On 11/01/2012 00:31, Mail Lists wrote:
On 01/10/2012 05:54 PM, Giles Coochey wrote:
Hi All,
I have set up three servers in a development environment. Via CR
they're updated to Centos 6.2
It appears that these servers have postfix installed on them by
default, which unfortunately I'm not very
On 01/11/12 12:50 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
I don't really have the enerygy to do that, thanks anyway. I'll
uninstall postfix and use sendmail. Just thought maybe there was a
quick way to keep the default MTA on the system.
the first google hit on 'postfix smarthost' says to change/add the
On Wed, January 11, 2012 10:09, John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/11/12 12:50 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
I don't really have the enerygy to do that, thanks anyway. I'll
uninstall postfix and use sendmail. Just thought maybe there was a
quick way to keep the default MTA on the system.
the first google
On 1/10/2012 12:52 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
On 01/11/2012 05:04 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Daniel J Walshdwa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Daniel J Walsh
dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
Now if only more people used RHEL we could further enhance
the
Dear Giles,
I think you're searching for this.
$ cat /etc/postfix/main.cf
myorigin=yourdomain.com
relayhost=your.smarthost.com
smtp_sasl_auth_enable=yes
## you probably want to limit how postfix authenticates
# smtp_sasl_security_options=noanonymous
# smtp_sasl_mechanism_filter=login
Dne 11.1.2012 1:13, email builder napsal(a):
Well, kind of. If you review this thread, you'll see that the the fix
was to stop using the RepoForge package for perl-NetAddr-IP so that it
wasn't mixed with CentOS packages for perl-Net-DNS and
perl-IO-Socket-INET6. Maybe your position is that
Redhat offers a desktop virtualization solution using kvm,qemu,libvirt and
spice which is directed at centralized server hosting virtual desktops and
thin clients connecting to it.
All the relevant software are open source. So it should be possible to achieve
the same feat with CentOS. Anyone
Rilindo Foster wrote:
So I looked up avahi on the web, but as far as I could see
it is not doing anything essential;
so I was wondering if stopping avahi-daemon would have any bad effect?
Avahi is a mdns daemon. You can safely disable it in most cases.
But what applications use mdns?
As
On 1/11/2012 6:42 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Rilindo Foster wrote:
So I looked up avahi on the web, but as far as I could see
it is not doing anything essential;
so I was wondering if stopping avahi-daemon would have any bad effect?
Avahi is a mdns daemon. You can safely disable it in most
On 01/11/2012 05:11 AM, Arif Tuhin wrote:
Redhat offers a desktop virtualization solution using kvm,qemu,libvirt and
spice which is directed at centralized server hosting virtual desktops and
thin clients connecting to it.
All the relevant software are open source. So it should be possible
On 01/11/12 3:47 AM, William Warren wrote:
multicast dns. How it applies to cent though i don't know at this instant.
its part of multimedia home network plug and play, I believe... lets
media boxes find media servers, and such.if you were to serve up
streaming media on a home network,
I used to use jabber for chats. But I don't find it in centos 5.7
anymore. Is it still around? Or has something else taken its place?
What do people using 5.7 use these days?
Is there anything which handles MSN?
tia.
___
CentOS mailing list
On 01/11/2012 04:42 AM, David Hrbáč wrote:
Dne 11.1.2012 1:13, email builder napsal(a):
Well, kind of. If you review this thread, you'll see that the the fix
was to stop using the RepoForge package for perl-NetAddr-IP so that it
wasn't mixed with CentOS packages for perl-Net-DNS and
On 01/11/2012 06:45 AM, ken wrote:
I used to use jabber for chats. But I don't find it in centos 5.7
anymore. Is it still around? Or has something else taken its place?
What do people using 5.7 use these days?
Is there anything which handles MSN?
tia.
Pidgin is the IM client included in
On 01/11/2012 11:07 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Daniel J Walshdwa...@redhat.com wrote:
That is not the way it works. SELinux Reference policy is a database
of rules that govern the default ways application run.
Yes, but it is application developers that know
On 01/10/2012 12:55 PM, Gene Poole wrote:
We've got about 200 existing servers running CentOS/RHEL 5.6 and all new
servers are being provisioned using CentOS/RHEL 6.1. So that everything
is consistent we need to upgrade the servers running CentOS/RHEL 5.6. I've
searched the CentOS wiki,
On 01/11/2012 03:07 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Daniel J Walshdwa...@redhat.com wrote:
That is not the way it works. SELinux Reference policy is a database
of rules that govern the default ways application run.
Yes, but it is application developers that know
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/11/2012 04:42 AM, David Hrbáč wrote:
Dne 11.1.2012 1:13, email builder napsal(a):
Well, kind of. If you review this thread, you'll see that the the fix
was to stop using the RepoForge package for perl-NetAddr-IP so that it
wasn't mixed with CentOS packages for
William Warren wrote:
Avahi is a mdns daemon. You can safely disable it in most cases.
But what applications use mdns?
As far as I can see, it is some sort of rival to dhcpd.
Is it only used within local LANs?
Is it used, for example, by CUPS to identify printers?
When, if ever, would it
Timothy Murphy wrote:
William Warren wrote:
Avahi is a mdns daemon. You can safely disable it in most cases.
But what applications use mdns?
As far as I can see, it is some sort of rival to dhcpd.
Is it only used within local LANs?
Is it used, for example, by CUPS to identify printers?
On 01/11/2012 07:19 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
Well there is already a beginner-friendly introduction:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SELinux
The problem I had with it is that there are several statements that are
unclear, missing, or just wrong. That's not necessarily the fault of the
On 01/11/2012 01:52 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/11/2012 06:45 AM, ken wrote:
I used to use jabber for chats. But I don't find it in centos 5.7
anymore. Is it still around? Or has something else taken its place?
What do people using 5.7 use these days?
Is there anything which handles
John R Pierce wrote:
its part of multimedia home network plug and play, I believe... lets
media boxes find media servers, and such.if you were to serve up
streaming media on a home network, it would be a useful thing to have.
otherwise? meh.
Could you give a concrete example of such a
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
its part of multimedia home network plug and play, I believe... lets
media boxes find media servers, and such. if you were to serve up
streaming media on a home network, it would be a useful
On 1/11/2012 5:32 AM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
On 01/11/2012 07:19 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
Well there is already a beginner-friendly introduction:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SELinux
The problem I had with it is that there are several statements that are
unclear, missing, or just wrong. That's not
This is very strange - has been happening the last few days. I just
upgraded this system from 5.3 to 5.7 on Monday and the problem started some
time after that (but not immediately because I know I used yum Monday
evening after the upgrade)
I get the following error from yum, but it goes away
Well, kind of. If you review this thread, you'll see that the the
fix
was to stop using the RepoForge package for perl-NetAddr-IP so that it
wasn't mixed with CentOS packages for perl-Net-DNS and
perl-IO-Socket-INET6. Maybe your position is that you won't fix
perl-NetAddr-IP because
And then there's the problem Nicolas is pointing out, which seems
to be part of my problem. If such conflicting packages are supposed
to be in rfx but are not. Maybe Daniel could move it, which
would definitely help my yum to stop complaining
David not Daniel. My apologies
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 04:38:27 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
But the hardest part is that these things are application specific and
there is no standardization for locations where applications do
things. In fact, distributions intentionally move those locations
around in their packaging.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Alan McKay
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 9:36
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] EPEL not working ... is it just me?
This is very strange - has been happening the last few
On 01/11/2012 08:45 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello John,
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:57:14 -0800 (PST) John Doejd...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: wwpsubscr...@free.fr
I wonder if some mount options aren't wrong with USB pendrives, see:
/dev/sdd1 on /media/monolith type vfat
You mean in the terminal on solexa-db you just issued the yum install
in, you can issue as the next command
wget http://fedora.mirror.nexicom.net/epel/5/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml
and it gets the xml file?
Yup, exactly
As a quick temporary fix/test I would comment mirrorlist and
On 01/11/2012 08:42 AM, email builder wrote:
Well, kind of. If you review this thread, you'll see that the the
fix
was to stop using the RepoForge package for perl-NetAddr-IP so that it
wasn't mixed with CentOS packages for perl-Net-DNS and
perl-IO-Socket-INET6. Maybe your position is
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/11/2012 08:42 AM, email builder wrote:
And then there's the problem Nicolas is pointing out, which seems
to be part of my problem. If such conflicting packages are supposed
to be in rfx but are not.Maybe Daniel could move it, which
would definitely help my
And then there's the problem Nicolas is pointing out, which seems
to be part of my problem. If such conflicting packages are supposed
to be in rfx but are not. Maybe Daniel could move it, which
would definitely help my yum to stop complaining
It is now part of RFX and
On 01/11/2012 09:59 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/11/2012 08:42 AM, email builder wrote:
And then there's the problem Nicolas is pointing out, which seems
to be part of my problem. If such conflicting packages are supposed
to be in rfx but are not.Maybe
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 04:38:27 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
But the hardest part is that these things are application specific and
there is no standardization for locations where applications do
things. In fact, distributions
Hello List,
i try to install Centos 6 on a Server with 2x 3TB Disks.
When anaconda is showing up the disk partitioner i cant
do more then 3 normal Partitions or more then 3 Raid Partitions.
Even when u choose that each partition is 200mb, u cant do more then
3 normal or raid partitions.
is
On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 10:47:44 AM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'll have to disagree, Lamar. There *are* large distros: RH its
derivatives, SuSE, and Debian its derivatives (i.e., Ubuntu), and though
there are kit distros (fedora?), they're more like the Big Three
automakers of the US,
Greetings,
I have helped host a few applications such as GLPI, OCSInventory, etc
etc. using the tarball method and untarring them in /var/www/htom
directory.
I have never done them though using yum.
I was trying to install Trac, Bugzilla etc using yum install method on
a Centos 6.2 box.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 10:47:44 AM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'll have to disagree, Lamar. There *are* large distros: RH its
derivatives, SuSE, and Debian its derivatives (i.e., Ubuntu), and though
there are kit distros
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:28:18 +0530
Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
Now where do these stuff get installed? they are not under /var/www/html
rpm -ql nameofrpm
If you're not sure of the names of the rpms that yum installed,
read /var/log/yum.log to find out.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
raju.rajs...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
I have helped host a few applications such as GLPI, OCSInventory, etc
etc. using the tarball method and untarring them in /var/www/htom
directory.
I have never done them though using yum.
I
Greetings,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Brian Mathis
brian.mathis+cen...@betteradmin.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
raju.rajs...@gmail.com wrote:
Yum only downloads and installs RPM files, so in general you will use
the rpm command to get the details
On 11/01/2012 10:33, Benjamin Hackl wrote:
$ cat /etc/postfix/main.cf
myorigin=yourdomain.com
relayhost=your.smarthost.com
smtp_sasl_auth_enable=yes
## you probably want to limit how postfix authenticates
# smtp_sasl_security_options=noanonymous
# smtp_sasl_mechanism_filter=login
2012/1/11 夜神 岩男 supergiantpot...@yahoo.co.jp:
That is not the way it works. SELinux Reference policy is a database
of rules that govern the default ways application run.
Yes, but it is application developers that know what their
applications need to do. Is there a way for them to express
Hello Ljubomir,
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:31:43 +0100 Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
On 01/11/2012 08:45 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello John,
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:57:14 -0800 (PST) John Doejd...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: wwpsubscr...@free.fr
I wonder if some mount options aren't
On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:06:31 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
I was thinking more of Ford getting people to forget about the Pinto -
which I think they have done fairly successfully although it may just
have to do with aging memory. Let's see, that was around 1980.
Maybe I'll try Fedora
On 11/01/2012 17:36, Giles Coochey wrote:
On 11/01/2012 10:33, Benjamin Hackl wrote:
$ cat /etc/postfix/main.cf
myorigin=yourdomain.com
relayhost=your.smarthost.com
smtp_sasl_auth_enable=yes
## you probably want to limit how postfix authenticates
# smtp_sasl_security_options=noanonymous
#
Is this really supposed to get easier over time? :) Now my audit.log
file shows that SELinux is blocking my cgi script, index.cgi (which is
what's actually served when the user visits the front page of one of our
proxy sites like sugarsurfer.com) from having 'read write to socket
(httpd_t)'.
Hi, Marko,
Marko Weber wrote:
i try to install Centos 6 on a Server with 2x 3TB Disks.
When anaconda is showing up the disk partitioner i cant
do more then 3 normal Partitions or more then 3 Raid Partitions.
Even when u choose that each partition is 200mb, u cant do more then
3 normal or
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
Still not a great analogy, though, since the Pinto (and the Corvair) were
oriented towards the normal user; Fedora is more of a 'concept car' thing.
I don't think of myself as a 'normal user', but I still don't
appreciate it
Blah, blah, blah,
Being blocked again, still appears to be based on new content vs. included
content.
Which makes it very annoying when I want to include context for my response.
blah, blah, blah, new content.
Hi, wwp,
wwp wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:31:43 +0100 Ljubomir
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
raju.rajs...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Brian Mathis
brian.mathis+cen...@betteradmin.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
raju.rajs...@gmail.com wrote:
Yum only
On 01/11/2012 08:35 AM Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/11/2012 01:52 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/11/2012 06:45 AM, ken wrote:
I used to use jabber for chats. But I don't find it in centos 5.7
anymore. Is it still around? Or has something else taken its place?
What do people using 5.7
On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 01:22:05 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
I don't think of myself as a 'normal user', but I still don't
appreciate it when a distribution goes out of its way to arbitrarily
modify and break what application developers spent years designing and
writing.
SELinux does not
Hi folks,
I've got a bit of a different scenario than I imagine most, and have spent
the last 60 or 90 minutes searching Amanda list archives and googling, but
did not come up with anything much. Then I went browsing around the
Amanda website and found vaulting and was wondering whether this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/11/2012 01:18 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
Is this really supposed to get easier over time? :) Now my
audit.log file shows that SELinux is blocking my cgi script,
index.cgi (which is what's actually served when the user visits the
front page
On 01/12/2012 03:18 AM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
Is this really supposed to get easier over time? :) Now my audit.log
file shows that SELinux is blocking my cgi script, index.cgi (which is
what's actually served when the user visits the front page of one of our
proxy sites like
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 01:22:05 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
I don't think of myself as a 'normal user', but I still don't
appreciate it when a distribution goes out of its way to arbitrarily
modify and break what application
On 01/12/2012 03:48 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
In Fedora we currently dontaudit this leak.
audit2allow -i /tmp/t
#= httpd_sys_script_t ==
# This avc has a dontaudit rule in the current policy
allow httpd_sys_script_t httpd_t:udp_socket { read write };
Pow.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/11/2012 02:50 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
On 01/12/2012 03:48 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
In Fedora we currently dontaudit this leak.
audit2allow -i /tmp/t
#= httpd_sys_script_t == # This avc
has a dontaudit rule in
Dne 11.1.2012 17:22, Johnny Hughes napsal(a):
OK ... then it ought to move (probably) :)
Se my post on repoforge users list.
http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/2012-January/022634.html
There's no one to move the package but Dag.
DH
___
Hey, Alan,
Alan McKay wrote:
snip
gtar on the back end, which is how I ended up at Amanda. In looking
through some of the initial configuration how-tos it seemed as though this
was massively over-complex for my application. But then I hit upon
vaulting
Dne 11.1.2012 17:12, email builder napsal(a):
I'm on a 32 bit machine, not sure if that makes a difference.
What I do know is this:
yum update
==
Package Arch Version
On 01/12/2012 04:49 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Lamar Owenlo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 01:22:05 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
I don't think of myself as a 'normal user', but I still don't
appreciate it when a distribution goes out of its way to
For one thing, I think you seriously need to look at backup up to offline
hard drives, instead of tapes. Unless you really want/need to archive the
tapes for seven years
Well, the scientists are talking longer than 7 years so HDs just are not
going to cut it
We back up to backup servers,
I installed Centos 6.2/i386 on a machine last night with a 1920x1080 monitor.
The installer ran in graphical mode and looked fine. After the install was
finished I rebooted and ran through the firstboot stuff (set up user, etc)
with no problem and, again, it looked good.
After that, when I
Aha, I forgot about /etc/yum.conf and found an erroneous entry there that
has fixed my problem!
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of In Defense of Food
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
2012/1/11 夜神 岩男 supergiantpot...@yahoo.co.jp:
Yes, the breakage came from having someone who didn't understand the
needs define that policy.
I think you are misunderstanding how SELinux policies are formed and how
they work. Its a *lot* less complicated and mysterious than you're
making it
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Alan McKay alan.mc...@gmail.com wrote:
For one thing, I think you seriously need to look at backup up to offline
hard drives, instead of tapes. Unless you really want/need to archive the
tapes for seven years
Well, the scientists are talking longer than 7
On 01/11/12 6:03 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
It is for devices with IP, but to find names that aren't officially
registered in a DNS server. For example if you have a Playstation 3,
or a newer blu-ray player that supports network streaming it will use
DHCP to get an address. But then suppose you
On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 11:42:08 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 04:38:27 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
But the hardest part is that these things are application specific and
there is no standardization
On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 02:49:29 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
SELinux does not 'go out of its way' to 'break' anything; rather, SELinux
enforces a deny by default 'need to access' policy.
Yes, the breakage came from having
On 11/01/12 11:16 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
its part of multimedia home network plug and play, I believe... lets
media boxes find media servers, and such.if you were to serve up
streaming media on a home network, it would be a useful thing to have.
otherwise? meh.
I use AVAHI for an
OK ... then it ought to move (probably) :)
Se my post on repoforge users list.
http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/2012-January/022634.html
There's no one to move the package but Dag.
Per your suggestion, I filed a bug report on this, although
that tracker seems like a lonely
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
Yes, the breakage came from having someone who didn't understand the
needs define that policy.
'Going out of its way to break' something means knowing what is needed for
something to work, and intentionally preventing it from
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 01:49:29PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
SELinux does not 'go out of its way' to 'break' anything; rather,
SELinux enforces a deny by default 'need to access' policy.
Yes, the breakage came from having
On Jan 10, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
But you'd be wrong on all counts. I'd argue the opposite - that you
should only be allowed to use languages that work across CPU types and
OS's so as to never be locked into a monopolistic single vendor.
You mean like
--On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 03:40:20 PM -0500 Alan McKay
alan.mc...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, the scientists are talking longer than 7 years so HDs just are not
going to cut it
Regarding the use of hard drives, you might want to have a look at this:
On 01/11/2012 07:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
wwp wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:31:43 +0100 Ljubomir Ljubojevicoff...@plnet.rs
wrote:
On 01/11/2012 08:45 AM, wwp wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:57:14 -0800 (PST) John Doejd...@yahoo.com
wrote:
From: wwpsubscr...@free.fr
I wonder if some
On Jan 10, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Rafał Radecki radecki.ra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
I am currently working for a hosting provider in a 100+ linux hosts'
environment. We have www, mail HA solutions, as storage we mainly use
NFS at the moment. We are also using DRBD, Heartbeat, Corosync.
I
On 01/11/2012 06:09 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
If you're not sure of the names of the rpms that yum installed,
read /var/log/yum.log to find out.
CentOS 6.x has yum history, 'yum history 185, yum history info 185 ...
--
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe
Google
On 01/10/2012 11:21 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:50:36 -0500
Mark LaPierre wrote:
Are you sure that your video card can support your desired resolution?
I am now.
After much fiddling around trying this and that I gave up and booted off of a
Centos 6.2 install disk, and that
On 01/11/2012 06:53 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/11/2012 05:11 AM, Arif Tuhin wrote:
Redhat offers a desktop virtualization solution using kvm,qemu,libvirt and
spice which is directed at centralized server hosting virtual desktops and
thin clients connecting to it.
All the relevant
On 01/11/2012 06:03 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
It is for devices with IP, but to find names that aren't officially
registered in a DNS server. For example if you have a Playstation 3,
or a newer blu-ray player that supports network streaming it will use
DHCP to get an address. But then suppose
Hello guys,
Did anyone noticed how green CentOS 6 is compared to the previous
release? I've been running a couple of CentOS 6 VMs (on our vSphere
environment) for the last couple of weeks and noticed a BIG difference
when it comes to CPU usage when the VM is completely idle. I would
like to
On 1/11/2012 6:10 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
On 01/11/2012 06:03 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
It is for devices with IP, but to find names that aren't officially
registered in a DNS server. For example if you have a Playstation 3,
or a newer blu-ray player that supports network streaming it will
On 1/11/2012 6:42 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
They did a great job with RHEL6 and I'm
curious what was changed in order to accomplish this.
It's probably the PowerTop work, primarily done to get better battery
life on laptops by throttling the CPU down when it's idle:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote:
It is for devices with IP, but to find names that aren't officially
registered in a DNS server. For example if you have a Playstation 3,
or a newer blu-ray player that supports network streaming it will use
DHCP to get
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
But you'd be wrong on all counts. I'd argue the opposite - that you
should only be allowed to use languages that work across CPU types and
OS's so as to never be locked into a monopolistic single vendor.
You mean like
I would not have it doing the alerting.
I'd have something poll it and graph the temp so you can see a good graph
of room temp over time.
And have that same something do the alerting.
But do your servers have sensors too? You really need to monitor those as
well because there can be a huge
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Alan McKay alan.mc...@gmail.com wrote:
I would not have it doing the alerting.
I'd have something poll it and graph the temp so you can see a good graph
of room temp over time.
And have that same something do the alerting.
But do your servers have sensors
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 17:53 [UTC -5],
Darr247 spake thusly:
I did not see that synopsis in your original post (and I'm not sure I
could figure out what commands you used by that).
The only 2 replies to this thread I saw in digest 84 issue 9 were to
John Doe.
Anyway, this is what I
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 17:53 [UTC -5],
Darr247 spake thusly:
I did not see that synopsis in your original post (and I'm not sure I
could figure out what commands you used by that).
The only 2 replies to this thread I saw in digest 84 issue 9 were to
John Doe.
Anyway, this is what I
H... well THAT doesn't seem right - getting 2 post acknowledgements to a
single message.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:57:58 -0600
Frank Cox wrote:
I installed Centos 6.2/i386 on a machine last night with a 1920x1080 monitor.
The installer ran in graphical mode and looked fine. After the install was
finished I rebooted and ran through the firstboot stuff (set up user, etc)
with no
On Jan 11, 2012, at 9:45 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
But you'd be wrong on all counts. I'd argue the opposite - that you
should only be allowed to use languages that work across CPU types and
OS's
On Jan 12, 2012, at 12:25 AM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 11, 2012, at 9:45 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
But you'd be wrong on all counts. I'd argue the opposite - that you
should
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
Yes, the breakage came from having someone who didn't understand the
needs define that policy.
I think part of the problem is that Linux+SELinux is a _different platform_
to Linux without SELinux.
If you look at it as
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
