Dear All,
I would like to make a whole lot of homedirs without Documents,
Downloads ,
like it was in CentOs5.
I know I have to adapt something in /etc/skel but cannot find out how to
do it.
Anyone can give me a hand with this?
greetings , J.
--
IT-medewerker
Opensource Software is
On 26.09.2012 11:30, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
Dear All,
I would like to make a whole lot of homedirs without Documents,
Downloads ,
like it was in CentOs5.
I know I have to adapt something in /etc/skel but cannot find out how
to
do it.
Anyone can give me a hand with this?
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:13 +0100, Nux! wrote:
On 26.09.2012 11:30, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
Dear All,
I would like to make a whole lot of homedirs without Documents,
Downloads ,
like it was in CentOs5.
I know I have to adapt something in /etc/skel but cannot find out how
to
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, John Austin wrote:
To: centos@centos.org
From: John Austin j...@jaa.org.uk
Subject: Re: [CentOS] make /home/user without all the maps
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:13 +0100, Nux! wrote:
On 26.09.2012 11:30, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
Dear All,
I would like to make a whole
On 26.09.2012 12:25, John Austin wrote:
Maybe
yum remove xdg-user-dirs-gtk
Good find! This has lead me to:
/etc/xdg/user-dirs.conf
/etc/xdg/user-dirs.defaults
Johan, that's what you need to customise.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 01:06:27PM +0100, Keith Roberts wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, John Austin wrote:
To: centos@centos.org
From: John Austin j...@jaa.org.uk
Subject: Re: [CentOS] make /home/user without all the maps
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:13 +0100, Nux! wrote:
On 26.09.2012
this works! commented out all the entry's in /etc/xdg/user-dirs.defaults.
Thanks for all the answers, now I don't have to explain to 50 users they
have to delete all those folders - or at least not use them.
greetings , J
Op 26-09-12 14:16, Nux! schreef:
On 26.09.2012 12:25, John Austin
On 26.09.2012 13:38, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
this works! commented out all the entry's in
/etc/xdg/user-dirs.defaults.
Thanks for all the answers, now I don't have to explain to 50 users
they
have to delete all those folders - or at least not use them.
greetings , J
Johan,
Be advised
hmmm. good point. The users on the server I'm configuring now will serve
as guinea piggs :-)
But indeed, I have to sent them a mail about changing the Firefox
default download directory.
greetings, J.
Op 26-09-12 14:35, Nux! schreef:
On 26.09.2012 13:38, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
this works!
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
Dear All,
We recently reinstalled our computing cluster. We were using CentOS
5.3 (32 bits). It is now CentOS 6.3 (64 bits), installed from the
CentOS 6.2 x64 CD, then upgraded to 6.3.
We have some issues with the memory needs of our running jobs. They
require much more than before, it may be
Hello,
This is on Centos 6 and not something I think is wrong with Centos 6
but I am looking to see if anybody else has experienced this and
if there is solution. So thanks up front for indulging me.
Because Linux makes routing decisions before SNAT it is causing
problems when trying to use FTP
On 09/26/12 19:14, Jérémie Dubois-Lacoste wrote:
Dear All,
Hi!
We recently reinstalled our computing cluster. We were using CentOS
5.3 (32 bits). It is now CentOS 6.3 (64 bits), installed from the
CentOS 6.2 x64 CD, then upgraded to 6.3.
We have some issues with the memory needs of our
Hm, interesting suggestion. But didn't change anything. :(
Thanks anyway,
Jérémie
2012/9/26 Adrian Sevcenco adrian.sevce...@cern.ch:
On 09/26/12 19:14, Jérémie Dubois-Lacoste wrote:
Dear All,
Hi!
We recently reinstalled our computing cluster. We were using CentOS
5.3 (32 bits). It
Jérémie Dubois-Lacoste wrote:
Dear All,
We recently reinstalled our computing cluster. We were using CentOS
5.3 (32 bits). It is now CentOS 6.3 (64 bits), installed from the
CentOS 6.2 x64 CD, then upgraded to 6.3.
We have some issues with the memory needs of our running jobs. They
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Emmett Culley emm...@webengineer.com wrote:
I have been using BackupPC via rsync daemons on the target machines and all
has been working well. At least until about the time rsync went to version
3.0.6.
Since then backups have been failing for some targets.
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Jérémie Dubois-Lacoste wrote:
Python script:
Avg Min Max
32 bits8500 5004 11132
64 bits32800 3 36336
8500 * 2 = 17000
5004 * 2 = 10007
11132 * 2 = 22264
So that ranges from 2-2.5 larger.
You may have misunderstood.
The detailed number I gave are obtained on distributions that
are not CentOS, and ok, it can makes sense between 32
and 64 bits.
But on CentOS 6.2, 64bits, I obtain:
SH: 103MB
PYTHON: 114MB
R:200MB
This is from a freshly installed CentOS 6.2
On 09/26/2012 11:05 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Emmett Culley emm...@webengineer.com
wrote:
I have been using BackupPC via rsync daemons on the target machines and all
has been working well. At least until about the time rsync went to version
3.0.6.
Since
On 09/26/2012 09:15 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Is there a way to make this work correctly?
Shorewall will generate a proper configuration if you specify the
track option in the providers file. It might be a good idea to use
that to generate your configs rather than building them by hand.
I
On 09/26/2012 09:14 AM, Jérémie Dubois-Lacoste wrote:
1. Run a python script and check the memory that
it requires (field VIRT of the top command).
Don't use VIRT as a reference for memory used. RES is a better
indication, but even that won't tell you anything useful about shared
memory, and
On 09/25/2012 08:33 PM, Emmett Culley wrote:
Since then backups have been failing for some targets. The failure
is a TCP ZeroWindow issue. It looks like the server rsync process
cannot empty it's buffer soon enough and eventually the process
fails.
If the rsync server sends a TCP ZeroWindow
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 09/26/2012 09:15 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Is there a way to make this work correctly?
Shorewall will generate a proper configuration if you specify the
track option in the providers file. It might be a good idea to use
Hello,
My name is Manfred. I have to install a flexlm license server on a pc with
centos 6.3 as operating system.
This machine contains two network cards. An Ethernet card and a wifi card.
For the Ethernet card centos generates a device called p3p2.
For the wifi card centos generates a device
Check for a typo where you got the 'et0', that's not a normal name (emX,
ethX, pXpY and wlanX are the usual).
As for a general comment/guide; make sure you've updated the
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-X files (note the DEVICE=... and
HWADDR=... lines).
Here's a general guide for
Hi digimer,
Sorry, I made a mistake.
... After rebooting centos generates a device called /dev/et0. ...
should be
... After rebooting centos generates a device called /dev/eth0. ...
CentOS made it. I got what I want.
Where is the general guide? I didn't understood what you mean.
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1312
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1312.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1311
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1311.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1313
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1313.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
Silvertip257, when you did this CentOS 6/KVM/bonding/bridging, did you
ever get all the parts playing together correctlhy?
I'm facing a setup with only two NIC's, and need for multiple trunked
VLAN access, and bonded pairs, and KVM based bridges to get the VM's
with exposed IP addresses. I can
Hi Nico,
I shared some configs here:
[CentOS-virt] [Advice] CentOS6 + KVM + bonding + bridging
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2012-September/003003.html
I hope this helps. I have another config with the trunked VLANs on a separate
interface (also bonded, as above) if you want
Hola, soy estudiante de sistemas y tengo que instalar big blue button en
centos 6 pero no en cuentro informacion que me guie tal vez ustedes me puede
ayudar con un gui de como instalarlo
De su página web:
http://code.google.com/p/bigbluebutto/wiki/InstallingBigBlueButtonCentOS
Es un poco antiguo pero quizá te servirá para orientarte.
Mas info:
http://code.google.com/p/bigbluebutton/wiki/TableOfContents?tm=6
Le 26/09/2012 10:41, Jimmy Bersoza a écrit :
Hola, soy estudiante
Hola Claudio,
quiero probar instalarlo, si no lo consigo probaré con otra
alternativaespero poder instarlo.
¿tus pruebas como fueron?
Gracias, un saludo.
Sergio.
El día 16 de mayo de 2012 22:21, Claudio Ceballos Paz
claudioceb...@gmail.com escribió:
Alguien instalo correctamente oVirt?
lo voy a probar gracias por su ayuda
Atte.
Jimmy Bersoza
Pasaje - El Oro- Ecuador
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:57:09 +0200
From: svillal...@gmail.com
To: centos-es@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-es] CentOS 6 + oVirt
Hola a tod@s,
Me gustaria saber habéis probado CentOS 6 +
35 matches
Mail list logo