>
>
> Il 16/06/20 08:11, Alessandro Baggi ha scritto:
>>
>>
>> Il 16/06/20 06:21, Gordon Messmer ha scritto:
>>> On 6/15/20 7:06 PM, Jay Hart wrote:
If I do 'systemctl start httpd', apache will start right up. But
during boot, it doesn't and I
get the resulting errors below.
Il 16/06/20 08:11, Alessandro Baggi ha scritto:
Il 16/06/20 06:21, Gordon Messmer ha scritto:
On 6/15/20 7:06 PM, Jay Hart wrote:
If I do 'systemctl start httpd', apache will start right up. But
during boot, it doesn't and I
get the resulting errors below.
Jun 15 21:17:28 dream
Just a wild guess, but it sounds like Apache is being started before the
network is online.Is this host simple static Ethernet or DHCP, or is it
something more complicated like WiFi?
I believe you can set service dependencies with systemd, ideally your
apache service isn't started before the
Il 16/06/20 06:21, Gordon Messmer ha scritto:
On 6/15/20 7:06 PM, Jay Hart wrote:
If I do 'systemctl start httpd', apache will start right up. But
during boot, it doesn't and I
get the resulting errors below.
Jun 15 21:17:28 dream httpd[1534]: (99)Cannot assign requested
address:
Hi all.
I wonder if you can help me here.
I have centos7 with 1 network interface and on that IFwe have 2 vlan.
>From both vlan we'd like to reach the internet independently so basically
with 2 different gateways.
we tried with all the routes,rules etc but only on one vlan we are able to
ping
On 16/6/20 4:15 pm, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
Note: when you will get update for httpd package all could be reverted
to the original status, so to avoid that your modified httpd.service
will get an overwrite, create an alternative httpd.service in
/etc/systemd/system (if I'm not wrong).
Thanks to all that responded. Gordon's suggestion worked brilliantly. I ran
the suggested
command, saved the file, rebooted, apache came right up.
Can't thank you guys enough.
Now, lets try to solve my intermittent connectivity issue, more on that later...
Jay
> On 16/6/20 4:15 pm,
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, Christopher Wensink wrote:
I don't have any lines in my configuration file for any of the servers,
how can I tell what the default protocols are?
Are the defaults controlled by samba or the kernel?
samba controls this via smb.conf
See "man smb.conf" for details. The min
On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 16:28 -0400, H wrote:
> I just installed C7 on a new computer and despite Simple Scan being
> installed as part of C7, I have not been able to get it to recognize
> my Canon scanner connected to a USB port. I did have it running on
> another computer with C7 so there should
Did you setup outbound NAT for both vlans via iptables?
Policy routing to multiple wan interfaces is a bit tricky,. It's been
years since I did it, what I remember was using ip rules to categorize and
tag the traffic, then alternate named ip route tables to direct the
different tags at different
Hi!
I get high cpu usage on my laptop (yes im running Centos on my laptop)
after my last update.
At the beginning i though it was libvrtd but after stopping it gnome
monitor keep showing high cpu usage although i couldnt find the app
that was responsible for it with the top command.
I searched
Hi all,
I updated a Dell XPS laptop from CentOS 8.1 (1911) to 8.2 (2004).
Installed kernels are
kernel-4.18.0-147.5.1.el8_1.x86_64
kernel-4.18.0-147.8.1.el8_1.x86_64
kernel-4.18.0-193.6.3.el8_2.x86_64
Unfortunately I can not boot into the latest
kernel-4.18.0-193.6.3.el8_2.x86_64.
After grub2
if you use more than one gateway, you have to 'decide' what traffic you
want to go through each of them, (so you have to set up routes or
user/group pools that controls access to interfaces etc ) it would still
be a good idea to call one of the interfaces/gateways the
"route of last resort",
Received these error message during update 16Jun2020.
Running scriptlet: kmod-kvdo-6.2.1.138-58.el8_1.x86_64
750/1181
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eno1: line 21: unexpected EOF while
looking for matching `"'
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eno1: line 22: syntax error:
unexpected
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 14:08, Jerry Geis wrote:
>
> So now that 8 is out - is it still "frowned" upon to do that in place
> update ?
> Is that not a good / valid solution ?
It really isn't a good solution without a lot of hand work. It can be
done but the person doing the updates needs to figure
On 06/15/2020 08:58 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 04:28:17PM -0400, H wrote:
>> I just installed C7 on a new computer and despite Simple Scan being
>> installed as part of C7, I have not been able to get it to recognize my
>> Canon scanner connected to a USB port. I did have it
Hi all,
with regard to LUKS; should it placed before LVM or after? Any
recommendations? TRIM command fully supported through all layers etc?
--
Leon
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 06/16/2020 07:54 AM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 16:28 -0400, H wrote:
>> I just installed C7 on a new computer and despite Simple Scan being
>> installed as part of C7, I have not been able to get it to recognize
>> my Canon scanner connected to a USB port. I did have it
On 06/16/2020 01:08 PM, H wrote:
> On 06/15/2020 08:58 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 04:28:17PM -0400, H wrote:
>>> I just installed C7 on a new computer and despite Simple Scan being
>>> installed as part of C7, I have not been able to get it to recognize my
>>> Canon scanner
So now that 8 is out - is it still "frowned" upon to do that in place
update ?
Is that not a good / valid solution ?
Thanks,
Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 16/06/2020 15:06, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I updated a Dell XPS laptop from CentOS 8.1 (1911) to 8.2 (2004).
>
> Installed kernels are
> kernel-4.18.0-147.5.1.el8_1.x86_64
> kernel-4.18.0-147.8.1.el8_1.x86_64
> kernel-4.18.0-193.6.3.el8_2.x86_64
>
> Unfortunately I can
At 12:30 PM 6/16/2020, John Pierce wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 12:26 PM david wrote:
>
> Examples of what I've tried, and then tested. None of them stopped
> an outgoing SSH from an internal system.
>
>iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -s 10.0.0.0/24 -j DROP
>iptables -I INPUT -p
Also, if you want to use deduplication (via VDO) then you must
remember to "dedupe then encrypt"
Storage > LUKS > VDO > LVM
old but good reference to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/2106521
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:00 PM Jason Edgecombe wrote:
>
> I recommend having LUKS be "under" LVM. the
Yeah, I've decided to get a new virtual server.
Natassia
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:29 AM Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 14:08, Jerry Geis wrote:
> >
> > So now that 8 is out - is it still "frowned" upon to do that in place
> > update ?
> > Is that not a good / valid
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:56 AM Natassia S wrote:
> Received these error message during update 16Jun2020.
>
> Running scriptlet: kmod-kvdo-6.2.1.138-58.el8_1.x86_64
> 750/1181
>
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eno1: line 21: unexpected EOF while
> looking for matching `"'
>
>
Du-oh! My bad, I was thinking that this was something that downloaded with
the updates. I found my error.
Thanks,
Natassia S.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 12:10 PM John Pierce wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:56 AM Natassia S wrote:
>
> > Received these error message during update 16Jun2020.
>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 12:26 PM david wrote:
>
> Examples of what I've tried, and then tested. None of them stopped
> an outgoing SSH from an internal system.
>
>iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -s 10.0.0.0/24 -j DROP
>iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -s 10.0.0.0/24 -j DROP
>
>
>
I recommend having LUKS be "under" LVM. the layers would be:
/dev/sda -> partition (/dev/sda1) -> LUKS (/dev/sda1_crypt) -> LVM physical
volume -> volume group -> logical volume -> filesystem
The layers described above are how the Ubuntu installer sets up an
encrypted LVM filesystem. As far as I
On 6/16/20 1:56 AM, Alfredo De Luca wrote:
I have centos7 with 1 network interface and on that IFwe have 2 vlan.
From both vlan we'd like to reach the internet independently so basically
with 2 different gateways.
Look for documentation on "multi-homing":
Am 16.06.20 um 22:04 schrieb Fabian Arrotin:
On 16/06/2020 15:06, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
Hi all,
I updated a Dell XPS laptop from CentOS 8.1 (1911) to 8.2 (2004).
Installed kernels are
kernel-4.18.0-147.5.1.el8_1.x86_64
kernel-4.18.0-147.8.1.el8_1.x86_64
At 03:47 PM 6/16/2020, Kenneth Porter wrote:
The rule is in the wrong chain. The INPUT chain affects packets that
terminate at the same machine. You want to block packets that will
be passed on to the Internet, so your rule needs to be in the
FORWARD chain. (The OUTPUT chain affects packets
--On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 5:20 PM -0700 david wrote:
If someone can suggest a firewall-cmd equivalent, it would be nice.
Alas, firewalld is targeted at end nodes and doesn't really provide much
facility for routers. Its big advantage there is in setting up a reasonable
default firewall
Am 16.06.20 um 23:07 schrieb Erick Perez - Quadrian Enterprises:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:00 PM Jason Edgecombe wrote:
I recommend having LUKS be "under" LVM. the layers would be:
/dev/sda -> partition (/dev/sda1) -> LUKS (/dev/sda1_crypt) -> LVM physical
volume -> volume group -> logical
Folks
I'm struggling with my firewall settings, and would appreciate some help.
I have a gateway machine (currently Centos 7 with IPV4 only) with two
NICs. One is connected to the internet, the other to an internal
network (10.0.0.0/24) of mixed hardware (windows7, android tablets,
android
Is your policy accept? It is possible to trace the packet through the
netfilter path by setting up raw table rules with TRACE as the target and
logging turned on (search the web for details - probably too much to post here)
but be aware that you need a very controlled test because the syslog
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:26 PM david wrote:
>
> ... I'm assuming
> that your advice about LAN represents the internal network because on
> most routers, it is, and WAN is the internet connection.
>
>
>
yeah, LAN == Local Area Network, WAN == Wide Area Network, generally
meaning the internet.
Thank you Gordon. That works for me. 8.2 needs the same fix.
Alan
On 16/06/2020 16:21, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 6/15/20 7:06 PM, Jay Hart wrote:
If I do 'systemctl start httpd', apache will start right up. But
during boot, it doesn't and I
get the resulting errors below.
Jun 15 21:17:28
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020, Leroy Tennison wrote:
I have a gateway machine (currently Centos 7 with IPV4 only) with two
NICs. One is connected to the internet, the other to an internal
network (10.0.0.0/24) of mixed hardware (windows7, android tablets,
android phones, linux boxes) using NAT. I wish
The rule is in the wrong chain. The INPUT chain affects packets that
terminate at the same machine. You want to block packets that will be
passed on to the Internet, so your rule needs to be in the FORWARD chain.
(The OUTPUT chain affects packets that originate at your machine.)
Here's a nice
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:2549 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:2549
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
41 matches
Mail list logo
