Re: [CentOS] How to have more than on SELinux context on a directory

If I understand well, I could add a type to another type?!?!?! If that is the case, I did not know about it like many things in the SELinux world. It is so complex and so badly documented. :-( On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Александр Кириллов wrote: > Александр

Re: [CentOS] How to have more than on SELinux context on a directory

2016-07-06 14:30 GMT+03:00 Bernard Fay : > If I understand well, I could add a type to another type?!?!?! If that is > the case, I did not know about it like many things in the SELinux > world. It is so complex and so badly documented. :-( > > > Poorly? Just read the

Re: [CentOS] How to have more than on SELinux context on a directory

I can access /depot/tftp from a tftp client but unable to do it from a Windows client as long as SELinux is enforced. If SELinux is permissive I can access it then I know Samba is properly configured. # getenforce Enforcing # ls -dZ /depot/tftp/ drwxrwxrwx. root root

Re: [CentOS] .NET on Centos.

Hi, On 28/06/16 18:17, Peter Q. wrote: > Hi there, I was reading about it. > https://www.redhat.com/en/about/blog/net-core-now-available-and-supported-red-hat-enterprise-linux-and-red-hat-openshift > > What will happen with Centos and .NET? > In the side of security and stability. Great

Re: [CentOS] DHCP max-lease-time maximum

On 7/6/2016 1:27 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote: :) ... the long lease is for some Accesspoints which we dont like to configure static, just plug in and run. why not configure reservations for those access points? the downside of a really long lease time is if you have to change

Re: [CentOS] How to have more than on SELinux context on a directory

If I understand well, I could add a type to another type?!?!?! No. The default targeted policy is mostly about Type Enforcement. Quote from the manual: "All files and processes are labeled with a type: types define a SELinux domain for processes and a SELinux type for files. SELinux policy

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7 Screen black after boot

Hello, I have the same problem again today with CentOS-7. I re-installed with GNOME Desktop and also configured two VMs in it, all was working fine and i left the system locked overnight. When i tried to unlock the next day morning, screen only shows up black. Again, i cannot see the GUI. I can

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7 Screen black after boot

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:16:23 +1000 > Venkata Balaji N wrote: > > > i left the system locked overnight. > > What are you using to lock the screen? Some of the screensavers can be > bad news on certain video cards (as

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7 Screen black after boot

On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:16:23 +1000 Venkata Balaji N wrote: > i left the system locked overnight. What are you using to lock the screen? Some of the screensavers can be bad news on certain video cards (as I've learned the hard way) and can cause just exactly that to happen. In that case, the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7 Screen black after boot

Hi Venkata, Can you please let me know the steps which you have followed for re-installing the GNOME? I am having a similar problem on one of our system. Regards Hersh On 7 July 2016 at 06:26, Venkata Balaji N wrote: > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Frank Cox

[CentOS] arne303 scratch in the sleep-blackboxxxx- no money

___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7 Screen black after boot

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Hersh wrote: > Hi Venkata, > > Can you please let me know the steps which you have followed for > re-installing the GNOME? I am having a similar problem on one of our > system. > To my understanding, when you install centos-7 with options

Re: [CentOS] How to have more than on SELinux context on a directory

On 07/06/2016 04:30 AM, Bernard Fay wrote: It is so complex and so badly documented. It is fairly complex, but I don't think it's badly documented. http://selinuxproject.org/page/Main_Page ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

[CentOS] DHCP max-lease-time maximum

Hi, I m looking for the max value for max-lease-time. would 512640 seconds (1 year) work? Thanks . Götz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] DHCP max-lease-time maximum

To much work ;) every MAC I dont have to type counts. /G Am 06.07.16 um 10:31 schrieb Eero Volotinen: > How about static ip mapping on dhcp? > > Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] DHCP max-lease-time maximum

DHCP uses 16 to represent an infinite lease. Try if it's supported. Anyway, it's insane value as year lease time :) Eero 2016-07-06 11:22 GMT+03:00 Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator < goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de>: > Hi, > > I m looking for the max value for max-lease-time. would 512640

Re: [CentOS] DHCP max-lease-time maximum

:) ... the long lease is for some Accesspoints which we dont like to configure static, just plug in and run. /Götz Am 06.07.16 um 10:24 schrieb Eero Volotinen: > DHCP uses 16 to represent an infinite lease. Try if it's supported. > Anyway, it's insane value as year lease time :) > >

Re: [CentOS] DHCP max-lease-time maximum

How about static ip mapping on dhcp? Eero 2016-07-06 11:27 GMT+03:00 Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator < goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de>: > :) ... the long lease is for some Accesspoints which we dont like to > configure static, just plug in and run. > > /Götz > > Am 06.07.16 um 10:24 schrieb

Re: [CentOS] SELinux C7 audit

Il 05/07/2016 18:46, Gordon Messmer ha scritto: On 07/05/2016 08:21 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: What are the meaning of rules on pol.te https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SELinux The CentOS howto has some information, and links to additional resources. The policy should be pretty easy to read,

[CentOS-announce] Announcing Release for Gluster 3.8 on CentOS Linux 6 x86_64

We are happy to announce the General Availability of Gluster 3.8 for CentOS Linux 6. Earlier versions (3.6 and 3.7) are still available and will keep receiving updates until the upstream Gluster Community marks them End-Of-Life. GlusterFS 3.8 brings many improvements and new functionalities.

[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2016:1388 CentOS 7 tzdata Enhancement Update

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2016:1388 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-1388.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2016:1388 CentOS 6 tzdata Enhancement Update

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2016:1388 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-1388.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] Announcing Release for Gluster 3.8 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64

We are happy to announce the General Availability of Gluster 3.8 for CentOS Linux 7. Earlier versions (3.6 and 3.7) are still available and will keep receiving updates until the upstream Gluster Community marks them End-Of-Life. GlusterFS 3.8 brings many improvements and new functionalities.