Re: [CentOS] How to force iscsi to see the new LUN size

2010-01-20 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 02:53:18PM -0800, Peter Blajev wrote: Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 05:34:47PM -0800, Peter Blajev wrote: Hi, I increased the size of one of the LUNs and on CentOS 5.4 if I restart iscsi (`service iscsi restart`) I'll see the the new size but

Re: [CentOS] Bind data directory borked on update from 5.3 to 5.4

2010-01-20 Thread Bowie Bailey
Les Mikesell wrote: On 1/19/2010 5:26 PM, Brian Mathis wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Bowie Baileybowie_bai...@buc.com wrote: I updated my secondary DNS server from 5.3 to 5.4 today. After the update, named would not start. A bit of investigation found that all of the

[CentOS] centos courseware?

2010-01-20 Thread Robert P. J. Day
does anyone here have pointers or access to courseware that could be used to teach centos (5.4, i believe)? publicly-available, free C/W would, of course, be ideal, but if you have some decent training manuals that you're willing to license on a per-manual basis, i'm still willing to chat.

Re: [CentOS] httpd and robots.txt

2010-01-20 Thread James Matthews
The best way is to remove it from your directory from the google webmaster tools. Also some bots don't listen so additionally to robots.txt use the webmaster central. James On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.comwrote: Add User-agent: Slurp Crawl-delay: 86400

[CentOS] followup to request for centos C/W

2010-01-20 Thread Robert P. J. Day
just to follow on my earlier post, i have pointers to a couple commercial C/W manuals for RHEL administration, but both of them use an entire chapter discussing virtualization using Xen. i'm under the impression that RH is firmly in the KVM camp (at least for now), and that learning Xen on red

Re: [CentOS] centos courseware?

2010-01-20 Thread b.j. mcclure
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 10:31 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: does anyone here have pointers or access to courseware that could be used to teach centos (5.4, i believe)? publicly-available, free C/W would, of course, be ideal, but if you have some decent training manuals that you're willing

Re: [CentOS] followup to request for centos C/W

2010-01-20 Thread Neil Aggarwal
i'm under the impression that RH is firmly in the KVM camp (at least for now), and that learning Xen on red hat/centos wouldn't be as useful as learning KVM. I agree. Since RH is moving to KVM, it is better to learn KVM if you have a choice. Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957,

Re: [CentOS] centos courseware?

2010-01-20 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, b.j. mcclure wrote: On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 10:31 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: does anyone here have pointers or access to courseware that could be used to teach centos (5.4, i believe)? publicly-available, free C/W would, of course, be ideal, but if you have

Re: [CentOS] followup to request for centos C/W

2010-01-20 Thread fabien faye
I can confirm, after my last discussion with Redhat, is it better to learn KVM. Xen is going to die on redhat and centos in some years. Fabien FAYE RHCE www.generationip.com Free network tools HOWTO for centos and Redhat - Mail Original - De: Neil Aggarwal n...@jammconsulting.com À:

Re: [CentOS] followup to request for centos C/W

2010-01-20 Thread Scot P. Floess
Just curious - any idea how much longer we can expect Xen support? I don't have the hardware requirements at home to support KVM - so I'd love for Xen to stick around forever ;) On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, fabien faye wrote: I can confirm, after my last discussion with Redhat, is it better to

Re: [CentOS] followup to request for centos C/W

2010-01-20 Thread Neil Aggarwal
I don't have the hardware requirements at home to support KVM I thought they run on the same hardware. What do you feel would not support KVM? Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://UnmeteredVPS.net/cpanel cPanel/WHM preinstalled on a virtual server for only $40/month! No

[CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Frank Cox
I have dealt with machines that have multiple network cards in them before, but never when they were on the same subnet so this issue has never come up before. My problem is that I can only access one IP address at a time. I started out using dhcp and found that if I went through the dhcp

Re: [CentOS] centos courseware?

2010-01-20 Thread b.j. mcclure
I find the RHEL Deployment Guide very helpful in this regard. Sorry. I don't have the link handy at the moment but it's available on the RH website.HTH. yes, i've already bookmarked those. i was curious in that there are some deployment guides at the centos site:

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Bob Beers
I can offer one tiny bit of help ... On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net wrote: Incidentally, it is my current understanding that anything that I do with an ip route command will go away on a reboot, therefore if I somehow screw up the routing on this box

Re: [CentOS] followup to request for centos C/W

2010-01-20 Thread Scot P. Floess
Sorry - misleading... What I mean is, my hardware does not support native virtualization. On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Neil Aggarwal wrote: I don't have the hardware requirements at home to support KVM I thought they run on the same hardware. What do you feel would not support KVM? Neil

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread m . roth
I can offer one tiny bit of help ... On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net wrote: Incidentally, it is my current understanding that anything that I do with an ip route command will go away on a reboot, therefore if I somehow screw up the routing on this box

Re: [CentOS] centos courseware?

2010-01-20 Thread Lucian @ lastdot.org
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:  does anyone here have pointers or access to courseware that could be used to teach centos (5.4, i believe)?  publicly-available, free C/W would, of course, be ideal, but if you have some decent training manuals

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 11:33 -0500, Bob Beers wrote: man iptables-save That would dump the table to a file, but what would I do with the file after that? I imagine there is a way to feed that back into the ip command and reconfigure it, but I could do that with rc.local and avoid one step.

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Frank Cox wrote on Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:27:29 -0600: I got rid of dhcp and set up static addresses using system-config-network. Can't help you on the routing back issue. Just wanted to remind you that you can assign static IP addresses via DHCP to specific MAC addresses. That might be easier

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 10:27 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: My problem is that I can only access one IP address at a time. I started out using dhcp and found that if I went through the dhcp song-and-dance then that address became active and the other one was disabled, and vice versa. I'm

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Les Mikesell
On 1/20/2010 11:31 AM, Frank Cox wrote: On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 10:27 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: My problem is that I can only access one IP address at a time. I started out using dhcp and found that if I went through the dhcp song-and-dance then that address became active and the other one was

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread R-Elists
I'm starting to wonder if the simplest solution to this is to punt. If I put a $40 router between eth2 and the big scary world, then eth2 could become 192.168.whatever.whatever, and then this routing issue would go away on its own and it could still talk to the outside world (and

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread fabien faye
Frank, I think the best way is to create bonding on eth1-eth2 and create an alias on this bond interface. If you need to use the two interfaces in same time, you can use round robin parameter on the bonding interface. If you need help on bonding you can use this howto :

[CentOS] error rsyncing large file

2010-01-20 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Trying to rsync a rather large file from a windows server to a centos server and all but this is working fine. As it's a 20 gig file I am trying to send the diff of with a -c, I suspect over the low bandwidth this presents an issue. I also stage this file locally on another centos server and

Re: [CentOS] followup to request for centos C/W

2010-01-20 Thread Eero Volotinen
On 1/20/10 7:14 PM, fabien faye wrote: I can confirm, after my last discussion with Redhat, is it better to learn KVM. Xen is going to die on redhat and centos in some years. In some years? It is supported until support cycle is over. So, in RHEL 5.4 due date is: 31 Mar 2014 Anyway, the

Re: [CentOS] error rsyncing large file

2010-01-20 Thread Les Mikesell
On 1/20/2010 12:01 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: Trying to rsync a rather large file from a windows server to a centos server and all but this is working fine. As it's a 20 gig file I am trying to send the diff of with a -c, I suspect over the low bandwidth this presents an issue. I also

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 09:50 -0800, R-Elists wrote: ummm, why do the two different networks need an IP on the same subnet ? I have had a number of people ask me why I want this arrangement, where I have two modems on a single outbound subnet. This is (going to be) a server with limited upload

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Bob Beers
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net wrote: On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 11:33 -0500, Bob Beers wrote: man iptables-save That would dump the table to a file, but what would I do with the file after that?  I imagine there is a way to feed that back into the ip command and

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 11:48 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: Why did you want this arrangement in the first place? IP routes are normally asymmetrical by design (it's a feature). I thought you said you already had a private address on eth0. Why do you need to distinguish between eth1/eth2 on

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread R-Elists
I have had a number of people ask me why I want this arrangement, where I have two modems on a single outbound subnet. This is (going to be) a server with limited upload bandwidth. By having two outbound connections, I can use a round robin dns entry to share the load between the

Re: [CentOS] error rsyncing large file

2010-01-20 Thread Brian Mathis
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: Trying to rsync a rather large file from a windows server to a centos server and all but this is working fine. As it's a 20 gig file I am trying to send the diff of with a -c, I suspect over the low bandwidth

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Bob Beers
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Bob Beers bob.be...@gmail.com wrote: You can save your ip route commands in the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ directory  files for each interface route-ethX.  They will then be automatically called when the  interface is brought up on reboot, or with

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Barry Brimer
Incidentally, it is my current understanding that anything that I do with an ip route command will go away on a reboot, therefore if I somehow screw up the routing on this box completely all I have to do is reboot it and I'll be back to what I had before.  Which is not a bad thing at the moment.  

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Bob Beers
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Bob Beers bob.be...@gmail.com wrote: here's a link to a more thorough explanation: http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/configuring-static-routes-in-debian-or-red-hat-linux-systems.html ok, last word from me on the subject, really,

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 10:27 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: My problem is that I can only access one IP address at a time. I started out using dhcp and found that if I went through the dhcp song-and-dance then that address became active and the other one was disabled, and vice versa. The solution

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Bob Beers wrote on Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:33:35 -0500: man iptables-save this won't save the routing table Kai -- Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 14:25 -0500, Bob Beers wrote: On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Bob Beers bob.be...@gmail.com wrote: here's a link to a more thorough explanation: http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/configuring-static-routes-in-debian-or-red-hat-linux-systems.html ok, last word from me

Re: [CentOS] followup to request for centos C/W

2010-01-20 Thread fabien faye
Like i have understood, xen could be also present and support on RHEL6 and in this case, it could be supported until the cycle of RHEL 6. But is it preferable to migrate all your xen to kvm in a near furtur. Kvm is a REDHAT project and REDHAT want to put all ressources to improve and develop

Re: [CentOS] error rsyncing large file

2010-01-20 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I don't understand why the diff shenanigans. Rsync has that built-in, so you shouldn't need to be doing that as a separate step. I am using cwrsync (3.0.6) and its failing no matter what switches I try. If it is a file size limit, you could try to split(1) the file, then rsync the chunks. You

Re: [CentOS] error rsyncing large file

2010-01-20 Thread Les Mikesell
On 1/20/2010 2:05 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: I don't understand why the diff shenanigans. Rsync has that built-in, so you shouldn't need to be doing that as a separate step. I am using cwrsync (3.0.6) and its failing no matter what switches I try. If it is a file size limit, you could try

Re: [CentOS] error rsyncing large file

2010-01-20 Thread James Bensley
Don't want to sound like a spoil sport but you could scp it over and already be well on your way? -- Regards, James ;) Samuel Goldwyn - I'm willing to admit that I may not always be right, but I am never wrong. - http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/s/samuel_goldwyn.html

Re: [CentOS] error rsyncing large file

2010-01-20 Thread Agile Aspect
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Brian Mathis brian.mat...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: Trying to rsync a rather large file from a windows server to a centos server and all but this is working fine. As it's a 20 gig file

[CentOS] perl updates always break perl programs, how to fix?

2010-01-20 Thread James Chase
I realize this is my fault because once upon a time I installed a package using CPAN and probably other admins on the system have as well but now whenever I update perl I have to jump through hoops to get perl applications to work again (usually updating Scalar::Util and another package with

Re: [CentOS] error rsyncing large file

2010-01-20 Thread Joseph L. Casale
People have reported different results with different builds on the backuppc list but I don't remember the versions. How is this failing? There is still a maximum path limit. Also, how are you using it? Running under cygwin sshd has had problems that might also be fixed in the latest

Re: [CentOS] error rsyncing large file

2010-01-20 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: Trying to rsync a rather large file from a windows server to a centos server and all but this is working fine. As it's a 20 gig file I am trying to send the diff of with a -c, I suspect over the low bandwidth

Re: [CentOS] perl updates always break perl programs, how to fix?

2010-01-20 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:46 PM, James Chase chase1...@gmail.com wrote: I realize this is my fault because once upon a time I installed a package using CPAN and probably other admins on the system have as well but now whenever I update perl I have to jump through hoops to get perl applications

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Clint Dilks
Frank Cox wrote: I have dealt with machines that have multiple network cards in them before, but never when they were on the same subnet so this issue has never come up before. My problem is that I can only access one IP address at a time. I started out using dhcp and found that if I went

Re: [CentOS] Determine security updates

2010-01-20 Thread Markus Falb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 19/01/2010 11:49, John Doe wrote: Try the yum-security package... Since when does it work for centos ? - -- best regards, markus -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Frank Cox
On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 10:27 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote: This Article should be exactly what you need http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/7291/print That's pretty much it. I will study this some more; it's an interesting situation and I want to understand the solution. Thanks! -- MELVILLE

Re: [CentOS] Determine security updates

2010-01-20 Thread Dave
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Markus Falb markus.f...@fasel.at wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 19/01/2010 11:49, John Doe wrote: Try the yum-security package... Since when does it work for centos ? I've been using it for at least 6 months. Sure hope it works!

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Les Mikesell
On 1/20/2010 1:41 PM, Frank Cox wrote: On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 14:25 -0500, Bob Beers wrote: On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Bob Beersbob.be...@gmail.com wrote: here's a link to a more thorough explanation:

Re: [CentOS] error rsyncing large file

2010-01-20 Thread Les Mikesell
On 1/20/2010 3:06 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: People have reported different results with different builds on the backuppc list but I don't remember the versions. How is this failing? There is still a maximum path limit. Also, how are you using it? Running under cygwin sshd has had problems

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Robert Spangler
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 13:57, Frank Cox wrote: On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 09:50 -0800, R-Elists wrote: ummm, why do the two different networks need an IP on the same subnet ? I have had a number of people ask me why I want this arrangement, where I have two modems on a single

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Les Mikesell
On 1/20/2010 4:08 PM, Robert Spangler wrote: On Wednesday 20 January 2010 13:57, Frank Cox wrote: On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 09:50 -0800, R-Elists wrote: ummm, why do the two different networks need an IP on the same subnet ? I have had a number of people ask me why I want this

Re: [CentOS] error rsyncing large file

2010-01-20 Thread Brett Serkez
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: snip As it's a 20 gig file I am trying to send the diff of with a -c, I suspect over snip This might be too basic a question, what type of file system are you using on the CentOS system? For instance if it

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 17:08 -0500, Robert Spangler wrote: Please be aware that DNS was not designed to do what you are doing. Yes it will do a round-robin but is not connection aware. Lose a link and you lose half of the connections even though one link is still active. I'm aware of

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 16:05 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: What's upstream? Two dsl lines from the same provider? Cable, actually. Can you get them provisioned on different subnets? If I really had to I probably could; I have another modem in this same building from them that I've had for a

Re: [CentOS] followup to request for centos C/W

2010-01-20 Thread Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:43:44 +0100 (CET) fabien faye fab...@faye.eu wrote: Like i have understood, xen could be also present and support on RHEL6 and in this case, it could be supported until the cycle of RHEL 6. But is it preferable to migrate all your xen to kvm in a near furtur. Not going

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0061 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 gzip - security update

2010-01-20 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0061 gzip security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0061.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/gzip-1.3.3-15.rhel3.i386.rpm source:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0061 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 gzip - security update

2010-01-20 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0061 gzip security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0061.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/gzip-1.3.3-15.rhel3.x86_64.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0045 CentOS 5 i386 cups Update

2010-01-20 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0045 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0045.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 0a6d0a8b6d3c45dea0bd37c6cb80c2a2

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0045 CentOS 5 x86_64 cups Update

2010-01-20 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0045 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0045.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 06338f960aa1bbb95f28ecee3a5acfe2

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0047 CentOS 5 i386 strace Update

2010-01-20 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0047 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0047.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: d12347f112e54dd0c287fabef8222b11

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0047 CentOS 5 x86_64 strace Update

2010-01-20 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0047 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0047.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 74621fdbce9c1989d940669e9565a01e

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0052 CentOS 5 x86_64 util-linux Update

2010-01-20 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0052 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0052.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 89df94ee2befa84688fd02d639e1ac57

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0052 CentOS 5 i386 util-linux Update

2010-01-20 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0052 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0052.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: cf4b70df807421492e7fba5cae101f51

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0061 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 gzip Update

2010-01-20 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0061 Moderate Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0061.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: a79cbe8f01e6757eac6e58c688812540

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0061 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 gzip Update

2010-01-20 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0061 Moderate Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0061.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 0902005f6c9aaeee4f2b02eb97189e6d

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0062 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 bind Update

2010-01-20 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0062 Moderate Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0062.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: c67faaad3c19c8f252544076b2152376

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0062 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 bind Update

2010-01-20 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0062 Moderate Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0062.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 49df0bcc13a7f08af43ffaaa97ef19b9

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0046 Important CentOS 5 i386 kernel Update

2010-01-20 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0046 Important Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0046.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: fafd732a8e5073b181e55608a4b73274

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0046 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 kernel Update

2010-01-20 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0046 Important Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0046.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: e929f552c487698d66c1ec94fb753628

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0050 CentOS 5 i386 glibc Update

2010-01-20 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0050 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0050.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: be6168c62d1243279008180f8c8eaaa2

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0050 CentOS 5 x86_64 glibc Update

2010-01-20 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0050 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0050.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 131a224ca0fea655997b8090f575dab4

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0054 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 openssl Update

2010-01-20 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0054 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0054.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 0685602c5b555a9523a725a44c057015

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0054 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 openssl Update

2010-01-20 Thread Karanbir Singh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0054 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0054.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 1e125078feacc2f3447af37537dc9476

[CentOS-virt] Windows Xen VM's have high guest CPU usage and poor performance

2010-01-20 Thread Ryan Pugatch
Hello all, I have a PowerEdge 2950 that I am using to host Windows XP VM's under CentOS. I am experiencing poor performance in the Xen VM's. Any time I try to do something, the CPU usage (as reported by the Windows task manager) hits 100% for a few and then drops back down. This is causing

Re: [CentOS-virt] Windows Xen VM's have high guest CPU usage and poor performance

2010-01-20 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 01/21/2010 05:18 AM, Ryan Pugatch wrote: Hello all, I have a PowerEdge 2950 that I am using to host Windows XP VM's under CentOS. I am experiencing poor performance in the Xen VM's. Any time I try to do something, the CPU usage (as reported by the Windows task manager) hits 100% for

[CentOS-es] Error: rejected after DATA Exim.

2010-01-20 Thread Sergio
Hola a t...@s! Alguien me podría dar una pista para solucionar este problema en mi servidor exim. Los avisos del nagios no me llegan, me aparece esto en el logs. F=nob...@web.midominio.com rejected after DATA: there is no valid sender in any header line. ¿Alguna idea? Tengo

Re: [CentOS-es] CentOS 4 en un antiguo PC

2010-01-20 Thread Rubén González
También podrías hacer un test del CD en otro computador a ver que resultado obtienes. From: bpin...@comet-ingenieria.es To: centos-es@centos.org Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:33:51 +0100 Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] CentOS 4 en un antiguo PC Ya he probado en modo texto pero pasa también por esa

[CentOS-es] unsubscribe

2010-01-20 Thread Junior del Toro
___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

Re: [CentOS-es] unsubscribe

2010-01-20 Thread Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez
On 01/20/2010 10:26 AM, Junior del Toro wrote: ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Junior seguir el enlace que aparece acá arriba, ahi te podrás desuscribir. saludos epe

Re: [CentOS-es] CentOS 4 en un antiguo PC

2010-01-20 Thread Santi Saez
El 19/01/10 18:45, Benjamin Pinazo escribió: (..) Emite una secuencia de líneas y despues de la que pone ‘running /sbin/loader’ aparece una ventana de fondo azul que pone ‘Welcom to CentOS’, y al cabo de unos cuantos segundos un mensaje que dice ‘To beging testing the CD media before