Hola a todos,
Estoy intentando instalar el mod_security en CentOS 4.7 pero me lanza esta
dependencia:
# rpm -ivh mod_security-2.1.4-1.jason.1.i386.rpm
advertencia:mod_security-2.1.4-1.jason.1.i386.rpm: Firma V3 DSA: NOKEY, key
ID 0d4306ef
error: Error de dependencias:
httpd-mmn
Gracias por tu respuesta.
Yo me he bajado el rpm de este directorio:
http://www.jasonlitka.com/media/EL4/i386/
Luego he buscado la dependencia httpd-mmn pero no aparece nada.
Ahora estoy mirando si funciona mejor el rpm de esta Web:
http://www.jackal-net.at/rpms/mod_security/
Saludos
Gracias por tu respuesta.
Yo me he bajado el rpm de este directorio:
http://www.jasonlitka.com/media/EL4/i386/
Luego he buscado la dependencia httpd-mmn pero no aparece nada.
Ahora estoy mirando si funciona mejor el rpm de esta Web:
http://www.jackal-net.at/rpms/mod_security/
Saludos
Gracias por los consejos, creo que lo ultimo puede ser el problema se
resolvio cambiando el punto de conexion y el cable pero lo ultimo tambien
puede ser, gracias a todos por sus consejos
--
Una alegría compartida se transforma en doble alegría; una pena compartida,
en media pena.
Hola
Estoy montando un nuevo server de correo.
He estado leyendo y he decidido montar Postfix+Dovecot.
Ahora tengo algunas dudas en relacion a los Usuarios y Dominios Virtuales:
En mi red estan alojadas tres departamentos los cuales en estos momentos
usa la misma direccion de correo:
Hola
Estoy montando un nuevo server de correo.
He estado leyendo y he decidido montar Postfix+Dovecot.
Ahora tengo algunas dudas en relacion a los Usuarios y Dominios Virtuales:
En mi red estan alojadas tres departamentos los cuales en estos momentos
usa la misma direccion de correo:
Xia Guowen wrote:
But, I shutdown Kerio and config MTA = sendmail.
Then
# service sendmail start
# hostname
mail.domain11.com
# echo test | mail -s test mail some...@domain22.com
I received is r...@mail.domain11.com
with sendmail, you need to set some configuration options to
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a windows domain or AD in this picture somewhere?
Not at all for all the usual Windows network migrations I've been
setting up. Typically small offices with less than 20 people so they
simply used workgroups
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Ned Slider n...@unixmail.co.uk wrote:
It is documented on the bug tracker and forums so is a well known
issue and is fixed in system-config-samba-1.2.41-3.el5. You could
always grab the upstream src.rpm now and build it yourself.
Thanks for the information,
Thanks for the information,
I have tried, but still hostname not domain
# cd /etc/mail
# grep MASQUERADE senmail.mc
MASQUERADE_AS(`domain11.com')
# make
# service sendmail restart
# echo test | mail -s test mail some...@domain22.com
# tailf /var/log/maillog
Feb 24 15:56:44 centos4
But, I shutdown Kerio and config MTA = sendmail.
Then
# service sendmail start
# hostname
mail.domain11.com
# echo test | mail -s test mail some...@domain22.com
I received is r...@mail.domain11.com
HOW?
With sendmail try to remove root from EXPOSED_USER list.
Yes,but fail.
# grep 'EXPOSED_USER' /etc/mail/sendmail.mc
EXPOSED_USER(`')dnl
# cd /etc/mail
# make
# service sendmail restart
# echo test | mail -s test mail some...@domain22.com
# tail /var/log/maillog
Feb 24 16:42:24 centos4 sendmail[6013]: n1O8gOYq006013:
from=r...@centos4.domain11.com,
Good,
Solution:
# vi /etc/mail/sendmail.mc
add this line : EXPOSED_USER(`Mailer-Daemon')
# cd /etc/mail
# make
# service sendmail restart
Thanks John R Pierce , A. Kirillov
- Original Message -
From: John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 17:56 -0800, nate wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone know of any issues with a dell poweredge 860?
I have one and the NMI number is getting high.
I have a digium card in the box and the NMI grows with or without the
card in the box.
Is it causing
hi,
I experienced 3 problems that i am 99% sure related to
kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus.x86_64.rpm
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.2/centosplus/x86_64/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus.x86_64.rpm
#1 on a nfs server
problem : constantly appearing on all my machines lockd:
SOCIAL SECURITY CHANGES
It does not matter if you personally like or dislike Obama. You need to
sign this petition and flood his e-mail box with e-mails that tell him that,
even if the House passes this bill, he needs to veto it. It is already
impossible to live on Social
Mark Weaver wrote:
SOCIAL SECURITY CHANGES
One strike and yer out.
Ralph
pgpl5HP4xxTLb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello *
For anybody who is interested.
There is a critical bug in cman (2.0.84) CentOS 5.2 provides. This is
already known and fixed.
The bug can be found here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485026
I backported the fix to the current CentOS version (2.0.84).
Those can be downloaded
These are the results of the diag from dell.
201 Status: WarningThe following PCI devices share the same IRQ -
[Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #1]:[Intel
Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller] Irq: 50.
201
Alain Terriault wrote:
hi,
I experienced 3 problems that i am 99% sure related to
kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus.x86_64.rpm
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.2/centosplus/x86_64/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus.x86_64.rpm
#1 on a nfs server
problem : constantly appearing on
Test setup:
main switch (192.168.16.0/20)
|
eth0: 192.168.28.[226|227]
VIP=192.168.16.123
2 lvs/keepalived servers
eth1: 10.0.0.[1|2]
|
test switch (10.0.0.0/8)
|
on 2-24-2009 6:13 AM Ralph Angenendt spake the following:
Mark Weaver wrote:
SOCIAL SECURITY CHANGES
One strike and yer out.
Ralph
Good! How stupid can people be that think something like this is valid anyway?
Nevermind... They can be that stupid!
--
MailScanner is like
Noob Centos Admin wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a windows domain or AD in this picture somewhere?
Not at all for all the usual Windows network migrations I've been
setting up. Typically small offices with less than 20 people so
2009/2/24 Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com:
Alain Terriault wrote:
I experienced 3 problems that i am 99% sure related to
kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus.x86_64.rpm
You cannot be sure 99% until you can reproduce the problems...
#1 on a nfs server
problem : constantly appearing
Does this RHEL 5 security update not apply to CentOS 5?
I've been waiting for a new kernel to be released by the CentOS team, but
it's apparently not coming?
- Mark A.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 03:53:28PM -0500, Mark Adams wrote:
Does this RHEL 5 security update not apply to CentOS 5?
I've been waiting for a new kernel to be released by the CentOS team, but
it's apparently not coming?
it will come as update of the 5.3 release.
--
Tru Huynh (mirrors,
Tru Huynh wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 03:53:28PM -0500, Mark Adams wrote:
Does this RHEL 5 security update not apply to CentOS 5?
I've been waiting for a new kernel to be released by the CentOS team, but
it's apparently not coming?
it will come as update of the 5.3 release.
Given that
I have two CentOS plus x86_64 workstations that as far as possible I am
trying to keep the same. One for home, one for my office. I have the 32
bit Firefox installed along with a number of plugins and have just found
that firefox no longer plays any shockwave content on my work machine, I
have
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:49:11 -0700
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Is there anything I can use to take an inventory of the filesystem
before and after some process to see what's changed?
yum install checkinstall
http://asic-linux.com.mx/~izto/checkinstall/
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~
Rob Kampen wrote:
I have two CentOS plus x86_64 workstations that as far as possible I am
trying to keep the same. One for home, one for my office. I have the 32
bit Firefox installed along with a number of plugins and have just found
that firefox no longer plays any shockwave content on
Quoting Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com:
Is there anything I can use to take an inventory of the filesystem
before and after some process to see what's changed?
Thanks!
jlc
I believe the audit subsystem can do this for you .. check out
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Is there anything I can use to take an inventory of the filesystem
before and after some process to see what's changed?
I frequently do something like this:
touch /tmp/copyctrl
# do update here
find / ! -type d -newer /tmp/copyctrl | sort
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 16:38 -0500, Rob Kampen wrote:
I have two CentOS plus x86_64 workstations that as far as possible I am
trying to keep the same. One for home, one for my office. I have the 32
bit Firefox installed along with a number of plugins and have just found
that firefox no
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 14:49 -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Is there anything I can use to take an inventory of the filesystem
before and after some process to see what's changed?
OOPS! My first reply ignored the fact you wanted an inventory. I
presume you mean a snapshot that you can use for a
OOPS! My first reply ignored the fact you wanted an inventory. I
presume you mean a snapshot that you can use for a diff?
That was misleading, sorry :)
You and Bill's solution will be perfect.
Thanks!
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
Good! How stupid can people be that think something like this is valid anyway?
How many names were on that list again?
It's not scientifically accurate by any stretch, but for the purposes
of this demonstration, it'll do
On Feb 24, 2009, at 5:48 PM, Jim Perrin jper...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com
wrote:
Good! How stupid can people be that think something like this is
valid anyway?
How many names were on that list again?
It's not scientifically
Noob Centos Admin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:20 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
That makes it somewhat harder to use multiple machines since you end up
having to create and maintain passwords on each.
True, but the usual work behaviour here means that seldom happen. Even
38 matches
Mail list logo
