On Sun, 2020-05-17 at 20:25 -0600, R C wrote:
> Ok, I get that, found it before; "typically sent as a UDP datagram to
> port 0, 7 or 9, or directly over Ethernet as EtherType 0x0842"
>
>
> The keyword being 'typically', but what is it that ether-wake actually
> uses/does? (I need to
Hi,
It seems that kernel-2.6.32-754.29.2 has not been announced on the
maillist. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:2103
Regards,
DH
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
after trying sshfs to mount a remote file system on a server with the result
that sshfs will sooner or later get stuck and require a reboot of the client,
I'm fed up with it and am looking for alternatives.
So next I would like to use NFS over a VPN connection instead. To minimize
the
thank you, that was the/an answer I was looking for.
On 5/18/20 7:51 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 07:46:00PM -0600, R C wrote:
what port does ether-wake use? (I believe it is port 9? but not sure).
The 'ether-wake' command in net-tools doesn't use a port at all.
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:38:24AM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 07:52:41PM +0530, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/firewalld_default_to_nftables
> >
> > mentions a
> >
> > docker-firewalld
> >
> > where can I find that package or
Dear All,
Does anyone know how to to live patching upgrade of CentOS 7 without rebuilding
the whole boot volume? I have enough disk space in Boot volume. I don’t want to
go through creating a new VM and install CentOS 7 patch release.
Thanks,
- Xinhuan
>> -Original Message-
>> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rich Greenwood
>> Sent: Monday, 18 May, 2020 08:34
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] ether-wake
>>
>> Some switch hardware can generate the packets directly, negating the need
>> for a
> actually using UDP. What I am NOT looking for is some patronizing answer
> disconnected from the question.
>
>
> I really wonder why you feel the need to go out on a branch to start
> lecturing and quoting answers that are not asked for.
>
>
> If you don't know the answer, simply don't
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 07:52:41PM +0530, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/firewalld_default_to_nftables
>
> mentions a
>
> docker-firewalld
>
> where can I find that package or source code?
That was just one of the proposed solutions. It looks like the
Hi,
I’m running a special initrd generated for SystemImager with a special dracut
module that relies on plyouth scripted theme.
It works perfectly on CentOS-6, CentOS-7, OpenSUSE-42.3, Fedora-29 (not tested
later) and used to work on CentOS-8.0
Since CentOS-8.1 was released, IT chrashes with
Actually you are not correct.
1st: I didn't quote the wikipedia article, someone sent that as an
answer to my previous post.
(similar mindset probably, as in your response)
2: You are wrong, broadcast packets, like for example DHCP, and also
WOL (if UDP), can be routed, by
the means
Am 16.05.20 um 17:48 schrieb Kay Diederichs:
On 5/16/20 5:09 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
Am 11.05.20 um 15:59 schrieb Leon Fauster:
Since C8.1 kvm guests have a huge delay while booting on a kvm host based on C6. This
delay was not present with C8.0. The "pause" happend
direct after
On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 07:46:00PM -0600, R C wrote:
> what port does ether-wake use? (I believe it is port 9? but not sure).
The 'ether-wake' command in net-tools doesn't use a port at all. It's
just a raw packet of EtherType 0x0842 as the so-called "Magic Packet"
Some switch hardware can generate the packets directly, negating the need
for a box on every VLAN. Meraki hardware can do it, but you have to go
through the dashboard so automating it isn't currently possible.
Here is some documentation on forwarding WoL on catalyst 3750 switches from
Cisco:
yeah I am wondering if that isn't the easiest route to go though if
there already is
one. I am waiting for an answer from Cisco. Cisco switches and routers
can forward wol
packets sent over udp. But etherwake doesn't do that apparently.
So if I want to wake up machines from a central
Hi,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/firewalld_default_to_nftables
mentions a
docker-firewalld
where can I find that package or source code?
thanks
---
Lee
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
> Actually you are not correct.
>
>
> 1st: I didn't quote the wikipedia article, someone sent that as an
> answer to my previous post.
>
> (similar mindset probably, as in your response)
>
> 2: You are wrong, broadcast packets, like for example DHCP, and also
> WOL (if UDP), can be routed,
when I found out that ether-wake only did raw ether packets, I notoced
there's also a wol in the distro, that broadcasts wake up packets using
udp, that I can redirect on cisco equipment. It's working now.
thanks,
Ron
On 5/18/20 9:45 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
Actually you are
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 8:14 PM Jonathan Billings
wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:38:24AM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 07:52:41PM +0530, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/firewalld_default_to_nftables
> > >
> > > mentions a
On May 18, 2020, at 5:13 AM, hw wrote:
>
> Is there a better alternative for mounting remote file systems over
> unreliable
> connections?
I don’t have a good answer for you, because if you’d asked me without all this
backstory whether NFS or SSHFS is more tolerant of bad connections, I’d
20 matches
Mail list logo
