Dag Wieers napsal(a):
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Marcus Moeller wrote:
BTW I think retaining revision numbers in translated documents makes a lot
of sense here too. Wouldn't it be nice if somehow MoinMoin would have a
relation between original and translated content to it could keep track
and
Buenas tardes Listeros, si alguno a implementado replicas en servicios DHCP
y DNS (los cambios que se realicen en un servidor se replique de inmediato
en otro) o tienen algun link que me sirva de guía sería de muchisima ayuda.
Como siempre gracias de antemano.
Cordialmente,
Carlos.
Melinda Odom wrote:
I am running centos 5 with php 5.1.6-20 and mysql 5.0.45-7.el5 on a
production server running a lot of ecommerce stores.
The future next versions of these stores all are requiring php 5.2 at
least. I don't want any problems with the ecommerce stores I have now
with php
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Melinda Odom wrote:
I found several posts last night about php 5.2 never being in centos 5
because redhat wouldn't support centos.
That sentence does not make any sense at all.
And I wonder why you're asking the exact same question again, after
getting several
HI,
I always get a grub prompt ,after I installed 2nd processor to the
Server IBM x3610
At the grub prompt, I always have to issue below commands. Then,
Server starts successfully.
grub root (hd0,0)
Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
grub kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-128.1.1.el5PAE
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:10:06 +0530
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
Could you pls let me know to overcome this issue?
What is the content of /boot/grub/grub.conf ?
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 02:10:06PM +0530, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
HI,
I always get a grub prompt ,after I installed 2nd processor to the
Server IBM x3610
At the grub prompt, I always have to issue below commands. Then,
Server starts successfully.
grub root (hd0,0)
Filesystem
Hi,
Thanks for your quick response
What is the content of /boot/grub/grub.conf ?
Pls see below
[r...@authpassword ~]# cat /boot/grub/grub.conf
# grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
# NOTICE: You have a /boot
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Melinda Odom i...@designhosting.biz wrote:
Hi,
Is there any news about CentOS 5.2 updating to php 5.2?
There have been packages for php 5.2 in the Centos Testing repository
for a while now. They work fine (for me at least), it's
Peter Hopfgartner wrote:
It seems to me that feedback to packages in testing are getting lost. I
sent mine for PHP and PostgreSQL (both run really fine on a number of
our servers), but there is no reply and no reaction. Maybe a Wiki-Page
or a ticket would be a better place to gather
Bart Schaefer wrote:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Dag Wieers d...@centos.org wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Bart Schaefer wrote:
There are wine RPMs at
http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el5/en/i386/rpmforge/RPMS/ -- but for some
reason yum list wine is not finding it on the CentOS5 system to
which I
Thanks. You are right. I did NOT reboot after change Ip address. It is
correct now.
--- 09/3/15 (日)，Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@gmail.com 寫道：
寄件者: Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@gmail.com
主旨: Re: [CentOS] NTP error message on /var/log/messages
收件者: CentOS mailing list
Motherboard - Intel DG41TY
Device: RealTek: 8111D
Driver: RTL8169
Causes Kernel panic during install and boot.
--
It seems that the newer the card that uses this driver, the worse the problems
are.
Is there any plan to roll a newer version into the installer or the actual
distribution itself?
2009/3/16 Drew Weaver drew.wea...@thenap.com:
Motherboard - Intel DG41TY
Device: RealTek: 8111D
Driver: RTL8169
Causes Kernel panic during install and boot.
It seems that the newer the card that uses this driver, the worse the
problems are.
Is there any plan to roll a newer version
On Thursday 12 March 2009 15:59, Roger Wells wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 12 March 2009 14:45:27 Roger Wells wrote:
I actually did install the home printer last night (Photosmart C6180).
hp-setup' ran fine, discovered the printer and installed it just as it
did for the LJ4350 (it
The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
webmaster should happen to read this...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
on 3-16-2009 1:55 AM Indunil Jayasooriya spake the following:
Hi,
Thanks for your quick response
What is the content of /boot/grub/grub.conf ?
Pls see below
[r...@authpassword ~]# cat /boot/grub/grub.conf
# grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun
On 3/16/09, R P Herrold herr...@centos.org wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
webmaster should happen to read this...
working fine here, and
R P Herrold wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
webmaster should happen to read this...
working fine here, and from two other test
Always useful to check with:
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/
http://internetpulse.net/
http://just-ping.com
Before reporting connectivity problems.
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Lanny Marcus
Sent:
On 3/16/09, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
R P Herrold wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
webmaster should happen to read this...
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
webmaster should happen to read this...
working fine here, and from two other test locations -- it
might make more
On 3/16/09, Flaherty, Patrick pflahe...@wsi.com wrote:
Always useful to check with:
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/
http://internetpulse.net/
http://just-ping.com
Before reporting connectivity problems.
Cool Pat. I'd never heard of any of those sites before. Thanks. I
clicked on your
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 12 March 2009 15:59, Roger Wells wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 12 March 2009 14:45:27 Roger Wells wrote:
I actually did install the home printer last night (Photosmart C6180).
hp-setup' ran fine, discovered the printer and installed
Indunil Jayasooriya induni...@gmail.com wrote:
Pls see below
[r...@authpassword ~]# cat /boot/grub/grub.conf
# grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
# NOTICE: You have a /boot partition. This means that
#
On Monday 16 March 2009 18:36:43 Roger Wells wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
my situation got a little more bizarre. The C series driver never
worked. At some level perhaps it did because test page's that
I printed would never come out, until I rebooted then they would all
come on out. The
Anne Wilson wrote:
I have hplip running on Mandriva 2009, Fedora 9 and Fedora 10. I get the
full
range of services there. I don't know why we have this strange situation on
CentOS. The HP website says it is tested against CentOS 5, yet the problems
seem to be down to not being able to
Robert Nichols wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
I have hplip running on Mandriva 2009, Fedora 9 and Fedora 10. I get the
full
range of services there. I don't know why we have this strange situation on
CentOS. The HP website says it is tested against CentOS 5, yet the
problems
seem
On Monday 16 March 2009 19:30:17 Robert Nichols wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
I have hplip running on Mandriva 2009, Fedora 9 and Fedora 10. I get the
full range of services there. I don't know why we have this strange
situation on CentOS. The HP website says it is tested against CentOS 5,
I work with a USB device that is intercepted by the USB HID driver.
In order to stop this behavior, the device needs to be added to the
HID blacklist (hid-core.c) and a custom kernel needs to be compiled.
If I create a CentOS specific patch, it appears I need to create the
patch against an
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
webmaster should happen to read this...
I know it is working for everyone
Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
webmaster should happen to read this...
I
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:36 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
web site is not responding to http requests from
Hi, I have two very similar AMD based work stations running fully
current CentOS x86_64.
Both have 4Gb of RAM, both have
[rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep flash
flash-plugin-10.0.22.87-release.i386
[rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep fire
firefox-3.0.6-1.el5.centos.i386
One machine
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:04 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:36 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it
Lanny Marcus wrote:
That's good to know. I seem to recall, years ago, they were installing
a Submarine cable to the USA.
Do you see anything in the traceroute that shows where the problem is?
It still won't load for me. I can see when it does the DNS lookup and
after that the browser status
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:50 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
[...]
17 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162) 48.485
ms !X 49.041 ms !X 48.281 ms !X
As man traceroute states, !X is communication administratively
prohibited... I think
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Marcelo Roccasalva
marcelo-cen...@irrigacion.gov.ar wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:50 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
[...]
17 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162) 48.485
ms !X 49.041 ms !X 48.281
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:45 PM, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:04 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:36 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:45 PM, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:04 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:36 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com
wrote:
Lanny Marcus
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:50 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
That's good to know. I seem to recall, years ago, they were installing
a Submarine cable to the USA.
Do you see anything in the traceroute that shows where the problem is?
It still won't load for
2009/3/16 Victor Padro vpa...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com
snip
The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but
the
web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
webmaster should happen to read
Lanny Marcus wrote:
Had a suggestion I try to get a different IP from our ISP and if my
wife isn't surfing now, I will try that.. Until today, I have only run
into one (1) web site that won't let me on, because my IP is in
Colombia. CentOS possibly has become the 2nd one. I hope not!
I
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 20:09 -0300, Marcelo Roccasalva wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:50 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
[...]
17 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162) 48.485
ms !X 49.041 ms !X 48.281 ms !X
As man traceroute
44 matches
Mail list logo
