Re: [CentOS] Reverting to nouveau

2016-10-11 Thread geo.inbox.ignored
ooppss. On 10/11/2016 02:18 AM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: > On 10/07/2016 02:03 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: <<>> > ps. > excuse delay in reply. problems with thunderbird > had me unable to run email. > ==> my posting to wrong list is not helping either. please excuse. -- peace out.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.raw very unusual format

2016-10-11 Thread Aliaksei Sheshka
> > did you look in the directory to see what is there? > > http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/ > Kind of, there is a CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.raw.tar.gz ( compare with CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.raw.xz ) But again link is not good, and why put raw disk inside the tar? It would me

Re: [CentOS] Hint for nslookup wanted ...

2016-10-11 Thread Walter H.
On Tue, October 11, 2016 15:23, Richard Mann wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On >> Behalf Of Walter H. >> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 9:05 AM >> To: centos@centos.org >> Subject: [CentOS] Hint for nslookup wanted ... >>

Re: [CentOS] gigE -> 100Mb problems

2016-10-11 Thread Tris Hoar
On 11/10/2016 09:14, John R Pierce wrote: On 10/10/2016 11:21 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 10/10/2016 09:31 PM, John R Pierce wrote: oh. Yeah, the entire "net-tools" package is deprecated. I tend to forget which of the two (ethtool or mii-tool) is in that set. # Avoid using any of these:

Re: [CentOS] Hint for nslookup wanted ...

2016-10-11 Thread Richard Mann
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Anand Buddhdev > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 9:28 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Hint for nslookup wanted ... > > On 11/10/16 15:23,

Re: [CentOS] Hint for nslookup wanted ...

2016-10-11 Thread Richard Mann
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Walter H. > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 9:05 AM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] Hint for nslookup wanted ... > > Hello, > > has anybody a hint for me, how I can use

Re: [CentOS] Hint for nslookup wanted ...

2016-10-11 Thread Walter H.
On Tue, October 11, 2016 15:27, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > This is bad advice, because in DNS, ANY != ALL > > If you query with qtype=any, and you ask a caching resolver, then it > will return to you all the records that are in its cache at that time, > which may or may not include the records you

[CentOS] Hint for nslookup wanted ...

2016-10-11 Thread Walter H.
Hello, has anybody a hint for me, how I can use nslookup to get either IPv6 only or both A and entries when doing this: e.g. # nslookup www.example.com Thanks, Walter ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] CentOS ISO contents

2016-10-11 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 10/10/2016 09:27 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 10.10.2016 um 13:45 schrieb Johnny Hughes : >> On 10/09/2016 06:15 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: >>> Am 09.10.2016 um 19:41 schrieb John R Pierce : On 10/9/2016 5:33 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: look in

Re: [CentOS] Hint for nslookup wanted ...

2016-10-11 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On 11/10/16 15:23, Richard Mann wrote: > Did your google break? > > For just IPv6 > nslookup -type= www.example.com > > For all records > nslookup -type=any www.example.com This is bad advice, because in DNS, ANY != ALL If you query with qtype=any, and you ask a caching resolver, then

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.raw very unusual format

2016-10-11 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 11/10/16 03:21, TE Dukes wrote: > Just a question, what exactly are these images? > > I see it mentioned on the CentOS website but not a lot of info on exactly > what it is and what it does. > > How does this differ from a CentOS 7 VM installed from an ISO? Are these > just pre-made images?

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.raw very unusual format

2016-10-11 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 11/10/16 13:16, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote: >> >> did you look in the directory to see what is there? >> >> http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/ >> > > Kind of, there is a CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.raw.tar.gz ( compare > with CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.raw.xz ) > > > But again link is

Re: [CentOS] Hint for nslookup wanted ...

2016-10-11 Thread John R Pierce
On 10/11/2016 6:41 AM, Walter H. wrote: [root@host ~]# nslookup -query=anywww.bipa.at Server: 192.168.23.2 Address:192.168.23.2#53 Non-authoritative answer: www.bipa.at canonical name =www.bipa.at.cdn.cloudflare.net. Authoritative answers can be found from: [root@host ~]#

Re: [CentOS] gigE -> 100Mb problems

2016-10-11 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 11.10.2016 um 10:14 schrieb John R Pierce: ok, so the mii-* stuff is deprecated (as is route, ifconfig, netstat, and arp? sigh). arp -> ip neigh Alexander ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS ISO contents

2016-10-11 Thread Leon Fauster
Am 11.10.2016 um 15:36 schrieb Johnny Hughes : > On 10/10/2016 09:27 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 10.10.2016 um 13:45 schrieb Johnny Hughes : >>> On 10/09/2016 06:15 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: >>> >>> They live in a different branch: >>> >>>

[CentOS] Virtualbox image

2016-10-11 Thread Jerry Geis
How do you make a Virtualbox image of C7 so that when you EXPORT that image and someone imports it that the values in /etc/fstab will be OK. Example: UUID=13813d49-15b7-48ed-ab0d-da52aa3a9078 / xfs defaults0 0 UUID=7f25297f-170c-4aee-ad4f-7ccc5867ed25 /home

Re: [CentOS] Unable to install extras "centos-release-scl" "epel-release"

2016-10-11 Thread waltdnes
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 04:19:24PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote > On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 18:09:21 -0400 > waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: > > > > What am I missing? > > Probably the fact that both of those repos are available for x86_64 only. Thanks. At least I won't waste any more time trying to

Re: [CentOS] Unable to install extras "centos-release-scl" "epel-release"

2016-10-11 Thread John R Pierce
On 10/11/2016 3:09 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: I have CentOS7 32-bit x86 AltArch in a VM. Following advice I found on Google, I tried stuff like "sudo yum install centos-release-scl" and "sudo yum install epel-release". They came back with... No package centos-release-scl available.

Re: [CentOS] gigE -> 100Mb problems

2016-10-11 Thread John R Pierce
On 10/11/2016 9:03 PM, Ashish Yadav wrote: Please test that if both the server are communicating with each other at 1Gbps or not via "iperf" tool. If above gives result of 1Gbps then it will eliminate the NICs problem then you know that it is a problem with cisco switch only. after they

Re: [CentOS] gigE -> 100Mb problems

2016-10-11 Thread Ashish Yadav
Hi, On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:03 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > I've got a pair of identical CentOS 6.7 servers, with SuperMicro X8DTE-F > motherboards, these have 2 each Intel 82574L ethernet ports. The eth0 > ports are plugged in with 10' runs of brand new cat 5e cable to a

Re: [CentOS] Unable to install extras "centos-release-scl" "epel-release"

2016-10-11 Thread Frank Cox
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 18:09:21 -0400 waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: > What am I missing? Probably the fact that both of those repos are available for x86_64 only. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS

[CentOS] Unable to install extras "centos-release-scl" "epel-release"

2016-10-11 Thread waltdnes
I have CentOS7 32-bit x86 AltArch in a VM. Following advice I found on Google, I tried stuff like "sudo yum install centos-release-scl" and "sudo yum install epel-release". They came back with... No package centos-release-scl available. No package epel-release available. What am I missing?

Re: [CentOS] gigE -> 100Mb problems

2016-10-11 Thread Marcelo Roccasalva
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 9:33 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > > I've got a pair of identical CentOS 6.7 servers, with SuperMicro X8DTE-F > motherboards, these have 2 each Intel 82574L ethernet ports. The eth0 ports > are plugged in with 10' runs of brand new cat 5e cable to a

Re: [CentOS] Virtualbox image

2016-10-11 Thread John R Pierce
On 10/11/2016 12:50 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: How do you make a Virtualbox image of C7 so that when you EXPORT that image and someone imports it that the values in /etc/fstab will be OK. Example: UUID=13813d49-15b7-48ed-ab0d-da52aa3a9078 / xfs defaults0 0

Re: [CentOS] gigE -> 100Mb problems

2016-10-11 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 10/10/2016 09:31 PM, John R Pierce wrote: oh. Yeah, the entire "net-tools" package is deprecated. I tend to forget which of the two (ethtool or mii-tool) is in that set. # Avoid using any of these: $ rpm -ql net-tools ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Proper setup for major package removals?

2016-10-11 Thread John R Pierce
On 10/10/2016 10:56 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: By the way, at startup, I notice a message quickly flash by like... "intel_rapl: no valid rapl domains". What's it about? some kinda new intel advanced power domain stuff (RAPL is "Running Average Power Limit"), to limit CPU power

Re: [CentOS] Reverting to nouveau

2016-10-11 Thread geo.inbox.ignored
On 10/07/2016 02:03 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 11:38 -0500, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: >> as for nvidia site, check to see if you can find a more proper driver at; >> >> http://www.nvidia.com/download/index.aspx > > That's where the drivers come from, via RPMfusion.

Re: [CentOS] gigE -> 100Mb problems

2016-10-11 Thread John R Pierce
On 10/10/2016 11:21 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 10/10/2016 09:31 PM, John R Pierce wrote: oh. Yeah, the entire "net-tools" package is deprecated. I tend to forget which of the two (ethtool or mii-tool) is in that set. # Avoid using any of these: $ rpm -ql net-tools

[CentOS-build-reports] Build Done: kernel-plus 3.10.0-327.36.2.el7.centos.plus.i686 on c7-plus

2016-10-11 Thread buildsys
logs/c7-plus/kernel-plus/20161011145837/3.10.0-327.36.2.el7.centos.plus.i686 logs/c7-plus/kernel-plus/20161011145837/3.10.0-327.36.2.el7.centos.plus.i686/build.log logs/c7-plus/kernel-plus/20161011145837/3.10.0-327.36.2.el7.centos.plus.i686/kernel-plus-3.10.0-327.36.2.el7.centos.plus.i686.rpm

Re: [CentOS-docs] https://wiki.centos.org/ContainerPipeline edit group

2016-10-11 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 10/10/16 16:46, Alan Bartlett wrote: > In turn, I ask where the "more and more people" are actually > requesting edit access for that page? It certainly is not on this > mailing list. so far, its just been the guys who are working on the buildsystem behind it - a couple of other folks ( eg.

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:2045 Important CentOS 6 tomcat6 Security Update

2016-10-11 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:2045 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2045.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:2047 Important CentOS 7 kernel Security Update

2016-10-11 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:2047 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2047.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:2046 Important CentOS 7 tomcat Security Update

2016-10-11 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:2046 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2046.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: