[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1249 CentOS 5 ipsec-tools Update

2012-09-11 Thread Johnny Hughes

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1249 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1249.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
a221822c45245f3a67b7f1af2252f90b7592b1df582041b87d7a726e9a59d91b  
ipsec-tools-0.6.5-14.el5_8.5.i386.rpm

x86_64:
4a5651b99036724dbbd58c58f3f1c5ee3e637a36059498cc52c6f1e87d1ffca8  
ipsec-tools-0.6.5-14.el5_8.5.x86_64.rpm

Source:
28b390a101923f5f7ae08b28f64ffb75e3bd41de8a78320769e47aa884509f30  
ipsec-tools-0.6.5-14.el5_8.5.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1244 CentOS 6 kdelibs3 FASTTRACK Update

2012-09-11 Thread Johnny Hughes

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1244 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1244.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 


i386:
303db08ca10b8b96ef36f8bdddfe748644700434e703bc938bb1f356a2a4c2c7  
kdelibs3-3.5.10-25.el6.i686.rpm
3edfffecd4c349c67b490940a5c2ae7e5f465311945ae466ee1c281d4feb36df  
kdelibs3-apidocs-3.5.10-25.el6.noarch.rpm
d821d284248379c46ec8c6d9166962e645a43732d75d68f5b511eadf47470d42  
kdelibs3-devel-3.5.10-25.el6.i686.rpm

x86_64:
303db08ca10b8b96ef36f8bdddfe748644700434e703bc938bb1f356a2a4c2c7  
kdelibs3-3.5.10-25.el6.i686.rpm
6f14e56618d32a0775bd4599b5013b2e535e8207493ba1e7c7d2e3fbb2e67753  
kdelibs3-3.5.10-25.el6.x86_64.rpm
89a11cc6c161e5561cff9dd4f229844b548b3783399d9e9dff215fa5e8eb21f5  
kdelibs3-apidocs-3.5.10-25.el6.noarch.rpm
d821d284248379c46ec8c6d9166962e645a43732d75d68f5b511eadf47470d42  
kdelibs3-devel-3.5.10-25.el6.i686.rpm
ea88e0c77781808e82fc045ab18a78da7f249cec42c31d8c16d076b0ef35ba60  
kdelibs3-devel-3.5.10-25.el6.x86_64.rpm

Source:
d4c1f483dfb1d0791b6ce8d725a32aaf4d81eb40c8ffc4aa4209d73edc22ab0c  
kdelibs3-3.5.10-25.el6.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1251 CentOS 6 kdelibs FASTTRACK Update

2012-09-11 Thread Johnny Hughes

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1251 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1251.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 


i386:
50f7ba08e4d506cd0c8855668c11ce093ea030c6c3e5836d5fa8bb6ea865a6cf  
kdelibs-4.3.4-17.el6.i686.rpm
64a2f5d78099eae5e3941faea048fbe45ee55138ea8c9fd08dee9f66c1e335e4  
kdelibs-apidocs-4.3.4-17.el6.noarch.rpm
a0860a5f4c2a73c162ad637d3dd4e4d9bd95316a34b6fbf44271be6fb5bf6eea  
kdelibs-common-4.3.4-17.el6.i686.rpm
49d902676386bde2f735bf6af1a5592b3a75cb4584fbf7532f9468ddd4658545  
kdelibs-devel-4.3.4-17.el6.i686.rpm

x86_64:
50f7ba08e4d506cd0c8855668c11ce093ea030c6c3e5836d5fa8bb6ea865a6cf  
kdelibs-4.3.4-17.el6.i686.rpm
42dff05ce579806349a75b3d9c8ef7ef7a3f9b2c2c569241579cb1055e4a57d1  
kdelibs-4.3.4-17.el6.x86_64.rpm
f239b8a426a6e3ede5a2044d532310bffa4a4ce3acf58ed9347c24559599abc0  
kdelibs-apidocs-4.3.4-17.el6.noarch.rpm
497e01397275227241ceef5889144481e32d3e1b87fa8c1731844fe12df4b258  
kdelibs-common-4.3.4-17.el6.x86_64.rpm
49d902676386bde2f735bf6af1a5592b3a75cb4584fbf7532f9468ddd4658545  
kdelibs-devel-4.3.4-17.el6.i686.rpm
4dad7209aa712781c9492dfbc00a0289f023626c7984502cda93a4d8d18b4e68  
kdelibs-devel-4.3.4-17.el6.x86_64.rpm

Source:
29869bfd8c0d64aa70031ffb75193a8d555e681cbea434e5f18fbe30c24d2981  
kdelibs-4.3.4-17.el6.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:1255 Moderate CentOS 5 libexif Update

2012-09-11 Thread Johnny Hughes

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:1255 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1255.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
6e920af8d43a148f5deedf517892bc443b3fabbc4f122b867171138cd9993793  
libexif-0.6.21-1.el5_8.i386.rpm
ef67490ae71d02173aaef9ba1db91fe7eac393dffb920a91a589325571696722  
libexif-devel-0.6.21-1.el5_8.i386.rpm

x86_64:
6e920af8d43a148f5deedf517892bc443b3fabbc4f122b867171138cd9993793  
libexif-0.6.21-1.el5_8.i386.rpm
ea0e1c15ba94353f0533ad9d473b4556abd1f573abf07804f97e350d3961755f  
libexif-0.6.21-1.el5_8.x86_64.rpm
ef67490ae71d02173aaef9ba1db91fe7eac393dffb920a91a589325571696722  
libexif-devel-0.6.21-1.el5_8.i386.rpm
71207be9a1be311b7164bfca0cd9cd2daac45f01868a971c10cb087b7a82c4d9  
libexif-devel-0.6.21-1.el5_8.x86_64.rpm

Source:
3a5d12f6b203cdf74c6b56959c550adff260378a58578d86cfd67eebd1ca56c1  
libexif-0.6.21-1.el5_8.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:1255 Moderate CentOS 6 libexif Update

2012-09-11 Thread Johnny Hughes

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:1255 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1255.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 


i386:
44415b6b347b99d9c106904c516300aefd48e8036760afec5677abe05232058b  
libexif-0.6.21-5.el6_3.i686.rpm
e73cf39a46dc12dfeea72c51308feb3ad584ab01a2c8247971abd0f8ed282be6  
libexif-devel-0.6.21-5.el6_3.i686.rpm

x86_64:
44415b6b347b99d9c106904c516300aefd48e8036760afec5677abe05232058b  
libexif-0.6.21-5.el6_3.i686.rpm
e682de9d94ace80eace2531647c56397150c25f4f10bdcddfb731fb14359c5e6  
libexif-0.6.21-5.el6_3.x86_64.rpm
e73cf39a46dc12dfeea72c51308feb3ad584ab01a2c8247971abd0f8ed282be6  
libexif-devel-0.6.21-5.el6_3.i686.rpm
3001f20dc3d8914f36b96faf82b5d488507c995b18ad1ff9b105db75169767c8  
libexif-devel-0.6.21-5.el6_3.x86_64.rpm

Source:
007b7b69aa446b4295ea8cde70b4806facf41fc3ae83d6f87ec26a7c68f94ecc  
libexif-0.6.21-5.el6_3.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


Re: [CentOS-es] Resumen de CentOS-es, Vol 69, Envío 6

2012-09-11 Thread Antonio Lopez
Hola!!

NATear IPv6? Hombre en principio una de los objetivos de Ipv6 es resolver
el problema del agotamiento de IPv4 y el necesario uso de NAT para el
ahorro de direcciones. ¿ No puedes habiltar IPv6 en la red interna ? Una
solucion dual-stack quizás sea lo ideal, para no tener que abandonar lo que
tengas bajo ipv4. Otro tema sería hacerlo de forma eficaz y segura, pero lo
seguro es que será interesantísimo

El 11 de septiembre de 2012 18:00, centos-es-requ...@centos.org escribió:

 Envíe los mensajes para la lista CentOS-es a
 centos-es@centos.org

 Para subscribirse o anular su subscripción a través de la WEB
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

 O por correo electrónico, enviando un mensaje con el texto help en
 el asunto (subject) o en el cuerpo a:
 centos-es-requ...@centos.org

 Puede contactar con el responsable de la lista escribiendo a:
 centos-es-ow...@centos.org

 Si responde a algún contenido de este mensaje, por favor, edite la
 linea del asunto (subject) para que el texto sea mas especifico que:
 Re: Contents of CentOS-es digest Además, por favor, incluya en
 la respuesta sólo aquellas partes del mensaje a las que está
 respondiendo.


 Asuntos del día:

1. Re: Como nateo ipv6 (Pcontreras)


 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:47:27 -0400
 From: Pcontreras pcontre...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Como nateo ipv6
 To: centos-es@centos.org
 Message-ID:
 
 capnn6i9cemikrc-6ngmpdqfafknlbgb8khvxrxgogwkht3y...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

 Aqui hay una directriz para despejar dudas.



 http://www.ipv6.cl/pagina/la-problematica-asociada-6to4-y-alternativas-para-traduccion-de-direcciones




 SL2

 2012/8/30 Nino Bravo nino1...@hotmail.com

 
 
  Estimados
 
  Tengo ciertas dudas sobre los cambios a ipv6.
 
  Si tengo una ip pública ipv6 y una ipv4 pública, como hago el nateo a mis
  ips privadas?, me funcionará el mismo firewall de ipv4 que he tenido
  siempre?
 
 
  Saludos
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  ___
  CentOS-es mailing list
  CentOS-es@centos.org
  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
 


 --

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


 Fin de Resumen de CentOS-es, Vol 69, Envío 6
 




-- 

*
*

“software is like sex, its better when its free”
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS] postfix mail server

2012-09-11 Thread jiten jha
I mean I have postfix server i want to merge all mail and users in mysql.

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:04 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:

 On 09/10/12 9:13 PM, jiten jha wrote:
  my answer is not. I mean I have 400 user with his/her mails. So can I
 shift
  or move all mails and users in MYSQL (database) .


 shift or move all mail and users from where to where ?  do you mean
 between two servers, or ??



 --
 john r pierceN 37, W 122
 santa cruz ca mid-left coast

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




-- 
Thanks  Regards
Jitendra Jha
+91-7498370550
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] postfix mail server

2012-09-11 Thread Frank Cox
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:27:34 +0530
jiten jha wrote:

 I mean I have postfix server i want to merge all mail and users in mysql.

Define your purpose.  That's not something that one would normally do.

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] ldap 2.4 for centos 5/rhel 5

2012-09-11 Thread Götz Reinicke
Am 10.09.12 18:36, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
 Hi,
 
 Is there any good source for openldap-server 2.4 version for centos 5 / rhel 
 5 ?

Hi, AFAIK that was a tricky one, we ended up to go with centos 6.x
because there was to much trouble, dependencies with other packages, the
berkley db/libs etc.

But thats one++ year ago.

Look here: http://ltb-project.org/wiki/download#openldap may be today it
is better.

Good luck /Götz

-- 
Götz Reinicke
IT-Koordinator

Filmakademie Baden-Württemberg GmbH


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] postfix mail server

2012-09-11 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/10/12 11:57 PM, jiten jha wrote:
 I mean I have postfix server i want to merge all mail and users in mysql.

and we've gone ful circle, without you answering our questions or.

the word 'merge' usually means to combine many pieces into one, like to 
combine a bunch of seperate files or folders into a single file.
previously you said 'shift or move', you need to tell us what you want 
to move from where to where, precisely, before we have a clue what 
you're talking about.


also, postfix is a mail transfer agent, it doesn't implement the user 
reader side like IMAP or POP, it just transfers messages. another 
package, such as dovecot or cyrus, is used as a client agent for reading 
email via pop or imap protocols, and its in one of these packages that 
the email folder format is normally defined.



-- 
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] ldap 2.4 for centos 5/rhel 5

2012-09-11 Thread Eero Volotinen
2012/9/11 Götz Reinicke goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de:
 Am 10.09.12 18:36, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
 Hi,

 Is there any good source for openldap-server 2.4 version for centos 5 / rhel 
 5 ?

 Hi, AFAIK that was a tricky one, we ended up to go with centos 6.x
 because there was to much trouble, dependencies with other packages, the
 berkley db/libs etc.

 But thats one++ year ago.

 Look here: http://ltb-project.org/wiki/download#openldap may be today

well. it's a bit different than ldap in centos 6

 is better.

 Good luck /Götz


I found this solution: http://tygerclan.net/?q=node/52

--
Eero
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] VLC Equivalent for CentOS 6.3 (SOLVED)

2012-09-11 Thread Hakan Koseoglu
On 11 September 2012 00:39, Mark LaPierre marklap...@aol.com wrote:
 Linux users too often flaunt the law by using patented software
 illegally.  By doing so we refuse to support those who invest their
 funds and blood to produce compatible software.  Then we complain about
 companies not supporting Linux.  I wonder who is at fault for that. ;-)
Unless they are not breaking any law since the software patent is not
recognized in their jurisdiction. The world does not end at the
borders of USA.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Are the CentOS forums available as RSS feeds?

2012-09-11 Thread John Doe
From: Hakan age...@meddatainc.com

 Newcomer to CentOS, have signed up for the mailing lists and tried
 unsuccessfully to find newsfeeds for the forums. Hoping someone here
 might know better?

Maybe try http://gmane.org/rss.php

JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] NFS mounts group name shows as nobody

2012-09-11 Thread Ryan Palamara
I am trying to find out why my group names are showing as nobody. I have a 
CentOS 6 system that is acting as a NFS server. I have some older fedora 
clients where the group name shows up fine, but newer CentOS 6 clients have the 
group name for NFS mounts show up as nobody. The username shows up fine but 
the group name shows up as nobody.

I have tried changing some setting in the idmapd.conf file, but nothing worked 
(domain, ldap_base) so it is back to default.

Thank you,

Ryan Palamara
ZAIS Group, LLC
2 Bridge Avenue, Suite 322
Red Bank, New Jersey 07701
Phone: (732) 450-7444
ryan.palam...@zaisgroup.commailto:ryan.palam...@zaisgroup.com




This e-mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may 
contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail 
and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and 
delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.

This is not an offer (or solicitation of an offer) to buy/sell the 
securities/instruments mentioned or an official confirmation. This is not 
research and is not from ZAIS Group but it may refer to a research 
analyst/research report. Unless indicated, these views are the author's and may 
differ from those of ZAIS Group research or others in the Firm. We do not 
represent this is accurate or complete and we may not update this. Past 
performance is not indicative of future returns.

IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE:.

To comply with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. 
federal tax advice contained herein (including any attachments), unless 
specifically stated otherwise, is not intended or written to be used, and 
cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal 
Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending any transaction or 
matter addressed herein to another party. Each taxpayer should seek advice 
based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances from an independent tax 
advisor.

ZAIS, ZAIS Group and ZAIS Solutions are trademarks of ZAIS Group, LLC.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] NFS mounts group name shows as nobody

2012-09-11 Thread Barbara Krasovec
We had the same problems..
Changing the Domain in idmapd.conf on client and server helped to solve 
the problem..

Server is CentOS6, clients are CentOS 5 or 6..
Are you using automount or fstab?

Barbara

On 09/11/2012 03:37 PM, Ryan Palamara wrote:
 I am trying to find out why my group names are showing as nobody. I have a 
 CentOS 6 system that is acting as a NFS server. I have some older fedora 
 clients where the group name shows up fine, but newer CentOS 6 clients have 
 the group name for NFS mounts show up as nobody. The username shows up fine 
 but the group name shows up as nobody.

 I have tried changing some setting in the idmapd.conf file, but nothing 
 worked (domain, ldap_base) so it is back to default.

 Thank you,

 Ryan Palamara
 ZAIS Group, LLC
 2 Bridge Avenue, Suite 322
 Red Bank, New Jersey 07701
 Phone: (732) 450-7444
 ryan.palam...@zaisgroup.commailto:ryan.palam...@zaisgroup.com

 


 This e-mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may 
 contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient you 
 are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
 e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
 this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to 
 this e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. 
 Thank you.

 This is not an offer (or solicitation of an offer) to buy/sell the 
 securities/instruments mentioned or an official confirmation. This is not 
 research and is not from ZAIS Group but it may refer to a research 
 analyst/research report. Unless indicated, these views are the author's and 
 may differ from those of ZAIS Group research or others in the Firm. We do not 
 represent this is accurate or complete and we may not update this. Past 
 performance is not indicative of future returns.

 IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE:.

 To comply with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. 
 federal tax advice contained herein (including any attachments), unless 
 specifically stated otherwise, is not intended or written to be used, and 
 cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal 
 Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending any transaction or 
 matter addressed herein to another party. Each taxpayer should seek advice 
 based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances from an independent tax 
 advisor.

 ZAIS, ZAIS Group and ZAIS Solutions are trademarks of ZAIS Group, LLC.
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] NFS mounts group name shows as nobody

2012-09-11 Thread Ryan Palamara
I am using automount, but have tested mounting it manually and have the same 
issue. I will try changing the idmapd.conf on the server as well as the client 
and see if that helps.

Also as an FYI when I do  ls -n, the GID shows up as 99. UID is fine.

Thank you,

Ryan Palamara
ZAIS Group, LLC
2 Bridge Avenue, Suite 322
Red Bank, New Jersey 07701
Phone: (732) 450-7444
ryan.palam...@zaisgroup.com


-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of 
Barbara Krasovec
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 9:45 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NFS mounts group name shows as nobody

We had the same problems..
Changing the Domain in idmapd.conf on client and server helped to solve the 
problem..

Server is CentOS6, clients are CentOS 5 or 6..
Are you using automount or fstab?

Barbara

On 09/11/2012 03:37 PM, Ryan Palamara wrote:
 I am trying to find out why my group names are showing as nobody. I have a 
 CentOS 6 system that is acting as a NFS server. I have some older fedora 
 clients where the group name shows up fine, but newer CentOS 6 clients have 
 the group name for NFS mounts show up as nobody. The username shows up fine 
 but the group name shows up as nobody.

 I have tried changing some setting in the idmapd.conf file, but nothing 
 worked (domain, ldap_base) so it is back to default.

 Thank you,

 Ryan Palamara
 ZAIS Group, LLC
 2 Bridge Avenue, Suite 322
 Red Bank, New Jersey 07701
 Phone: (732) 450-7444
 ryan.palam...@zaisgroup.commailto:ryan.palam...@zaisgroup.com

 


 This e-mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may 
 contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient you 
 are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
 e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
 this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to 
 this e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. 
 Thank you.

 This is not an offer (or solicitation of an offer) to buy/sell the 
 securities/instruments mentioned or an official confirmation. This is not 
 research and is not from ZAIS Group but it may refer to a research 
 analyst/research report. Unless indicated, these views are the author's and 
 may differ from those of ZAIS Group research or others in the Firm. We do not 
 represent this is accurate or complete and we may not update this. Past 
 performance is not indicative of future returns.

 IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE:.

 To comply with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. 
 federal tax advice contained herein (including any attachments), unless 
 specifically stated otherwise, is not intended or written to be used, and 
 cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal 
 Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending any transaction or 
 matter addressed herein to another party. Each taxpayer should seek advice 
 based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances from an independent tax 
 advisor.

 ZAIS, ZAIS Group and ZAIS Solutions are trademarks of ZAIS Group, LLC.
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



This e-mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may 
contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail 
and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and 
delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.

This is not an offer (or solicitation of an offer) to buy/sell the 
securities/instruments mentioned or an official confirmation. This is not 
research and is not from ZAIS Group but it may refer to a research 
analyst/research report. Unless indicated, these views are the author's and may 
differ from those of ZAIS Group research or others in the Firm. We do not 
represent this is accurate or complete and we may not update this. Past 
performance is not indicative of future returns.

IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE:.

To comply with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. 
federal tax advice contained herein (including any attachments), unless 
specifically stated otherwise, is not intended or written to be used, and 
cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal 
Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending any transaction or 
matter addressed herein to another party. Each taxpayer should seek advice 
based on the 

Re: [CentOS] NFS mounts group name shows as nobody

2012-09-11 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Ryan Palamara
ryan.palam...@zaisgroup.com wrote:
 I am trying to find out why my group names are showing as nobody. I have a 
 CentOS 6 system that is acting as a NFS server. I have some older fedora 
 clients where the group name shows up fine, but newer CentOS 6 clients have 
 the group name for NFS mounts show up as nobody. The username shows up fine 
 but the group name shows up as nobody.

This is a know issue (or a feature) with nfs4.

https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-49407

Or some page that is more accessible:

http://serverfault.com/questions/98741/files-mounted-over-nfsv4-are-owned-by-4294967294-uids-and-gids-match

In short, If the NFSv4 client and server domain names do not match,
all the usernames will show up as nobody.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Is glusterfs ready?

2012-09-11 Thread Jose P. Espinal
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:00 PM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:

 From: Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de

 On 09/05/2012 07:14 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
  Another factor is that the available space is the physical space
  divided by 4 due to the replication across the nodes on top of the
  nodes being RAID'd themselves.
 That really depends on your setup. I'm not sure what you mean by the nodes
 being raided themselves.
 I think he meant gluster RAID1 plus hardware RAID (10 I guess from the
 x2, instead of standalone disks).

 JD
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



Hello, this comment was posted on a site I administer, where
I chronologically publish an archive of some CentOS (and some other
distros) lists:

= [comment] =
A new comment on the post Is Glusterfs Ready?

Author : Jeff Darcy (IP: 173.48.139.36 ,
pool-173-48-139-36.bstnma.fios.verizon.net)
E-mail : j...@pl.atyp.us
URL: http://pl.atyp.us
Whois  : http://whois.arin.net/rest/ip/173.48.139.36
Comment:

Hi.  I'm one of the GlusterFS developers, and I'll try to offer a slightly
different perspective.

First, sure GlusterFS has bugs.  Some of them even make me cringe.  If we
really wanted to get into a discussion of the things about GlusterFS that
suck, I'd probably be able to come up with more things than anybody, but
one of the lessons I learned early in my career is that seeing all of the
bugs for a piece of software leads to a skewed perspective.  Some people
have had problems with GlusterFS but some people have been very happy with
it, and I guarantee that every alternative has its own horror stories.
 GlusterFS and XtreemFS were the only two distributed filesystems that
passed some *very simple* tests I ran last year.  Ceph crashed.  MooseFS
hung (and also doesn't honor O_SYNC).  OrangeFS corrupted data.  HDFS
cheats by buffering writes locally, and doesn't even try to implement half
of the required behaviors for a general-purpose filesystem.  I can go
through any of those codebases and find awful bug after horrible bug after
data-destroying bug . . . and yet each of them has their fans too, because
most users could never possibly hit the edge conditions where those bugs
exist.  The lesson is that anecdotes do not equal data.  Don't listen to
vendor hype, and don't listen to anti-vendor bashing either.  Find out what
the *typical* experience across a large number of users is, and how well
the software works in your own testing.

Second, just as every piece of software has bugs, every truly distributed
filesystem (i.e. not NFS) struggles with lots of small files.  There has
been some progress in this area with projects like Pomegranate and GIGA+,
we have some ideas for how to approach it in GlusterFS (see my talk at SDC
next week), but overall I think it's important to realize that such a
workload is likely to be problematic for *any* offering in the category.
 You'll have to do a lot of tuning, maybe implement some special
workarounds yourself, but if you want to combine this I/O profile with the
benefits of scalable storage it can all be worth it.

Lastly, if anybody is paying a 4x disk-space penalty (at one site) I'd say
they're overdoing things.  Once you have replication between servers,
RAID-1 on each server is overkill.  I'd say even RAID-6 is overkill.  How
many simultaneous disk failures do you need to survive?  If the answer is
two, as it usually seems to be, then GlusterFS replication on top of RAID-5
is a fine solution and requires a maximum of 3x (more typically just a bit
more than 2x).  In the future we're looking at various forms of compression
and deduplication and erasure codes that will all bring the multiple down
even further.

So I can't say whether it's ready or whether you can trust it.  I'm not
objective enough for my opinion on that to count for much.  What I'm saying
is that distributed filesystems are complex pieces of sofware, none of the
alternatives are where any of us working on them would  like to be, and the
only way any of these projects get better is if users let us know of
problems they encounter.  Blog posts or comments describing specific
issues, from people whose names appear nowhere on any email or bug report
the developers could have seen, don't help to advance the state of the art.

= [/comment] =


Regards,


-- 
J. Pavel Espinal
Skype: p.espinal
http://ww.pavelespinal.com
http://www.slackware-es.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 91, Issue 7

2012-09-11 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. CEBA-2012:1249  CentOS 5 ipsec-tools Update (Johnny Hughes)
   2. CEBA-2012:1252  CentOS 6 selinux-policy Update (Johnny Hughes)
   3. CEBA-2012:1250  CentOS 6 python Update (Johnny Hughes)
   4. CEBA-2012:1244 CentOS 6 kdelibs3 FASTTRACK Update (Johnny Hughes)
   5. CEBA-2012:1251 CentOS 6 kdelibs FASTTRACK Update (Johnny Hughes)


--

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:04:35 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1249  CentOS 5 ipsec-tools Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20120911100435.ga7...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1249 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1249.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
a221822c45245f3a67b7f1af2252f90b7592b1df582041b87d7a726e9a59d91b  
ipsec-tools-0.6.5-14.el5_8.5.i386.rpm

x86_64:
4a5651b99036724dbbd58c58f3f1c5ee3e637a36059498cc52c6f1e87d1ffca8  
ipsec-tools-0.6.5-14.el5_8.5.x86_64.rpm

Source:
28b390a101923f5f7ae08b28f64ffb75e3bd41de8a78320769e47aa884509f30  
ipsec-tools-0.6.5-14.el5_8.5.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:20:23 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1252  CentOS 6 selinux-policy
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20120911122023.ga13...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1252 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1252.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 


i386:
85b887e7f57f1cc2ae3b83f3a4e9b2115b4f13edd6da976fe97637471d877c8e  
selinux-policy-3.7.19-155.el6_3.4.noarch.rpm
986ffcaa9974d96360fac643545e19f2a0b0af8b2be53c847e1ca3a49d6c62f1  
selinux-policy-doc-3.7.19-155.el6_3.4.noarch.rpm
8674cea7e8c9575f72d8b2d9f7958d328b9003933db2416ef831f6dd02bac672  
selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-155.el6_3.4.noarch.rpm
59c93c1c982b5ef6205761a4b6491d0b207644d8eac9763e9ae8ef38b5948ed0  
selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-155.el6_3.4.noarch.rpm
18d7b133d56ac9e86fc8af7c4212be68aeb3f522a8a7762c79f2640652427213  
selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-155.el6_3.4.noarch.rpm

x86_64:
8e8e040252e385f59918312dc57800b647e7fd3aad3bfad939bff9d77a0ba0a1  
selinux-policy-3.7.19-155.el6_3.4.noarch.rpm
e5bcd4635a4a25b75a143bfec84ddf1b5004989669ecaab700d302611f280a1e  
selinux-policy-doc-3.7.19-155.el6_3.4.noarch.rpm
96aae592ba052f7c53c6d33c3b36c4f99b09b4e58abe3d0bd95c4a4b7fb55db1  
selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-155.el6_3.4.noarch.rpm
fc4d19d1e5f0d21fa8a5aa59c46b5615290ffd116c164d00149a2b5cdaec6331  
selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-155.el6_3.4.noarch.rpm
0486b695c2aef13462680512917c59e57f39b71a5507859bf5f1374ac8f5e714  
selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-155.el6_3.4.noarch.rpm

Source:
7a1a75ddc8b3978d5118eba26cada7a90029c30926e7e77d205104752c341b16  
selinux-policy-3.7.19-155.el6_3.4.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:20:41 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1250  CentOS 6 python Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20120911122041.ga13...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1250 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1250.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 


i386:
544006ad24605e1fba259ce453ebf61cabd7f988b36f2a503eec794420ad  
python-2.6.6-29.el6_3.3.i686.rpm
50a7c587f52185a6a9da846dcf45707faf3ca8447bb15974f6db5e310f16d60b  
python-devel-2.6.6-29.el6_3.3.i686.rpm
606f91033a3f70f9525832b9e350bc9916e44a44cb50b52b9280615fec9aa2d0  
python-libs-2.6.6-29.el6_3.3.i686.rpm
30f96db8b8385fd4e1bd68a5abecfa28ac695570d530f18899ab7375d95c59bb  
python-test-2.6.6-29.el6_3.3.i686.rpm
f59751222914afc8170e2342cb7a03cc663dccdd2f4585887c2f662a8473f6e9  
python-tools-2.6.6-29.el6_3.3.i686.rpm

Re: [CentOS] NFS mounts group name shows as nobody

2012-09-11 Thread Ryan Palamara
Does this explain why uid shows fine but not gid?

Thank you,

Ryan Palamara
ZAIS Group, LLC
2 Bridge Avenue, Suite 322
Red Bank, New Jersey 07701
Phone: (732) 450-7444
ryan.palam...@zaisgroup.com


-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of 
Akemi Yagi
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 11:40 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NFS mounts group name shows as nobody

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Ryan Palamara ryan.palam...@zaisgroup.com 
wrote:
 I am trying to find out why my group names are showing as nobody. I have a 
 CentOS 6 system that is acting as a NFS server. I have some older fedora 
 clients where the group name shows up fine, but newer CentOS 6 clients have 
 the group name for NFS mounts show up as nobody. The username shows up fine 
 but the group name shows up as nobody.

This is a know issue (or a feature) with nfs4.

https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-49407

Or some page that is more accessible:

http://serverfault.com/questions/98741/files-mounted-over-nfsv4-are-owned-by-4294967294-uids-and-gids-match

In short, If the NFSv4 client and server domain names do not match, all the 
usernames will show up as nobody.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



This e-mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may 
contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail 
and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and 
delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.

This is not an offer (or solicitation of an offer) to buy/sell the 
securities/instruments mentioned or an official confirmation. This is not 
research and is not from ZAIS Group but it may refer to a research 
analyst/research report. Unless indicated, these views are the author's and may 
differ from those of ZAIS Group research or others in the Firm. We do not 
represent this is accurate or complete and we may not update this. Past 
performance is not indicative of future returns.

IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE:.

To comply with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. 
federal tax advice contained herein (including any attachments), unless 
specifically stated otherwise, is not intended or written to be used, and 
cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal 
Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending any transaction or 
matter addressed herein to another party. Each taxpayer should seek advice 
based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances from an independent tax 
advisor.

ZAIS, ZAIS Group and ZAIS Solutions are trademarks of ZAIS Group, LLC.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Is glusterfs ready?

2012-09-11 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Jose P. Espinal j...@pavelespinal.com wrote:

 Blog posts or comments describing specific
 issues, from people whose names appear nowhere on any email or bug report
 the developers could have seen, don't help to advance the state of the art.

Just speaking for myself here, I'm less interested in 'advancing' the
state of the art' (which usually means running something painfully
broken) than in finding something that already works...  You didn't
paint a very rosy picture there.  Would it be better to just forget
filesystem semantics and use one of the distributed nosql databases
(riak, mongo, cassandra, etc.).

-- 
   Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS 6 early panic on ESXi 4.1.0 build 800380

2012-09-11 Thread Tilman Schmidt
I run VMware vSphere 4 Essentials with three almost identically
configured ESXi 4.1 hosts and a mix of 32 and 64 bit guests including
Windows 2003 and 2008 as well as CentOS 5 and 6. Recently I updated one
of the hosts to build 800380. The new build runs Windows and CentOS 5
VMs fine, but CentOS 6 guests won't come up.

I tried two different CentOS 6 VMs. Both have the latest standard kernel
(2.6.32-279.5.2.el6.x86_64). Both run perfectly fine on one of the other
VMware hosts still running ESXi 4.1.0 build 702113. On build 800380,
both display the GRUB menu alright but freeze immediately afterwards,
emitting the message

PANIC: early exception 0d rip 10:81038879 error 0 cr2 0

on the bottom of the virtual console. Both run perfectly fine again once
I move them back to the host with the older ESXi build.

From one of the failed boot attempts, I captured a VMware debug log
which shows:

Sep 11 17:21:19.628: vcpu-0| RDMSR: unknown MSR[0x1a0] (read as zero):
rip=0x810388db count=1
Sep 11 17:21:19.628: vcpu-0| RDMSR: unknown MSR[0x1a0] (read as zero):
rip=0x810388db count=2
Sep 11 17:21:19.629: vcpu-0| X86Fault_Warning:
vmcore/vmm64/cpu/interp.c:427: cs:eip=0x10:0x81038879 fault=13
Sep 11 17:21:19.632: vcpu-0| Vix: [1125838 vmxCommands.c:9609]:
VMAutomation_HandleCLIHLTEvent. Do nothing.
Sep 11 17:21:19.632: vcpu-0| MsgHint: msg.monitorevent.halt (sent)
Sep 11 17:21:19.632: vcpu-0| The CPU has been disabled by the guest
operating system. Power off or reset the virtual machine.

Ideas?

aTdHvAaNnKcSe,
Tilman



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 early panic on ESXi 4.1.0 build 800380

2012-09-11 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/11/12 12:06 PM, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
 I run VMware vSphere 4 Essentials with three almost identically
 configured ESXi 4.1 hosts and a mix of 32 and 64 bit guests including
 Windows 2003 and 2008 as well as CentOS 5 and 6. Recently I updated one
 of the hosts to build 800380. The new build runs Windows and CentOS 5
 VMs fine, but CentOS 6 guests won't come up.

 I tried two different CentOS 6 VMs. Both have the latest standard kernel
 (2.6.32-279.5.2.el6.x86_64). Both run perfectly fine on one of the other
 VMware hosts still running ESXi 4.1.0 build 702113. On build 800380,
 both display the GRUB menu alright but freeze immediately afterwards,
 emitting the message

 PANIC: early exception 0d rip 10:81038879 error 0 cr2 0

 on the bottom of the virtual console. Both run perfectly fine again once
 I move them back to the host with the older ESXi build.

  From one of the failed boot attempts, I captured a VMware debug log
 which shows:

 Sep 11 17:21:19.628: vcpu-0| RDMSR: unknown MSR[0x1a0] (read as zero):
 rip=0x810388db count=1
 Sep 11 17:21:19.628: vcpu-0| RDMSR: unknown MSR[0x1a0] (read as zero):
 rip=0x810388db count=2
 Sep 11 17:21:19.629: vcpu-0| X86Fault_Warning:
 vmcore/vmm64/cpu/interp.c:427: cs:eip=0x10:0x81038879 fault=13
 Sep 11 17:21:19.632: vcpu-0| Vix: [1125838 vmxCommands.c:9609]:
 VMAutomation_HandleCLIHLTEvent. Do nothing.
 Sep 11 17:21:19.632: vcpu-0| MsgHint: msg.monitorevent.halt (sent)
 Sep 11 17:21:19.632: vcpu-0| The CPU has been disabled by the guest
 operating system. Power off or reset the virtual machine.

 Ideas?



from here, it appears to be a hardware or vmware issue.   NOTHING the 
guest OS does should crash the hypervisor.   I'd file a bug report with 
vmware.


-- 
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] How to? Set boot up display resolution

2012-09-11 Thread James B. Byrne
I have been given a replacement monitor for my CentOS-6.3 KVM test
platform.  It is an LG E2251 22in letterbox format screen whereas the
unit it replaces was a 17 standard format display.  The console
messages now look as through they were output on Silly Putty.

The display itself displays a message to set the resolution to 1920 x
1080.  I have found references to using the vga option in the
grub.conf file.  However, I can find no comprehensive list of what
value to use.  The references I have found actually say see the
source code in the Linux kernel tree, which does not strike me as
particularly user friendly shall we say.

How do I do this or am I condemned to rubber band output.
-- 
***  E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel  ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte  Lyne Limited  http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive  vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] How to? Set boot up display resolution

2012-09-11 Thread Keith Roberts
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, James B. Byrne wrote:

 To: centos@centos.org
 From: James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
 Subject: [CentOS] How to?  Set boot up display resolution
 
 I have been given a replacement monitor for my CentOS-6.3 KVM test
 platform.  It is an LG E2251 22in letterbox format screen whereas the
 unit it replaces was a 17 standard format display.  The console
 messages now look as through they were output on Silly Putty.

 The display itself displays a message to set the resolution to 1920 x
 1080.  I have found references to using the vga option in the
 grub.conf file.  However, I can find no comprehensive list of what
 value to use.  The references I have found actually say see the
 source code in the Linux kernel tree, which does not strike me as
 particularly user friendly shall we say.

 How do I do this or am I condemned to rubber band output.

This might be what you are looking for James:

http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/svga.txt

HTH

Keith

---
Websites:
http://www.karsites.net
http://www.php-debuggers.net
http://www.raised-from-the-dead.org.uk

All email addresses are challenge-response protected with
TMDA [http://tmda.net]
---
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] How to? Set boot up display resolution

2012-09-11 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 09/11/2012 02:21 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
 I have been given a replacement monitor for my CentOS-6.3 KVM test
 platform.  It is an LG E2251 22in letterbox format screen whereas the
 unit it replaces was a 17 standard format display.  The console
 messages now look as through they were output on Silly Putty.

 The display itself displays a message to set the resolution to 1920 x
 1080.  I have found references to using the vga option in the
 grub.conf file.  However, I can find no comprehensive list of what
 value to use.  The references I have found actually say see the
 source code in the Linux kernel tree, which does not strike me as
 particularly user friendly shall we say.

 How do I do this or am I condemned to rubber band output.

Are you talking about a CLI display boot resolution or a GUI display
setting in X?

If CLI, use this table:

http://wiki.antlinux.com/pmwiki.php?n=HowTos.VgaModes





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 early panic on ESXi 4.1.0 build 800380

2012-09-11 Thread Laurent
Le 2012-09-11 21:06, Tilman Schmidt a écrit :
 I run VMware vSphere 4 Essentials with three almost identically
 configured ESXi 4.1 hosts and a mix of 32 and 64 bit guests including
 Windows 2003 and 2008 as well as CentOS 5 and 6. Recently I updated 
 one
 of the hosts to build 800380. The new build runs Windows and CentOS 5
 VMs fine, but CentOS 6 guests won't come up.

 I tried two different CentOS 6 VMs. Both have the latest standard 
 kernel
 (2.6.32-279.5.2.el6.x86_64). Both run perfectly fine on one of the 
 other
 VMware hosts still running ESXi 4.1.0 build 702113. On build 800380,
 both display the GRUB menu alright but freeze immediately afterwards,
 emitting the message


I've found what is probably your post on VMware Communities.
http://communities.vmware.com/message/2112173?tstart=0

It seems there's a second 4.1 update 3 build (811144):
http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_UScmd=displayKCexternalId=2020362

It fixes another panic, so trying this build may help.
--
PR722061: When a Linux kernel crashes, the linux kexec feature is used 
to enable booting into a special kdump kernel and gathering crash dump 
files. An SMP Linux guest configured with kexec might cause the virtual 
machine to fail with a monitor panic during this reboot. Error messages 
such as the following might be logged:

vcpu-0| CPU reset: soft (mode 2)
vcpu-0| MONITOR PANIC: vcpu-0:VMM fault 14: src=MONITOR 
rip=0xfc28c30d regs=0xfc008b50
--

-- 
Laurent.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Are the CentOS forums available as RSS feeds?

2012-09-11 Thread Les Mikesell
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Hakan age...@meddatainc.com wrote:
 Newcomer to CentOS, have signed up for the mailing lists and tried
 unsuccessfully to find newsfeeds for the forums. Hoping someone here
 might know better?


There is an rss icon at the bottom of the main forum page that sort-of
works in google reader:
https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/rss.php
But I don't think it is particularly useful - you only get a couple of
lines of each posting.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] How to? Set boot up display resolution

2012-09-11 Thread James B. Byrne
So, I located the Kernel source documents or something approximating
same:

http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/svga.txt

From this I gather that I probably have to reboot the system to
discover what mode to use.  Is there another way of getting this info
once the system is started?


http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/fb/vesafb.txt

From this I read:

Advantages:

 * It provides a nice large console (128 cols + 48 lines with 1024x768)
   without using tiny, unreadable fonts.

Now, I would really like to get back to an 80x24/26 cli console
display, preferably centered on the new monitor.  Is this possible?  I
would also like the font to be a bit larger, how is this done?

Is it true, as I have been told, that one can no longer purchase a
'standard' form factor flat panel monitor?  That they only make
widescreens now? Really???


-- 
***  E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel  ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte  Lyne Limited  http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive  vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] postfix mail server

2012-09-11 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:18 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:


 also, postfix is a mail transfer agent, it doesn't implement the user
 reader side like IMAP or POP, it just transfers messages. another
 package, such as dovecot or cyrus, is used as a client agent for reading
 email via pop or imap protocols, and its in one of these packages that
 the email folder format is normally defined.

On the postfix side of things you can probably configure the mail
addresses controlling future deliveries to do whatever you want.
There are many options and the details will depend on what you have
and what you want.   Already-delivered mail messages are no longer
controlled by postfix.   There are programs to move messages from one
imap account to another if you need to move between servers or server
types.  Imapsync will do one account at a time, given the servers,
logins, and passwords.  I think the cyrus tools have something to move
all accounts.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 early panic on ESXi 4.1.0 build 800380

2012-09-11 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 11.09.2012 21:14, schrieb John R Pierce:
 On 09/11/12 12:06 PM, Tilman Schmidt wrote:

 I tried two different CentOS 6 VMs. Both have the latest standard kernel
 (2.6.32-279.5.2.el6.x86_64). Both run perfectly fine on one of the other
 VMware hosts still running ESXi 4.1.0 build 702113. On build 800380,
 both display the GRUB menu alright but freeze immediately afterwards,
 emitting the message

 PANIC: early exception 0d rip 10:81038879 error 0 cr2 0
[...]
 from here, it appears to be a hardware or vmware issue.

I tend to exclude hardware issues. The host in question was working fine
before the update.

   NOTHING the guest OS does should crash the hypervisor.

Perhaps I wasn't quite clear. It's the guest OS that panics. The
hypervisor continues quite unperturbed by its guest's fate.

Thanks,
Tilman



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 early panic on ESXi 4.1.0 build 800380

2012-09-11 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 11.09.2012 21:57, schrieb Laurent:
 I've found what is probably your post on VMware Communities.
 http://communities.vmware.com/message/2112173?tstart=0

Indeed.

 It seems there's a second 4.1 update 3 build (811144):
 http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_UScmd=displayKCexternalId=2020362

Thanks, I'll give it a try.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Are the CentOS forums available as RSS feeds?

2012-09-11 Thread Hakan
Yes, I had found it and was surprised that the forums are not
accessible as newsfeeds.

On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:47:40 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Hakan age...@meddatainc.com wrote:
 Newcomer to CentOS, have signed up for the mailing lists and tried
 unsuccessfully to find newsfeeds for the forums. Hoping someone here
 might know better?


There is an rss icon at the bottom of the main forum page that sort-of
works in google reader:
https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/rss.php
But I don't think it is particularly useful - you only get a couple of
lines of each posting.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Are the CentOS forums available as RSS feeds?

2012-09-11 Thread Hakan
Seems to be for mailing lists, not for various forums?

On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 02:58:48 -0700 (PDT), John Doe wrote:

From: Hakan age...@meddatainc.com

 Newcomer to CentOS, have signed up for the mailing lists and tried
 unsuccessfully to find newsfeeds for the forums. Hoping someone here
 might know better?

Maybe try http://gmane.org/rss.php

JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] VLC Equivalent for CentOS 6.3 (SOLVED)

2012-09-11 Thread Mark LaPierre
On 09/11/2012 04:55 AM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
 On 11 September 2012 00:39, Mark LaPierremarklap...@aol.com  wrote:
 Linux users too often flaunt the law by using patented software
 illegally.  By doing so we refuse to support those who invest their
 funds and blood to produce compatible software.  Then we complain about
 companies not supporting Linux.  I wonder who is at fault for that. ;-)
 Unless they are not breaking any law since the software patent is not
 recognized in their jurisdiction. The world does not end at the
 borders of USA.
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Then they wouldn't be using patented software illegally would they?

-- 
 _
°v°
   /(_)\
^ ^  Mark LaPierre
Registerd Linux user No #267004
www.counter.li.org

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] VLC Equivalent for CentOS 6.3 (SOLVED)

2012-09-11 Thread Craig White

On Sep 11, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:

 On 09/11/2012 04:55 AM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
 On 11 September 2012 00:39, Mark LaPierremarklap...@aol.com  wrote:
 Linux users too often flaunt the law by using patented software
 illegally.  By doing so we refuse to support those who invest their
 funds and blood to produce compatible software.  Then we complain about
 companies not supporting Linux.  I wonder who is at fault for that. ;-)
 Unless they are not breaking any law since the software patent is not
 recognized in their jurisdiction. The world does not end at the
 borders of USA.
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
 
 Then they wouldn't be using patented software illegally would they?

discussion of this hardly appropriate for this list but your assertion is not 
correct. It's typically not using software illegally, but sometimes using it 
without recompense to the authors or in the case of DVD, the consortium that 
accepts money for the various entities. In other areas, this can be known as a 
shakedown.

Craig
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Deduplication data for CentOS?

2012-09-11 Thread Bob Hepple
Rainer Traut tr.ml@... writes:

 
 Hi list,
 
 is there any working solution for deduplication of data for centos?
 We are trying to find a solution for our backup server which runs a bash 
 script invoking xdelta(3). But having this functionality in fs is much 
 more friendly...
 
 We have looked into lessfs, sdfs and ddar.
 Are these filesystems ready to use (on centos)?
 ddar is sthg different, I know.
 
 Thx
 Rainer
 


Not sure if it's already been mentioned but storeBackup uses rsync and hardlinks
to minimise storage - and it break up big files and backs up the fragments
separately. May help ...
http://www.nongnu.org/storebackup/en/node2.html

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos