Re: [CentOS-docs] Automated listing of translations on each wiki page

2010-12-02 Thread Jerry Amundson
Ralph, gmail is working for me. Are you using the *left* mouse button? :-) On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Timothy Lee timothy.ty@gmail.com wrote: Dear Marcus, On 11/29/2010 07:43 PM, Marcus Moeller wrote: Dear Ralph. On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Ralph Angenendt

Re: [CentOS-virt] IBM GPFS filesystem

2010-12-02 Thread Evan Fraser
Adam Wead amsterda...@... writes: Hi all,I was wondering if anyone might be able to speak about using IBM's GPFS filesystem as a means of storing virtual guests in a clustered environment with CentOS as the nodes and KVM as the hypervisor? I'm looking at using IBM's TSM software for archiving

Re: [CentOS-virt] IBM GPFS filesystem

2010-12-02 Thread carlopmart
On 12/02/2010 10:53 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote: On 12/02/2010 12:58 PM, compdoc wrote: []...live migration...? ___ Interesting. Does live migration not work on ext3 or ext4? No. You need a shared filesystem. Thats not true. You can do live kvm

Re: [CentOS-virt] IBM GPFS filesystem

2010-12-02 Thread Fabian Arrotin
Benjamin Franz wrote: On 12/02/2010 12:58 PM, compdoc wrote: []...live migration...? snip No. You need a shared filesystem. Which pretty much leaves you on either NFS or a clustered filesystem. Totally wrong ! If you have never tested it , try it (and try to understand clvmd) before

Re: [CentOS-virt] IBM GPFS filesystem

2010-12-02 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Fabian Arrotin fabian.arro...@arrfab.net wrote: Adam Wead wrote: Hi all, Why would so much people use a clusterfs for Virtualization ? Just use lvm and a logical volumes for your guests. Did you mean CLVM? Where does snapshot stand? bitty outta

Re: [CentOS-virt] IBM GPFS filesystem

2010-12-02 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 12:45:22PM +0530, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: Greetings, On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Fabian Arrotin fabian.arro...@arrfab.net wrote: Adam Wead wrote: Hi all, Why would so much people use a clusterfs for Virtualization ? Just use lvm and a logical

Re: [CentOS-es] [OT] Correo prueba

2010-12-02 Thread Ricardo Martinez
Te leo El 01/12/2010 23:03, Juan Pablo Botero juanpabloboterolo...@gmail.com escribió: Saludos. Quisiera saber si ustedes en la lista, ven este correo, ya que hace días envié una pregunta y recibí como respuesta, que es necesario aprobación del moderador de la lista, no se si es política de la

[CentOS-es] Agregar modulos pptp

2010-12-02 Thread Ricardo Isaza
http://www.puntodered.com/ Hola foro como puedo cargar estos modulos que no trae el kernel de fabrica modprobe ip_nat_pptp modprobe ip_conntrack_pptp estos dos modulos me permiten hacer conexiones multiples para pptp les agradezco me puedan ayudar ___

Re: [CentOS-es] [OT] Correo prueba

2010-12-02 Thread Lic. Domingo Varela Yahuitl.
De igual manera te confirmo que he recibido tu prueba de correo. No obstante tambien he recibido en unos posts que he enviado a la lista que falta la aprovacion del moderador On 02/12/2010 07:44 a.m., Lucas Smud wrote: Recibido! Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:09:04 -0600 From:

Re: [CentOS-es] Bloquear ip para mandar mails qmail

2010-12-02 Thread Yoinier Hernandez Nieves
El 02/12/10 09:23, Azu Carlitox escribió: Hola, hay una ip que no conozco que esta intentando enviar mails desde mi servidor de correo, la ip es 109.230.217.170, me intento conectar por rdp y es un windows 2003 server, pero no lo conozco, lo que me llegan a mi correo pila de peticiones de esa

Re: [CentOS-es] Bloquear ip para mandar mails qmail

2010-12-02 Thread Salman PSL
Desde qmail no recuerdo hace tiempo que no lo uso. Con Postfix hay un metodo rapido y directo. Pero como lo que nos ocupa es CentOS y no qmail, esto no falla: /sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 109.230.217.170 -j DROP - Mensaje original - De: Azu Carlitox elazucarli...@gmail.com Para:

Re: [CentOS-es] PROBLEMAS CON EL TERMINAL

2010-12-02 Thread Carlos Hernandez
On 12/02/2010 02:08 PM, Carlos Jara Alva wrote: Saludos comunidad, tengo un problema con el centos 5.4, cuando quiero ingresar al terminal presionando CRTL + ALT + F1 y asi hasta el F6 me sale este mensaje hci_scodat_packet:hci0 sco packet for unknown conection handle 92 y asi se repite

Re: [CentOS-es] Bloquear ip para mandar mails qmail

2010-12-02 Thread Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez
On 12/02/2010 09:23 AM, Azu Carlitox wrote: Hola, hay una ip que no conozco que esta intentando enviar mails desde mi servidor de correo, la ip es 109.230.217.170, me intento conectar por rdp y es un windows 2003 server, pero no lo conozco, lo que me llegan a mi correo pila de peticiones de

Re: [CentOS-es] Cambiar puerto SSH

2010-12-02 Thread René Lara Alvarado
- Original Message - From: Rhonny rhonny.l...@gmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 7:37 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Cambiar puerto SSH 2010/12/1 Ricardo Cuevas Camarena rcue...@nic.mx -Original Message- From: centos-es-boun...@centos.org

Re: [CentOS-es] reinicio servidor

2010-12-02 Thread victor santana
Bueno, más datos: 1º el servidor está sobre una ups o sai, testeada. 2º en los logs no muestra el motivo del reinicio, si es por acpi, por inconcluencia en los irq o algo así. 3º No he probado lo que dice santi, pero avisaré. gracias y espero deciros algo en breve El 1 de diciembre de 2010

[CentOS] samba3x troubles

2010-12-02 Thread Galia Lisovskaya
Hi all, I get troubles with samba3x server: samba3x-winbind-3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2 samba3x-3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2 samba3x-common-3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2 Some times, users call and ask of any folder in any share sleep. Locked not _all_ share, only one of it's folder. In logs i don't see any errors(for time

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread Veiko Kukk
On 01/12/10 21:12, Boris Epstein wrote: So now my question is, what PCI 1 Gbit/s Ethernet adapters should I use under CentOS? If you have had a consistent positive experience with any particular chipset/brand please speak up. Use Intel NIC-s and you don't have to worry. -- Veiko

Re: [CentOS] x86_64 and Thunderbird Trash folder.

2010-12-02 Thread John Doe
From: Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com I just ran into something odd, I have x86_64 5.5 running with Thunderbird. I am getting a message about can delete the email as Trash is FULL. The file size is 4G. Whats up with that I have the 64 bit executable running. file

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Wednesday 01 December 2010 20:12:18 Boris Epstein wrote: Hello listmates, As some of you may know we have been having a really bad problem with Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 cards. See here for details: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?24,140124,140224 So now my question

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread Christopher Chan
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 06:53 PM, Peter Kjellström wrote: For completeness (since many previous posts have touched on this), we don't use jumbo frames since we have no problem reaching wirespeed with normal 1500 frames. Seriously? What switches?

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Thursday 02 December 2010 12:22:38 Christopher Chan wrote: On Thursday, December 02, 2010 06:53 PM, Peter Kjellström wrote: For completeness (since many previous posts have touched on this), we don't use jumbo frames since we have no problem reaching wirespeed with normal 1500 frames.

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread Bent Terp
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote: You get what you pay for -- this is a valid rule of thumb throughout the whole life. Except with CentOS - we get SO much more than we pay for :-D ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread Christopher Chan
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 08:28 PM, Peter Kjellström wrote: On Thursday 02 December 2010 12:22:38 Christopher Chan wrote: On Thursday, December 02, 2010 06:53 PM, Peter Kjellström wrote: For completeness (since many previous posts have touched on this), we don't use jumbo

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread m . roth
Bent Terp wrote: On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote: You get what you pay for -- this is a valid rule of thumb throughout the whole life. Except with CentOS - we get SO much more than we pay for :-D Hah - I was thinking of another angle: so,

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread Timo Schoeler
On 12/02/2010 04:34 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Bent Terp wrote: On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote: You get what you pay for -- this is a valid rule of thumb throughout the whole life. Except with CentOS - we get SO much more than we pay for

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread m . roth
Timo Schoeler wrote: On 12/02/2010 04:34 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Bent Terp wrote: On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote: You get what you pay for -- this is a valid rule of thumb throughout the whole life. Except with CentOS - we get SO much

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread miguelmedalha
For completeness (since many previous posts have touched on this), we don't use jumbo frames since we have no problem reaching wirespeed with normal 1500 frames. Jumbo frames have advantages other than reaching wirespeed. Its use produces less overhead and in general less CPU utilization.

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 70, Issue 2

2010-12-02 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

[CentOS] debuginfo and debuginfo-common for PAE with systemtap

2010-12-02 Thread Alice Anderson
I want to use systemtap on a 5.3 system but cannot find supporting kernel-PAE-debuginfo or kernel-debuginfo-common packages. Am I being a noob, or do these not exist for the PAE kernel? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] debuginfo and debuginfo-common for PAE with systemtap

2010-12-02 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Thursday 02 December 2010 18:24:12 Alice Anderson wrote: I want to use systemtap on a 5.3 system but cannot find supporting kernel-PAE-debuginfo or kernel-debuginfo-common packages. Am I being a noob, or do these not exist for the PAE kernel? Sometimes a specific package is missing but

Re: [CentOS] debuginfo and debuginfo-common for PAE with systemtap

2010-12-02 Thread Akemi Yagi
2010/12/2 Peter Kjellström c...@nsc.liu.se: On Thursday 02 December 2010 18:24:12 Alice Anderson wrote: Sometimes a specific package is missing but for 5.3 PAE it seems quite good: This from our mirror (mirror.nsc.liu.se) but I assume they're available upstreams in vault too. Note that

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!

2010-12-02 Thread Jerry Franz
On 11/28/2010 09:31 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote: [...] And then, one day, it won't work. Worse - it doesn't always *log* what it is doing in a way that you can figure out. Occasionally not at all. So you spend a few hours poking at the system until you try the magic of turning off SELinux. And

Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS

2010-12-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:34 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Bent Terp wrote: On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote: You get what you pay for -- this is a valid rule of thumb throughout the whole life. Except with CentOS - we get SO much more than we

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3

2010-12-02 Thread Ron Blizzard
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:19 PM, cybernet cyberne...@yahoo.com wrote: centOS 5.5 is for servers not for desktops, please get use to that use another distribution like ... a very popular one for desktops Or just install the multimedia add-ons and use it as your desktop. For MP3s, I just

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3

2010-12-02 Thread Ron Blizzard
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Johan Scheepers johans...@telkomsa.net wrote: Good day, Been googling about this matter. Afraid I am now confused. Too many options..: for/against/whatever. Some is years ago. Kindly please a step x step manner in which to accomplish to enable mp3 please.