-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Robert Heller
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 3:25 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Cc: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] interview request for ppl who have Shockwave/.Firefox
working
I'm
On 04/01/2011 05:32 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
dmesg is not reporting any issues.
The /proc/mdstat looks fine.
md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
X blocks [2/2] [UU]
however /var/log/messages says:
smartd[3392] Device /dev/sda 20 offline uncorrectable sectors
The machine is running
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Vnpenguin vnpeng...@vnoss.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 06:51, Todd Cary t...@aristesoftware.com wrote:
I tried to install Google Chrome and received the dependencies
error. Is Centos too old for the new Chrome or is there an older
Chrome version that is
Fidel Dominguez-Valero wrote on Sun, 03 Apr 2011 14:45:41 -0400:
ok, could you help me to do that?
Is there anything you do not need help with?
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello friends,
I have downloaded wine-1.3.13.tar.bz2
How to install it ?
I have no internet connection. so I want to install it manually.
Thanks in advance.
Rajan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011, Jay Leafey wrote:
You COULD use option #1, but it requires some additional resources and a
LOT of shuffling.
Why do you need to shuffle?
fdisk /dev/sda
delete the PV partition
create a new PV partition starting at the same sector but ending at the end of
the now larger
Hi
I use the Chromium build from:
http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~cxs548/chrome
The highest Chromium rev you can run with the RHEL5.x flash-plugin
chrome-10.0.612.0.tar.gz is v10. chrome-11 is incompatible with
flash-plugin-10.2.152.27-0.1.el5.rf. Looks like
flash-plugin_10.2.153.1-0.1.el5.rf is
Scott Silva wrote:
Could it be that the bad sectors so far have been in unused areas? Once a
drive runs out of sectors to map corrections to, I would really think
about replacing it.
This advice is so often repeated by people on lists. This is a pretty normal
function of modern hard drives.
Hi,
to prevent scripted dictionary attacks to sshd
I applied those iptables rules:
-A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 22 -m recent
--update --seconds 60 --hitcount 4 --name SSH --rsource -j DROP
-A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 22 -m recent --set
--name SSH
On 04/04/11 2:01 AM, Rajan Dahal wrote:
Hello friends,
I have downloaded wine-1.3.13.tar.bz2
How to install it ?
I have no internet connection. so I want to install it manually.
thats probably the source tarball for Wine, and will need to be
compiled. doesn't it have a README and/or
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/04/11 2:01 AM, Rajan Dahal wrote:
I have downloaded wine-1.3.13.tar.bz2
How to install it ?
I have no internet connection. so I want to install it manually.
thats probably the source tarball for Wine, and will need to be
compiled.
On 04/04/11 11:11, John Hodrien wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011, Jay Leafey wrote:
You COULD use option #1, but it requires some additional resources and a
LOT of shuffling.
Why do you need to shuffle?
fdisk /dev/sda
delete the PV partition
create a new PV partition starting at the same
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 09:51:14PM -0700, Todd Cary wrote:
I tried to install Google Chrome and received the dependencies
error. Is Centos too old for the new Chrome or is there an older
Chrome version that is compatible?
You can use this repo. Made by someone on the forums, I
believe his
On 03/04/11 20:45, Fidel Dominguez-Valero wrote:
ok, could you help me to do that?
[root@server ~]# man reposync
kind regards,
David Sommerseth
On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 21:36 +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2011/4/3 Fidel Dominguez-Valero fdval...@gmail.com:
Yes, I know that, but I want to
On 04/04/11 11:18, Rainer Traut wrote:
Hi,
to prevent scripted dictionary attacks to sshd
I applied those iptables rules:
-A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 22 -m recent
--update --seconds 60 --hitcount 4 --name SSH --rsource -j DROP
-A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW
On 04/04/11 2:41 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
Beware that RPMforge contains the stable releases (1.2.2) and the RPMforge
testing repository is at 1.3.7, but I am doing a 1.3.17 build right now.
Often the latest development release have a better success rate than the
stable release, but if you are
Personally I seem to get the best results by installing it orally [?]
330.gif___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Can you please stop this?
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
That's what I called tricky ;-)
As I do not need one big partition but a lot of smaller ones (for VMs)
I've now just added another pv and volume group. This way I can decide on
which one a new volume goes. In case I ever need to I can still merge
them.
Kai
On Monday 04 April 2011 12:18:43 Rainer Traut wrote:
Hi,
to prevent scripted dictionary attacks to sshd
I applied those iptables rules:
-A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 22 -m recent
--update --seconds 60 --hitcount 4 --name SSH --rsource -j DROP
-A INPUT -p tcp -m
Hi Folks,
CentOS 5.5 - Postgresql 8.4
Installed - startet
try to
createuser -d- -a -p username
get message
could not connect to server: Connection refused
Is the server running locally and accepting
connections on Unix domain socket /tmp/.s.PGSQL.0?
On 3.4.2011 23:57, Steve Clark wrote:
Big issue I saw with Scientific Linux was a lack of commitment to long
term support matching what RedHat and Centos provide.
This seems to be true.
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/
https://www.scientificlinux.org/distributions/
On 04/04/11 3:44 AM, Timothy Kesten wrote:
Hi Folks,
CentOS 5.5 - Postgresql 8.4
Installed - startet
try to
createuser -d- -a -p username
get message
could not connect to server: Connection refused
Is the server running locally and accepting
On 04/04/2011 06:47 AM, Markus Falb wrote:
On 3.4.2011 23:57, Steve Clark wrote:
Big issue I saw with Scientific Linux was a lack of commitment to long
term support matching what RedHat and Centos provide.
This seems to be true.
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 10:31 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/01/11 6:54 PM, Digimer wrote:
I would not fault someone for moving on, but I would when said person
does so in a manner that only leads to unhelpful drama.
yeah, seriously. call the
Am Montag, 4. April 2011 13:00 schrieb John R Pierce:
On 04/04/11 3:44 AM, Timothy Kesten wrote:
Hi Folks,
CentOS 5.5 - Postgresql 8.4
Installed - startet
try to
createuser -d- -a -p username
get message
could not connect to server: Connection refused
On 04/04/11 4:25 AM, Timothy Kesten wrote:
thought the -p option is for password.
thats -P as in big P.
But problem is solved: reinstalled Postgresql - now it works like it should
say huh? seems kinda over the top for a minor usage error.
___
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/04/11 2:41 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
Beware that RPMforge contains the stable releases (1.2.2) and the RPMforge
testing repository is at 1.3.7, but I am doing a 1.3.17 build right now.
Often the latest development release have a better success rate
Am Montag, 4. April 2011 13:30 schrieb John R Pierce:
But problem is solved: reinstalled Postgresql - now it works like it
should
say huh? seems kinda over the top for a minor usage error.
Maybe a little missconfiguration - overlooked by me :-)
Timothy
On 04/04/2011 02:46 AM Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Robert Heller
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 3:25 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Cc: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] interview request for
On 04/03/2011 08:06 PM Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
On Sunday 03 April 2011 18:41, ken wrote:
For a long time now I've wanted to be able to watch videos. I've
done the try this! and try that! method and it hasn't worked
well. So I'm wondering if anyone running CentOS 5.5 has Shockwave on
Hi,
maybe this is not really helpful for you.
But maybe you want try fedora linux for websurfing.
Its also RHEL based.
I don't know why you need a webbrowser on an enterprise linux.
For me is links or lynks enough on CentOS ;-)
Best regards,
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:
On Monday 04 April 2011 08:09, ken wrote:
What does your about:plugins page say? (For explication, see the
about:plugins subthread.) Or do you have some other diagnostic which
indicates these are not the same?
It does say Shockwave Flash. Now isn't that interesting, because Adobe
itself
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of ken
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 2:02 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] about:plugins -Re: interview request for ppl who have
Shockwave/.Firefox working
Under Tools... I have
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Yves Bellefeuille
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 2:38 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] interview request for ppl who have Shockwave/.Firefox
working
Anyway, did you download
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Hello dear friends
Anyone know if in the U.S is going to organize the FLISOL? Especially
in the state of Michigan.
Perhaps if Michigan moves south of the border...
For those of us who don't know FLISOL from Lysol (which includes me)
On 04/03/2011 09:24 PM Robert Heller wrote:
At Sun, 03 Apr 2011 18:41:35 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
For a long time now I've wanted to be able to watch videos. I've done
the try this! and try that! method and it hasn't worked well. So
I'm wondering if anyone
On 04/04/2011 08:37 AM Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
On Monday 04 April 2011 08:09, ken wrote:
What does your about:plugins page say? (For explication, see the
about:plugins subthread.) Or do you have some other diagnostic which
indicates these are not the same?
It does say Shockwave Flash.
On 04/04/2011 08:41 AM Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of ken
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 2:02 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] about:plugins -Re: interview request for ppl who have
Am 04.04.2011 12:34, schrieb Marian Marinov:
How is it possible for an attacker to try to logon more then 4 times?
Can the attacker do this with only one TCP/IP connection without
establishing a new one?
Or have the scripts been adapted to this?
The attackers are not trying constantly.. Just
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Hi,
I need to fit at least three NICs and I was looking for
motherboard models that contain 3 or 4 CPI (or PCI-e) slots and works
with CentOS.
You can get 4 etherports on one card...
For 17 examples:
Hi Brunner,
I need four network interfaces. This can be in one or multiple cards.
The problem is just what you've described : lack of info regarding the
compatibility/stability of such card under CentOS.
And since some of those dual/quad cards cost more than the motherboard
itself I can't
Am Montag, den 04.04.2011, 15:07 +0200 schrieb Rainer Traut:
Am 04.04.2011 12:34, schrieb Marian Marinov:
How is it possible for an attacker to try to logon more then 4 times?
Can the attacker do this with only one TCP/IP connection without
establishing a new one?
Or have the scripts been
One other factor might be video hardware acceleration. Of those who
have Shockwave working, are you also running VHA??
On 04/03/2011 06:41 PM ken wrote:
For a long time now I've wanted to be able to watch videos. I've done
the try this! and try that! method and it hasn't worked well. So
I'm
On Apr 2, 2011, at 5:28 PM, Dawid Horacy Golebiewski
dawid.golebiew...@tu-harburg.de wrote:
I pondered Solaris for some time, but as I do not intend to build the OS
from scratch and nexenta was to GUIed for me I started researching SME.
What puzzled me is the theory and the practice: RAIDz
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, robert mena wrote:
Hi Brunner,
I need four network interfaces. This can be in one or multiple cards.
The problem is just what you've described : lack of info regarding the
compatibility/stability of such card under CentOS.
And since some of those dual/quad cards cost
On 04/04/2011 04:11 AM, Cal Sawyer wrote:
Hi
I use the Chromium build from:
http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~cxs548/chrome
The highest Chromium rev you can run with the RHEL5.x flash-plugin
chrome-10.0.612.0.tar.gz is v10. chrome-11 is incompatible with
flash-plugin-10.2.152.27-0.1.el5.rf.
On 04/04/11 15:35, henry ritzlmayr wrote:
Am Montag, den 04.04.2011, 15:07 +0200 schrieb Rainer Traut:
Am 04.04.2011 12:34, schrieb Marian Marinov:
How is it possible for an attacker to try to logon more then 4 times?
Can the attacker do this with only one TCP/IP connection without
Just about any motherboard will work. Where you typically would run into
problems would be drivers for expansion cards/peripherals.
We have 4 NICs in many of our CentOS 5 servers:
Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5709 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 20)
Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708
You could also try using tcpwrappers along with iptables.
On 04/04/2011 06:34 AM, Marian Marinov wrote:
On Monday 04 April 2011 12:18:43 Rainer Traut wrote:
Hi,
to prevent scripted dictionary attacks to sshd
I applied those iptables rules:
-A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp
Am Montag, den 04.04.2011, 16:04 +0200 schrieb David Sommerseth:
On 04/04/11 15:35, henry ritzlmayr wrote:
Am Montag, den 04.04.2011, 15:07 +0200 schrieb Rainer Traut:
Am 04.04.2011 12:34, schrieb Marian Marinov:
How is it possible for an attacker to try to logon more then 4 times?
Can
Re quad-port NICs: AOC-SG-i4 is good, too, and smaller than the UG version.
iirc, it uses a newer Intel chipset as well. Oddly, it isn't listed on
Supermicro's site except as a PDF factsheet. I have a few of them and they
work well. There's also the Intel EXPI9404PTL, but here in the UK it's
On 04/04/11 11:18, Rainer Traut wrote:
to prevent scripted dictionary attacks to sshd
I applied those iptables rules:
-A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 22 -m recent
--update --seconds 60 --hitcount 4 --name SSH --rsource -j DROP
-A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m
Guys,
really... look at denyhosts and Hawk.
Both projects analyze the logs of the service and check for failed login
attempts.
It is useless to battle the bruteforcers at the network level since they can
adapt their behaviour to really easy surcomvent any firewalls.
In order to protect your
Hey you should check out fail2ban as well. Excellent little app that analysis
the log for the corresponding demon using a regex (u can create custom ones
too) and performs an action you choose including iptables, hosts.deny, etc..
You can easily adjust setting like 3 failed connections max per
Rajan Dahal wrote:
Hello friends,
I have downloaded wine-1.3.13.tar.bz2
How to install it ?
I have no internet connection. so I want to install it manually.
If you can d/l that, you might consider d/l the rpms, which would install
and configure it correctly.
mark
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Of ken
Under Tools... I have Adobe Reader 9.3, Adobe Reader 9.4
(temporarily disabled due to testing), Helix DNA Plugin: RealPlayer G2
Plug-in Compatible, NPAPI Plugins Wrapper 1.3.0, and Shockwave Flash
10 0 r153, that's all.
Now looking at about:plugins under Shockwave Flash
According to http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOSLiveCD5.5
There is a Network Install option on the Live CD
that is the same as our CentOS-5.5-i386-netinstall ISO.
I've looked quite carefully at my CentOS-5.5 Live CD (on a USB stick),
and I don't see a Network Install option
Rainer Traut wrote:
Am 04.04.2011 12:34, schrieb Marian Marinov:
How is it possible for an attacker to try to logon more then 4 times?
Can the attacker do this with only one TCP/IP connection without
establishing a new one?
Or have the scripts been adapted to this?
The attackers are not
On 4/1/2011 1:44 PM, Windsor Dave L. (AdP/TEF7) wrote:
On 3/24/2011 11:03 AM, Windsor Dave L. (AdP/TEF7.1) wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I recently installed CentOS 5.5 x86_64 on a brand new ProLiant DL380 G7. I
have identical OS software running reock-solid on two other DL380 ProLiant
servers,
I tried to install Google Chrome and received the dependencies
error. Is Centos too old for the new Chrome or is there an older
Chrome version that is compatible?
Chrome depends on a few newer packages than exist in 5.5. I'm guessing
centos 6 will have updated packages which will allow Chrome to
Robert Heller wrote:
At Mon, 04 Apr 2011 09:39:04 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
snip
And yes, the 64-bit flash 'preview' plugin and yes, it plays flash
videos just fine there. [*I* have no use for nVidia's drive -- I don't
do 3D modeling or video games, etc.]
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 09:51 -0500, Russell Jones wrote:
Hello!
I am having a strange issue with CentOS 5.4 that I cannot seem to solve.
Every DNS lookup results in records being requested first before A
records. As a result, this causes a large amount of unnecessary DNS
traffic on the
At Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:39:30 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote:
Robert Heller wrote:
At Mon, 04 Apr 2011 09:39:04 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
snip
And yes, the 64-bit flash 'preview' plugin and yes, it plays flash
videos just fine there. [*I*
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:44:00AM -0600, compdoc wrote:
I tried to install Google Chrome and received the dependencies
error. Is Centos too old for the new Chrome or is there an older
Chrome version that is compatible?
Chrome depends on a few newer packages than exist in 5.5. I'm guessing
Robert Heller wrote:
At Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:39:30 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote:
Robert Heller wrote:
At Mon, 04 Apr 2011 09:39:04 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
snip
And yes, the 64-bit flash 'preview' plugin and yes, it plays
Robert Heller wrote:
At Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:39:30 -0400 CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org wrote:
Robert Heller wrote:
At Mon, 04 Apr 2011 09:39:04 -0400 CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org
wrote:
snip
And yes, the 64-bit flash 'preview' plugin and yes, it plays flash
videos just
At Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:22:59 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Robert Heller wrote:
At Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:39:30 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Robert Heller wrote:
At Mon, 04 Apr 2011 09:39:04 -0400 CentOS mailing list
Thanks for your help!
Doubtful, if you are seeing lookups. Does ip addr show any
IPv6 interfaces?
No active ipv6 interfaces:
[root@hostname1 ~]# ip addr
1: lo: LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8
Robert Heller wrote:
At Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:22:59 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
snip
I have no trouble with multiple xterm windows (to different machines). I
never maximize the xterm windows, so there is room for several on the
screen. And I do have multiple 'virtual'
All,
As much as I hate to ask, how is this project coming along? We are
approaching the 4 month post-release point...
-David
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 11:34:25AM -0500, Russell Jones wrote:
[root@hostname1 ~]# tcpdump -v 'port 53'
tcpdump: listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96
bytes
11:07:24.989304 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 65039, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto: UDP (17), length: 60)
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, David Brian Chait wrote:
All,
As much as I hate to ask, how is this project coming along? We are
approaching the 4 month post-release point...
-David
David,
Karanbir said on the Twitter account (and elsewhere) roughly 3 weeks after
CentOS 5.6 gets released, and
Le 04/04/2011 18:53, David Brian Chait a écrit :
All,
As much as I hate to ask, how is this project coming along? We
are approaching the 4 month post-release point...
-David
Hi David,
The last news given by Karanbir on his twitter account, an March 30, was
that 5.6 was mostly GA,
Thank you, but unfortunately this is a different issue. These boxes do
not run bind, they resolve their DNS queries via dedicated bind servers
on the network. Configuring the bind servers on the network a different
way still would not stop the IPv6 traffic I am showing in the TCP dump
from
On Monday 04 April 2011 12:25:06 Mister IT Guru wrote:
The one thing I would love to be able to contribute my time to is
helping test new code, and get it out the door so guys on the street can
test it out.
Before you get flamed-off by people who are already extremely pissed by
previous
On 4/4/2011 12:22 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Wow - you haven't lived
All my work-stations have dual monitors. If you regularly use a
browser and a word processor or spreadsheet you will benefit.
If you are trying to set up servers and compare between them, it is
very useful too.
Makes copy paste
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Thank you, but unfortunately this is a different issue. These boxes do
not run bind, they resolve their DNS queries via dedicated bind
servers on the network. Configuring the bind servers on the network a
different way still would not stop the IPv6 traffic I am
At Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:37:06 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote:
Robert Heller wrote:
At Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:22:59 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
snip
I have no trouble with multiple xterm windows (to different machines). I
never maximize the xterm
On 04/04/11 10:03 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
So the main problem that CentOS team has to solve with each major release is
to construct a build environment that will produce binaries that are bit-by-
bit equivalent to official RHEL (up to trademarks, branding and some other
stuff).
From my
Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
Karanbir said on the Twitter account (and elsewhere) roughly 3 weeks after
CentOS 5.6 gets released, and that will be hopefully by tomorrow. He says
all but 30 packages are OK with CentOS 6, but 5.6 is their first
priority.
Make that 60 packages + anaconda + mirror
Where two screens really rock is where you have a remote desktop sort of
session to a 2nd computer. one screen is one system, the other screen
is the other. also for watching videos while doing other stuff,
maximize the video on one screen, noodle on another.
2011/4/4 Gilbert Sebenste seben...@weather.admin.niu.edu:
Karanbir said on the Twitter account (and elsewhere) roughly 3 weeks after
CentOS 5.6 gets released, and that will be hopefully by tomorrow. He says
all but 30 packages are OK with CentOS 6, but 5.6 is their first
priority.
If
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Monday 04 April 2011 12:25:06 Mister IT Guru wrote:
snip
Maybe it's my curiosity, but my brain tells me that Fedora is the
forerunner for RHEL. And the Fedora code is out there. CentOS is built
from the RHEL code, with all RHEL specific items removed. Ergo - If I
Rainer Traut tr.ml@... writes:
Hi,
to prevent scripted dictionary attacks to sshd
I applied those iptables rules:
SNIP
Lots of good advice from several people. All of the suggested solutions mean
you still have to wade through log entries from the unsuccessful attacks.
I've been
Thanks.
Yes, the modules are disabled via /etc/modprobe.conf:
alias net-pf-10 off
alias ipv6 off
The issue at stake here is not queries timing out, as these aren't even
external network queries, it's the queries being sent to begin with. We
have thousands of CentOS 5 boxes all doing 3 or more
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Anyway, as I understand it, this list is for bashing the CentOS devs
and not the SL ones!
bash, ksh, tcsh, zsh and ash are allowed; bash is not required.
dash is forbidden because we don't mention Debby
David G. Miller wrote:
Rainer Traut tr.ml@... writes:
to prevent scripted dictionary attacks to sshd
I applied those iptables rules:
SNIP
Lots of good advice from several people. All of the suggested solutions
mean you still have to wade through log entries from the unsuccessful
attacks.
If Karanbir says 3 weeks it takes 3 months. (as well as with CentOS 5.6)
Well that and we have been a few days away from 5.6 for well over a few months
now...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Monday 04 April 2011 21:08:45 David G.Miller wrote:
Rainer Traut tr.ml@... writes:
Hi,
to prevent scripted dictionary attacks to sshd
I applied those iptables rules:
SNIP
Lots of good advice from several people. All of the suggested solutions
mean you still have to wade
On 04/04/2011 07:26 PM, David Brian Chait wrote:
If Karanbir says 3 weeks it takes 3 months. (as well as with CentOS 5.6)
Well that and we have been a few days away from 5.6 for well over a few
months now...
If you have a problem with things - feel free to then ignore my updates.
- KB
On 04/04/2011 09:00 AM, compdoc wrote:
It's possible to set up guests to use a block device that will get you the
same disk I/O as the underlying storage.
Is that what you're seeing? What speed does the host see when benchmarking
the RAID volumes, and what speeds do the guests see?
Yes,
Funny. When no news is given, people don't like it. When news is given,
people still don't like it: it's inaccurate. However, people really,
really don't like the 100% accurate estimate: When it's ready
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 04/04/11 11:32 AM, Chuck Munro wrote:
I'd love to hear what other software RAID users think, especially
regarding large-capacity drives. It's rare for a modern drive to hand
out bad data without an accompanying error condition (which the md
driver should handle), but I have read that
Le 04/04/2011 20:31, Karanbir Singh a écrit :
On 04/04/2011 07:26 PM, David Brian Chait wrote:
If Karanbir says 3 weeks it takes 3 months. (as well as with CentOS 5.6)
Well that and we have been a few days away from 5.6 for well over a few
months now...
If you have a problem with things -
David G. Miller wrote:
Rainer Traut tr.ml@... writes:
Hi,
to prevent scripted dictionary attacks to sshd
I applied those iptables rules:
SNIP
Lots of good advice from several people. All of the suggested solutions mean
you still have to wade through log entries from the unsuccessful
On 04/04/2011 02:26 PM, David Brian Chait wrote:
If Karanbir says 3 weeks it takes 3 months. (as well as with CentOS 5.6)
Well that and we have been a few days away from 5.6 for well over a few
months now...
Oh here we go again...
CentOS == It'll release when it's ready, not before. What
Russell Jones wrote:
Thanks.
Yes, the modules are disabled via /etc/modprobe.conf:
alias net-pf-10 off
alias ipv6 off
The issue at stake here is not queries timing out, as these aren't even
external network queries, it's the queries being sent to begin with. We
snip
Really dumb question,
David Brian Chait wrote:
If Karanbir says 3 weeks it takes 3 months. (as well as with CentOS 5.6)
Well that and we have been a few days away from 5.6 for well over a few
months now...
OK guys. Why don't you fork the CentOS project and build your own???
Why don't ANYBODY fork CentOS
No such thing as dumb questions when you're asking other people for help
:-)
Here's the whole file:
=
passwd: files nis
shadow: files nis
group: files nis
hosts: files dns nis
bootparams: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
ethers: files
netmasks: files
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
