[CentOS-es] Problemas al actualizar squid
Hola a todos , como les dije en mensaje anterior , estoy presentando problemas con la Cache de mi squid... Probé actualizar la versión del squid 2.5 por la 2.6 primeramente desintale , el squid 2.5 y limpie la cache y luego Hice los siguientes pasos . /configure Make all Make install pero la nueva vercion no se instalo ? Saludos walter ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Problemas al actualizar squid
2008/6/1 Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hola a todos , como les dije en mensaje anterior , estoy presentando problemas con la Cache de mi squid... Probé actualizar la versión del squid 2.5 por la 2.6 primeramente desintale , el squid 2.5 y limpie la cache y luego Hice los siguientes pasos . /configure Make all Make install pero la nueva vercion no se instalo ? Podrías pegar los mensajes finales que salen al momento de hacer make y make install Saludos walter ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Luis Solís Cel. 082567403 / Fono (03)2853529 Ambato - Ecuador ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] traducción de las notas para CentOS-5.2
El mié, 28-05-2008 a las 14:20 -0500, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez escribió: hola Hola Epe no sé si estén al tanto, CentOS-5.2 está al salir, quizá esta semana o quien sabe un poquito más tarde. En todo caso, aqui están las notas en Español: http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.2/Spanish Tomadas de las notas en Inglés: http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.2 Comentarios: Para mi gusto el texto estaba muy a la inglesa... muy traducido a la directa... he retocado algunas cosas. He quitado cosas como: nosotros hemos hecho por hemos hecho (he removido algunos nosotros, nos). Me parece bien Aquí algunas cosas que tengo dudas: Notas de Entrega : En español se usa eso de poner mayusculas a cada palabra? Creo que no Cierto, no lo usuamos. Decía: CentOS 5.2 es la primera actualizacion?!?! le he cambiado a CentOS 5.2 es la segunda actualizacion... Cierto. continuo uso de la palabra: hechos un hecho creo que es un hito, una marca, una certeza de algo.. pienso que hablan aqui de issues (problemas) no de hechos. Aunque exactamente no son «problemas». No tengo a mano en este instante el texto, pero generalmente issue lo usan para referirse a algo que va salir para la venta o para la circulación. Por ejempĺo security issues es algo que salió para circulación. Voy a mirar el texto y ver que es más adecuado. Hay que revisar un continuo cambio de usted a tú durante todo el texto. Usamos usted o usamos tú? ejemplo: Aún siendo un usuario inexperto en CentOS su ayuda puede ser útil. Nos gusta escuchar los problemas que has encontrado, si tuviste problemas Yo creo que nos quedamos con tu. Gracias Epe Saludos -- Hardy Beltran Monasterios Consultor e Instructor GNU/Linux LPI Certified (LPIC-1) / RedHat Certified (RHCE) http://www.hardy.com.bo ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] traducción de las notas para CentOS-5.2
continuo uso de la palabra: hechos un hecho creo que es un hito, una marca, una certeza de algo.. pienso que hablan aqui de issues (problemas) no de hechos. Aunque exactamente no son «problemas». No tengo a mano en este instante el texto, pero generalmente issue lo usan para referirse a algo que va salir para la venta o para la circulación. Por ejempĺo security issues es algo que salió para circulación. Voy a mirar el texto y ver que es más adecuado. hola, mi pequeño aporte: issue (para mi) son temas, asuntos security issues asuntos de seguridad security issues temas de seguridad no necesariamente son problemas en inglés dice: Known Issues eso no se debería traducir como Asuntos conocidos ? (en lugar de Problemas conocidos) ejemplo: El instalador gráfico es para sistemas con memoria superior a 512MB. Usar el instalador gráfico en sistemas con menos de 512MB puede causar problemas. y en realidad eso es un tema, no un error o bug, el tema es no usar el instalador gráfico si el sistema tiene menos de 512 mb de memoria ram creo que en otras release notes he visto Known bugs (y ahí si me parece más adecuada la traducción de Problemas conocidos) quizás esto ya se ha discutido y acordado previamente, no quisiera volver sobre algo ya tratado y adoptado por todos :-) saludos, Horacio ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-Samba question
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 5:55 PM, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think your reading the wrong guide, try this one and this has traversed on long enough. Almost Two weeks now. 1) This has been going on, on and off, for a lot longer than two weeks. 2) I was hoping that it would be considered long enough when the problem is solved. 3) My samba configuration is only a part of the problem, and it works for my Windows XP guest, even with all the tweaks I've added/used. The problem also has (a lot) to do with the Windows configuration, which may not be perfect, since I used the wrong guide to set it up and check it, but nothing here even addresses that. But thank you for your opinion. Samba 3 By Example: http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba3-ByExample/ Samba 3 How To: http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba3-HOWTO.pdf http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba3-HOWTO/ These were where I started out, and how I got what I have to work with my WXP guest in the first place. I was using the other guide as an additional resource - it /is/ on the samba site, after all, and they don't appear to have a step-by-step guide for samba 3+. Thanks. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-Samba question
I just found something interesting. I brought up my XP guest, and it had no trouble at all connecting to the shares, but it couldn't open the workgroup at all and the printer had become disconnected. I could not reconnect through the workgroup (duh), but if I just input the network name, the printer came up just fine. So: I can connect to my shares from the XP guest, and I can connect to my printer from the XP guest, I just can't open the workgroup (this is relatively new, like, since I began messing with the smb.conf file in the last two weeks). Don't know exactly what that means, but I haven't given up yet. Tomorrow I'll dig in more on the remote machine and see where that all takes me. Any helpful suggestions still welcome :-) mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] CentOS-Samba question
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MHR Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 4:01 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS-Samba question On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 5:55 PM, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think your reading the wrong guide, try this one and this has traversed on long enough. Almost Two weeks now. 1) This has been going on, on and off, for a lot longer than two weeks. 2) I was hoping that it would be considered long enough when the problem is solved. 3) My samba configuration is only a part of the problem, and it works for my Windows XP guest, even with all the tweaks I've added/used. The problem also has (a lot) to do with the Windows configuration, which may not be perfect, since I used the wrong guide to set it up and check it, but nothing here even addresses that. But thank you for your opinion. Samba 3 By Example: http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba3-ByExample/ Samba 3 How To: http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba3-HOWTO.pdf http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba3-HOWTO/ These were where I started out, and how I got what I have to work with my WXP guest in the first place. I was using the other guide as an additional resource - it /is/ on the samba site, after all, and they don't appear to have a step-by-step guide for samba 3+. Thanks. Mhr - Hrmm. The Samba 3 guide covers all Samba Versions 3 and greater. There are only minimal differences between the versions. Some options are being phased out though so keep that in mind. Do this just for kicks. Take your samba config file and rename it. Take what I posted in email to you and use it for the main samba config fig file. You will only need to change the directory paths to match yours. Try one share at a time. You should be able to access it (the samba server share) with any windows xp user account, wether it's a guest account or not. You will need the correct chmod and chown with the -R option on the shared folder. Sometime when using the GUI in changing the folder and file permissions, it want allow Recursiveness to the folder thus use the shell command to do it. johnstanley. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] CentOS-Samba question
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MHR Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 5:40 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS-Samba question I just found something interesting. I brought up my XP guest, and it had no trouble at all connecting to the shares, but it couldn't open the workgroup at all and the printer had become disconnected. I could not reconnect through the workgroup (duh), but if I just input the network name, the printer came up just fine. --- If you logged on from the Windows Guest Account then you know it is authenticating by the guest or nobody account that's on the Samba Server. The previous config file I that I stuck in the mail for you will work on a Windows Client machine providing there is sufficient name and ip address translation. It will authenticate against the samba server nobody account. IE, as in provide anonymous user name and password authentication so the user will not have to enter a password. That is to get you going on the right path. From there you will need to incorporate some type of user mode authentication. You don't want the whole world to access it. So: I can connect to my shares from the XP guest, and I can connect to my printer from the XP guest, I just can't open the workgroup (this is relatively new, like, since I began messing with the smb.conf file in the last two weeks). Don't know exactly what that means, but I haven't given up yet. Tomorrow I'll dig in more on the remote machine and see where that all takes me. Any helpful suggestions still welcome :-) Mhr -- OK, you don't need to just open the Workgroup. All you really need to do is just add the share on the Samba server. Here we go like this; Tools | Map Network Drive or Right Click My Computer and Select Map Network Drive. What I believe you concern is about Browsing the Network? You don't need to Browse the network in order to connect to the shares. But you will have to add each share you have on the samba server to the windows clients. Now if your really concerned about eyeball browsing the network (I am not making fun of you either) Go To Start | Run |, and in the run command box type net use \\samba_server_name_here\. Then they should, I say should again be in Network Neighborhood. Also the your Win98 client may need to set up with an LMHOSTS file and using NetBios/tcpip. They can be configured to use the Samba servers WIN Server to provide hostname to ip address translation. It would really be justafiable to have a DNS Server on the network to do the translation. Another thing that comes to mind is that the Win98 clients are not authenticating against the given user account. Now why is that? If I recall right there is an issue with password encryption. I believe it's mentioned in the earlier stated links I gave you and that would be in one of the downloadable PDF Files. Wish you Luck, JohnStanley ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] External USB Hard Drive mount problems
Hi Folks I have a number of external USB enclosures with hard drives in. Some are IDE and others are SATA drives. I'm running CentOS 5 + all updates. Recently when I plug in an external drive I get the message Invalid filesystem type. I have install the NTFS-3G bits stuff and reformatted the hard drives with FAT32 but still get the same error message. This started after an update (not shore which one,) as I had been able to copy files to / from these disks before. I have turned off selinux and had a look at my fstab file, but can't see any thing obvious. Can some one point me in the right direction to debug this please? Regards John -- Guy Fawkes, the only man to enter the houses of Parliament with honest intentions, (he was going to blow them up!) Registered Linux user number 414240 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Hardened ver of CentOS?
Can anyone recommend a hardened CentOS distro? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Hardened ver of CentOS?
Rogelio wrote: Can anyone recommend a hardened CentOS distro? CentOS /is/ a distro, there is only one centos 'distribution'. centos configured with selinux enabled, appropriate firewall rules, and the minimum number of services required for your application should be fairly 'hardened' as-is. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Hardened ver of CentOS?
NSA guides on hardening RHEL5. Should be applicable to CentOS5 as well. http://www.nsa.gov/snac/downloads_redhat.cfm?MenuID=scg10.3.1.1 I read about this on /. some weeks ago, but I just skimmed through it, so I can't say how effective I think it is. I thought it would be useful to point to it on list though. HTH, Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] sticky bit inside user's dir
Hello there, I have the following problem. I need a user not to be able to delete (rm -rf) a dir inside his home directory (a dir which is owned by him). The sticky bit is supposed to do just that... and it does, in every part of the file system but in his home. Same goes for acls (setfacl -m u:user:rx dir), a rm -rf inside his directory will render the acls useless. Is there any workaround against that? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sticky bit inside user's dir
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:37:43 +0300 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any workaround against that? Use chattr to set it as an immutable file. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sticky bit inside user's dir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 15:45:21 -0600 Frank Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:37:43 +0300 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any workaround against that? Use chattr to set it as an immutable file. Ah.. yes, I forgot about that. Chattr is not an option (I need to automate some dir deletions and i cant do that, not even as root if I use chattr). All I need is to get acls working the way they should (and prevent rm -rf). Thanks for your reply. what if you set the group access to root; i.e. username.root. E.g. SGID http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/what-is-sticky-bit-mode-suid-sgid-258719/ -- Mark - the rule of law is good, however the rule of tyrants just plain sucks! Real Tax Reform begins with getting rid of the IRS. == Powered by CentOS5 (RHEL5) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] drbd strategy
Thanks guys for the info. I understand that the secondary machine needs a /var too while in standby, and since it can't also mount it as part of the DRBD array, then it has to be a vanilla partition on both machines. Thanks for clearing that up. On Saturday 31 May 2008 09:28, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: You would be better off by using a DRBD partition for /var/lib/mysql and leaving the rest of /var out of DRBD. But DRBD only replicates entire physical devices right? So I would have to re-partition... if so I can't do that. But we could move mySQL files to /home or something as well. Not pretty but it should work. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
