>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Ed Westphal
>Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 2:24 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: [CentOS] 5.6 update experience - EXCELLENT!
>
>Just updated 98 packages on this ole hardware raid 10 b
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Mathieu Baudier
>Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 5:22 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6
>
>(especially for focusing on 5.6 before 6.0)
Hear-here!
--
/Sorin
>>
>>Just updated 98 packages on this ole hardware raid 10 box - 5.6 final is
>>running just fine. No problems. THANKS.
>
> Topping that; 175 packages dropped in on my test-machine at work. 8-)
> Feels like
> I'm getting spoiled with updates like this that "just work". ;*)
>
> So far, so good. Gre
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Phil Schaffner
>Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 3:55 AM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] ext4 support in anaconda?
>
>S.Tindall wrote on 04/10/2011 01:46 PM:
>> Just boot the inst
S.Tindall wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 21:00 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:33:56AM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Is there an easy way to determine what rpms might be missing? I'd hoped
to use something like "rpm -qR" against each of the installed packag
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Olaf Mueller wrote:
>>> I am searching for an internet usb surf-stick (umts) that works under
>>> CentOS. Is anyone using such a stick and if so, which chip has this
>>> usb-stick?
>>>
>>> Would a Huawei E160E chi
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 09:39 -0700, Chuck Munro wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Just a short note to add my vote for a HUGE round of applause to the
> CentOS team for their untiring efforts in getting releases out the door.
> I've just upgraded several servers to 5.6 and it all "just works".
This is o
Hello, after updating to Cents 5.6 and so to kvm-83-224
my KVM virtual machines qemu qcow2 based images do not start anymore.
Looking at VM console the error message is that VM media is not bootable.
Going back to previous KVM version kvm-83-164 from Centos 5.5 they works
again.
What's wrong with
why don't you simply rsync down what you need? Installing of a mounted iso
via pxe is probably the less preferred method. rsync also gives you the
option of excluding stuff you don't need.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.ce
Try a yum update and look at the output. Now, with a new release this is a
good option, anyway.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Le 11/04/2011 11:30, Riccardo Veraldi a écrit :
> Hello, after updating to Cents 5.6 and so to kvm-83-224
> my KVM virtual machines qemu qcow2 based images do not start anymore.
> Looking at VM console the error message is that VM media is not bootable.
> Going back to previous KVM version kvm-83-1
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Riccardo Veraldi
wrote:
>
> Hello, after updating to Cents 5.6 and so to kvm-83-224
> my KVM virtual machines qemu qcow2 based images do not start anymore.
> Looking at VM console the error message is that VM media is not bootable.
>
> What's wrong with qemu images
On 4/11/11 11:45 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Riccardo Veraldi
> wrote:
>> Hello, after updating to Cents 5.6 and so to kvm-83-224
>> my KVM virtual machines qemu qcow2 based images do not start anymore.
>> Looking at VM console the error message is that VM media is not boo
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 04:37, Mister IT Guru wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 09:39 -0700, Chuck Munro wrote:
>> RedHat's move to defend their support business against the
>> freeloading distro vendors (we all know who those sharks are!) wasn't
>> aimed at CentOS, but it has significantly increased
>> I'm hazarding a guess here - that the os/{i386,x86_64}/CentOS/*.rpm's that
>> have 'centos' in the name have had changes made for CentOS. The others
>> have not and the sources are available from upstream at eg
>>
>> http://mirrors.kernel.org/redhat/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS/
>
On 04/11/2011 12:46 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
> Oh well, so much for that idea! According to the release notes
> (http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.6) there is a list
> of packages modified by centos - and that includes httpd. So the
> absence of 'centos' in the release string does _n
On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they
will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel.
I got a kernel built with the patches using t
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Phil Schaffner
>Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 3:55 AM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] ext4 support in anaconda?
>
>S.Tindall wrote on 04/10/2011 01:46 PM:
>> Just boot the inst
On Sunday 10 April 2011 17:31:15 Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Eero Volotinen wrote on Sun, 10 Apr 2011 17:41:20 +0300:
> > well, I think geoip library it not supported in rhel and this requires
> > geoip library..
>
> yeah, geoip is an rpmforge package.
> Marko, you can easily compile it yourself, it's a
Later this week I will have to install a serious KVM setup, and I am
looking for background material.
I found a nice how-to:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/KVM
...but it is probably partly outdated by now.
Then there is a fine virtualization manual:
http://www.centos.org/docs/5
5.6 version of the virtualization guide from RedHat includes Xen and KVM:
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Virtualization/index.html
-Giovanni
On Apr 11, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Later this week I will have to install a serious KVM setup, and I am
lo
Jerry Geis wrote:
> I have updated to 5.6 - GREAT job guys...
>
> when I do "host slashdot.org" for example it comes back immediately.
> when I enter slashdot.org on firefox it says "Looking up slashdot.org"
> for a LONG time like 15 or 20 seconds
> before continuing.
>
> I have set network.dns.di
What is the package that allows copy and paste between windows?
I think I need to yum reinstall it.
after the 5.6 update I get the copy button when I right click - (for
example in thunderbird)
put when I then goto a console window and try to right click and paste
the paste is grey-ed or ghosted.
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Chuck Munro wrote:
> Just a short note to add my vote for a HUGE round of applause to the
> CentOS team for their untiring efforts in getting releases out the door.
> I've just upgraded several servers to 5.6 and it all "just works".
>
+1 for the CentOS team!
Jerry Geis wrote:
> What is the package that allows copy and paste between windows?
> I think I need to yum reinstall it.
> after the 5.6 update I get the copy button when I right click - (for
> example in thunderbird)
> put when I then goto a console window and try to right click and paste
> the
On 04/11/2011 05:53 AM, Tom Brown wrote:
>>> I'm hazarding a guess here - that the os/{i386,x86_64}/CentOS/*.rpm's that
>>> have 'centos' in the name have had changes made for CentOS. The others
>>> have not and the sources are available from upstream at eg
>>>
>>> http://mirrors.kernel.org/redhat/
On 11.4.2011 16.07, Torres, Giovanni (NIH/NINDS) [C] wrote:
> 5.6 version of the virtualization guide from RedHat includes Xen and KVM:
Oh damn. I didn't notice the URL which said 5.2. Thanks.
- Jussi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://li
At Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:34:06 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> What is the package that allows copy and paste between windows?
> I think I need to yum reinstall it.
> after the 5.6 update I get the copy button when I right click - (for
> example in thunderbird)
> put when I then goto a cons
At Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:46:17 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
>
> Jerry Geis wrote:
> > What is the package that allows copy and paste between windows?
> > I think I need to yum reinstall it.
> > after the 5.6 update I get the copy button when I right click - (for
> > example in thunderbi
> Instead of removing the unwanted .repo files, replace them with empty files.
> That way an upgrade should just result in a .rpmnew file being created.
because by removing them from the centos-release package and
rebuilding it they are not there in the first place.
___
>>> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:26:55PM -0500, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
Remember, you could have been at the limit of reboots before it does a
automatic fsck. Been there, done that.
>>> ...or time, if the filesystem has a force-fsck-after-N-days feature.
>> Yes, it could have, but it's been
On Saturday 09 April 2011 14:01:34 Luigi Rosa wrote:
> Just one thing: THANK YOU ALL!!!
+3 servers! 8)
And I guess no. 4, as soon as hardware gets fixed... ;-)
Best, :-)
Marko
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/l
Robert Heller wrote:
> At Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:46:17 +0200 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>> Jerry Geis wrote:
>>> What is the package that allows copy and paste between windows?
>>> I think I need to yum reinstall it.
>>> after the 5.6 update I get the copy button when I right click - (for
>>> ex
Luigi Rosa wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Just one thing: THANK YOU ALL!!!
>
#insert
(In addition to the update, NO MORE "WHEN WILL 5.6 COME OUT?!?!?!?!?!!!"
threads!)
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cento
On 04/11/2011 10:17 AM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:26:55PM -0500, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
> Remember, you could have been at the limit of reboots before it does a
> automatic fsck. Been there, done that.
...or time, if the filesystem has a force-fsck-after-N-da
Jerry Geis wrote:
> What is the package that allows copy and paste between windows?
> I think I need to yum reinstall it.
> after the 5.6 update I get the copy button when I right click - (for
> example in thunderbird)
> put when I then goto a console window and try to right click and paste
> the
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> Luigi Rosa wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Just one thing: THANK YOU ALL!!!
>>
> #insert
>
> (In addition to the update, NO MORE "WHEN WILL 5.6 COME
> OUT?!?!?!?!?!!!" threads!)
So when will 6.0 be out?
(sorry; yes I am OCD-e
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of m.r...@5-cent.us
>Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 4:52 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6
>
>(In addition to the update, NO MORE "WHEN WILL 5.6 COME OUT?!?!?!?!?!!!"
Just tried running a configuration on 5.6 with ext4 as the "/"
partitition. I got the error
that cannot boot ext4 partition. bummer I know this is just a boot
issue and make the ext3 but I was disappointed.
Maybe 6.0 will have ext4 bootable.
jerry
___
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Just tried running a configuration on 5.6 with ext4 as the "/"
> partitition. I got the error
> that cannot boot ext4 partition. bummer I know this is just a boot
> issue and make the ext3 but I was disappointed.
>
> Maybe 6.0 will have ext
Jerry Geis wrote:
> What is the package that allows copy and paste between windows?
> I think I need to yum reinstall it.
> after the 5.6 update I get the copy button when I right click - (for
> example in thunderbird)
> put when I then goto a console window and try to right click and paste
> the
Jerry Geis wrote:
> Jerry Geis wrote:
>> What is the package that allows copy and paste between windows?
>> I think I need to yum reinstall it.
>> after the 5.6 update I get the copy button when I right click - (for
>> example in thunderbird)
>> put when I then goto a console window and try to righ
Tom Brown wrote on Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:08:48 +0100:
> because by removing them from the centos-release package and
> rebuilding it they are not there in the first place.
Yeah, but you have to do that all the time (e.g. with each update).
Replacing with empty files is a one-time operation.
Kai
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> The main support *I* need is timely updates and releases.
This is the key indicator that says you want RHEL not CentOS.
Insert spiffy .sig here:
Life is complex: it has both real and imaginary parts.
//me
**
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> Just tried running a configuration on 5.6 with ext4 as the "/"
> partitition. I got the error that cannot boot ext4 partition.
> bummer I know this is just a boot issue and make the ext3 but I
> was disappointed.
>
> Maybe 6.0 will have ext4 bootable.
I ins
> What is the package that allows copy and paste
>between windows?
How do you connect to centos? VNC?
If you're running vnc4server on the centos box, there's a program you have
to leave running named vncconfig that allows clipboard xfer...
___
CentO
On 4/11/2011 10:55 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
>
>> The main support *I* need is timely updates and releases.
>
> This is the key indicator that says you want RHEL not CentOS.
That's only true if you think the CentOS team is incapable of matching
some definitio
On 04/10/2011 07:15 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> You just gave me examples of more "person Foo dropping by Bar"... I'm
> not sure how that can shorten the gap between upstream and CentOS
> releases. It seems more in the way of giving user support.
No, re-read what I said. Ownership in the
On 04/11/11 9:14 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> >> The main support*I* need is timely updates and releases.
>> >
>> > This is the key indicator that says you want RHEL not CentOS.
> That's only true if you think the CentOS team is incapable of matching
> some definition of 'timely'.
well, whatever
Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
>> Luigi Rosa wrote:
>>>
>>> Just one thing: THANK YOU ALL!!!
>>>
>> #insert
>>
>> (In addition to the update, NO MORE "WHEN WILL 5.6 COME
>> OUT?!?!?!?!?!!!" threads!)
>
> So when will 6.0 be out?
>
> (sorry; yes I am OCD-enabled; no obv
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> On 4/11/2011 10:55 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
>> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
>>
>>> The main support *I* need is timely updates and releases.
>>
>> This is the key indicator that says you want RHEL not CentOS.
>
> That's only true if you think the CentOS
On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they
will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel.
I
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>
> On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes in
> 0004586 (thanks). I am pleased to report
> that they appear to work as adverti
On 04/11/2011 01:08 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes in
0004586 (thanks). I am pleased to report
th
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> Hmm... without looking at the dates of the files I had downloaded the
>
> kernel-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.centos.ayplus.i686.rpm 09-Mar-2011
> 11:36
>
> files let me try the
>
> kernel-2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1.i686.rpm
On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hmm... without looking at the dates of the files I had downloaded the
kernel-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.centos.ayplus.i686.rpm 09-Mar-2011
11:36
files let me try the
kernel-2.6.32-71.24.1.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> Yes, that ( 2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1 ) is the right one. :)
>
> Akemi
>
> HOORAY - it works.
>
> I got an ipv6 address:
> $ ip6 a s eth2
> 4: eth2: mtu 1500 qlen 1000
> inet6 2001:db8
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
>> On 4/11/2011 10:55 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
>>> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
>>>
The main support *I* need is timely updates and releases.
>>>
>>> This is the key indicator that says you want RHEL not
At Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:27:54 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Jerry Geis wrote:
> > Jerry Geis wrote:
> >> What is the package that allows copy and paste between windows?
> >> I think I need to yum reinstall it.
> >> after the 5.6 update I get the copy button when I right click - (for
> >>
On 04/11/2011 01:51 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Yes, that ( 2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1 ) is the right one. :)
Akemi
HOORAY - it works.
I got an ipv6 address:
$ ip6 a s eth2
4: eth2: mtu 1500 qle
On 4/11/2011 1:22 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>
>> does it work if you log in as another user?
>
> So long as it is the same X Server. If you log into a different console
> and then do a 'startx -- :1' (or :2, :3, etc.), then no it won't work.
> If you just do a su or sudo su in a [gnome] terminal, t
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:19:22PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
>
> Considering you follow the "it's released when it's ready" mantra, what
[ ... ]
> I no longer expect any change.
Then why are you always coming back here to voice your concerns
if you don't expect any change?
Tru
--
Tru Huynh (mir
Hi,
I'ld like to know where or how I can find changes in a package update.
Also, is there a way to find out which package updates are security updates?
thanks
--
Bernard
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinf
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 19:54, Bernard Fay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'ld like to know where or how I can find changes in a package update.
http://linux.die.net/man/1/yum-changelog
rpm -qa --changelog foo.bar.rpm
Cheers,
--
Kind Regards,
Christopher J. Buckley
__
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:19:22PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
>>
>> Considering you follow the "it's released when it's ready" mantra, what
> [ ... ]
>> I no longer expect any change.
>
> Then why are you always coming back here to voice your conce
Great! Thanks a lot!
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Christopher J. Buckley wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 19:54, Bernard Fay
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'ld like to know where or how I can find changes in a package update.
>
> http://linux.die.net/man/1/yum-changelog
> rpm -qa --changelog fo
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:19:22PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
>
>> Considering you follow the "it's released when it's ready" mantra, what
> [ ... ]
>> I no longer expect any change.
>
> Then why are you always coming back here to voice your concerns
> if you
On 04/11/2011 03:10 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:19:22PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
>>
>>> Considering you follow the "it's released when it's ready" mantra, what
>> [ ... ]
>>> I no longer expect any change.
>>
>> Then why are you alw
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> /putting on asbestos pants.
Not needed... And they itch.
> Perhaps the tack to take is to apply pressure to the upstream provider
> to release the build details? I am sure that many folks who start with
> CentOS, grow to be large and move to RH proper. So there
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Digimer wrote:
> On 04/11/2011 03:10 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:19:22PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
>>>
Considering you follow the "it's released when it's ready" mantra, what
>>> [ ... ]
I no longer
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 03:03:05PM -0400, Brian Mathis wrote:
>
> I for one am glad about it as it is obvious that it needs to be
> addressed.
we all agree that it can be done better/faster/...
> The constant retorts against anyone asking is just
> unbelievable. Maybe if the questions can be re
On Apr 9, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
>>> Just one thing: THANK YOU ALL!!!
>
> Thanks a lot!
> (especially for focusing on 5.6 before 6.0)
+1
--
Ryan Ordway E-mail: rord...@oregonstate.edu
Unix Systems Administrator rord...@library.oregonstat
On 4/11/2011 2:33 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
>
> Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report back
> what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ?
So having everyone repeat the same mistakes with no coordination is your
idea of doing things faster
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
> 4) back to your genuine inquiry "how can I help it be ready faster?"
>
> Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report back
> what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ?
>
> [... anything usefull for y
On 04/11/2011 11:04 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
>> Just tried running a configuration on 5.6 with ext4 as the "/"
>> partitition. I got the error that cannot boot ext4 partition.
>> bummer I know this is just a boot issue and make the ext3 but I
>> was disapp
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 09:48:18PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
>
> > 4) back to your genuine inquiry "how can I help it be ready faster?"
> >
> > Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report
> > back
> > what you find out as the pr
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 02:44:03PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 4/11/2011 2:33 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
> >
> > Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report
> > back
> > what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ?
>
> So having everyone rep
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 09:48:18PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
>>
>>> 4) back to your genuine inquiry "how can I help it be ready faster?"
>>>
>>> Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:00:57PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
>
> > right: you are locked inside a maze, there is one exit somewhere.
> > Everyone start from the same place, eveyone benefit from the
> > person who find the exit. We don't have the solution at t
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
>
> [free troll feeding is over for me]
> --
Do you want payment for your troll feeding now? ;)
--
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux
Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 04/11/2011 01:51 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> By the way, has this been accepted in the mainline kernel?
> The patches are in 2.6.38.2 just downloaded from kernel.org.
Indeed. Just found it here:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/st
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:00:57PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
>>
>>> right: you are locked inside a maze, there is one exit somewhere.
>>> Everyone start from the same place, eveyone benefit from the
>>> person who find
On 4/11/2011 2:59 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
>
>>> Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report
>>> back
>>> what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ?
>>
>> So having everyone repeat the same mistakes with no coordination is your
>> idea of doi
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:20:59PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
...
> > My maze is the build order (ie dependancy order of the SRPMS),
> > What are yours? how do you get to that number of mazes?
>
> The build order is not what took 86 days, was it ?
it's too eas
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 03:37:28PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 4/11/2011 2:59 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
> >
> >>> Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report
> >>> back
> >>> what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ?
> >>
> >> So having e
On 11/04/11 20:16, Digimer wrote:
>
> /putting on asbestos pants.
>
> each release is more complex than the last. The web of dependency grows,
> so the reverse-engineering takes longer and longer.
>
This is just complete nonsense. You clearly have no understanding of the
processes involved in reb
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:20:59PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
> ...
>>> My maze is the build order (ie dependancy order of the SRPMS),
>>> What are yours? how do you get to that number of mazes?
>>
>> The build order is
Did the Announce go out for CentOS 5.6, or are people just jumping the gun?
If it went out, I missed it, and need to look at my spam filters.
If it hasn't gone out yet, then maybe I'm OK...
See... No "is it ready" crap in here!
___
CentOS mailing list
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote:
> I only see wasted time talking, no actions. I will be happy to be proven
> wrong.
We are more alike than it seems at first. I don't see actions either, I
only see the output of actions because the process is deliberately closed.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@w
Tru Huynh wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 03:37:28PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 4/11/2011 2:59 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
>> >
>> >>> Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and
>> >>> document/report back what you find out as the proper order of
>> >>> rebuild of the upstream SRPMS
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
> Did the Announce go out for CentOS 5.6, or are people just jumping the gun?
> If it went out, I missed it, and need to look at my spam filters.
>
> If it hasn't gone out yet, then maybe I'm OK...
>
> See... No "is it ready" crap in here!
It we
On 4/11/2011 3:54 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
>
>> I might throw some time and equipment at it if I knew I wasn't
>> re-inventing square wheels (or even round ones for that matter). And I
>> suspect that others smarter than I am would do the same and maybe even
>> improve the approach by coming up with
At Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:07:12 -0700 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Did the Announce go out for CentOS 5.6, or are people just jumping the gun?
> If it went out, I missed it, and need to look at my spam filters.
It went out.
>
> If it hasn't gone out yet, then maybe I'm OK...
>
> See... No "i
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> Tru Huynh wrote:
>> Same answer for you than I made for Dag, volunteer to coordinate,
>> build, write scripts, publish *your* work and you will be helping
> your fellows.
>
> I must be missing something here. If it had been someone I didn't
> know, that's one th
on 4/11/2011 2:12 PM William Hooper spake the following:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
>> Did the Announce go out for CentOS 5.6, or are people just jumping the gun?
>> If it went out, I missed it, and need to look at my spam filters.
>>
>> If it hasn't gone out yet, then m
On 4/11/2011 4:04 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> I must be missing something here. If it had been someone I didn't know,
> that's one thing, but Dag's been contributing to Linux as a whole for a
> lotta years, and his site is a major repository.
Heh, I suppose we could have approximately the same
On 4/11/2011 4:02 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 11/04/11 20:16, Digimer wrote:
>>
>> /putting on asbestos pants.
>>
>> each release is more complex than the last. The web of dependency grows,
>> so the reverse-engineering takes longer and longer.
>>
>
> This is just complete nonsense. You clearly have
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 4/11/2011 4:04 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>> I must be missing something here. If it had been someone I didn't know,
>> that's one thing, but Dag's been contributing to Linux as a whole for a
>> lotta years, and his site is a major repository.
>
>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 05:27:13PM -0400, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
>
> If it were me, wiser you are to listen to frogs and crickets.
> Dag is saying "I want to help but your system is closed".
> I believe him more than anybody in CentOS.
Except for the whole "I resign" issue with Dag an
For a long period of time, my Apache root directory has been
/home/httpd. For security reasons, this is not so good as
SELinux has informed me. Now all of the files have been copied
to /var/www/etc with owner and group "root". The privileges are
754 (rwxr-xr--), however apache does not have
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
