On Thursday 10 May 2012 17.36.07 Gregory Machin wrote:
Hi.
At the moment it seems my machines just update to the latest current
release . I install a 6.0 machine and run yum update , and next thing
its 6.2 .
I have a requirement where I need machines to only upgrade to even
numbered sub
On 05/09/12 10:36 PM, Gregory Machin wrote:
I have a requirement where I need machines to only upgrade to even
numbered sub releases eg: 6.0 , 6.2, 6.4 and only on my approval.
thats a rather strange requirement. 6.1 is 6.0 with updates rolled up.
a more sane requirement would be to only
From: Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com
I have two seemingly identical (in this reglard, at least) machine - both
of them are running CentOS 6.2 with bind (bind-chroot) installed. I used
webmin to edit the DNS configuration. One one of them it seems to work
fine, on the other I get messages akin
On 05/10/2012 01:46 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Thursday 10 May 2012 17.36.07 Gregory Machin wrote:
Hi.
At the moment it seems my machines just update to the latest current
release . I install a 6.0 machine and run yum update , and next thing
its 6.2 .
I have a requirement where I need
On Thursday 10 May 2012 03.58.17 Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/10/2012 01:46 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Thursday 10 May 2012 17.36.07 Gregory Machin wrote:
Hi.
At the moment it seems my machines just update to the latest current
release . I install a 6.0 machine and run yum update , and
On 05/10/2012 04:49 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Thursday 10 May 2012 03.58.17 Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/10/2012 01:46 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Thursday 10 May 2012 17.36.07 Gregory Machin wrote:
Hi.
At the moment it seems my machines just update to the latest current
release . I
I would like to use dnsmasq to cache nameserver query results, and I
have set dhcp to prepend the 127.0.0.1 name-server to the list of
nameservers. dnsmasq would then automatically exclude the localhost as a
name server and use all the others from the list provided by dhcp.
But it was too
On 05/10/2012 06:55 AM, Timothy Madden wrote:
I would like to use dnsmasq to cache nameserver query results, and I
have set dhcp to prepend the 127.0.0.1 name-server to the list of
nameservers. dnsmasq would then automatically exclude the localhost as a
name server and use all the others from
On 05/10/2012 08:55 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 05/09/12 10:36 PM, Gregory Machin wrote:
I have a requirement where I need machines to only upgrade to even
numbered sub releases eg: 6.0 , 6.2, 6.4 and only on my approval.
thats a rather strange requirement. 6.1 is 6.0 with updates rolled
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
There are several solutions to be able to make that happen ... manual
repos yourself, mrepo, spacewalk, etc.
All of those that I've investigated make you manage copies of packages
locally which seems like overkill when
On 05/10/2012 07:52 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
There are several solutions to be able to make that happen ... manual
repos yourself, mrepo, spacewalk, etc.
All of those that I've investigated make you manage copies of
On 5/10/2012 4:57 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: Boris Epsteinborepst...@gmail.com
I have two seemingly identical (in this reglard, at least) machine - both
of them are running CentOS 6.2 with bind (bind-chroot) installed. I used
webmin to edit the DNS configuration. One one of them it seems to
On 05/10/2012 01:07 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 05/10/2012 06:55 AM, Timothy Madden wrote:
I would like to use dnsmasq to cache nameserver query results, and I
have set dhcp to prepend the 127.0.0.1 name-server to the list of
nameservers. dnsmasq would then automatically exclude the localhost as
On May 10, 2012, at 1:36, Gregory Machin wrote:
I have a requirement where I need machines to only upgrade to even
numbered sub releases eg: 6.0 , 6.2, 6.4 and only on my approval. But
will allow updates within a given release.
Others have debated the usefulness of this requirement, so I
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
All of those that I've investigated make you manage copies of packages
locally which seems like overkill when you aren't changing them
locally. Is there any solution that simply lets you tell yum not to
install any
On 05/10/2012 09:40 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
All of those that I've investigated make you manage copies of packages
locally which seems like overkill when you aren't changing them
locally. Is there any solution that simply
I have been reading a tutorial on configuring and securing a CentOS 6.2 machine:
http://www.howtoforge.com/perfect-server-centos-6.2-x86_64-with-apache2-ispconfig-3-p3
This tutorial bases the configuration on an application called
ISPConfig. I am not sure that I like the idea of disabling the
On 05/10/2012 04:56 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
I have been reading a tutorial on configuring and securing a CentOS 6.2
machine:
http://www.howtoforge.com/perfect-server-centos-6.2-x86_64-with-apache2-ispconfig-3-p3
This tutorial bases the configuration on an application called
ISPConfig. I am
on 5/9/2012 9:59 AM Les Mikesell spake the following:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Bob Hoffman b...@bobhoffman.com wrote:
I am starting to see a real pattern to all this.
I would love to see someone do a case study on spam attacks. Their
system seems well honed to scale up with your
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On windows I use filemon, it tells me every file operation and its result. I
have search high and low, but cannot seem to find an alternative.
I tried the instructions from
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=2415252#post2415252
...
echo 1 /proc/sys/vm/block_dump
while true; do dmesg -c;
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
I think you are over-analyzing. The senders are distributed and shift
around whether you do anything defensive or not, and if you have ever
accepted an address, even years ago with a system like qmail that
accepted
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
In distant past I though of SELinux as burden. Now, I use it on every
system I install.
Take a look at Virtualmin (GPL). I prefer it instead of ISPConfig, and
it has regular repository you can install and update from.
Everyone,
Can anyone refer me to a tutorial as to how to rename the network cards,
ie I have one that ended up being system-eth3, that I want to be
system-eth1?
I am setting up a new CentOS 6.2 system that I plan to use as a gateway
and e-mail server. The original machine had only one nic card,
Just went through this last night UUID is involved now this should help -
https://alteeve.com/w/Changing_the_ethX_to_Ethernet_Device_Mapping_in_EL6
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote:
Everyone,
Can anyone refer me to a tutorial as to how to rename the
Meant to say UDEV...
Just went through this last night UUID is involved now this should help -
https://alteeve.com/w/Changing_the_ethX_to_Ethernet_Device_Mapping_in_EL6
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.netwrote:
Everyone,
Can anyone refer me to a tutorial as
Just went through this last night UUID is involved now this should help -
https://alteeve.com/w/Changing_the_ethX_to_Ethernet_Device_Mapping_in_EL6
Tom,
Thank you very much. This should help me fix the problem.
Greg
___
CentOS mailing list
On 05/10/12 1:57 AM, John Doe wrote:
http://www.virtualmin.com/node/19608
From that page: The best fix for now would be to
stop using the chroot completely, as it has few real security benefits
in my opinion.
from my page (not written)
The best fix would be to toss webmin out the door, its
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote:
Can anyone refer me to a tutorial as to how to rename the network cards,
ie I have one that ended up being system-eth3, that I want to be
system-eth1?
I am setting up a new CentOS 6.2 system that I plan to use as a
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:25 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
from my page (not written)
The best fix would be to toss webmin out the door, its a piece of junk
that just messes up your system configuration
same goes for CPanel, Plesk, and the rest of that lot.
If webmin is a
On 5/10/2012 1:25 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 05/10/12 1:57 AM, John Doe wrote:
http://www.virtualmin.com/node/19608
From that page: The best fix for now would be to
stop using the chroot completely, as it has few real security benefits
in my opinion.
from my page (not written)
The best
On 05/10/2012 06:48 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevicoff...@plnet.rs wrote:
In distant past I though of SELinux as burden. Now, I use it on every
system I install.
Take a look at Virtualmin (GPL). I prefer it instead of ISPConfig, and
it has regular
Is there a way of installing xulrunner-1.9 along side xulrunner-10.0? I
have an application that wants the older version of xulrunner and does
not seem to work with xulrunner-10.0.
--
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 / hel...@deepsoft.com
Deepwoods Software--
What is the best way to upgrade to Python 2.6 from the default Python
2.4.
I've read these horror stories online and don't want to break yum.
Hi. At least there are 2 ways that I have tried and work.
The first:
yum install gcc tcl tk sqlite-devel readline-devel gdbm-devel
yum install
Two related questions about the minor release numbers (e.g. the 'x' in 5.x or
6.x) :
1) What constitutes the o.s. being at a particluar minor release? Typically,
when you install you are getting a package set available from a specific minor
release number. But what minor release is the o.s.
on 5/10/2012 1:14 PM Jon Detert spake the following:
Two related questions about the minor release numbers (e.g. the 'x' in 5.x or
6.x) :
1) What constitutes the o.s. being at a particluar minor release? Typically,
when you install you are getting a package set available from a specific
On Wednesday 09 May 2012 16:38, the following was written:
I have two seemingly identical (in this reglard, at least) machine - both
of them are running CentOS 6.2 with bind (bind-chroot) installed. I used
webmin to edit the DNS configuration. One one of them it seems to work
fine, on the
On 05/10/2012 10:35 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
on 5/10/2012 1:14 PM Jon Detert spake the following:
Two related questions about the minor release numbers (e.g. the 'x' in 5.x
or 6.x) :
1) What constitutes the o.s. being at a particluar minor release?
Typically, when you install you are
On 05/10/12 2:12 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I can not agree with this. Minor versions also introduce newer kernels
(hardware support) and some changes in packages that are not done during
regular update releases. Certain technological previews are also
introduced and so on.
Those 'newer
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
I can not agree with this. Minor versions also introduce newer kernels
(hardware support) and some changes in packages that are not done during
regular update releases. Certain technological previews are also
On 05/10/2012 11:48 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevicoff...@plnet.rs wrote:
I can not agree with this. Minor versions also introduce newer kernels
(hardware support) and some changes in packages that are not done during
regular update releases.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
I do not agree with minor versions are only snapshots in time when
install media is re-generated. I should have left only part of the
sentence I disagree with.
They coincide with batches of less critical fixes so if
On May 10, 2012, at 6:27 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
What I got out of it is virtualmin is trying to play with chrooted files
in the chrooted location instead of understanding
that bind-chroot kinda dynamically or symbolically puts them there (or
whatever it does).
It should be changing them
On 10/05/12 20:55, Timothy Madden wrote:
I would like to use dnsmasq to cache nameserver query results, and I
have set dhcp to prepend the 127.0.0.1 name-server to the list of
nameservers. dnsmasq would then automatically exclude the localhost as a
name server and use all the others from the
On May 10, 2012, at 10:25 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 05/10/12 1:57 AM, John Doe wrote:
http://www.virtualmin.com/node/19608
From that page: The best fix for now would be to
stop using the chroot completely, as it has few real security benefits
in my opinion.
from my page (not written)
on 5/10/2012 9:47 AM Les Mikesell spake the following:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
I think you are over-analyzing. The senders are distributed and shift
around whether you do anything defensive or not, and if you have ever
accepted an address,
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote on 05/10/2012 05:56 PM:
I do not agree with minor versions are only snapshots in time when
install media is re-generated. I should have left only part of the
sentence I disagree with.
What's not to agree with in that? It may be incomplete, but not incorrect.
Would
The even number is merely selected as a reference point, nothing to do
with stable or unstable .
I'm aiming to create a controlled environment where there is less
that users can do to break their systems ...
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
All of those that I've investigated make you manage copies of packages
locally which seems like overkill when you aren't changing them
locally.
On 05/10/2012 12:36 AM, Gregory Machin wrote:
Hi.
At the moment it seems my machines just update to the latest current
release . I install a 6.0 machine and run yum update , and next thing
its 6.2 .
I have a requirement where I need machines to only upgrade to even
numbered sub releases eg:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0554
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0554.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0558
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0558.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0560
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0560.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0552
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0552.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0565
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0565.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0566
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0566.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0555
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0555.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0557
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0557.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0556
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0556.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:0564
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0564.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:0563
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0563.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0561
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0561.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0527
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0527.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
Se agradece
César D. Cruz Arrunátegui
- Mensaje original -
De: cheperobert jrobertoa...@gmail.com
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Enviados: Miércoles, 9 de Mayo 2012 12:01:52
Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] descarga de src.rpms
El día 8 de mayo de 2012 23:37, César CRUZ ARRUNATEGUI
Estimados, antes que nada gracias por su tiempo.
Tengo el siguiente caso en un servidor de aplicación Jira de producción:
El servidor tiene 12 GB de RAM, se toma toda la ram y la guarda en cache
como se puede ver a continuación:
# free -m
total used free shared
On 05/10/2012 01:40 PM, Federico Don wrote:
Estimados, antes que nada gracias por su tiempo.
Tengo el siguiente caso en un servidor de aplicación Jira de producción:
El servidor tiene 12 GB de RAM, se toma toda la ram y la guarda en cache
como se puede ver a continuación:
# free -m
Hola,
Quizás suene un poco obvio lo que voy a decir, pero puede servir:
1-Creas un usuario exclusivo para ingresar a ese directorio.
2-En /etc/sudoers indicas los comandos que puede ejecutar (dejas fuera
rm).
Atte.
Rodrigo Escares
2012/5/8 Alexander Rojas Garcia siste...@tehindu.com
Hola,
El 8 de mayo de 2012 08:46, Ernesto Pérez Estévez
cen...@ecualinux.comescribió:
On 05/08/2012 07:46 AM, Alexander Rojas Garcia wrote:
Hola,
Estoy buscando como poder implementar un chmod para una carpeta la cual
se
puede leer, escribir pero no borrar archivos y restringir el acceso
Buenas y Santas.
Entiendo que hasta la fecha, lo unico que podria solucionar este problema, son
las ACL de NFSv4. Creo que hay pruebas hechas con filesystems linux, con patch
al kernel. Este conjunto de ACL´s incluye write y delete, como atributos
separados y no excluyentes, es decir: el
Paso mas data Ernesto, para ver si me podes ayudar:
ps auwwx | egrep java
root 9506 0.0 0.0 61144 744 pts/0S+ 17:45 0:00 egrep java
jira 10285 1.7 31.7 5277532 3911312 ? Sl May02 210:27
/opt/java/jdk1.6.0_25/bin/java
# top
top - 17:46:39 up 8 days, 5:26, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.04, 0.06
Tasks: 132 total, 1 running, 131 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si,
0.0%st
Mem: 12299972k total, 4768128k used, 7531844k free,
71 matches
Mail list logo
