[CentOS-virt] Xen4CentOS kernel panic on dom0 reboot
Hello, I've been using Xen4CentOS for the last 3 months. It's working fine and dom0/domUs are stable but the server does a kernel panic when doing a reboot and the server has to be hard reset manually. It has kernel panic on the 3 last reboot. Please stand by while rebooting the system... INFO: task reboot:19800 blocked for more than 120 seconds echo 0 /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs disables this message Call trace ... Picture of the call trace: http://i59.tinypic.com/169olt1.png CentOS: 6.5 Kernel: 3.10.23-11.el6.centos.alt.x86_64 Xen: 4.2.3 Server: Supermicro 6017R-WRF Any idea how to troubleshoot or fix this issue? We can't reboot the dom0 during the week because domUs (2) are in production and this server is in a datacenter. Kind regards, Karl ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] Xen4CentOS kernel panic on dom0 reboot
On 05/03/14 15:09, Karl Johnson wrote: Hello, I've been using Xen4CentOS for the last 3 months. It's working fine and dom0/domUs are stable but the server does a kernel panic when doing a reboot and the server has to be hard reset manually. It has kernel panic on the 3 last reboot. There is a xenbus device still present and during shutdown it is trying to set it to CLOSED but at this point xenstored isn't running and the xenbus write stalls. Do you have VMs that are still running when you attempt a reboot? If so shutting them down will likely avoid this. Can you provide the output of xenstore-ls prior to attempting a reboot? David ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] Xen4CentOS kernel panic on dom0 reboot
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:17 AM, David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.comwrote: On 05/03/14 15:09, Karl Johnson wrote: I've been using Xen4CentOS for the last 3 months. It's working fine and dom0/domUs are stable but the server does a kernel panic when doing a reboot and the server has to be hard reset manually. It has kernel panic on the 3 last reboot. There is a xenbus device still present and during shutdown it is trying to set it to CLOSED but at this point xenstored isn't running and the xenbus write stalls. Do you have VMs that are still running when you attempt a reboot? If so shutting them down will likely avoid this. Can you provide the output of xenstore-ls prior to attempting a reboot? I though Xen init.d scripts would stop all of them before rebooting? Here's the output of chkconfig and xenstore-ls: http://pastebin.centos.org/8186/ Thanks, Karl ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-es] Error sending a email to account of email personal (postfix)
El 04/03/2014 22:10, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin escribió: Frances esta es la salida de *telnet mail.latitud33.cl http://mail.latitud33.cl 25* Trying 67.20.125.184... Connected to mail.latitud33.cl. Escape character is '^]'. E220-box810.bluehost.com ESMTP Exim 4.80 #2 Tue, 04 Mar 2014 14:07:16 -0700 220-We do not authorize the use of this system to transport unsolicited, 220 and/or bulk e-mail. EHLO yyt.com 250-box810.bluehost.com Hello yyt.com [190.196.62.166] 250-SIZE 52428800 250-8BITMIME 250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN 250-STARTTLS 250 HELP MAIL FROM: root@dev2 250 OK RCPT TO: rodr...@latitud33.cl 451 Temporarily unable to process your email. Please try again later. al parecer no se puede procesar el correo electronico. ¿Has hecho la misma prueba con el MAIL FROM: root@enum-server.localdomain? Hazla también con el MAIL FROM: tucuentagm...@gmail.com. Debería funcionar. El 4 de marzo de 2014, 13:31, Francesc Guitart fguit...@gmx.com escribió: El 04/03/2014 17:20, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin escribió: Ok log...envió correcto a cuenta gmail Mar 4 13:42:28 localhost postfix/pickup[16153]: B57077AC8E: uid=0 from=root Mar 4 13:42:28 localhost postfix/cleanup[16212]: B57077AC8E: message-id=20140304134228.B57077AC8E@enum.localdomain Mar 4 13:42:28 localhost postfix/qmgr[2121]: B57077AC8E: from=root@eNUM.localdomain, size=471, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Mar 4 13:42:29 localhost postfix/smtp[16214]: connect to gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:4002:c07::1a]:25: Network is unreachable Mar 4 13:42:30 localhost postfix/smtp[16214]: B57077AC8E: to= rodrigo.pichin...@gmail.com, relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[74.125.137.26]:25, delay=2.1, delays=0.19/0.04/1.2/0.65, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 OK 1393940550 e32si24471118yhi.62 - gsmtp) Mar 4 13:42:30 localhost postfix/qmgr[2121]: B57077AC8E: removed Efectivamente no se ve nada. Todo funciona OK y no da ninguna pista. Creo que también puede ser el dns interno que tenemos, el cual no resuelve algunos host No creo que sea eso. ¿Porqué afectaría tu DNS interno a que un servidor de mail externo acepte o no un mail? Puedes hacer una prueba para verificar que mi teoría es cierta. Si el servidor de mail que nos ocupa acepta conexiones telnet al puerto 25 intenta mandar un mail por comandos SMTP desde una dirección de mail que no existe, por ejemplo he...@yyt.com. Después repite los pasos con root@enum.server.localdomain. Si el error es el mismo estoy en lo cierto. Para mandar el un mail por telnet: telnet mail.latitud33.cl 25 EHLO yyt.com MAIL FROM: he...@yyt.com RCPT TO: rodr...@latitud33.cl DATA Subject: Prueba Hola pajarito sin cola. . QUIT Repite esto remplazando he...@yyt.com por root@enum-server.localdomain Saludos. El 4 de marzo de 2014, 13:17, Francesc Guitart fguit...@gmx.com escribió: El 04/03/2014 16:56, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin escribió: Cierto. Creo que eme estoy explicando mal. desde enum.server.localdomain puedo enviar mail a gmail echo mail de prueba | mail -s mail deprueba rodrigo.pichin...@gmail.com todo bien pero no puedo enviar a este email-.. rodr...@dominiox.cl si hago dig mx latitud33.cl resuelve bien. me captas?? Ahora sí! ^_^ El servidor de latitud33.cl está comprobando que el dominio que envía existe o es válido. Muy a menudo se hace con una simple consulta DNS inversa (PTR). Como no encuentra el dominio enum-server.localdomain en la dirección IP desde donde se envía el mail pues no lo acepta. De aquí el 550 Sender verify failed (in reply to RCPT TO command). ¿Me explico? ¿Puedes pasar el log de los mails a gmail que sí funcionan? Sólo para intentar confirmar que se trata de eso, aunque si funciona bien no sé si saldremos de dudas... El 4 de marzo de 2014, 12:52, Francesc Guitart fguit...@gmx.com escribió: El 04/03/2014 16:15, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin escribió: enum-server.localdomain es el nombre de host donde envio el mail.esto funciona al enviar a una cuenta gmail pero no al envia a una cuenta del tipo cuentas.cl Si enum-server.localdomain es el nombre de host a donde envías el mail, ¿cómo es resulto este dominio en tu servidor de mail? .localdomain es, como su nombre indica, un dominio local y no resolvible en Internet a menos que lo añadas en /etc/hosts Si haces ping gmail.com funciona. Si haces ping yahoo.com también funciona. Si haces dig mx gmail.com resuelve bien. Si haces dig mx yahoo.com resuelve bien. En cambio ping enum-server.localdomain no funciona y dig mx enum-server.localdomain tampoco. El 4 de marzo de 2014, 12:13, Francesc Guitart fguit...@gmx.com escribió: Hola, El 04/03/2014 15:40, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin escribió: Hola a todos: Tengo la siguiente interrogante: Resulta que tengo centos 6.4 al ejecutar el siguiente comando: 1) MTA alternatives --config mta la salida es la siguiente:
Re: [CentOS-es] Error sending a email to account of email personal (postfix)
El 04/03/2014 22:10, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin escribió: Frances esta es la salida de *telnet mail.latitud33.cl http://mail.latitud33.cl 25* Trying 67.20.125.184... Connected to mail.latitud33.cl. Escape character is '^]'. E220-box810.bluehost.com ESMTP Exim 4.80 #2 Tue, 04 Mar 2014 14:07:16 -0700 220-We do not authorize the use of this system to transport unsolicited, 220 and/or bulk e-mail. EHLO yyt.com 250-box810.bluehost.com Hello yyt.com [190.196.62.166] 250-SIZE 52428800 250-8BITMIME 250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN 250-STARTTLS 250 HELP MAIL FROM: root@dev2 ^^ Esto no es una cuenta de mail, falta la extensión del dominio. Es normal que no te deje enviar si no respetas los estándares. Ni root@dev2 ni root@enum-server.localdomain son cuentas de mail funcionales. 250 OK RCPT TO: rodr...@latitud33.cl 451 Temporarily unable to process your email. Please try again later. al parecer no se puede procesar el correo electronico. El 4 de marzo de 2014, 13:31, Francesc Guitart fguit...@gmx.com escribió: El 04/03/2014 17:20, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin escribió: Ok log...envió correcto a cuenta gmail Mar 4 13:42:28 localhost postfix/pickup[16153]: B57077AC8E: uid=0 from=root Mar 4 13:42:28 localhost postfix/cleanup[16212]: B57077AC8E: message-id=20140304134228.B57077AC8E@enum.localdomain Mar 4 13:42:28 localhost postfix/qmgr[2121]: B57077AC8E: from=root@eNUM.localdomain, size=471, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Mar 4 13:42:29 localhost postfix/smtp[16214]: connect to gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:4002:c07::1a]:25: Network is unreachable Mar 4 13:42:30 localhost postfix/smtp[16214]: B57077AC8E: to= rodrigo.pichin...@gmail.com, relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[74.125.137.26]:25, delay=2.1, delays=0.19/0.04/1.2/0.65, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 OK 1393940550 e32si24471118yhi.62 - gsmtp) Mar 4 13:42:30 localhost postfix/qmgr[2121]: B57077AC8E: removed Efectivamente no se ve nada. Todo funciona OK y no da ninguna pista. Creo que también puede ser el dns interno que tenemos, el cual no resuelve algunos host No creo que sea eso. ¿Porqué afectaría tu DNS interno a que un servidor de mail externo acepte o no un mail? Puedes hacer una prueba para verificar que mi teoría es cierta. Si el servidor de mail que nos ocupa acepta conexiones telnet al puerto 25 intenta mandar un mail por comandos SMTP desde una dirección de mail que no existe, por ejemplo he...@yyt.com. Después repite los pasos con root@enum.server.localdomain. Si el error es el mismo estoy en lo cierto. Para mandar el un mail por telnet: telnet mail.latitud33.cl 25 EHLO yyt.com MAIL FROM: he...@yyt.com RCPT TO: rodr...@latitud33.cl DATA Subject: Prueba Hola pajarito sin cola. . QUIT Repite esto remplazando he...@yyt.com por root@enum-server.localdomain Saludos. El 4 de marzo de 2014, 13:17, Francesc Guitart fguit...@gmx.com escribió: El 04/03/2014 16:56, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin escribió: Cierto. Creo que eme estoy explicando mal. desde enum.server.localdomain puedo enviar mail a gmail echo mail de prueba | mail -s mail deprueba rodrigo.pichin...@gmail.com todo bien pero no puedo enviar a este email-.. rodr...@dominiox.cl si hago dig mx latitud33.cl resuelve bien. me captas?? Ahora sí! ^_^ El servidor de latitud33.cl está comprobando que el dominio que envía existe o es válido. Muy a menudo se hace con una simple consulta DNS inversa (PTR). Como no encuentra el dominio enum-server.localdomain en la dirección IP desde donde se envía el mail pues no lo acepta. De aquí el 550 Sender verify failed (in reply to RCPT TO command). ¿Me explico? ¿Puedes pasar el log de los mails a gmail que sí funcionan? Sólo para intentar confirmar que se trata de eso, aunque si funciona bien no sé si saldremos de dudas... El 4 de marzo de 2014, 12:52, Francesc Guitart fguit...@gmx.com escribió: El 04/03/2014 16:15, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin escribió: enum-server.localdomain es el nombre de host donde envio el mail.esto funciona al enviar a una cuenta gmail pero no al envia a una cuenta del tipo cuentas.cl Si enum-server.localdomain es el nombre de host a donde envías el mail, ¿cómo es resulto este dominio en tu servidor de mail? .localdomain es, como su nombre indica, un dominio local y no resolvible en Internet a menos que lo añadas en /etc/hosts Si haces ping gmail.com funciona. Si haces ping yahoo.com también funciona. Si haces dig mx gmail.com resuelve bien. Si haces dig mx yahoo.com resuelve bien. En cambio ping enum-server.localdomain no funciona y dig mx enum-server.localdomain tampoco. El 4 de marzo de 2014, 12:13, Francesc Guitart fguit...@gmx.com escribió: Hola, El 04/03/2014 15:40, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin escribió: Hola a todos: Tengo la siguiente interrogante: Resulta que tengo centos 6.4 al ejecutar el siguiente comando:
Re: [CentOS-es] Error sending a email to account of email personal (postfix)
Francesc: pero entonces como puedo enviar un mail a una cuenta gmail sin problemas?? El 5 de marzo de 2014, 5:24, Francesc Guitart fguit...@gmx.com escribió: El 04/03/2014 22:10, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin escribió: Frances esta es la salida de *telnet mail.latitud33.cl http://mail.latitud33.cl 25* Trying 67.20.125.184... Connected to mail.latitud33.cl. Escape character is '^]'. E220-box810.bluehost.com ESMTP Exim 4.80 #2 Tue, 04 Mar 2014 14:07:16 -0700 220-We do not authorize the use of this system to transport unsolicited, 220 and/or bulk e-mail. EHLO yyt.com 250-box810.bluehost.com Hello yyt.com [190.196.62.166] 250-SIZE 52428800 250-8BITMIME 250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN 250-STARTTLS 250 HELP MAIL FROM: root@dev2 ^^ Esto no es una cuenta de mail, falta la extensión del dominio. Es normal que no te deje enviar si no respetas los estándares. Ni root@dev2 ni root@enum-server.localdomain son cuentas de mail funcionales. 250 OK RCPT TO: rodr...@latitud33.cl 451 Temporarily unable to process your email. Please try again later. al parecer no se puede procesar el correo electronico. El 4 de marzo de 2014, 13:31, Francesc Guitart fguit...@gmx.com escribió: El 04/03/2014 17:20, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin escribió: Ok log...envió correcto a cuenta gmail Mar 4 13:42:28 localhost postfix/pickup[16153]: B57077AC8E: uid=0 from=root Mar 4 13:42:28 localhost postfix/cleanup[16212]: B57077AC8E: message-id=20140304134228.B57077AC8E@enum.localdomain Mar 4 13:42:28 localhost postfix/qmgr[2121]: B57077AC8E: from=root@eNUM.localdomain, size=471, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Mar 4 13:42:29 localhost postfix/smtp[16214]: connect to gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:4002:c07::1a]:25: Network is unreachable Mar 4 13:42:30 localhost postfix/smtp[16214]: B57077AC8E: to= rodrigo.pichin...@gmail.com, relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[74.125.137.26]:25, delay=2.1, delays=0.19/0.04/1.2/0.65, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 OK 1393940550 e32si24471118yhi.62 - gsmtp) Mar 4 13:42:30 localhost postfix/qmgr[2121]: B57077AC8E: removed Efectivamente no se ve nada. Todo funciona OK y no da ninguna pista. Creo que también puede ser el dns interno que tenemos, el cual no resuelve algunos host No creo que sea eso. ¿Porqué afectaría tu DNS interno a que un servidor de mail externo acepte o no un mail? Puedes hacer una prueba para verificar que mi teoría es cierta. Si el servidor de mail que nos ocupa acepta conexiones telnet al puerto 25 intenta mandar un mail por comandos SMTP desde una dirección de mail que no existe, por ejemplo he...@yyt.com. Después repite los pasos con root@enum.server.localdomain. Si el error es el mismo estoy en lo cierto. Para mandar el un mail por telnet: telnet mail.latitud33.cl 25 EHLO yyt.com MAIL FROM: he...@yyt.com RCPT TO: rodr...@latitud33.cl DATA Subject: Prueba Hola pajarito sin cola. . QUIT Repite esto remplazando he...@yyt.com por root@enum-server.localdomain Saludos. El 4 de marzo de 2014, 13:17, Francesc Guitart fguit...@gmx.com escribió: El 04/03/2014 16:56, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin escribió: Cierto. Creo que eme estoy explicando mal. desde enum.server.localdomain puedo enviar mail a gmail echo mail de prueba | mail -s mail deprueba rodrigo.pichin...@gmail.com todo bien pero no puedo enviar a este email-.. rodr...@dominiox.cl si hago dig mx latitud33.cl resuelve bien. me captas?? Ahora sí! ^_^ El servidor de latitud33.cl está comprobando que el dominio que envía existe o es válido. Muy a menudo se hace con una simple consulta DNS inversa (PTR). Como no encuentra el dominio enum-server.localdomain en la dirección IP desde donde se envía el mail pues no lo acepta. De aquí el 550 Sender verify failed (in reply to RCPT TO command). ¿Me explico? ¿Puedes pasar el log de los mails a gmail que sí funcionan? Sólo para intentar confirmar que se trata de eso, aunque si funciona bien no sé si saldremos de dudas... El 4 de marzo de 2014, 12:52, Francesc Guitart fguit...@gmx.com escribió: El 04/03/2014 16:15, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin escribió: enum-server.localdomain es el nombre de host donde envio el mail.esto funciona al enviar a una cuenta gmail pero no al envia a una cuenta del tipo cuentas.cl Si enum-server.localdomain es el nombre de host a donde envías el mail, ¿cómo es resulto este dominio en tu servidor de mail? .localdomain es, como su nombre indica, un dominio local y no resolvible en Internet a menos que lo añadas en /etc/hosts Si haces ping gmail.com funciona. Si haces ping yahoo.com también funciona. Si haces dig mx gmail.com resuelve bien. Si haces dig mx yahoo.com resuelve bien. En cambio ping
Re: [CentOS-es] Error sending a email to account of email personal (postfix)
El 05/03/2014 13:08, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin escribió: Francesc: pero entonces como puedo enviar un mail a una cuenta gmail sin problemas?? ¿Pero no dices que los mails a las cuentas de GMAIL sí funcionan? El 5 de marzo de 2014, 5:24, Francesc Guitart fguit...@gmx.com escribió: El 04/03/2014 22:10, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin escribió: Frances esta es la salida de *telnet mail.latitud33.cl http://mail.latitud33.cl 25* Trying 67.20.125.184... Connected to mail.latitud33.cl. Escape character is '^]'. E220-box810.bluehost.com ESMTP Exim 4.80 #2 Tue, 04 Mar 2014 14:07:16 -0700 220-We do not authorize the use of this system to transport unsolicited, 220 and/or bulk e-mail. EHLO yyt.com 250-box810.bluehost.com Hello yyt.com [190.196.62.166] 250-SIZE 52428800 250-8BITMIME 250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN 250-STARTTLS 250 HELP MAIL FROM: root@dev2 ^^ Esto no es una cuenta de mail, falta la extensión del dominio. Es normal que no te deje enviar si no respetas los estándares. Ni root@dev2 ni root@enum-server.localdomain son cuentas de mail funcionales. 250 OK RCPT TO: rodr...@latitud33.cl 451 Temporarily unable to process your email. Please try again later. al parecer no se puede procesar el correo electronico. El 4 de marzo de 2014, 13:31, Francesc Guitart fguit...@gmx.com escribió: El 04/03/2014 17:20, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin escribió: Ok log...envió correcto a cuenta gmail Mar 4 13:42:28 localhost postfix/pickup[16153]: B57077AC8E: uid=0 from=root Mar 4 13:42:28 localhost postfix/cleanup[16212]: B57077AC8E: message-id=20140304134228.B57077AC8E@enum.localdomain Mar 4 13:42:28 localhost postfix/qmgr[2121]: B57077AC8E: from=root@eNUM.localdomain, size=471, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Mar 4 13:42:29 localhost postfix/smtp[16214]: connect to gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:4002:c07::1a]:25: Network is unreachable Mar 4 13:42:30 localhost postfix/smtp[16214]: B57077AC8E: to= rodrigo.pichin...@gmail.com, relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[74.125.137.26]:25, delay=2.1, delays=0.19/0.04/1.2/0.65, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 OK 1393940550 e32si24471118yhi.62 - gsmtp) Mar 4 13:42:30 localhost postfix/qmgr[2121]: B57077AC8E: removed Efectivamente no se ve nada. Todo funciona OK y no da ninguna pista. Creo que también puede ser el dns interno que tenemos, el cual no resuelve algunos host No creo que sea eso. ¿Porqué afectaría tu DNS interno a que un servidor de mail externo acepte o no un mail? Puedes hacer una prueba para verificar que mi teoría es cierta. Si el servidor de mail que nos ocupa acepta conexiones telnet al puerto 25 intenta mandar un mail por comandos SMTP desde una dirección de mail que no existe, por ejemplo he...@yyt.com. Después repite los pasos con root@enum.server.localdomain. Si el error es el mismo estoy en lo cierto. Para mandar el un mail por telnet: telnet mail.latitud33.cl 25 EHLO yyt.com MAIL FROM: he...@yyt.com RCPT TO: rodr...@latitud33.cl DATA Subject: Prueba Hola pajarito sin cola. . QUIT Repite esto remplazando he...@yyt.com por root@enum-server.localdomain Saludos. El 4 de marzo de 2014, 13:17, Francesc Guitart fguit...@gmx.com escribió: El 04/03/2014 16:56, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin escribió: Cierto. Creo que eme estoy explicando mal. desde enum.server.localdomain puedo enviar mail a gmail echo mail de prueba | mail -s mail deprueba rodrigo.pichin...@gmail.com todo bien pero no puedo enviar a este email-.. rodr...@dominiox.cl si hago dig mx latitud33.cl resuelve bien. me captas?? Ahora sí! ^_^ El servidor de latitud33.cl está comprobando que el dominio que envía existe o es válido. Muy a menudo se hace con una simple consulta DNS inversa (PTR). Como no encuentra el dominio enum-server.localdomain en la dirección IP desde donde se envía el mail pues no lo acepta. De aquí el 550 Sender verify failed (in reply to RCPT TO command). ¿Me explico? ¿Puedes pasar el log de los mails a gmail que sí funcionan? Sólo para intentar confirmar que se trata de eso, aunque si funciona bien no sé si saldremos de dudas... El 4 de marzo de 2014, 12:52, Francesc Guitart fguit...@gmx.com escribió: El 04/03/2014 16:15, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin escribió: enum-server.localdomain es el nombre de host donde envio el mail.esto funciona al enviar a una cuenta gmail pero no al envia a una cuenta del tipo cuentas.cl Si enum-server.localdomain es el nombre de host a donde envías el mail, ¿cómo es resulto este dominio en tu servidor de mail? .localdomain es, como su nombre indica, un dominio local y no resolvible en Internet a menos que lo añadas en /etc/hosts Si haces ping gmail.com funciona. Si haces ping yahoo.com también funciona. Si haces dig mx gmail.com resuelve bien. Si haces dig mx yahoo.com resuelve bien. En cambio ping enum-server.localdomain no funciona y dig
[CentOS-es] openvpn y centos
hola amigos tengo una consultaactualmente tengo mi servidor vpn funcionando en modo roadwarrior , pero me han solicitado que ahora se añada una toda una oficina remota a la sede¿como se podria hacer en este caso?¿se puede tener un servidor vpn en modo roadwarrior y en modo site to site? gracias ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] openvpn y centos
¿qué software de VPN usas? El 5 de marzo de 2014, 12:17, César C. arvega...@hotmail.com escribió: hola amigos tengo una consultaactualmente tengo mi servidor vpn funcionando en modo roadwarrior , pero me han solicitado que ahora se añada una toda una oficina remota a la sede¿como se podria hacer en este caso?¿se puede tener un servidor vpn en modo roadwarrior y en modo site to site? gracias ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] openvpn y centos
amigo uso openvpn Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 12:40:41 -0500 From: ebo...@gmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] openvpn y centos ¿qué software de VPN usas? El 5 de marzo de 2014, 12:17, César C. arvega...@hotmail.com escribió: hola amigos tengo una consultaactualmente tengo mi servidor vpn funcionando en modo roadwarrior , pero me han solicitado que ahora se añada una toda una oficina remota a la sede¿como se podria hacer en este caso?¿se puede tener un servidor vpn en modo roadwarrior y en modo site to site? gracias ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] openvpn y centos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/05/2014 12:44 PM, César C. wrote: hola amigos tengo una consultaactualmente tengo mi servidor vpn funcionando en modo roadwarrior , pero me han solicitado que ahora se añada una toda una oficina remota a la sede¿como se podria hacer en este caso?¿se puede tener un servidor vpn en modo roadwarrior y en modo site to site? gracias el funcionamiento de una vpn de red a red no es más que un caso especial de road warrior, estoy seguro sí podrías hacerlo saludos epe - -- Ernesto Pérez +593 9 9924 6504 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTF4SuAAoJEMcLM24mwCb62o0IAK6CaQZaodBGnCKNjvqgRdLa H4Ug3/wjSHD+LjYnamm4qvISGr/2uLhi39NQqhv5qqLxALB9CTBDmrTWgtCbdA26 lOQjKeh6XcLp4Yk1W052GRIMjdT+637iyLwSsxICdFOo/ReHzOw5eEYBK1mxzWAj QFu1WaIPV/kQpY896Xh/rDrc7PPVdSFvDsbQAgyEvP7Bh6xxYt2ydC0Iv8a8z+x4 uTQQSLG+a6mGWpY87S65PLANZyHn9W2/OaZJ2n/GFsoMC3cQ4y9fQcrViYu2JSkQ foOXFOwwb8BeUD0LRZluesVxXEoXlaI8uhoyyPs+OzZ/VI89h4pL23cvGz3myAE= =JRW0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] openvpn y centos
hola gracias por responder a mi pregunta,una consulta mas ¿se usa el mismo archivo de configuración vpn?la idea es que ese mismo servidor sea servidor vpn roadwarrior y sede de un site to site gracias Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 15:10:23 -0500 From: ernesto.pe...@cedia.org.ec To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] openvpn y centos -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/05/2014 12:44 PM, César C. wrote: hola amigos tengo una consultaactualmente tengo mi servidor vpn funcionando en modo roadwarrior , pero me han solicitado que ahora se añada una toda una oficina remota a la sede¿como se podria hacer en este caso?¿se puede tener un servidor vpn en modo roadwarrior y en modo site to site? gracias el funcionamiento de una vpn de red a red no es más que un caso especial de road warrior, estoy seguro sí podrías hacerlo saludos epe - -- Ernesto Pérez +593 9 9924 6504 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTF4SuAAoJEMcLM24mwCb62o0IAK6CaQZaodBGnCKNjvqgRdLa H4Ug3/wjSHD+LjYnamm4qvISGr/2uLhi39NQqhv5qqLxALB9CTBDmrTWgtCbdA26 lOQjKeh6XcLp4Yk1W052GRIMjdT+637iyLwSsxICdFOo/ReHzOw5eEYBK1mxzWAj QFu1WaIPV/kQpY896Xh/rDrc7PPVdSFvDsbQAgyEvP7Bh6xxYt2ydC0Iv8a8z+x4 uTQQSLG+a6mGWpY87S65PLANZyHn9W2/OaZJ2n/GFsoMC3cQ4y9fQcrViYu2JSkQ foOXFOwwb8BeUD0LRZluesVxXEoXlaI8uhoyyPs+OzZ/VI89h4pL23cvGz3myAE= =JRW0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] openvpn y centos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/05/2014 03:14 PM, César C. wrote: hola gracias por responder a mi pregunta,una consulta mas ¿se usa el mismo archivo de configuración vpn?la idea es que ese mismo servidor sea servidor vpn roadwarrior y sede de un site to site gracias sí, el mismo fundamentalmente, tan sólo se le indica que cuando se conecte el client2 (por ejemplo) levante una ruta hacia la red interna de él... este client2 es el cliente (en mi ejemplo) que tiene una red detrás (por eso es una conexión red a red y no red a host) http://www.ecualug.org/?q=2007/02/07/comos/3_configuracion_de_openvpn_red_red - -- Ernesto Pérez +593 9 9924 6504 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTF4rRAAoJEMcLM24mwCb6wtgH/04FcSV/v/TWfug2PoDW5n/g 3cu8KJbUSQG47nDVoh6LIBq0rgCzDtM1eIp/c31wTKOatCwSVL052mxwtsbZr3gr AvrbiU8oECKFWhssPqGpuQ4iYdNXCYNqUJpmFEP/pPUrUHYuBKWr205dB+Fut9p8 EbmNFWpiVrw59zyml6GpcMY5ZMcfZe42NeBEUPfHXM6VIPl0KrFwE74o8932PCdE 8IjcaAtnU34ctzdfp6YDsTcgOGy2S8kDSjniDiuUp0wJJPp5XCE6yeyf8bapz6sE rIyG8WI6tJG0uiSOExsFrvVhyvs8WoE/xdhQIc2fQdNFsEAAjgk+wvILj/P87Ug= =bwUI -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] openvpn y centos
gracias amigo, lo hice como está en el enlace y funcionó. Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 15:36:33 -0500 From: ernesto.pe...@cedia.org.ec To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] openvpn y centos -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/05/2014 03:14 PM, César C. wrote: hola gracias por responder a mi pregunta,una consulta mas ¿se usa el mismo archivo de configuración vpn?la idea es que ese mismo servidor sea servidor vpn roadwarrior y sede de un site to site gracias sí, el mismo fundamentalmente, tan sólo se le indica que cuando se conecte el client2 (por ejemplo) levante una ruta hacia la red interna de él... este client2 es el cliente (en mi ejemplo) que tiene una red detrás (por eso es una conexión red a red y no red a host) http://www.ecualug.org/?q=2007/02/07/comos/3_configuracion_de_openvpn_red_red - -- Ernesto Pérez +593 9 9924 6504 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTF4rRAAoJEMcLM24mwCb6wtgH/04FcSV/v/TWfug2PoDW5n/g 3cu8KJbUSQG47nDVoh6LIBq0rgCzDtM1eIp/c31wTKOatCwSVL052mxwtsbZr3gr AvrbiU8oECKFWhssPqGpuQ4iYdNXCYNqUJpmFEP/pPUrUHYuBKWr205dB+Fut9p8 EbmNFWpiVrw59zyml6GpcMY5ZMcfZe42NeBEUPfHXM6VIPl0KrFwE74o8932PCdE 8IjcaAtnU34ctzdfp6YDsTcgOGy2S8kDSjniDiuUp0wJJPp5XCE6yeyf8bapz6sE rIyG8WI6tJG0uiSOExsFrvVhyvs8WoE/xdhQIc2fQdNFsEAAjgk+wvILj/P87Ug= =bwUI -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Ayuda Rutas
Hola amigos un saludo a todos por molestarles con un peque problema haber si me pueden guiar con mi problema, paso a explicar Tengo un servidor centos 5.10 con 3 tarjetas de red, presta servicio dhcp proxy firewall y adicional esta conectado a un equipo que tiene un tunel de datos con otra oficina. El equipo al cuál está conectado el servidor linux tiene varias interfaces de red e internamente tiene vlans para dar el servicio de internet y el servicio del tunel datos, actualmente este equipo tiene asignado la ip 192.168.0.3 en la una oficina y en al otra oficina tiene la ip 172.25.144.3, desde la oficina con al ip 172 puedo hacer ping a la ip 192.168.0.3 sin problemas. Para poder llegar a los equipos con la ip 172 tengo creada esta ruta route add -net 172.25.144.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.0.3 eth2 Cuando activo esta interfaz de red (eth2) y creo la ruta puedo hacer ping a la ip 172.25.144.3 pero me quedo sin internet en mi servidor, he hablado con el proveedor y ellos me dicen que no es probloema de ellos sino mio he realizado algunas pruebas pero en todas cuando activo la interfaz eth2 me quedo sin internet. Acá el resumen de mis tarjetas eth0 = ip del isp 181.XX.XX.XX eth1 = ip local de la red 192.168.0.1 eth2= ip tunel de datos 192.168.0.4 puerta de enlace 192.168.0.3 Gracias a todos los que puedan ayudarme en este dilema Saludos César ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS] maraidb for el6
hi, i put together a mariadb rpm for el6. it seem to be much more complicated then i thought. the sources was: - Karanbir's mariadb for centos6 5.5.29 http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/mariadb/ unfortunately the link disappear a few days ago but i've got the src.rpm - rhel7 mariadb-5.5.33a-3.el7.src.rpm - fedora's mariadb-5.5.35-4.fc21.src.rpm - rhel6's scl's mariadb55-mariadb-5.5.35-1.1.el6.src.rpm the problem doesn't seems to complicated but after a few hours i hope we created a good rpm which can update the previous el6's mysql packages. the packages are here: http://lfarkas.org/linux/packages/redhat/6/mariadb/ regards. -- Levente Si vis pacem para bellum! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] maraidb for el6
Le 05/03/2014 10:35, Farkas Levente a écrit : hi, i put together a mariadb rpm for el6. it seem to be much more complicated then i thought. the sources was: - Karanbir's mariadb for centos6 5.5.29 http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/mariadb/ unfortunately the link disappear a few days ago but i've got the src.rpm - rhel7 mariadb-5.5.33a-3.el7.src.rpm - fedora's mariadb-5.5.35-4.fc21.src.rpm - rhel6's scl's mariadb55-mariadb-5.5.35-1.1.el6.src.rpm the problem doesn't seems to complicated but after a few hours i hope we created a good rpm which can update the previous el6's mysql packages. the packages are here: http://lfarkas.org/linux/packages/redhat/6/mariadb/ regards. just wondering, was something wrong with the version in centos SCL? http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/SCL ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 109, Issue 1
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2014:0247 Important CentOS 5 gnutls Update (Johnny Hughes)
2. CESA-2014:0249 Important CentOS 5 postgresql Update
(Johnny Hughes)
3. CESA-2014:0246 Important CentOS 6 gnutls Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 20:51:10 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:0247 Important CentOS 5 gnutls
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20140304205110.ga4...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0247 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0247.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
b603b43caa97ad8272ce87f1f736a29d87ecdc10564ff93bfdf5d46b8c2e4bd7
gnutls-1.4.1-14.el5_10.i386.rpm
effe174cb91c216f5408f5d47ebb65c890857ae2af40b73e984bd1fe123a1837
gnutls-devel-1.4.1-14.el5_10.i386.rpm
7ef92c37156065ade2d3413864939f1c44990869115cd44c5e55a5a6d9fd5b8c
gnutls-utils-1.4.1-14.el5_10.i386.rpm
x86_64:
b603b43caa97ad8272ce87f1f736a29d87ecdc10564ff93bfdf5d46b8c2e4bd7
gnutls-1.4.1-14.el5_10.i386.rpm
54562c8761782be33c37ab9eb5a33789832564bb1873b1a9714bf3572a217812
gnutls-1.4.1-14.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
effe174cb91c216f5408f5d47ebb65c890857ae2af40b73e984bd1fe123a1837
gnutls-devel-1.4.1-14.el5_10.i386.rpm
c5d0d8dcf71258e9d7d3d04b1aab4a30b21b8742f9aa2268b7fc945f9a668527
gnutls-devel-1.4.1-14.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
bb33be46e58222f0d8460e5c5ff78a178a485083985ce60bb39ddc4504c97546
gnutls-utils-1.4.1-14.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
Source:
3d326f124ce342e939e50b5c6ab60a9e279749255d08dbd22a150dcec97fb7a8
gnutls-1.4.1-14.el5_10.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 20:53:33 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:0249 Important CentOS 5
postgresql Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20140304205333.ga4...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0249 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0249.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
894c94c7e573d62e918cf3f95f9904e8441967a7afa4d9e5da0cf7313196ba45
postgresql-8.1.23-10.el5_10.i386.rpm
a5e79a931c84b10e9ed95dfc3e432f524478d685aba649b5e3ae46cfbb61188e
postgresql-contrib-8.1.23-10.el5_10.i386.rpm
010f7d6cc661d1dc860a6f4e2314f687eba487ceec3e563e648d36d99cd350ef
postgresql-devel-8.1.23-10.el5_10.i386.rpm
df0fca46734d16893d56daa347957be266a77a97341287805cc5f3e267911c55
postgresql-docs-8.1.23-10.el5_10.i386.rpm
388adb0d066a739100ee0eeebdb19ec8abc901d69651b328eb755146f4d9839d
postgresql-libs-8.1.23-10.el5_10.i386.rpm
15e21759caffd8bc8ff564876e663245af2347db08dc252cb9ad20c8834a237a
postgresql-pl-8.1.23-10.el5_10.i386.rpm
0681ac65140792eefbb2d12f07dc622cb36758be14c62cd2305e980669088fd9
postgresql-python-8.1.23-10.el5_10.i386.rpm
47d7334e6fc5aca0f54282bfe663a9fb33c80ea34728c1c2cc4da9be95728ff0
postgresql-server-8.1.23-10.el5_10.i386.rpm
4649f6d53783d7884f98b0f78571d5277db34379454b7b80253dace680e7
postgresql-tcl-8.1.23-10.el5_10.i386.rpm
9cadc0ae8650bec9a3a001a31cfe373a6c36a96f388b2ea5a936d9ece22af998
postgresql-test-8.1.23-10.el5_10.i386.rpm
x86_64:
442e06662ef0aae4b9c203b99c5c5f30ec224c234d6e37c05a0298b5650aa87b
postgresql-8.1.23-10.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
60931c05ab967054a3fe578ba1c5f11e11780001ebc90ac40d0f125c29575281
postgresql-contrib-8.1.23-10.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
010f7d6cc661d1dc860a6f4e2314f687eba487ceec3e563e648d36d99cd350ef
postgresql-devel-8.1.23-10.el5_10.i386.rpm
e19f5873032e4b87e55726933a65ad04015941140506bb142ba13eae5602510c
postgresql-devel-8.1.23-10.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
21dba37edd94d324cf4ea513f3c2008f16c33810b16ac0b115f4a0e0b8ad9541
postgresql-docs-8.1.23-10.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
388adb0d066a739100ee0eeebdb19ec8abc901d69651b328eb755146f4d9839d
postgresql-libs-8.1.23-10.el5_10.i386.rpm
12976a0ae6517bd30e379b478349d6a4878dd48b0b2f713d293b863792ea8668
postgresql-libs-8.1.23-10.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
063f8c059736d94e55b1a30e588c54443bac5632e2346aaaf6af1330b00a26d8
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 install
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:00:08PM -0500, Kenny Noe wrote: Mark, My apologies for your frustration However I don't see a way to bottom post my replies. FYI... I'm using gmail. Are you saying the gmail interface gives no way to click at the place where you want to type? Here is my favorite example of top posting and why it is bad. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? Good example. Stop it! :-) -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 // ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 install
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:00:08PM -0500, Kenny Noe wrote: Mark, My apologies for your frustration However I don't see a way to bottom post my replies. FYI... I'm using gmail. Are you saying the gmail interface gives no way to click at the place where you want to type? Since nobody has actually mentioned a solution for him (specifically that he's not seeing how to not top post; or at least I haven't noticed one, sorry if I missed and this is just redundant): in the gmail web interface, you'll want to look for the grayed out boxed ellipsis in the mail as you start to respond (it'll look something like [...]), hover over it, it'll say 'show trimmed text', click that and you'll see the entirety of the email message and you can bottom post your response.like I did for this one. -- Even the Magic 8 ball has an opinion on email clients: Outlook not so good. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 install
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:43 AM, zGreenfelder zgreenfel...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:00:08PM -0500, Kenny Noe wrote: Mark, My apologies for your frustration However I don't see a way to bottom post my replies. FYI... I'm using gmail. Are you saying the gmail interface gives no way to click at the place where you want to type? Since nobody has actually mentioned a solution for him (specifically that he's not seeing how to not top post; or at least I haven't noticed one, sorry if I missed and this is just redundant): in the gmail web interface, you'll want to look for the grayed out boxed ellipsis in the mail as you start to respond (it'll look something like [...]), hover over it, it'll say 'show trimmed text', click that and you'll see the entirety of the email message and you can bottom post your response.like I did for this one. -- Even the Magic 8 ball has an opinion on email clients: Outlook not so good. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Ok thanks to all for showing me the errors of my ways grin --Kenny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Replace failed disk in raid
Hello list A disk, part of a raid failed and I have to replace it. My problem is the swap partition which is in raid0. The rest partitions are in raid1 and I successfully removed them. The partition in swap cant removed because is probably active. How can I stop swap and remove partition? After replacing the faulty disk and rebuilt how I start swap again? Thank you in advance Nikos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replace failed disk in raid
On 03/05/2014 02:55 PM, Nikos Gatsis - Qbit wrote: Hello list A disk, part of a raid failed and I have to replace it. My problem is the swap partition which is in raid0. The rest partitions are in raid1 and I successfully removed them. The partition in swap cant removed because is probably active. How can I stop swap and remove partition? swapoff -a After replacing the faulty disk and rebuilt how I start swap again? swapon -a ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replace failed disk in raid
From: Nikos Gatsis - Qbit ngat...@qbit.gr How can I stop swap and remove partition? After replacing the faulty disk and rebuilt how I start swap again? # apropos swap | grep '(8)' JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replace failed disk in raid
On 5/3/2014 3:59 μμ, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 05.03.2014 14:55, schrieb Nikos Gatsis - Qbit: A disk, part of a raid failed and I have to replace it. My problem is the swap partition which is in raid0. The rest partitions are in raid1 and I successfully removed them. The partition in swap cant removed because is probably active. How can I stop swap and remove partition? After replacing the faulty disk and rebuilt how I start swap again? man swapoff I have run swapoff and swap stop, but I cant still remove partition from raid0. Should I stop md also? Thank you. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 install
On Tue, March 4, 2014 19:00, Kenny Noe wrote: Mark, My apologies for your frustration However I don't see a way to bottom post my replies. FYI... I'm using gmail. Respectfully --Kenny The top-post controversy B.S. is an affectation of the technocratii. Most business correspondence, in other words the vast majority of written communication, uses top post responses because that makes more sense in basic communication between two correspondents. It is hardly surprising then that most business communication software does exactly that. Technical mailing lists members generally prefer bottom posting because it allows casual readers to re-establish often complex contexts in the middle of an exchange when such are interleaved with multiple complex discussion threads. But, the amount of correspondence delivered through mailing lists is vanishingly small when compared to the total volume of written electronic communication. Thus, in the grand scheme of things, I categorise complainants about top posting with the same class of people that want the fork on the right and the knife on the left, or vice versa; in other words, too trivial to matter and not worth bothering about. That said, it does make sense to follow the bottom post convention on mailing list discussions because it does aid readers in following the discussion thread and thus increases the likely hood of a meaningful response. Think of it in terms of a television serial that begins with: Last time on X we left our heroes . . . -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replace failed disk in raid
On 05.03.2014 15:31, Nikos Gatsis - Qbit wrote: On 5/3/2014 3:59 μμ, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 05.03.2014 14:55, schrieb Nikos Gatsis - Qbit: A disk, part of a raid failed and I have to replace it. My problem is the swap partition which is in raid0. The rest partitions are in raid1 and I successfully removed them. The partition in swap cant removed because is probably active. How can I stop swap and remove partition? After replacing the faulty disk and rebuilt how I start swap again? man swapoff I have run swapoff and swap stop, but I cant still remove partition from raid0. Should I stop md also? Thank you. You need to be more exact when describe what you are doing and what the result is. I have run swapoff and swap stop What where the exact commands and arguments you used and what was the output? Did you verify that the swap was actually disabled after running these commands? cant still remove partition from raid0 What commands and arguments did you run to remove the drive? What was the result? Regards, Dennis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] where can download CENTOS 5.X????
CENTOS.org can web page design. I can not find anywhere to download CENTOS 5.X version. Can anyone point me to the location? Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] where can download CENTOS 5.X????
On 05/03/14 10:10 AM, mcclnx mcc wrote: CENTOS.org can web page design. I can not find anywhere to download CENTOS 5.X version. Can anyone point me to the location? Thanks. http://vault.centos.org/ -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] where can download CENTOS 5.X????
On 5 March 2014 10:10, mcclnx mcc mcc...@yahoo.com.tw wrote: CENTOS.org can web page design. I can not find anywhere to download CENTOS 5.X version. Can anyone point me to the location? Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I can see it in the following link [0], let me know if this helps [0] http://wiki.centos.org/Download -- Kind Regards Earl Ramirez ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 + Quagga + SELinux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/2014 07:56 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
Hello All,
Does anyone happen to be running Quagga on CentOS 5 with SELinux in
enforcing mode? Have you had to create SELinux policies or did it just
work out of the box?
(I'll get around to building this out on CentOS 6 as well.)
I'm simply trying to write my config (for the zebra daemon) and it can't
be written...
Looks like this bug from Fedora 8 in 2008 [0] remains (or one similar to
it spawned). And the problem was present in 2010 per the CentOS forums
[1].
I'm not opposed to creating SELinux policies and I may do just that (or
run around in Permissive mode!). But it'd be awesome if upstream included
policies for quagga since quagga is software they package.
Maybe Dan Walsh will hop in on this. ;-)
[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429252 [1]
https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=21040
type=AVC msg=audit(1393980136.848:15): avc: denied { add_name } for
pid=2646 comm=zebra name=zebra.conf.CxNsyz
scontext=root:system_r:zebra_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:zebra_conf_t:s0 tclass=dir type=SYSCALL
msg=audit(1393980136.848:15): arch=4003 syscall=5 success=no exit=-13
a0=8512960 a1=c2 a2=180 a3=1e6a6 items=0 ppid=1 pid=2646 auid=0 uid=92
gid=92 euid=92 suid=92 fsuid=92 egid=92 sgid=92 fsgid=92 tty=(none) ses=1
comm=zebra exe=/usr/sbin/zebra subj=root:system_r:zebra_t:s0
key=(null)
~]# ls -Z /etc/quagga/ -rw-r--r-- root root
system_u:object_r:zebra_conf_t bgpd.conf.sample -rw-r--r-- root root
system_u:object_r:zebra_conf_t bgpd.conf.sample2 -rw-r--r-- root root
system_u:object_r:zebra_conf_t ospf6d.conf.sample -rw-r--r-- root root
system_u:object_r:zebra_conf_t ospfd.conf.sample -rw-r--r-- root root
system_u:object_r:zebra_conf_t ripd.conf.sample -rw-r--r-- root root
system_u:object_r:zebra_conf_t ripngd.conf.sample -rw-r- quagga
quaggavt root:object_r:zebra_conf_t vtysh.conf -rwxr-x--- quagga
quaggavt system_u:object_r:zebra_conf_t vtysh.conf.sample -rw---
quagga quagga root:object_r:zebra_conf_t zebra.conf -rw-r--r--
root root system_u:object_r:zebra_conf_t zebra.conf.sample -rw-r-
quagga quaggavt root:object_r:zebra_conf_t zebra.conf.sav
Does
setsebool -P zebra_write_conf 1
Fix your problem?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlMXQGMACgkQrlYvE4MpobOeiQCg53V7Sgi63GRsc8TMJIvnTg/J
FJMAn3ZpuvheeSodlzoikHyc+xJVPyqh
=biiO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 + Quagga + SELinux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/2014 07:56 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
Hello All,
Does anyone happen to be running Quagga on CentOS 5 with SELinux in
enforcing mode? Have you had to create SELinux policies or did it just
work out of the box?
(I'll get around to building this out on CentOS 6 as well.)
I'm simply trying to write my config (for the zebra daemon) and it can't
be written...
Looks like this bug from Fedora 8 in 2008 [0] remains (or one similar to
it spawned). And the problem was present in 2010 per the CentOS forums
[1].
I'm not opposed to creating SELinux policies and I may do just that (or
run around in Permissive mode!). But it'd be awesome if upstream included
policies for quagga since quagga is software they package.
Maybe Dan Walsh will hop in on this. ;-)
[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429252 [1]
https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=21040
type=AVC msg=audit(1393980136.848:15): avc: denied { add_name } for
pid=2646 comm=zebra name=zebra.conf.CxNsyz
scontext=root:system_r:zebra_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:zebra_conf_t:s0 tclass=dir type=SYSCALL
msg=audit(1393980136.848:15): arch=4003 syscall=5 success=no exit=-13
a0=8512960 a1=c2 a2=180 a3=1e6a6 items=0 ppid=1 pid=2646 auid=0 uid=92
gid=92 euid=92 suid=92 fsuid=92 egid=92 sgid=92 fsgid=92 tty=(none) ses=1
comm=zebra exe=/usr/sbin/zebra subj=root:system_r:zebra_t:s0
key=(null)
~]# ls -Z /etc/quagga/ -rw-r--r-- root root
system_u:object_r:zebra_conf_t bgpd.conf.sample -rw-r--r-- root root
system_u:object_r:zebra_conf_t bgpd.conf.sample2 -rw-r--r-- root root
system_u:object_r:zebra_conf_t ospf6d.conf.sample -rw-r--r-- root root
system_u:object_r:zebra_conf_t ospfd.conf.sample -rw-r--r-- root root
system_u:object_r:zebra_conf_t ripd.conf.sample -rw-r--r-- root root
system_u:object_r:zebra_conf_t ripngd.conf.sample -rw-r- quagga
quaggavt root:object_r:zebra_conf_t vtysh.conf -rwxr-x--- quagga
quaggavt system_u:object_r:zebra_conf_t vtysh.conf.sample -rw---
quagga quagga root:object_r:zebra_conf_t zebra.conf -rw-r--r--
root root system_u:object_r:zebra_conf_t zebra.conf.sample -rw-r-
quagga quaggavt root:object_r:zebra_conf_t zebra.conf.sav
man zebra_selinux
...
If you want to allow zebra daemon to write it configuration files, you
must turn on the zebra_write_config boolean. Disabled by default.
setsebool -P zebra_write_config 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlMXQJUACgkQrlYvE4MpobMV3wCbBlasOQtoQWQZ1dchVAPTgWz0
xe4AoIimsQko9yw3qXzwyNTF2J0Reish
=NCas
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 install
Kenny Noe wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:43 AM, zGreenfelder zgreenfel...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:00:08PM -0500, Kenny Noe wrote: My apologies for your frustration However I don't see a way to bottom post my replies. FYI... I'm using gmail. Are you saying the gmail interface gives no way to click at the place where you want to type? Since nobody has actually mentioned a solution for him (specifically that he's not seeing how to not top post; or at least I haven't noticed one, sorry if I missed and this is just redundant): Since I've never used gmail (and refuse to ever do so), I don't know the interface... other that to note that *all* webmail ranges from mostly useable (I'm using squirrelmail here at work for my own account) to utterly lousy (i.e., Lookout, er, Outlook Web Access). in the gmail web interface, you'll want to look for the grayed out boxed ellipsis in the mail as you start to respond (it'll look something like [...]), hover over it, it'll say 'show trimmed text', click that and you'll see the entirety of the email message and you can bottom post your response.like I did for this one. Ok thanks to all for showing me the errors of my ways grin Hallelujah, brethren and sistran, he has Seen the Light, and come to the True Unix Way g mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] where can download CENTOS 5.X????
From: mcclnx mcc mcc...@yahoo.com.tw CENTOS.org can web page design. I can not find anywhere to download CENTOS 5.X version. Can anyone point me to the location? On the CentOS homepage, click on Get CentOS Linux Now. Then click on the alternative downloads link... JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] maraidb for el6
On 03/05/2014 03:43 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: Le 05/03/2014 10:35, Farkas Levente a écrit : hi, i put together a mariadb rpm for el6. it seem to be much more complicated then i thought. the sources was: - Karanbir's mariadb for centos6 5.5.29 http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/mariadb/ unfortunately the link disappear a few days ago but i've got the src.rpm - rhel7 mariadb-5.5.33a-3.el7.src.rpm - fedora's mariadb-5.5.35-4.fc21.src.rpm - rhel6's scl's mariadb55-mariadb-5.5.35-1.1.el6.src.rpm the problem doesn't seems to complicated but after a few hours i hope we created a good rpm which can update the previous el6's mysql packages. the packages are here: http://lfarkas.org/linux/packages/redhat/6/mariadb/ regards. just wondering, was something wrong with the version in centos SCL? http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/SCL This should be the one CentOS users use ... it will be maintained for the lifetime of Software Collections for RHEL. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 + Quagga + SELinux
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Does setsebool -P zebra_write_conf 1 Fix your problem? So far I ran: setsebool -P allow_zebra_write_config=1 ( per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429252#c1 ) I'll run your different command this evening and see what I get. Thanks for pointing out there is a zebra_selinux manpage in your second reply ... I was ignorant to its existence. :-/ -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 // ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 + Quagga + SELinux
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote: man zebra_selinux ... If you want to allow zebra daemon to write it configuration files, you must turn on the zebra_write_config boolean. Disabled by default. setsebool -P zebra_write_config 1 Is there some global registration facility for selinux context names or are you the only one that knows them all? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] maraidb for el6
On 03/05/2014 10:43 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: Le 05/03/2014 10:35, Farkas Levente a écrit : hi, i put together a mariadb rpm for el6. it seem to be much more complicated then i thought. the sources was: - Karanbir's mariadb for centos6 5.5.29 http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/mariadb/ unfortunately the link disappear a few days ago but i've got the src.rpm - rhel7 mariadb-5.5.33a-3.el7.src.rpm - fedora's mariadb-5.5.35-4.fc21.src.rpm - rhel6's scl's mariadb55-mariadb-5.5.35-1.1.el6.src.rpm the problem doesn't seems to complicated but after a few hours i hope we created a good rpm which can update the previous el6's mysql packages. the packages are here: http://lfarkas.org/linux/packages/redhat/6/mariadb/ regards. just wondering, was something wrong with the version in centos SCL? http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/SCL actually all of them has a few bugs. see my bz about the bugs : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069586 on the other hand scl rpm is not a real replacement for mysql rather then a parallel installable package. -- Levente Si vis pacem para bellum! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] gnutls bug
I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages?I see the updated source file here: http://vault.centos.org/6.5/updates/Source/SPackages/ But I don't see the correct version of the packages in the 6.4 tree here: http://vault.centos.org/6.4/updates/x86_64/Packages/ Where should I be looking for the updated package for 6.4? Thanks. -- -MichaelC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] gnutls bug
On 03/06/2014 10:19 AM, Michael Coffman wrote: I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages?I see the updated source file here: http://vault.centos.org/6.5/updates/Source/SPackages/ But I don't see the correct version of the packages in the 6.4 tree here: http://vault.centos.org/6.4/updates/x86_64/Packages/ Where should I be looking for the updated package for 6.4? 6.4 is EOL, there will not be any updated packages. If you update (yum update) then you will be on 6.5 and that will have the latest version. Note that the latest binary releases are not in vault (as vault is for older archived stuff). Peter ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] gnutls bug
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:19:26 -0700 Michael Coffman wrote: Where should I be looking for the updated package for 6.4? yum update should bring your system up to the current Centos release which includes the gnutls fix. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] gnutls bug
On 3/5/2014 1:19 PM, Michael Coffman wrote: I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages?I see the updated source file here: http://vault.centos.org/6.5/updates/Source/SPackages/ But I don't see the correct version of the packages in the 6.4 tree here: http://vault.centos.org/6.4/updates/x86_64/Packages/ Where should I be looking for the updated package for 6.4? 6.4 is CentOS 6 without any updates since March last year. http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6/updates/x86_64/Packages/ is where you should be looking for updates to centos6. once 6.5 is packaged, no more updates are released to 6.4, the updates are to '6' and bring you up to 6.5+ -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] gnutls bug
On 05.03.2014 22:19, Michael Coffman wrote: I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages?I see the updated source file here: http://vault.centos.org/6.5/updates/Source/SPackages/ But I don't see the correct version of the packages in the 6.4 tree here: http://vault.centos.org/6.4/updates/x86_64/Packages/ Where should I be looking for the updated package for 6.4? There never will be any. 6.4 and 6.5 are not independent installations of the system and you simply have to upgrade to 6.5 to get fixes. Regards, Dennis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 install
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:25 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Since I've never used gmail (and refuse to ever do so), I don't know the interface... other that to note that *all* webmail ranges from mostly useable (I'm using squirrelmail here at work for my own account) to utterly lousy (i.e., Lookout, er, Outlook Web Access). Heh. If you use gmail's web interface, you don't even care about how someone responds. It will automatically hide the parts you've already seen, regardless of how they are quoted or whether they are above/below the new parts. It replaces them with ellipses (...) that you can click to expand in case you've forgotten the context, and it (optionally) places the message in its thread context with the posts you have already read collapsed, but likewise easily expanded. And of course if you need to find something that isn't already arranged to be a click away you can search for it. Google knows how to search. Also, I'm willing to bet that that Outlook Web server that you are ranting about is the decade+ old 2003 version. The 2010 version is not bad at all (and I say that reluctantly, not being a big MS fan in general). Sometimes newer is better. Especially 10 years newer. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 install
Les Mikesell wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:25 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Since I've never used gmail (and refuse to ever do so), I don't know the interface... other that to note that *all* webmail ranges from mostly useable (I'm using squirrelmail here at work for my own account) to utterly lousy (i.e., Lookout, er, Outlook Web Access). Heh. If you use gmail's web interface, you don't even care about how someone responds. It will automatically hide the parts you've already seen, regardless of how they are quoted or whether they are above/below the new parts. It replaces them with ellipses (...) that Oh, what a wonderful interface... for folks who have no memory, or care where a conversation's been. Thanks for giving me another reason (I should want to search inside an email that's maybe 40 or 60 lines long, to see what someone said?) that I *never* want to use it. snip Also, I'm willing to bet that that Outlook Web server that you are ranting about is the decade+ old 2003 version. The 2010 version is not bad at all (and I say that reluctantly, not being a big MS fan in general). Sometimes newer is better. Especially 10 years newer. Nope, they've upgraded us to 2010 last year. The one good thing is that they seem to have gotten rid of the vile ActiveX controls in the calendar, and I now can see and turn off the send reminders every 15 min by default when I've scheduled vacation time w/ my manager in firefox, rather than having to go home, and fire up the work WonDoze laptop. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Full screen in Dual Monitor setup.
This question is related to Centos 6.4 running on workstations with dual monitors attached using Nvidia drivers, twinview mode. We've gotten stuck on a window manager specific issue with getting 'vncviewer' (tigervnc) to go full screen to both monitors. If Gnome is the window manager, we have no issues. Hitting F8 in vncviewer and selecting full screen expands the viewer across both displays as expected. If KDE is the window manager, vncviewer will only expand to completely fill one of the two displays, even if the 'vncviewr' option enable full-screen over all monitors is enabled. In the Multiple Monitors system settings all options are enabled, suggesting that multiple monitor full screen mode should be working. Any thoughts on how to get full screen to work across both displays properly on KDE? Extra information: VNC: tigervnc-1.3.0-16.el6.x86_64 (issue is seen with stock tigervnc-1.1.0-5.el6.x86_64.rpm) Nvidia driver packages installed: kmod-nvidia-310.44-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64 nvidia-x11-drv-310.44-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64 Ray Frush Either you are part of the solution T:970.288.6223 or part of the precipitate. -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*- Avago Technologies | APD Technical Computing | IT Engineer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] gnutls bug
Thanks for the helpful replies. Guess I'll build it myself. On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de wrote: On 05.03.2014 22:19, Michael Coffman wrote: I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages? I see the updated source file here: http://vault.centos.org/6.5/updates/Source/SPackages/ But I don't see the correct version of the packages in the 6.4 tree here: http://vault.centos.org/6.4/updates/x86_64/Packages/ Where should I be looking for the updated package for 6.4? There never will be any. 6.4 and 6.5 are not independent installations of the system and you simply have to upgrade to 6.5 to get fixes. Regards, Dennis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- -MichaelC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 install
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:58 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Heh. If you use gmail's web interface, you don't even care about how someone responds. It will automatically hide the parts you've already seen, regardless of how they are quoted or whether they are above/below the new parts. It replaces them with ellipses (...) that Oh, what a wonderful interface... for folks who have no memory, or care where a conversation's been. I don't think you get it. It caters exactly to both of those situations. The things you have already read are conveniently out of the way, assuming that you'll remember them and not want to waste the screen space - yet displayed at a click without a full screen redraw if you want them. Thanks for giving me another reason (I should want to search inside an email that's maybe 40 or 60 lines long, to see what someone said?) that I *never* want to use it. No, the search is for other things that might be anywhere in your mailbox or subfolders. Remember just a few words? - no problem. Want messages in threads you have responded to before but might have missed the last reply back? - easy, and fast. Also, I'm willing to bet that that Outlook Web server that you are ranting about is the decade+ old 2003 version. The 2010 version is not bad at all (and I say that reluctantly, not being a big MS fan in general). Sometimes newer is better. Especially 10 years newer. Nope, they've upgraded us to 2010 last year. The one good thing is that they seem to have gotten rid of the vile ActiveX controls in the calendar, and I now can see and turn off the send reminders every 15 min by default when I've scheduled vacation time w/ my manager in firefox, rather than having to go home, and fire up the work WonDoze laptop. I find the 2010 version very usable from a Mac/firefox window with no ActiveX. I almost never bother firing up a vpn on a laptop to run outlook at home just for mail-related things. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] gnutls bug
On 3/5/2014 3:22 PM, Michael Coffman wrote: Thanks for the helpful replies. Guess I'll build it myself. what? why??? yum update gnutls *done* -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] gnutls bug
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Michael Coffman michael.coff...@avagotech.com wrote: Thanks for the helpful replies. Guess I'll build it myself. Why? 'yum update gnutls' will get it, bringing along only things specified as having version-specific dependencies if there are any. But it is generally a bad idea to let the rest of your system get out of date. Is there some reason you can't do a full 'yum update' to pick up the rest of the fixes? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] gnutls bug
Not sure what your environment looks like but the systems I manage are locked down and it's typically difficult to get them changed. We have hundreds of systems ( desktop, server and HPC systems) that are all the same rev with all the same packages. A large number of vendor packages and internally developed packages have to be re-qualified everytime anything is changed. So we don't change them often. On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:26 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 3/5/2014 3:22 PM, Michael Coffman wrote: Thanks for the helpful replies. Guess I'll build it myself. what? why??? yum update gnutls *done* -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- -MichaelC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] gnutls bug
On 3/5/2014 3:36 PM, Michael Coffman wrote: Not sure what your environment looks like but the systems I manage are locked down and it's typically difficult to get them changed. We have hundreds of systems ( desktop, server and HPC systems) that are all the same rev with all the same packages. A large number of vendor packages and internally developed packages have to be re-qualified everytime anything is changed. So we don't change them often. so you're a year behind on any security fixes why are you worried about this one, then? -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] gnutls bug
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:44 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 3/5/2014 3:36 PM, Michael Coffman wrote: Not sure what your environment looks like but the systems I manage are locked down and it's typically difficult to get them changed. We have hundreds of systems ( desktop, server and HPC systems) that are all the same rev with all the same packages. A large number of vendor packages and internally developed packages have to be re-qualified everytime anything is changed. So we don't change them often. so you're a year behind on any security fixes why are you worried about this one, then? This seems like it has more potentiol to impact users in my environment that are using a web browser to access sites outside our firewall. It seemed like a reasonable question to me as it looke like it might be easily updated. I did not realize that once the OS was vaulted, there were no more updates. Now I know so thanks... -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- -MichaelC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] gnutls bug
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Michael Coffman michael.coff...@avagotech.com wrote: so you're a year behind on any security fixes why are you worried about this one, then? This seems like it has more potentiol to impact users in my environment that are using a web browser to access sites outside our firewall. It seemed like a reasonable question to me as it looke like it might be easily updated. I did not realize that once the OS was vaulted, there were no more updates. Now I know so thanks... No, what everyone has said is that there _are_ updates, and yum knows how to get them, even selectively. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] gnutls bug
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:12:49PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Michael Coffman updated. I did not realize that once the OS was vaulted, there were no more updates. Now I know so thanks... No, what everyone has said is that there _are_ updates, and yum knows how to get them, even selectively. More to the point, 6.4 and 6.5 are just markers in the sand for CentOS 6. 6.5 is basically just a rebasing of the packages to make it easier to install; it's an accumulation of updates for 6.4 in an easy to digest form. If you stop thinking of 6.4 and 6.5 as different OS's but as the same OS but at different parts of their patch lifecycle then it becomes a lot simpler. -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] gnutls bug
- Original Message - From: Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 4:43:37 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] gnutls bug On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:12:49PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Michael Coffman updated. I did not realize that once the OS was vaulted, there were no more updates. Now I know so thanks... No, what everyone has said is that there _are_ updates, and yum knows how to get them, even selectively. More to the point, 6.4 and 6.5 are just markers in the sand for CentOS 6. 6.5 is basically just a rebasing of the packages to make it easier to install; it's an accumulation of updates for 6.4 in an easy to digest form. If you stop thinking of 6.4 and 6.5 as different OS's but as the same OS but at different parts of their patch lifecycle then it becomes a lot simpler. Perhaps a good analogy is with old and crusty WindowsXP. You have the original release of WindowsXP(CentOS 6.0), then came WindowsXP service pack1(centOS 6.1), then service pack2(centos 6.2), etc. The one big difference is that you can pick and choose exactly which packages that ship with CentOS get updated. So in your case all you would need to do is yum update gnutls and that would save you from having to compile from source. I have to ask though, How did you stand up an HPC cluster and individual CentOS nodes without learning how this works? David C. Miller ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replace failed disk in raid
On 2014-03-05, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr wrote: On 03/05/2014 02:55 PM, Nikos Gatsis - Qbit wrote: After replacing the faulty disk and rebuilt how I start swap again? swapon -a You'll probably also need to remake the swap space before doing swapon: mkswap /path/to/md/swap/device --keith -- kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] gnutls bug
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote: No, what everyone has said is that there _are_ updates, and yum knows how to get them, even selectively. More to the point, 6.4 and 6.5 are just markers in the sand for CentOS 6. 6.5 is basically just a rebasing of the packages to make it easier to install; it's an accumulation of updates for 6.4 in an easy to digest form. If you stop thinking of 6.4 and 6.5 as different OS's but as the same OS but at different parts of their patch lifecycle then it becomes a lot simpler. I think it is really just a quirk of centos package management where to be kind to the repository mirror sites they rebase what the repositories hold to be just the newest at each minor release (since that is what a yum update will pull anyway). That way the mirrors don't have to hold all of the old/intermediate package versions that are only kept in the vault repository. It is pretty much irrelevant to normal updates - you can update from any version to current, even just with specific packages. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] gnutls bug
Before you update anything, I suggest you run rpm -e --test gnutls If this complains about refers to more than one package then use rpm -e --test gnutls.i386 gnutls.x86_64 This will tell you what other packages depend on the gnutls library. It's probably fewer than you think, because RHEL/CentOS have openssl packages as well. We determined that for our servers we could simply remove gnutls (desktops are a different matter). (Ideally rpm -q --whatrequires would tell you this, but in fact it does not unless you know the magic string that fully names libgnutls.so...) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] gnutls bug
I have some sympathy for Michael. There are organisations which are so paranoid that they will not allow updates between eg 6.4 and 6.5, either because they insist on rigorous (ie lengthy and time consuming) regression testing of applications or because a third party package vendor specifies a particular level of OS for their product (I can think of at least two). Who has not been caught in the not supported here trap? You install a package from the OS supplier, and have an issue with it. You go to the forum for the package and get the response upgrade to the latest release, but the OS supplier will not support the OS if you upgrade the package to the latest release! Cheers, Cliff Cheers, Cliff On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote: On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:12:49PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Michael Coffman updated. I did not realize that once the OS was vaulted, there were no more updates. Now I know so thanks... No, what everyone has said is that there _are_ updates, and yum knows how to get them, even selectively. More to the point, 6.4 and 6.5 are just markers in the sand for CentOS 6. 6.5 is basically just a rebasing of the packages to make it easier to install; it's an accumulation of updates for 6.4 in an easy to digest form. If you stop thinking of 6.4 and 6.5 as different OS's but as the same OS but at different parts of their patch lifecycle then it becomes a lot simpler. -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
