Re: [CentOS] HPC question: torques replacement

2020-04-17 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:28:13AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > I wonder what other options experts would recommend. Hopefully, not too far > from torque (or PBS) from user prospective. My workplace switched from Torque (with moab as the scheduler) to Slurm (https://slurm.schedmd.com/) for our

Re: [CentOS] Strangeness on X11 screen capture

2020-04-17 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020, Jerry Geis wrote: When I take a screen shot I get "different" things. I use: export DISPLAY=:0.0 /usr/bin/xwd -silent -root -out screen; convert screen screen.png I tried import also for the screen capture and its the same random images. Granted the images are all things

Re: [CentOS] HPC question: torques replacement

2020-04-17 Thread Benson Muite
Dear Valeri Slurm (https://slurm.schedmd.com/) is also reasonable. You might also take a look at Cobalt (https://xgitlab.cels.anl.gov/aig-public/cobalt) which is not developed too far from you. Benson ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] HPC question: torques replacement

2020-04-17 Thread Dahringer, Richard
Hey Valeri - IIRC, midway (and maybe midway2?) use slurm for job scheduling. I don't know how many of your faculty use both your nodes and midway, but maybe consolidating on to a single scheduler would be easier for them? (also, it's been a while ... hi!  ) Richard -Original

[CentOS] HPC question: torques replacement

2020-04-17 Thread Valeri Galtsev
Dear Experts, I know there are many HPC (high performance computing) experts on this list. I'd like to ask your advise. Almost two decades ago I chose to go with OpenPBS (turned down condor and other alternatives for whatever reason) for clusters and number crunchers I support for the

Re: [CentOS] Strangeness on X11 screen capture

2020-04-17 Thread Jerry Geis
Thanks Michael I have been using electron-kiosk - Would that be contributing to the situation? I have been playing videos - we pages etc... Any thoughts on something to help get the right picture ? Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] fail2ban firewalld problems with current CentOS 7

2020-04-17 Thread Rob Kampen
On 17/04/20 10:55 pm, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: Am 17.04.20 um 02:59 schrieb Rob Kampen: On 13/04/20 1:30 pm, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 4/9/20 6:31 AM, Andreas Haumer wrote: ... I'm neither a fail2ban nor a SELinux expert, but it seems the standard fail2ban SELinux policy as provided by

Re: [CentOS] Thank You

2020-04-17 Thread Xiaomei NIU
Totally agree ! Best regards Xiaomei - Original Message - From: "david" To: "CentOS mailing list" Sent: Friday, 17 April, 2020 05:14:54 Subject: Re: [CentOS] Thank You At 07:59 PM 4/16/2020, you wrote: >Just reaching out to say thanks to all the folks that keep CentOS, >EPEL, this

[CentOS] CentO 8 and nftables default policy

2020-04-17 Thread Alessandro Baggi
Hi list, I'm studying nftables. I'm using CentOS 8.1 (Gnome) and I disabled firewalld. I noticed that a default policy is created with tables and chains probably for firewalld. So I created a .nft script where I stored my rules with a flush for previous ruleset, then saved on

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] fail2ban firewalld problems with current CentOS 7

2020-04-17 Thread Leon Fauster via CentOS
Am 17.04.20 um 02:59 schrieb Rob Kampen: On 13/04/20 1:30 pm, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 4/9/20 6:31 AM, Andreas Haumer wrote: ... I'm neither a fail2ban nor a SELinux expert, but it seems the standard fail2ban SELinux policy as provided by CentOS 7 is not sufficient anymore and the recent