Re: [CentOS-docs] Automated listing of translations on each wiki page
Ralph, gmail is working for me. Are you using the *left* mouse button? :-) On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Timothy Lee timothy.ty@gmail.com wrote: Dear Marcus, On 11/29/2010 07:43 PM, Marcus Moeller wrote: Dear Ralph. On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Ralph Angenendt ralph.angene...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Timothy Leetimothy.ty@gmail.com wrote: I now realize that CentOS have customized the Modern theme quite a bit. Please find attached a patch against CentOS' screen.css. The CSS declarations for .navibar and #langbar are now shared to ease future maintenance. The broken top menu should also be fixed. The patch was made against http://wiki.centos.org/wiki/modern-CentOS/css/screen.css If I resize the window to be smaller than 1200 pixels in width, it now messes up the langbar by pushing down the leftmost button. Obviously this only happens when you actively select a page and that then shows up on the right hand of the navigation bar. I'd rather have a bit more vertical space between navibar and langbar, so this cannot happen. Do you think it could be possible to use a pulldown bar for language selection like in: http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/Style/Web/Default Maybe we could also adopt this css to Mantis, but I never hacked a Mantis theme before. Could you perhaps send me the one that is currently used, so I can take a look at the structure? Generating the options for the pull-down list should be quite easy -- just changing a few lines in the code. The down side is that those links would not be picked up by search engines. You must also use either javascript or server-side logic to do the page redirection. If the This wiki in ... line towards the bottom is to replicate the langbar (or pulldown bar), then that *would* be picked up by search engines, correct? Also, could the two be sync'd up? Meaning, have the same languages, in the same order, with the same look. Per the latter, the en and de pages display a text description, while the es page uses two-letter code, and es has horizontal lines bordering it (which I like), whereas en and de are plain. jerry ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-virt] IBM GPFS filesystem
Adam Wead amsterda...@... writes: Hi all,I was wondering if anyone might be able to speak about using IBM's GPFS filesystem as a means of storing virtual guests in a clustered environment with CentOS as the nodes and KVM as the hypervisor? I'm looking at using IBM's TSM software for archiving data from disk to tape. This requires buying a license for GPFS which is used in conjunction with TSM but can also be used as a clustered filesystem as well. As I understand it, GPFS can work with CentOS so long as you're using the right kernel.Is anyone out there using CentOS+GPFS for their virtualization environment?many thanks in advance,...adam ___ CentOS-virt mailing list centos-v...@... http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt Hi Adam, I use GPFS as my filesystem for my Centos-Xenvirtual environment. The Virtual servers are converted Compute nodes, running Centos 5.4 with Xen 3.4.2 and have Infiniband connectivity to the NSD servers. The VM's all live on the GPFS filesystem. This has worked pretty well, the disk performance of the VM's has been good when using the GPL paravirt drivers (my VM's are windows server 2003). I'm currently in the process of trying to re-setup the infrastructure using stateless Centos+KVM Virtual servers instead, but its too early to tell if its working or not. Good luck, Evan. ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] IBM GPFS filesystem
On 12/02/2010 10:53 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 12/02/2010 12:58 PM, compdoc wrote:
[]...live migration...?
___
Interesting. Does live migration not work on ext3 or ext4?
No. You need a shared filesystem.
Thats not true. You can do live kvm guest migration using RHEL/CentOS+RHCS+KVM
using
lvm volumes to allocate/install kvm guests, for example. In this case you don't
need
a shared filesystem ...
To accomplish a live kvm migration (or xen) you need a shared storage, not a
clustered filesystem or shared filesystem.
Which pretty much leaves you on either
NFS or a clustered filesystem. RH has an example of using NFS - with a
strong statement attached that you shouldn't do it that way in real life
because the performance is poor.
I have two solaris zfs/nfs fileservers sharing storage to 5 ESXi servers and
performance is very very good ... And it is a production system ...
Trying to mount ext3 or ext4 simultaneously from two machines (on say
iSCSI) would just result in filesystem corruption.
This case isn't possible, because you can't mount an ext3 or ext4 filesystem at
the
same time in two or more hosts ...
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] IBM GPFS filesystem
Benjamin Franz wrote: On 12/02/2010 12:58 PM, compdoc wrote: []...live migration...? snip No. You need a shared filesystem. Which pretty much leaves you on either NFS or a clustered filesystem. Totally wrong ! If you have never tested it , try it (and try to understand clvmd) before saying that it doesn't work ! If you've never tried it, that means you've never played with the rhcs stack, because even if you want to put gfs/gfs2 on top, you still need clvmd to have a consistent logical volume management across all the nodes in the hypervisor cluster ... It seems to me that most people wanting to have a clusterfs (gfs/gfs2/ocfs2/whateverfs) on top of a shared storage want that just because they are used to that thing that Vmware did for a shared storage : vmfs on top of a shared storage and file-based container (.vmdk) for the virtual machines. I've installed several solutions based purely on lvm Please compare all the solutions and you'll easily find that on a performance/IO level you'll be always faster to put put extra layer between the VM storage and the shared storage -- -- Fabian Arrotin ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] IBM GPFS filesystem
Greetings, On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Fabian Arrotin fabian.arro...@arrfab.net wrote: Adam Wead wrote: Hi all, Why would so much people use a clusterfs for Virtualization ? Just use lvm and a logical volumes for your guests. Did you mean CLVM? Where does snapshot stand? bitty outta touch with tech these days... Regards, Rajagopal ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] IBM GPFS filesystem
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 12:45:22PM +0530, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: Greetings, On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Fabian Arrotin fabian.arro...@arrfab.net wrote: Adam Wead wrote: Hi all, Why would so much people use a clusterfs for Virtualization ? Just use lvm and a logical volumes for your guests. Did you mean CLVM? Where does snapshot stand? bitty outta touch with tech these days... You can also use normal LVM over shared iSCSI LUN, but you need to be (very) careful with running LVM management commands and getting all the nodes (dom0s) to be in sync :) (Citrix XenServer does this, but there the management toolstack takes care of the LVM command execution + state synchronization). -- Pasi ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-es] [OT] Correo prueba
Te leo El 01/12/2010 23:03, Juan Pablo Botero juanpabloboterolo...@gmail.com escribió: Saludos. Quisiera saber si ustedes en la lista, ven este correo, ya que hace días envié una pregunta y recibí como respuesta, que es necesario aprobación del moderador de la lista, no se si es política de la lista o es restricción hecha a mi. Gracias -- Cordialmente: Juan Pablo Botero Administrador de Sistemas informáticos Fedora Ambassador for Colombia Cargos actuales: Professional ABACO DE BOLITAS Developer level 1 Certified ABACO DE BOLITAS certifed developer. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Agregar modulos pptp
http://www.puntodered.com/ Hola foro como puedo cargar estos modulos que no trae el kernel de fabrica modprobe ip_nat_pptp modprobe ip_conntrack_pptp estos dos modulos me permiten hacer conexiones multiples para pptp les agradezco me puedan ayudar ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] [OT] Correo prueba
De igual manera te confirmo que he recibido tu prueba de correo. No obstante tambien he recibido en unos posts que he enviado a la lista que falta la aprovacion del moderador On 02/12/2010 07:44 a.m., Lucas Smud wrote: Recibido! Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:09:04 -0600 From: mauricio.rami...@axtop.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] [OT] Correo prueba On 01/12/10 16:03, Juan Pablo Botero wrote: Saludos. Quisiera saber si ustedes en la lista, ven este correo, ya que hace días envié una pregunta y recibí como respuesta, que es necesario aprobación del moderador de la lista, no se si es política de la lista o es restricción hecha a mi. Gracias recibí tu correo, lo de la aprobación dependa posiblemente del contenido de tu pregunta, pero en realidad lo ignoro. Saludos. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Saludos cordiales. -- Lic. Domingo Varela Yahuitl. IT/Specialist -- Linux/Unix/Win. *System Administrator and Technical Support*. PH -- PUE: *044 2223 284502* PH -- PUE: *+52 - 2223284502* http://www.linuxsc.net MSN: domin...@yahoo.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Bloquear ip para mandar mails qmail
El 02/12/10 09:23, Azu Carlitox escribió: Hola, hay una ip que no conozco que esta intentando enviar mails desde mi servidor de correo, la ip es 109.230.217.170, me intento conectar por rdp y es un windows 2003 server, pero no lo conozco, lo que me llegan a mi correo pila de peticiones de esa ip para mandar mails a nombre de jan...@r200-40-252-52.static.adinet.com.uy Quisiera saber como puedo desde qmail para bloquear que no acepte las peticiones de esta ip. Gracias y salu2 Carlitos ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es si tienes iptables puedes hacerlo asi, antes de permitir el puerto 25. -A INPUT -s 109.230.217.170 -p tcp -m tcp --port 25 -j DROP Espero te sirva. -- Yoinier Hernández Nieves. Administrador de Redes. Nodo Provincial Teico Las Tunas. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Bloquear ip para mandar mails qmail
Desde qmail no recuerdo hace tiempo que no lo uso. Con Postfix hay un metodo rapido y directo. Pero como lo que nos ocupa es CentOS y no qmail, esto no falla: /sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 109.230.217.170 -j DROP - Mensaje original - De: Azu Carlitox elazucarli...@gmail.com Para: centos-es@centos.org Enviado: jueves, 02 de diciembre de 2010 15:23 Asunto: [CentOS-es] Bloquear ip para mandar mails qmail Hola, hay una ip que no conozco que esta intentando enviar mails desde mi servidor de correo, la ip es 109.230.217.170, me intento conectar por rdp y es un windows 2003 server, pero no lo conozco, lo que me llegan a mi correo pila de peticiones de esa ip para mandar mails a nombre de jan...@r200-40-252-52.static.adinet.com.uy Quisiera saber como puedo desde qmail para bloquear que no acepte las peticiones de esta ip. Gracias y salu2 Carlitos ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Saludos Salvador Guzman Salman PSL Vigo, Galicia, España +34 986.21.30.27 +34 679-Salman Correo @Salman.ES Informaciones @Salman.ES para listas de correo http://Salman.EU/ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] PROBLEMAS CON EL TERMINAL
On 12/02/2010 02:08 PM, Carlos Jara Alva wrote: Saludos comunidad, tengo un problema con el centos 5.4, cuando quiero ingresar al terminal presionando CRTL + ALT + F1 y asi hasta el F6 me sale este mensaje hci_scodat_packet:hci0 sco packet for unknown conection handle 92 y asi se repite hasta el final de la pantalla.. y ni con crtl + z o c lo detiene Que puede ser lo que esta ocurriendo? El modo grafico funciona normal, abro el terminal y todo bien.. no tengo problemas con nada en la parte grafica. Gracias ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Una consulta, por si acaso.. tienes un bluetooth en al maquina? -- Carlos Vicente Hernandez Zapata Operador Direccion de Informatica Universidad de La Frontera - Temuco Telefono: (45) 325512 /* Se omiten tildes para desfigurar el texto*/ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Bloquear ip para mandar mails qmail
On 12/02/2010 09:23 AM, Azu Carlitox wrote: Hola, hay una ip que no conozco que esta intentando enviar mails desde mi servidor de correo, la ip es 109.230.217.170, me intento conectar por rdp y es un windows 2003 server, pero no lo conozco, lo que me llegan a mi correo pila de peticiones de esa ip para mandar mails a nombre de jan...@r200-40-252-52.static.adinet.com.uy Quisiera saber como puedo desde qmail para bloquear que no acepte las yo particularmente usaría spamdyke, que es un greylisting pero que además te permite bloquear ips... me funciona bien con mis qmails. saludos epe peticiones de esta ip. Gracias y salu2 Carlitos ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Cambiar puerto SSH
- Original Message - From: Rhonny rhonny.l...@gmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 7:37 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Cambiar puerto SSH 2010/12/1 Ricardo Cuevas Camarena rcue...@nic.mx -Original Message- From: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of René Lara Alvarado Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 5:47 PM To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-es] Cambiar puerto SSH Por la nececidad de acceder a dos servidores a traves de mismo router me vi en la nececidad de cambiar de puerto al ssh a uno de ellos. Cambiar puertos de SSH: Editar el archivo sshd_config: cd /etc/ssh vi sshd_config Aqui localizo la linea que contiene el parametro port y en lugar del 22 que es el defaul le ponemos el que deseamos. Mi pregunta es: ¿cual es la diferencia entre los archivos ssh_config y sshd_config ? R.Lara -- Hola, La diferencia (específicamente en el parámetro port) es que con sshd_config configuras el puerto por mediante el cual el servidor escucha ese servicio. Con el ssh_config configuras el puerto por defecto que usas para conectarte a los servidores desde un cliente es especifico. Por ejemplo si haces ssh x.x.x.x. -l user, tu cliente por defecto usa el puerto 22 (ssh_config) y si el servidor escucha por el 22 se conecta (sshd_config) En resumen: sshd_config es el archivo de configuración del servidor ssh_config es el archivo de configuración del cliente Saludos! ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Gracias r.lara ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] reinicio servidor
Bueno, más datos: 1º el servidor está sobre una ups o sai, testeada. 2º en los logs no muestra el motivo del reinicio, si es por acpi, por inconcluencia en los irq o algo así. 3º No he probado lo que dice santi, pero avisaré. gracias y espero deciros algo en breve El 1 de diciembre de 2010 12:28, victor santana reparaciononl...@gmail.comescribió: Hola a t...@s, tengo un servidor con centos 5 y ,de forma aleatoria o se me escapa cuando, se me reinicia. No sé por que y me gustaría saber que debo habilitar el los logs para que me registre este fallo. salu2 -- ___ REPARACIONONLINE GARANTIA PARA SU PC -- ___ REPARACIONONLINE GARANTIA PARA SU PC ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS] samba3x troubles
Hi all, I get troubles with samba3x server: samba3x-winbind-3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2 samba3x-3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2 samba3x-common-3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2 Some times, users call and ask of any folder in any share sleep. Locked not _all_ share, only one of it's folder. In logs i don't see any errors(for time of user call, may be errors in log was some times before). I use samba3x-vfs-scannedonly-3.3.8-0.20 to anti-virus defence, but for one of share VFS object of vfs-scannedonly disabled. Today, folder of this share is lock :( Also, this samba-server locate in OpenVZ container, but don't any UBC fails. I get troble on [share] and [production] share. Today i get troble on [production] share, in one of subdirs: ls -la /var/share/share/No.\ заказов/ total 24 drwxrwsrwx 2 nobody all 4096 Dec 2 10:19 . drwxrwsr-t 11 nobody all 4096 Dec 2 10:51 .. -rw-rw-rw- 1 nobody all 165 Dec 1 12:38 ~$номера заказов.xlsx -rw-rw-rw- 1 nobody all 12121 Dec 2 10:19 номера заказов.xlsx Not any not-standart files in this folder. smb.conf: [global] server string = samba08u netbios name = samba08u log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 kernel oplocks = yes load printers = no show add printer wizard = no printing = none printcap name = /dev/null disable spoolss = yes browsable = yes map to guest = Bad User log level = 0 vfs:2 syslog = 0 [davidenko] comment = Личные файлы %U path = /var/share/davidenko read only = No valid users = davidenko, @top create mask = 666 directory mask = 777 vfs objects = scannedonly full_audit scannedonly: domain_socket = False scannedonly: portnum = 2020 scannedonly: scanhost = localhost scannedonly: hide_nonscanned_files = False scannedonly: allow_nonscanned_files = True full_audit:prefix = %u|%I full_audit:failure = none full_audit:success = connect disconnect opendir mkdir rmdir closedir open close read pread write pwrite sendfile rename unlink chmod fchmod chown fchown chdir ftruncate lock symlink readlink link mknod realpath full_audit:facility = local5 full_audit:priority = notice [production] comment = prod path = /var/share/production read only = No guest ok = no valid users = @prod, @top create mask = 666 directory mask = 777 force user = nobody vfs objects = scannedonly full_audit scannedonly: domain_socket = False scannedonly: portnum = 2020 scannedonly: scanhost = localhost scannedonly: hide_nonscanned_files = False scannedonly: allow_nonscanned_files = True veto files = /*.bat/*autorun.inf/ delete veto files = yes full_audit:prefix = %u|%I full_audit:failure = none full_audit:success = connect disconnect opendir mkdir rmdir closedir open close read pread write pwrite sendfile rename unlink chmod fchmod chown fchown chdir ftruncate lock symlink readlink link mknod realpath full_audit:facility = local5 full_audit:priority = notice [share] comment = all path = /var/share/share read only = No guest ok = yes create mask = 666 directory mask = 777 force user = nobody vfs objects = scannedonly full_audit scannedonly: domain_socket = False scannedonly: portnum = 2020 scannedonly: scanhost = localhost scannedonly: hide_nonscanned_files = False scannedonly: allow_nonscanned_files = True veto files = /*.bat/*autorun.inf/ delete veto files = yes full_audit:prefix = %u|%I full_audit:failure = none full_audit:success = connect disconnect opendir mkdir rmdir closedir open close read pread write pwrite sendfile rename unlink chmod fchmod chown fchown chdir ftruncate lock symlink readlink link mknod realpath full_audit:facility = local5 full_audit:priority = notice -- Galina Lisovskaya ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On 01/12/10 21:12, Boris Epstein wrote: So now my question is, what PCI 1 Gbit/s Ethernet adapters should I use under CentOS? If you have had a consistent positive experience with any particular chipset/brand please speak up. Use Intel NIC-s and you don't have to worry. -- Veiko ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] x86_64 and Thunderbird Trash folder.
From: Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com I just ran into something odd, I have x86_64 5.5 running with Thunderbird. I am getting a message about can delete the email as Trash is FULL. The file size is 4G. Whats up with that I have the 64 bit executable running. file /usr/lib64/thunderbird-2.0.0.24/thunderbird-bin /usr/lib64/thunderbird-2.0.0.24/thunderbird-bin: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, stripped Which Trash, the local one or the imap one...? If local, check in: ~/.thunderbird/*.default/Mail/Local\ Folders/ Otherwise, check on the IMAP server... JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On Wednesday 01 December 2010 20:12:18 Boris Epstein wrote: Hello listmates, As some of you may know we have been having a really bad problem with Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 cards. See here for details: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?24,140124,140224 So now my question is, what PCI 1 Gbit/s Ethernet adapters should I use under CentOS? If you have had a consistent positive experience with any particular chipset/brand please speak up. We have O(1000) of both broadcom and intel (various models) and we've had very few problems over the years with those. I wouldn't hesitate to buy either but given a choice I'd go for intel (since I do think the few hickups we've had, more often than not, struck the broadcoms). For completeness (since many previous posts have touched on this), we don't use jumbo frames since we have no problem reaching wirespeed with normal 1500 frames. /Peter signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 06:53 PM, Peter Kjellström wrote: For completeness (since many previous posts have touched on this), we don't use jumbo frames since we have no problem reaching wirespeed with normal 1500 frames. Seriously? What switches? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On Thursday 02 December 2010 12:22:38 Christopher Chan wrote: On Thursday, December 02, 2010 06:53 PM, Peter Kjellström wrote: For completeness (since many previous posts have touched on this), we don't use jumbo frames since we have no problem reaching wirespeed with normal 1500 frames. Seriously? What switches? Mostly procurve, but really, 1G eth goes wirespeed almost regardless what you do to it nowadays. In fact, I can run wirespeed 10G eth through our cisco, procurve and bladnetworks without going jumbo. IMO lots of people waste time on jumbo frames when there's really no (or very little) need. /Peter signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote: You get what you pay for -- this is a valid rule of thumb throughout the whole life. Except with CentOS - we get SO much more than we pay for :-D ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 08:28 PM, Peter Kjellström wrote: On Thursday 02 December 2010 12:22:38 Christopher Chan wrote: On Thursday, December 02, 2010 06:53 PM, Peter Kjellström wrote: For completeness (since many previous posts have touched on this), we don't use jumbo frames since we have no problem reaching wirespeed with normal 1500 frames. Seriously? What switches? Mostly procurve, but really, 1G eth goes wirespeed almost regardless what you do to it nowadays. In fact, I can run wirespeed 10G eth through our cisco, procurve and bladnetworks without going jumbo. I have HP Procurves too and I don't get wirespeed... I'll run an artificial benchmark...maybe it's disk i/o in the way. IMO lots of people waste time on jumbo frames when there's really no (or very little) need. Maybe... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
Bent Terp wrote: On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote: You get what you pay for -- this is a valid rule of thumb throughout the whole life. Except with CentOS - we get SO much more than we pay for :-D Hah - I was thinking of another angle: so, Timo, you pay for love? mark that's not quite what I think of when I use that word ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On 12/02/2010 04:34 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Bent Terp wrote: On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote: You get what you pay for -- this is a valid rule of thumb throughout the whole life. Except with CentOS - we get SO much more than we pay for :-D Hah - I was thinking of another angle: so, Timo, you pay for love? No, I get paid. Billions of dollars. ;P mark that's not quite what I think of when I use that word ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
Timo Schoeler wrote: On 12/02/2010 04:34 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Bent Terp wrote: On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote: You get what you pay for -- this is a valid rule of thumb throughout the whole life. Except with CentOS - we get SO much more than we pay for :-D Hah - I was thinking of another angle: so, Timo, you pay for love? No, I get paid. Billions of dollars. ;P I'm too old - shouldn't that be billions and billions? g mark do you have a spare million or two from those billions? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
For completeness (since many previous posts have touched on this), we don't use jumbo frames since we have no problem reaching wirespeed with normal 1500 frames. Jumbo frames have advantages other than reaching wirespeed. Its use produces less overhead and in general less CPU utilization. Your network will see less trafic and your CPUs will be free to do other work. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 70, Issue 2
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ...@centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-ow...@centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest... Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2010:0919 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 php - security update (Tru Huynh) 2. CESA-2010:0919 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 php - security update (Tru Huynh) 3. CESA-2010:0926 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 krb5 - security update (Tru Huynh) 4. CESA-2010:0926 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 krb5 -security update (Tru Huynh) -- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 23:07:00 +0100 From: Tru Huynh t...@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0919 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 php - security update To: centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: 20101201220700.ga8...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0919 php security update for CentOS 4 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0919.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/php-4.3.9-3.31.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/php-devel-4.3.9-3.31.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/php-domxml-4.3.9-3.31.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/php-gd-4.3.9-3.31.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/php-imap-4.3.9-3.31.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/php-ldap-4.3.9-3.31.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/php-mbstring-4.3.9-3.31.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/php-mysql-4.3.9-3.31.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/php-ncurses-4.3.9-3.31.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/php-odbc-4.3.9-3.31.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/php-pear-4.3.9-3.31.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/php-pgsql-4.3.9-3.31.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/php-snmp-4.3.9-3.31.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/php-xmlrpc-4.3.9-3.31.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/php-4.3.9-3.31.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 i386 installations by running the command: yum update php\* Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20101201/d0db33e5/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 2 Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 23:08:34 +0100 From: Tru Huynh t...@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0919 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 php - security update To: centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: 20101201220834.gb8...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0919 php security update for CentOS 4 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0919.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-4.3.9-3.31.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-devel-4.3.9-3.31.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-domxml-4.3.9-3.31.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-gd-4.3.9-3.31.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-imap-4.3.9-3.31.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-ldap-4.3.9-3.31.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-mbstring-4.3.9-3.31.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-mysql-4.3.9-3.31.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-ncurses-4.3.9-3.31.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-odbc-4.3.9-3.31.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-pear-4.3.9-3.31.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-pgsql-4.3.9-3.31.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-snmp-4.3.9-3.31.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-xmlrpc-4.3.9-3.31.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/php-4.3.9-3.31.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update php\* Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20101201/c7a76170/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 3 Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 23:09:54 +0100 From: Tru Huynh t...@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0926 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 krb5 - security update To: centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: 20101201220954.gc8...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0926 krb5 security
[CentOS] debuginfo and debuginfo-common for PAE with systemtap
I want to use systemtap on a 5.3 system but cannot find supporting kernel-PAE-debuginfo or kernel-debuginfo-common packages. Am I being a noob, or do these not exist for the PAE kernel? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] debuginfo and debuginfo-common for PAE with systemtap
On Thursday 02 December 2010 18:24:12 Alice Anderson wrote: I want to use systemtap on a 5.3 system but cannot find supporting kernel-PAE-debuginfo or kernel-debuginfo-common packages. Am I being a noob, or do these not exist for the PAE kernel? Sometimes a specific package is missing but for 5.3 PAE it seems quite good: kernel-PAE-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.1.1.el5.i686.rpm kernel-PAE-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm kernel-PAE-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.1.10.el5.i686.rpm kernel-PAE-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.1.14.el5.i686.rpm kernel-PAE-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.1.16.el5.i686.rpm kernel-PAE-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.i686.rpm kernel-PAE-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5.i686.rpm kernel-PAE-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.7.1.el5.i686.rpm This from our mirror (mirror.nsc.liu.se) but I assume they're available upstreams in vault too. Note that there's no repo for debuginfo packages and very few mirrors carry them. You really should upgrade to latest kernel given the amount of known vulnerabilities in older kernels. /Peter signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] debuginfo and debuginfo-common for PAE with systemtap
2010/12/2 Peter Kjellström c...@nsc.liu.se: On Thursday 02 December 2010 18:24:12 Alice Anderson wrote: Sometimes a specific package is missing but for 5.3 PAE it seems quite good: This from our mirror (mirror.nsc.liu.se) but I assume they're available upstreams in vault too. Note that there's no repo for debuginfo packages and very few mirrors carry them. Here: http://debuginfo.centos.org/5 You really should upgrade to latest kernel given the amount of known vulnerabilities in older kernels. ++1 Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
On 11/28/2010 09:31 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote: [...] And then, one day, it won't work. Worse - it doesn't always *log* what it is doing in a way that you can figure out. Occasionally not at all. So you spend a few hours poking at the system until you try the magic of turning off SELinux. And then it starts working again. My experience is that *unless you have a system configured exactly like the defaults*, SELinux is prone to suddenly deciding after an update that it doesn't like your configuration anymore. Once because an update to SELinux changed the labeling on an existing directory tree - blowing away my own applied labeling with no warning. And there are even RH supplied rpms that *do not work* with SELinux without being SELinux being tweaked first. And in an exact example of this, today I needed to update some WordPress (WP) installations. Only, for some reason the FTP based autoupdater didn't work today. You guessed it - SELinux had struck again. I have left SELinux active on this machine because I don't trust WP not to get hacked. I went out of my way to make the system as SELinux friendly as I could when I built it because of this. It has had SELinux active right from the start. But something in the normal yum system updates or other routine system operation over the last several months apparently caused the system to mis-label part of the directory tree making it so that FTP (which is only allowed from the localhost to support WP updating) could no longer access some directory trees. No idea why: I'm the only person who has logged into the machine since March - and I only log in to run updates. It worked on April 26th - but not today. My fix today? I temporarily disabled SELinux, ran the WP updates, touched /.autorelabel and rebooted the machine. And mysteriously the FTP problem is gone now. This isn't the first time this has happened on this machine. If I wasn't so specifically paranoid about WP, SELinux would be disabled on this machine as well. -- Benjamin Franz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:34 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Bent Terp wrote: On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote: You get what you pay for -- this is a valid rule of thumb throughout the whole life. Except with CentOS - we get SO much more than we pay for :-D Hah - I was thinking of another angle: so, Timo, you pay for love? mark that's not quite what I think of when I use that word Rent to own ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:19 PM, cybernet cyberne...@yahoo.com wrote: centOS 5.5 is for servers not for desktops, please get use to that use another distribution like ... a very popular one for desktops Or just install the multimedia add-ons and use it as your desktop. For MP3s, I just install XMMS and the MP3 codec for XMMS. -- RonB -- Using CentOS 5.5 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Johan Scheepers johans...@telkomsa.net wrote: Good day, Been googling about this matter. Afraid I am now confused. Too many options..: for/against/whatever. Some is years ago. Kindly please a step x step manner in which to accomplish to enable mp3 please. Thanks Johan Here's a good link on setting up multimedia with CentOS. http://linuxforeverything.com/wordpress/?p=73 -- RonB -- Using CentOS 5.5 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
