On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Bob McConnell rmcco...@lightlink.com wrote:
Ryan Wagoner wrote:
IPv6 is not broken by design. NAT was implemented to extend the time
until IPv4 exhaustion. A side effect was hiding the internal IPv4
address, which complicates a number of protocols like FTP and
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Ryan Wagoner rswago...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Bob McConnell rmcco...@lightlink.com wrote:
Ryan Wagoner wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Bob McConnell rmcco...@lightlink.com
wrote:
David Sommerseth wrote:
On 06/12/10 15:29, Todd
Hello everyone!
How can i dump with human-readable format all e-mails sent and received
via HTTP web-interface, for example, via aol.com or gmail.com - it's
just examples, there's own mail service, but not under control.
Connections to web-iface not secured with HTTPS, pure HTTP. In case of
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 11:08 AM, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
On Dec 6, 2010, at 7:51 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 08:57 AM, David wrote:
Folks
I have been following the IPV6 comments.
What concerns me with the loss of NAT are the following issues:
1) My
Em 06-12-2010 15:55, Mathieu Baudier escreveu:
Also, there will soon be a MediaWiki 1.16 package in EPEL[1]. There is
Good news!
Actually my dependencies were probably from EPEL in that case, not RPMForge.
___
CentOS mailing list
On 07/12/10 02:26, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/6/10 6:27 PM, Brian Mathis wrote:
You are enjoying a side-effect of NAT by thinking it
is a firewall.
The other nice side-effect of NAT is that you get an effectively infinite
number
of addresses behind it without any pre-arrangement with
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 17:15 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
So, spending one or two or 100s /64 subnets with public IPv6 addresses
which is completely blocked in a firewall will serve exactly the same
purpose as a site-local subnet. But this /64 net may get access to the
Internet *if*
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 18:28 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
IPv6 is not broken by design. NAT was implemented to extend the time
until IPv4 exhaustion. A side effect was hiding the internal IPv4
address, which complicates a number of protocols like FTP and SIP. The
only downside I see is ISPs
b) Do I get charged by my ISP on a per-device basis?
Heh, if they want to micromanage...
This is no science fiction.
Some big providers in some countries limit the number of device that
can connect to internet. You have to register the MAC address of your
single PC (which, by the way, is
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 07:23 PM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
b) Do I get charged by my ISP on a per-device basis?
Heh, if they want to micromanage...
This is no science fiction.
Never said it was.
Some big providers in some countries limit the number of device that
can connect to
/me does not care. Not sure about other folks though...do them a service :-p
In theory, a lot of residential routers (not provided by the ISP) will
allow to set the sent MAC address via their web interface.
And on a full fledged Linux OS:
ifconfig ethX hw ether MY:MA:CA:DD:RE:SS
(or something
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mathieu Baudier said the following on 07/12/10 12:23:
Some big providers in some countries limit the number of device that
can connect to internet.
FastWeb does this in Italy.
They configure their router (to which you do NOT have access) giving
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:23:08PM +0100, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
b) Do I get charged by my ISP on a per-device basis?
Heh, if they want to micromanage...
This is no science fiction.
Some big providers in some countries limit the number of device that
can connect to internet. You
On 12/07/2010 12:53 PM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
...
And on a full fledged Linux OS:
ifconfig ethX hw ether MY:MA:CA:DD:RE:SS
(or something like that, see man ifconfig)
I just did not say whether I have ever tried in real...
You just add the following line to
Can a machine with only an IPV6 address communicate with a machine that only
has an IPV4 or are they separate?
--
Sincerely,
John Thomas
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 07/12/10 12:23, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
b) Do I get charged by my ISP on a per-device basis?
Heh, if they want to micromanage...
This is no science fiction.
Some big providers in some countries limit the number of device that
can connect to internet. You have to register the MAC
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:55:17PM -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
3) When I connect my IPV6 refrigerator with its automatic inventory
system tracking every RFID-enabled carrot I use, won't I be making my
shopping habits visible to all those annoying advertisers? Or, in
other words, am I
On 12/07/2010 06:56 AM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mathieu Baudier said the following on 07/12/10 12:23:
Some big providers in some countries limit the number of device that
can connect to internet.
FastWeb does this in Italy.
They configure
On 12/07/2010 05:13 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 07/12/10 02:26, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/6/10 6:27 PM, Brian Mathis wrote:
You are enjoying a side-effect of NAT by thinking it
is a firewall.
The other nice side-effect of NAT is that you get an effectively infinite number
On 07/12/10 13:22, John Thomas wrote:
Can a machine with only an IPV6 address communicate with a machine that
only has an IPV4 or are they separate?
They are separated. It's two different protocols, even though they are
similar in many aspects.
There are some projects trying to bridge that
I have a fairly involved root cron task that I moved verbatim from
another server. On the original server, this task ran without
problem. On the new server, when this task runs via cron, which I
confirm is happening by looking in the cron log, no files are
transferred and no error is reported.
James B. Byrne wrote:
I have a fairly involved root cron task that I moved verbatim from
another server. On the original server, this task ran without
problem. On the new server, when this task runs via cron, which I
confirm is happening by looking in the cron log, no files are
transferred
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 14:34:33 James B. Byrne wrote:
I have a fairly involved root cron task that I moved verbatim from
another server. On the original server, this task ran without
problem. On the new server, when this task runs via cron, which I
confirm is happening by looking in the
At Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:34:33 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
I have a fairly involved root cron task that I moved verbatim from
another server. On the original server, this task ran without
problem. On the new server, when this task runs via cron, which I
confirm
On Tue, December 7, 2010 09:49, Brent L. Bates wrote:
If you aren't already doing so, use the full path to the
commands you are
I have done as you suggest and that indeed has solved the problem.
Thank you very much.
Regards,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 19:26 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/6/10 6:27 PM, Brian Mathis wrote:
You are enjoying a side-effect of NAT by thinking it
is a firewall.
The other nice side-effect of NAT is that you get an effectively infinite
number
of addresses behind it without any
3) When I connect my IPV6 refrigerator with its automatic inventory
system tracking every RFID-enabled carrot I use, won't I be making
my
shopping habits visible to all those annoying advertisers? Or, in
other words, am I compromising my privacy? Actually, although such
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:55 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
David wrote:
Folks
I have been following the IPV6 comments.
What concerns me with the loss of NAT are the following issues
3) When I connect my IPV6 refrigerator with its automatic inventory
system tracking every RFID-enabled
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 07:41:24AM -0200, Clovis Tristao wrote:
Em 06-12-2010 15:55, Mathieu Baudier escreveu:
Also, there will soon be a MediaWiki 1.16 package in EPEL[1]. There is
Good news!
Actually my dependencies were probably from EPEL in that case, not RPMForge.
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 17:15 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
So, spending one or two or 100s /64 subnets with public IPv6 addresses
which is completely blocked in a firewall will serve exactly the same
purpose as a site-local subnet. But this /64 net may get access to
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 05:29:09 am Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 18:28 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
No, the downside is that each address used will be exposed to the world.
False. That is *NOT* a downside.
In your opinion. Others hold a different opinion. While
Question. In a chained cron job like this:
sshfs . . . /usr/bin/rsync . . . | /bin/mail -s . . . .
. .
Is there anyway to get a failure message from the first part to be
emailed or logged?
Given the resolution of this problem I gather that sshfs must not
have been found and
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Mathieu Baudier mbaud...@argeo.org wrote:
b) Do I get charged by my ISP on a per-device basis?
This is no science fiction.
Some big providers in some countries limit the number of device that
can connect to internet. You have to register the MAC address
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 18:28 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
IPv6 is not broken by design. NAT was implemented to extend the time
until IPv4 exhaustion. A side effect was hiding the internal IPv4
address, which complicates a number of protocols like FTP and SIP. The
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Bob McConnell rmcco...@lightlink.com wrote:
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 18:28 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
IPv6 is not broken by design. NAT was implemented to extend the time
until IPv4 exhaustion. A side effect was hiding the internal IPv4
On 12/06/2010 06:47 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
I agree, and would like to look at the AVC's to understand what could
have broken the labeling
Well - since it happened again this morning, here you go. On further
investigation in backups, I previously had the user account that I use
for the FTP
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 05:29:09 am Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 18:28 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
No, the downside is that each address used will be exposed to the
world.
False. That is *NOT* a downside.
In your opinion. Others hold a
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:11 -0500, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 05:29:09 am Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 18:28 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
No, the downside is that each address used will be exposed to the world.
False. That is *NOT* a downside.
In
At Tue, 7 Dec 2010 10:21:27 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Question. In a chained cron job like this:
sshfs . . . /usr/bin/rsync . . . | /bin/mail -s . . . .
. .
Is there anyway to get a failure message from the first part to be
emailed or logged?
James B. Byrne wrote:
Question. In a chained cron job like this:
sshfs . . . /usr/bin/rsync . . . | /bin/mail -s . . . .
. .
Is there anyway to get a failure message from the first part to be
emailed or logged?
Given the resolution of this problem I gather that sshfs must not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/07/2010 10:36 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 12/06/2010 06:47 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
I agree, and would like to look at the AVC's to understand what could
have broken the labeling
Well - since it happened again this morning, here you go.
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 10:32:32 am Tom H wrote:
Is 172.16.10.72 a private address of yours or of your ISP?
More to the point; do you have a route to his address?
Blackhole routing makes the best firewall in the world; you can't even attempt
to hack an address to which your autonomous
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:32 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Bob McConnell rmcco...@lightlink.com wrote:
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 18:28 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
IPv6 is not broken by design. NAT was implemented to extend the time
until IPv4
Gavin Carr wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:55:17PM -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
3) When I connect my IPV6 refrigerator with its automatic inventory
system tracking every RFID-enabled carrot I use, won't I be making my
shopping habits visible to all those annoying advertisers? Or, in
other
On 12/7/10 9:21 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
Question. In a chained cron job like this:
sshfs . . . /usr/bin/rsync . . . | /bin/mail -s . . . .
. .
Is there anyway to get a failure message from the first part to be
emailed or logged?
Given the resolution of this problem I gather
On 12/07/2010 07:36 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 12/06/2010 06:47 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
I agree, and would like to look at the AVC's to understand what could
have broken the labeling
Well - since it happened again this morning, here you go. On further
investigation in backups, I
On 12/7/10 9:07 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
site-local addresses are officially deprecated.
If you want a device to only be available locally - block the traffic
to/from that device.
So security will depend on every connection owner having a high level of
knowledge about ipv6 internals?
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:49 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
There _is_ more information leakage with ipv6, in the sense that you are
using a real ip from an internal machine on the connection. But the
point is that the security benefit of that is largely illusory, security
by obscurity.
On 12/6/10 3:54 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Hi All,
I am attempting to install CentOS 5.5 64 bit on my new Mac Mini. I boot to
the CD and when I get to selecting where I am installing from (local cd, hard
disk, ftp, etc) I select Local CD and it cannot find a driver and wants me to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/07/2010 10:59 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 12/07/2010 07:36 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 12/06/2010 06:47 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
I agree, and would like to look at the AVC's to understand what could
have broken the labeling
Well -
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:01 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/7/10 9:07 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
site-local addresses are officially deprecated.
If you want a device to only be available locally - block the traffic
to/from that device.
So security will depend on every connection
On 12/7/10 9:04 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
The other nice side-effect of NAT is that you get an effectively infinite
number
of addresses behind it without any pre-arrangement with anyone else. Even if
ISPs hand out what they expect to reasonably-sized blocks, won't it be much
harder to
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:16 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/7/10 9:04 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
Some people's belief that NAT is some magic sauce that makes
themmore
secure [it does not] or provides them more flexibility [it does not]
than real addresses ... causes the people who
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Brunner, Brian T.
bbrun...@gai-tronics.com wrote:
Trim your quotes.
LOL
I was in a hurry... I think that this applies to all in this thread so
I hope that you've email everyone else...
Also, please keep your commands on-list; I only caught your email
because
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 10:32:32 am Tom H wrote:
Is 172.16.10.72 a private address of yours or of your ISP?
More to the point; do you have a route to his address?
I have a route to his dsl router, which, assuming that the
LOL twice, I'll top-post! (I hate M$ Office, but I'm stuck with it)
I didn't want my whining (not commanding) archived for-frigging-ever, so
I sent it direct.
TBH I ran out of steam/indignation/angst after a few of the over-quoter
under-trimmers, so I didn't get all.
-Original
On 12/07/2010 08:12 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Yes SELinux and all MAC systems require that if the administrator puts
files in non default directories, then they have to have to be told. In
the case of SELinux, this involves correcting the labeling. DAC has
similar problems, in that you need
On 12/7/10 10:20 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
Some people's belief that NAT is some magic sauce that makes
themmore
secure [it does not] or provides them more flexibility [it does not]
than real addresses ... causes the people who understand networking to
have to spend time explaining that
On 12/7/2010 11:36 AM, Tom H wrote:
I have a route to his dsl router, which, assuming that the ipv4 and
ipv6 firewalls are as good at allowing/disallowing access, makes his
current ipv4 and his future ipv6 addresses equally accessible.
I've been following the NAT debate here and something
On 07/12/10 16:49, Bob McConnell wrote:
Gavin Carr wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:55:17PM -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
3) When I connect my IPV6 refrigerator with its automatic inventory
system tracking every RFID-enabled carrot I use, won't I be making my
shopping habits visible to all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Les Mikesell said the following on 07/12/10 17:01:
So security will depend on every connection owner having a high level of
knowledge about ipv6 internals? Is this being designed by people planning
careers as consultants?
A network protocol
On 07/12/10 18:01, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/7/10 10:20 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
[...snip...]
permit outbound client connections from anything connected behind them
without much regard to how many devices there are, and block everything
else isn't NAT. That's a router/firewall.
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/7/10 9:07 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
site-local addresses are officially deprecated.
If you want a device to only be available locally - block the traffic
to/from that device.
So security will depend on
You need to install and use Apple's Boot Camp to make CentOS work on a
Mac Mini. It will install a utility on the drive that will make the Mini
look like an ordinary system instead of the Apple based hardware
including standard drivers for the Cd/DVD and hard drives and network
and sound
The issue is similar to that of using passwords of more than
10 characters composed of random mixed-case alphanumeric
characters (ideally with special characters mixed in). Yes -
they are provably more secure in a technical sense than
virtually any easily remembered system.
However
On 07/12/10 16:45, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:32 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Bob McConnell rmcco...@lightlink.com
wrote:
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 18:28 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
IPv6 is not broken by design. NAT
On Sun, 5 Dec 2010, Ron Loftin wrote:
On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 23:52 +0530, Ritika Garg wrote:
CentOS 5.5 is installed in the system. I installed the package
kmod-ntfs-2.1.27-3.el5.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
I mounted Seagate external hard disk. I am able to copy contents from
the hard disk to the
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Niki Kovacs wrote:
Robert Heller a écrit :
Will FAT support the larger external disks, such as the .5TB and larger?
I read the replies to my previous posts, and I get your point, since I
didn't know about the various limitations. It's probably due to the fact
that we're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/07/2010 11:59 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 12/07/2010 08:12 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Yes SELinux and all MAC systems require that if the administrator puts
files in non default directories, then they have to have to be told. In
the case
On 12/7/10 11:19 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 07/12/10 18:01, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/7/10 10:20 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
[...snip...]
permit outbound client connections from anything connected behind them
without much regard to how many devices there are, and block everything
Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
snip
My solution is to use complex passwords, and write them down wrong,
making my write-down a password hint, but not a password.
My task is to remember what is my transform from hint to fact: (examples
follow, choose your own)
snip
Yeah, I use hints, too... but do
On 07/12/10 18:10, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 12/7/2010 11:36 AM, Tom H wrote:
I have a route to his dsl router, which, assuming that the ipv4 and
ipv6 firewalls are as good at allowing/disallowing access, makes his
current ipv4 and his future ipv6 addresses equally accessible.
I've been
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 12/07/2010 11:59 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 12/07/2010 08:12 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Yes SELinux and all MAC systems require that if the administrator puts
files in non default directories, then they have to have to be told.
In the case of SELinux, this involves
On 07/12/10 18:39, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/7/10 11:19 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 07/12/10 18:01, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/7/10 10:20 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
[...snip...]
permit outbound client connections from anything connected behind them
without much regard to how many
On 12/7/2010 12:43 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 07/12/10 18:10, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 12/7/2010 11:36 AM, Tom H wrote:
I have a route to his dsl router, which, assuming that the ipv4 and
ipv6 firewalls are as good at allowing/disallowing access, makes his
current ipv4 and his future ipv6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/07/2010 12:46 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 12/07/2010 11:59 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 12/07/2010 08:12 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Yes SELinux and all MAC systems require that if the administrator puts
files in non
On 12/7/10 11:10 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I have a route to his dsl router, which, assuming that the ipv4 and
ipv6 firewalls are as good at allowing/disallowing access, makes his
current ipv4 and his future ipv6 addresses equally accessible.
I've been following the NAT debate here and
On 07/12/10 18:52, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 12/7/2010 12:43 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 07/12/10 18:10, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 12/7/2010 11:36 AM, Tom H wrote:
I have a route to his dsl router, which, assuming that the ipv4 and
ipv6 firewalls are as good at allowing/disallowing access, makes
On 12/7/10 11:53 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
We have attempted to work with them, setup default labeling for them
when we know about the problems, embarrass them when they say you need
to disable SELInux. Red Hat is working on new developer tools to help
third party developers work on RHEL
HI
I was just assigned a laptop with a pre install windows 7 in it. I decide to
dual boot this server with cent os 5.5 , i did a linux text at the boot
prompt as anaconda was not able to display the graphis screen ( it was
barely viable ) . The installation happened perfect , but when i start x
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I am not arguing that SELinux is easy, I am arguing that it is not
rocket science. I have worked for a several years to try to make
If rocket science means very difficult and obscure, yes, it is.
I've got to cry foul here. Difficult and obscure
On 7/12/10 8:33 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Ah, I must pity you who have to live with what you've got in the United
States being under the rule of these tyrants. You guys probably can only
dream of getting a 100MB fibre connection for 13USD/mnth or a 1GB fibre
connection for 30 or so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/07/2010 01:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 12/07/2010 12:46 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 12/07/2010 11:59 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 12/07/2010 08:12 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
mvnch
What
On 12/7/2010 1:13 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/7/10 11:10 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I have a route to his dsl router, which, assuming that the ipv4 and
ipv6 firewalls are as good at allowing/disallowing access, makes his
current ipv4 and his future ipv6 addresses equally accessible.
I've been
On 8/12/10 4:12 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 07/12/10 16:49, Bob McConnell wrote:
No, it is not FUD, it is a real concern by people with much to lose.
Those of you evangelizing this new, and still unproven technology can't
seem to recognize this simple fact.
This is FUD.
Agreed, but
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 12:26:30 pm David Sommerseth wrote:
You mean something along the way ... Oh, this Bob uses 172.16.10.72 ...
let's run some traceroutes towards his gateway. That could be
64.57.176.18, right? Then we can just setup a direct route from us to
his 172.16.10.0/24
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 12:39:28 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
How many devices? You mean exceeding the number of available inside a
IPv6 subnet? I do hope you're kidding ... as for a /64 subnet we're
talking about 4.294.967.296 addresses doubled 32 times.
Is that what people will
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 03:31:15 pm Lamar Owen wrote:
It will depend upon your provider if you get PA addresses;
Minor edit: 'The prefix size of your address block with depend upon your
provider, if you get PA addresses by default from your provider;
Sorry for the error.
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:51:16AM -0500, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
LOL twice, I'll top-post! (I hate M$ Office, but I'm stuck with it)
Really? In blatant disregard for the published guidelines for
use on this and other centos.org mailing lists? How very
sporting of
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Agnello George wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Agnello George agnello.dso...@gmail.com
Subject: [CentOS] display issue after installing centos 5.5 on hp probook
4420s
HI
I was just assigned a laptop with a pre install windows 7 in it. I
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 10:29 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
On 12/03/10 10:47 PM, muhammad panji wrote:
Dear all,
I have a 4,1TB Logical volume consist of four disks with size of 2TB,
1TB, 1TB, and 500GB. The LV
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
I wrote this paper to try to explain what SELinux tends to complain about.
http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/Presentations/selinux_four_things.pdf
I am having difficulty with the pdf file - both adobe and kpdf have
problems with the pages with screen shots
On 12/7/10 1:45 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
And it isn't really rocket science. It's just an extension to the existing
classical permissions system --- it works in analogous way, just with greater
flexibility and power. If you know how to understand and use file permissions,
you will easily
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Agnello George agnello.dso...@gmail.com wrote:
HI
I was just assigned a laptop with a pre install windows 7 in it. I decide to
dual boot this server with cent os 5.5 , i did a linux text at the boot
prompt as anaconda was not able to display the graphis
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
Bogus. The reason is that they haven't been pressured into adoption by
higher powers; so we will get into a nice scramble to migrate in a
pinch.
most people have no idea what NAT is, don't care, and shouldn't
On Dec 7, 2010, at 7:41 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
Bogus. The reason is that they haven't been pressured into adoption by
higher powers; so we will get into a nice scramble to migrate in a
Does this mean I have to type in URLs like:
http://3ffe:1900:4545:3:200:f8ff:fe21:67cf/
I can only image phonetically calling these off on a support call, I'd get
half way through it and the other end would tell me to forget it I'll wait
until DNS is working again.
In fact with DNS
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 20:37 -0500, Ross Walker wrote:
On Dec 7, 2010, at 7:41 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
Bogus. The reason is that they haven't been pressured into adoption by
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 20:44 -0500, Tony Schreiner wrote:
Does this mean I have to type in URLs like:
http://3ffe:1900:4545:3:200:f8ff:fe21:67cf/
I can only image phonetically calling these off on a support call,
I'd get half way through it and the other end would tell me to forget
it I'll
On Dec 7, 2010, at 9:20 PM, Adam Tauno Williams awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 20:37 -0500, Ross Walker wrote:
On Dec 7, 2010, at 7:41 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
