:
I believe this is completely OT, but I want to be positive. I have a fully
up to date CentOS 5.2 box. During the past week, when surfing with Firefox
(and today, while testing with Konqueror), frequently, especially when DNS
is slow, I am seeing
On 7/8/08, Bill Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008, Lanny Marcus wrote:
I believe this is completely OT, but I want to be positive. I have a fully
up to date CentOS 5.2 box. During the past week, when surfing with Firefox
(and today, while testing with Konqueror),
On Tue, July 8, 2008 4:50 pm, Scott Silva wrote:
This is a server that seems to resolve ok. Done from my home server.
; DiG 9.2.4 +trace -x 63.110.242.66
This one doesn't, it seems that the server won't answer the request.
; DiG 9.2.4 +trace -x 208.252.226.196
I can get the A record
Lanny Marcus wrote:
Interesting idea! I will read the IPCop documentation, to see if I can
do that on my IPCop box.
If not, I'm interested in SME Server, if that will do the job. What I
don't like about SME Server is that their documentation isn't
available for download. I like to have local
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Ross Cavanagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
Interesting idea! I will read the IPCop documentation, to see if I can do
that on my IPCop box.
If not, I'm interested in SME Server, if that will do the job. What I
don't like about SME Server is
On 7/8/08, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Ross Cavanagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
As for the SME documentation, you can select to view as one page [the
option is at the bottom of the page when you are browse to the specific
documentattion].
eg.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/8/08, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Ross Cavanagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
As for the SME documentation, you can select to view as one page [the
option is at the bottom of
On Tue, July 8, 2008 9:56 pm, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 7/8/08, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Ross Cavanagh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
As for the SME documentation, you can select to view as one page [the
option is at the bottom of the page when you
On 7/8/08, Stephen John Smoogen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 7/8/08, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Ross Cavanagh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
As for the SME documentation, you can
On Tue, July 8, 2008 10:03 pm, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 7/8/08, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Ross Cavanagh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
As for the SME documentation, you
On 7/8/08, Marko A. Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, July 8, 2008 10:03 pm, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 7/8/08, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Ross Cavanagh
[EMAIL
On 7/8/08, Marko A. Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, July 8, 2008 10:03 pm, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 7/8/08, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Ross Cavanagh
[EMAIL
on 7-8-2008 5:50 PM Brian spake the following:
On Tue, July 8, 2008 4:50 pm, Scott Silva wrote:
This is a server that seems to resolve ok. Done from my home server.
; DiG 9.2.4 +trace -x 63.110.242.66
This one doesn't, it seems that the server won't answer the request.
; DiG 9.2.4
Lanny Marcus kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika keskiviikko, 9. heinäkuuta
2008):
I can replicate it every time I try with Firefox under CentOS 5, but it
works fine with Konqueror. An EeePC and a laptop running Ubuntu don't
have any problems accessing this page with Firefox.
I tested
I just had the misfortune to press Shift-{print screen} accidentally
while in a Gnome desktop, and the result was a completely unresponsive
system where the only recovery was a power switch initiated shutdown.
Further investigation shows the runaway creation of gnome-screenshot
processes.
System
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0533 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
c2c6d8ced889948d7a52fbbb577ec2ff
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0533 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
c56c92553eb90170033acee5bb59452b
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0533 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
ca1344838bf27d12d7c1a4828e648bb0
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0533 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
dabb543cd24968481bcdf89e196d88be
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0533
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
x86_64:
bind-9.2.4-28.0.1.el4.x86_64.rpm
bind-chroot-9.2.4-28.0.1.el4.x86_64.rpm
97 matches
Mail list logo
