"has been in circulation since the early 00's" I assume it is not the
same binary since '00?
SIGKILL usually comes from the kernel. is selinux enabled? Does the
application start "automatically", or is it started by a user?
Ron
On 8/5/19 9:02 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 01:54:56AM +, Grant Street wrote:
> Try checking your /var/log/messages for OOM killer log lines. If your machine
> is running low on memory the oom killer will start killing high memory usage
> programs.
>
> Grant
we have watched top while it runs and there's no
Try checking your /var/log/messages for OOM killer log lines. If your machine
is running low on memory the oom killer will start killing high memory usage
programs.
Grant
From: CentOS on behalf of Fred Smith
Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2019 10:57 AM
To:
Hi all!
I'm stuck on something really bizarre that is happening to a product
I "own" at work. It's a C program, built on CentOS, runs on CentOs or
RHEL, has been in circulation since the early 00's, is in use at
hundreds of sites.
recently, at multiple customer sites it has started just going
On Aug 5, 2019, at 11:25 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 13:17, Jerry Geis wrote:
>
>> Why is it that "all" I am really doing at the moment is copying things to
>> an external SSD disk USB3 connected and the machine "freezes"... Why is
>> that?
>>
> You may have a
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 09:31:56AM +0100, Giles Coochey wrote:
>
> On 05/08/2019 09:18, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > > I've found the default 10min bans hardly bother some attackers.
> > > So I've added the "recidive" feature of fail2ban. After the
> > > second 10min ban, the attacker is blocked for 1
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 09:00:23AM +0100, Giles Coochey wrote:
>
> On 05/08/2019 08:50, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >
> > I've found the default 10min bans hardly bother some attackers.
> > So I've added the "recidive" feature of fail2ban. After the
> > second 10min ban, the attacker is blocked for 1
On Tue, 6 Aug 2019, Peter wrote:
On 6/08/19 3:44 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
In any case, Centos 7 has not always been this slow.
Presumably something has changed.
Websites have gotten more resource-intensive. You've run "yum updates" and
now have a newer version of Firefox and/or Chrome.
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, John Horne wrote:
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 xymon xymon 0 Aug 2 14:07 /proc/58032/exe ->
/usr/sbin/xymond;5d44410e (deleted)
I am aware of what the 'deleted' part means, but have no idea what the
';5d44410e' part means. Is this some sort of thread reference?
IIRC that's the inode
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, Richard wrote:
Does the system slow down when you have your internet connection
enabled, but aren't explicitly using it (i.e., not using a browser)?
The slowdown only happens when the browser is open,
but I do not have to be using it.
If so, look at the netstat output
Thanks John,
I did the yum remove on rh-ruby22*
did a yum install rh-ruby23-ruby
then I found the rh-ruby23-ruby-devel and now it works.
Jerry
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> In any case, Centos 7 has not always been this slow.
> Presumably something has changed.
Firefox especially, and to some extent Chrome, have both started using
much more memory recently (as in the last six months or so). I run 50+
desktops on CentOS and I've noticed more and more of them
Peter wrote:
> On 6/08/19 6:33 AM, Richard wrote:
>
>>> Javascript - if you're using firefox, install NoScript last week.
>>>
>>
>> NoScript selectively blocks javascript, it doesn't turn it off --
>> which for testing purposes, at least, is the goal.
>>
>> In ff -- about:config - then enter
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 5:01 AM Jerry Geis wrote:
> Thanks John for the info... I did that and now I'm missing a file.
> I tried to ask yum what package I need - but It did not know.
>
>
> Building native extensions. This could take a while...
> ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension.
>
>
Richard wrote:
>> Date: Monday, August 05, 2019 13:38:49 -0400
>> From: mark
>
>>> Richard wrote:
>>>
>>> Does the system slow down when you have your internet connection
>>> enabled, but aren't explicitly using it (i.e., not using a browser)? If
>>> so, look at the netstat output (as root) to
On 6/08/19 6:33 AM, Richard wrote:
Javascript - if you're using firefox, install NoScript last week.
NoScript selectively blocks javascript, it doesn't turn it off --
which for testing purposes, at least, is the goal.
In ff -- about:config - then enter "javascript" in the search line
and set
On 6/08/19 3:44 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
In any case, Centos 7 has not always been this slow.
Presumably something has changed.
Websites have gotten more resource-intensive. You've run "yum updates"
and now have a newer version of Firefox and/or Chrome. Your browsing
habits have changed
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 2:01 PM Jerry Geis wrote:
> Anyway to use "nice" command to help with responiveness? I was just using
> "rsync . /media/external" to do the copy.
>
You need to discover where it is blocking before deciding which solution
will work. Something like iotop, atop, or other
There are no errors in dmesg.
Top was showing 88% idle.
If something is blocking somewhere as Stephen suggested - that's a major
bummer.
The keyboard is USB attached and the external SSD disk is USB attached.
The mother board is an X299 UD4 Pro
Anyway to use "nice" command to help with
On 8/5/19 10:17 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
Do I need to 'tweak' something to no see GUI freezes... Waiting on
characters to show - even remoted in with SSH experiences the same thing -
so its not just X.
Look at the output of "dmesg" and see if there are errors there.
> Date: Monday, August 05, 2019 13:38:49 -0400
> From: mark
>> Richard wrote:
>>
>> Does the system slow down when you have your internet connection
>> enabled, but aren't explicitly using it (i.e., not using a
>> browser)? If so, look at the netstat output (as root) to see
>> what's going
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:21 AM Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
>
> Il 05/08/19 18:07, Akemi Yagi ha scritto:
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:01 AM Alessandro Baggi
> > wrote:
> > Do you have secureboot enabled? Then yes, that requires a proper key.
> >
> > Akemi
>
> Yes I have secureboot enabled. If
Jerry Geis wrote:
>
> I have a customer server with 32 cores, 128G ram i7960X. So nice box...
>
> Why is it that "all" I am really doing at the moment is copying things to
> an external SSD disk USB3 connected and the machine "freezes"... Why is
> that?
>
> clearly plenty of CPU RAM everything...
Richard wrote:
>> Date: Monday, August 05, 2019 10:44:00 -0500
>> From: Michael Hennebry
>>
>> To be clear, by "Centos 7 installation",
>> I meant a PC on which Centos 7 was installed.
>>
>> In any case, Centos 7 has not always been this slow.
>> Presumably something has changed.
>> I've been
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 13:17, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a customer server with 32 cores, 128G ram i7960X. So nice box...
>
> Why is it that "all" I am really doing at the moment is copying things to
> an external SSD disk USB3 connected and the machine "freezes"... Why is
> that?
>
>
Hi all,
I have a customer server with 32 cores, 128G ram i7960X. So nice box...
Why is it that "all" I am really doing at the moment is copying things to
an external SSD disk USB3 connected and the machine "freezes"... Why is
that?
clearly plenty of CPU RAM everything...
I can see "blocking" to
> Date: Monday, August 05, 2019 10:44:00 -0500
> From: Michael Hennebry
>
> To be clear, by "Centos 7 installation",
> I meant a PC on which Centos 7 was installed.
>
> In any case, Centos 7 has not always been this slow.
> Presumably something has changed.
> I've been living with this for
Il 05/08/19 18:07, Akemi Yagi ha scritto:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:01 AM Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
Il 05/08/19 17:49, Akemi Yagi ha scritto:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:42 AM Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
Il 05/08/19 17:30, Akemi Yagi ha scritto:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:46 AM Alessandro Baggi
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:01 AM Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
>
> Il 05/08/19 17:49, Akemi Yagi ha scritto:
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:42 AM Alessandro Baggi
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Il 05/08/19 17:30, Akemi Yagi ha scritto:
> >>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:46 AM Alessandro Baggi
> >>> wrote:
>
>
Il 05/08/19 17:49, Akemi Yagi ha scritto:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:42 AM Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
Il 05/08/19 17:30, Akemi Yagi ha scritto:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:46 AM Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
Hey there,
I'm trying to compile a single module following this guide:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:42 AM Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
>
> Il 05/08/19 17:30, Akemi Yagi ha scritto:
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:46 AM Alessandro Baggi
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey there,
> >> I'm trying to compile a single module following this guide:
> >>
> >>
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, Peter wrote:
On 5/08/19 10:42 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Mem: 2020144 1454904 76140 204764 489100
135004
Swap: 4883724 978480 3905244
free -h is generally more readable, but...
It's RAM. You basically have a total of 2G ram on
Il 05/08/19 17:30, Akemi Yagi ha scritto:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:46 AM Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
Hey there,
I'm trying to compile a single module following this guide:
https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BuildingKernelModules#head-d2e4c05886f94c701e4ae74387d41d8c40c25d01
and
On Sun, 4 Aug 2019, John Pierce wrote:
So you need to modify the source file that NetworkManager is using.
somewhere in /etc/network or /etc/networking-scripts, a config file has
DNS0=192.168.0.1 or sokmething, or your system is getting that from DHCP
Will check on that.
the web login on
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:46 AM Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
>
> Hey there,
> I'm trying to compile a single module following this guide:
>
> https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BuildingKernelModules#head-d2e4c05886f94c701e4ae74387d41d8c40c25d01
>
> and
>
>
On 8/5/19 5:01 AM, Nikos Gatsis - Qbit wrote:
On 8/2/2019 6:23 AM, Nikos Gatsis - Qbit wrote:
After update last centos packages, greek characters from sql request
look like question marks ?
After hours of tryingΒ to find out what happens, I found out that
updated freetds and after httpd
Hey there,
I'm trying to compile a single module following this guide:
https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BuildingKernelModules#head-d2e4c05886f94c701e4ae74387d41d8c40c25d01
and
https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/I_need_the_Kernel_Source
I tried to compile a module for novuton led controller supplied
On 05/08/2019 13:44, John Horne wrote:
On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 13:06 +0100, Giles Coochey wrote:
On 05/08/2019 12:56, John Horne wrote:
I was going to say no to both of these, however the RPM package ('xymon') was
itself updated at around the time mentioned on Aug 02.
The hex number is
On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 13:06 +0100, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 05/08/2019 12:56, John Horne wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was looking at a process through the '/proc' file system, and came across
> > a process name which seemed to contain a hex value:
> >
> > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 xymon xymon 0 Aug 2 14:07
On 05/08/2019 12:56, John Horne wrote:
Hello,
I was looking at a process through the '/proc' file system, and came across a
process name which seemed to contain a hex value:
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 xymon xymon 0 Aug 2 14:07 /proc/58032/exe ->
/usr/sbin/xymond;5d44410e (deleted)
I am aware of what
On 5/8/2019 1:20 μ.μ., Nikos Gatsis - Qbit wrote:
On 3/8/2019 3:00 ΞΌ.ΞΌ., centos-requ...@centos.org wrote:
On 8/2/2019 6:23 AM, Nikos Gatsis - Qbit wrote:
After update last centos packages, greek characters from sql request
look like question marks ?
Inspect the raw binary of the HTTP
Thanks John for the info... I did that and now I'm missing a file.
I tried to ask yum what package I need - but It did not know.
Building native extensions. This could take a while...
ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension.
/opt/rh/rh-ruby22/root/usr/bin/ruby -r
Hello,
I was looking at a process through the '/proc' file system, and came across a
process name which seemed to contain a hex value:
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 xymon xymon 0 Aug 2 14:07 /proc/58032/exe ->
/usr/sbin/xymond;5d44410e (deleted)
I am aware of what the 'deleted' part means, but have no idea
> On Aug 5, 2019, at 4:12 AM, Peter wrote:
>
> On 5/08/19 10:42 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> Mem:2020144 1454904 76140 204764 489100
>> 135004
>> Swap: 4883724 978480 3905244
>
> free -h is generally more readable, but...
>
> It's RAM. You
Am 2019-08-05 12:30, schrieb Alexander Dalloz:
Am 2019-08-05 12:24, schrieb Ralf Prengel:
Hallo,
has anyone a hint how to use an Adaptec RAID 51645 under Centos 7?
A volume is created using the controller interface but isn't active
under centos.
Thanks for hintsts
Ralf
That's a pretty old
Am 2019-08-05 12:24, schrieb Ralf Prengel:
Hallo,
has anyone a hint how to use an Adaptec RAID 51645 under Centos 7?
A volume is created using the controller interface but isn't active
under centos.
Thanks for hintsts
Ralf
That's a pretty old RAID controller. Kernel module support for such
Hallo,
has anyone a hint how to use an Adaptec RAID 51645 under Centos 7?
A volume is created using the controller interface but isn't active
under centos.
Thanks for hintsts
Ralf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 05/08/2019 09:18, Pete Biggs wrote:
I've found the default 10min bans hardly bother some attackers.
So I've added the "recidive" feature of fail2ban. After the
second 10min ban, the attacker is blocked for 1 week.
Oh definitely. My systems are set to "3 bans and you're out" - a
recidive
>
> I've found the default 10min bans hardly bother some attackers.
> So I've added the "recidive" feature of fail2ban. After the
> second 10min ban, the attacker is blocked for 1 week.
>
Oh definitely. My systems are set to "3 bans and you're out" - a
recidive ban is permanent after three
On 5/08/19 10:42 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Mem: 2020144 1454904 76140 204764 489100
135004
Swap: 4883724 978480 3905244
free -h is generally more readable, but...
It's RAM. You basically have a total of 2G ram on the system, you have
less
On 05/08/2019 08:50, Jon LaBadie wrote:
I've found the default 10min bans hardly bother some attackers.
So I've added the "recidive" feature of fail2ban. After the
second 10min ban, the attacker is blocked for 1 week.
Interesting, didn't know about that feature, but, oh, I just generally
On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 04:50:05PM +0100, Giles Coochey wrote:
>
> On 02/08/2019 19:38, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 10:19:49AM -0400, mark wrote:
> > > Fred Smith wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 09:28:23AM -0400, mark wrote:
> > >
>
> I've been using fail2ban for some
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
unknown user pushed a commit to branch master
in repository centos/centos.org.
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new c18eb62 Added new keys for CentOS 8 and beyond
c18eb62 is described
53 matches
Mail list logo
